Carbon Calculations over the Life Cycle of Industrial Activities (CCaLC)
Submitting Institution
University of ManchesterUnit of Assessment
Aeronautical, Mechanical, Chemical and Manufacturing EngineeringSummary Impact Type
TechnologicalResearch Subject Area(s)
Chemical Sciences: Physical Chemistry (incl. Structural)
Environmental Sciences: Environmental Science and Management
Engineering: Environmental Engineering
Summary of the impact
Research in the UoA developed a methodology for Carbon Calculations over
the Life Cycle of
Industrial Activities (CCaLC), providing `cradle to grave' carbon
footprint estimates for commercial
products. The methodology was embedded in a set of software tools designed
to be used by non-
experts, allowing companies to perform carbon footprinting in-house. The
software is free to
download, currently with 3300 users in more than 70 countries. The
methodology and software
tools have been endorsed by BERR (now BIS), DEFRA and the World Bank, and
used widely by
industry, across a range of sectors, to reduce carbon footprints of their
products. This has resulted
in significant environmental and socio-economic benefits, including
estimated climate change
mitigation gains in excess of £450m.
Underpinning research
The research underpinning this case study emerged from the project funded
by EPSRC, NERC
and the Carbon Trust from 1 Feb 2007-31 July 2010. Key researchers were:
- Professor Adisa Azapagic (2006-present; Principal Investigator);
- Dr Heinz Stichnothe (2007-2010; PDRA);
- Dr Haruna Gujba (2008-2010; PDRA);
- Dr Namy Espinoza Orias (2008-2011; PDRA);
- Dr Harish Jeswani (2008-present; PDRA); and
- Dr David Amienyo (2009-present; PhD student & PDRA).
The main aim of the research was to deliver a methodology (CCaLC) and
decision-support
software tools for industry to help companies reduce their life cycle
environmental impacts, and
particularly carbon footprints (greenhouse gas emissions), at minimum
cost. A `whole systems'
approach was applied to consider complete life cycles of products,
technologies and services from
`cradle to grave'. This encompasses extraction of primary resources,
production, use/reuse of
products and end-of-life waste management. Whist the focus was on the
estimation of carbon
footprints, other environmental impacts, such as water footprint, ozone
layer depletion, acidification
and eutrophication, were also included to ensure that carbon emissions are
not reduced at the
expense of other impacts. As part of the research, over 50 case studies
were developed in
collaboration with 30+ partners from different industries, including the
chemical, food & drink and
bio-sectors.
The key generic findings of the research were that:
- CCaLC is a powerful tool for providing new insights on carbon hot
spots, often overturning
previous assumptions and helping to focus carbon reduction efforts in
areas where greatest
improvements can be achieved [e.g. 1-3,5,6].
- Significant carbon reductions can be achieved across different sectors
using information
obtained from CCaLC [e.g. 1-4].
- Mitigation of carbon emissions can often lead to an increase in other
environmental impacts
and/or costs -these trade-offs can be identified easily through CCaLC,
helping to make more
sustainable decisions [e.g. 2,3,4].
- CCaLC can be used successfully for engagement along supply chains,
raising awareness and
disseminating best practice for carbon reductions [e.g. 1,2,3,5].
References to the research
CCaLC won several prizes, including: the IChemE top Award for Outstanding
Achievements in
Chemical and Process Engineering (2010); the GSK Innovation Award, awarded
by the Chemical
Industries Association (2011); and the Chemistry Innovation Award for the
Best Collaborative
Project (2011). The research was published in leading international
research journals in the field of
sustainability, including the International Journal of Life Cycle
Assessment; Journal of Cleaner
Production; and Resources, Conservation & Recycling.
Key publications
1. Stichnothe H. & Azapagic, A. (2009). Bioethanol from Waste: Life
Cycle Estimation of the
Greenhouse Gas Saving Potential. Resources, Conservation & Recycling
53(11) 624-630;
doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.04.012.
2. Stichnothe, H. & Azapagic A. (2013). Life Cycle Assessment of
Recycling PVC Window
Frames. Resources, Conservation & Recycling 71(1) 40-47;
doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.
2012.12.005.
3. Amienyo, D., Gujba, H. Stichnothe, H. & Azapagic, A. (2013). Life
Cycle Environmental
Impacts of Soft Carbonated Drinks. Int. J. of Life Cycle Assessment 18(1)
77-92;
doi:10.1007/s11367-012-0459-y.
Further relevant publications
4. Azapagic, A., H. Jeswani and H. Gujba (2011). Assessing Biomass
Options for Electricity
Generation on a Life Cycle Basis. Waste and Biomass Valorisation 2(1)
33-43;
10.1007/s12649-010-9057-z.
5. Espinoza-Orias, N., Stichnothe, H. & Azapagic A. (2011). The
Carbon Footprint of Bread. The
Int. J. of Life Cycle Assessment 16(4) 351-365;
doi:10.1007/s11367-011-0271-0.
6. Jeswani, K.H., Smith, R. W. & Azapagic, A. (2013). Energy from
Waste: Carbon Footprint of
Incineration and Landfill Biogas in the UK. Int. J. of Life Cycle
Assessment 18(1) 218-229;
doi:10.1007/s11367-012-0441-8.
Details of the impact
Context
Existing carbon footprinting methodologies and software tools are either
too simplistic or too
complex and thus not suited for use in-house by industry. As a result,
most companies have to rely
on external consultants, which often inhibits them from estimating carbon
footprints because of
associated costs and confidentiality. Furthermore, most previous
approaches have only considered
estimation of carbon emitted directly by organisations rather than the
emissions along the whole
supply chain — a key requirement in mitigating climate change. CCaLC
overcomes these barriers
by enabling them to estimate the carbon footprint and identify optimal
reduction strategies in-house.
The research laid the foundations for addressing these issues by taking a
life cycle
approach with the aim of helping companies to identify carbon reduction
opportunities from `cradle
to grave', in-house.
Pathways to Impact
We recognised that the key to achieving practical impact from the work
was to embed the rigorous
CCaLC methodology in software tools simple enough to be used by
non-experts. Working with the
18 industry partners in the research (joined subsequently by 15+ others),
we developed a suite of
software tools incorporating a database with 6000+ data entries: CCaLC
for estimation of carbon
footprints applicable to all sectors; CCaLC Optimiser for
optimisation of carbon footprints
applicable to all sectors; CCaLC PVC applicable to the PVC sector;
and CCaLC BIOCHEM
applicable to the industrial biotechnology (IB) sector. To encourage
uptake, CCaLC is provided
free of charge. The first version was launched in July 2010 and up to 31
July 2013 had around
3300 users from more than 70 countries. Several updates have been released
since the launch
(currently v.3.1). To aid dissemination, we worked closely with the
Chemistry Innovation
Knowledge Transfer Network (CIKTN), who helped disseminate CCaLC widely
across industry.
Examples of dissemination routes pursued by CIKTN included promotion to
250 SMEs across
Europe to stimulate innovation in bio-based products, presentations to
over 150 UK businesses, a
series of industry events, and the CIKTN website. CCaLC is also included
in CIKTN's Sustainable
Design Guide to help drive innovation [A]. Amongst new partners was the
World Bank who, as a
result, recommend CCaLC as part of their Platform for Climate-Smart
Planning [B].
Reach and Significance
CCaLC's international user base is made up of companies (~65%),
government bodies (~10%)
and others (~25%), including universities and individuals. CCaLC has
significant geographical
reach: 50% of users are UK-based, 25% are based in rest of Europe and 25%
span countries as
diverse as Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, India, Indonesia and USA.
Examples of specific
impacts are given below for four key industrial sectors.
PVC Industry: PVC is one of the most extensively used plastics in
the world with current global
demand of 37 Mt and a forecast annual growth of ~5% from 2011-2020. The
European PVC sector
is committed to carbon reductions through VinylPlus, an ongoing 10-year
voluntary initiative to
improve its sustainability. The CCaLC-PVC software has been used for the
reduction and
management of the carbon footprints of PVC products, processes and supply
chains. It has been
endorsed by DEFRA [C], and across the PVC sector, including by the British
Plastics Federation
and INEOS ChlorVinyls — a leading VinylPlus partner and Europe's largest
PVC producer,
employing 3000 people. Using CCaLC has provided INEOS with the insight
that the use of
recycled PVC offers a 20-fold reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
compared to virgin
product, leading directly to a focus on recycling as a pathway to reducing
the industry's emissions
[D]. Currently Europe recycles 100 kt pa of waste PVC window frames,
equivalent to a saving of
around 200 kt CO2 eq. pa [2] - a £42m pa saving through
mitigation of climate change based on
the findings of the Stern Report. Use of CCaLC showed that achieving the
VinylPlus target of 800
kt pa recycled PVC by 2020 would result in a 1.6 Mt pa reduction in CO2
eq. emissions, equivalent
to 2.4% of the emissions from the sector. CCaLC also showed that a saving
of 6.7 Mt CO2 eq. pa
could be achieved by using a new non-aqueous polymerisation route, instead
of the current
aqueous process [D]. This would represent a 10% saving of annual GHG
emissions for the whole
PVC sector, half of the emission reduction target of 20% set by VinylPlus
for 2020 and, based on
Stern's findings, equivalent to a saving of £360m in mitigation of climate
change. Summarising the
impact, INEOS ChlorVinyl state that "CCaLC is increasingly being used
across the PVC sector,
and is viewed as a central plank in the European PVC industry's carbon
commitment. ...It has
proved valuable because it continues to provide a simple yet effective
tool to illustrate how various
players in the vinyl value chain can make a difference to carbon and
other environmental savings."
[D].
Industrial Biotechnology: In recognising that the industrial
biotechnology (IB) sector will be "one
of the strongest driving forces behind the world's low-carbon revolution",
the BERR (now BIS) IB
Innovation and Growth Team for UK Government recommended adoption of CCaLC
as the
preferred toolkit for the calculation of carbon footprint [E].
Subsequently, CCaLC is now used
across the IB sector to identify carbon hot spots and improvement
opportunities. An example is the
UK-based speciality-chemicals company Croda International, who have 3400
employees in 34
countries, and boast revenues in excess of £1bn. Croda manufactures 70% of
its chemicals using
renewable materials and use CCaLC to calculate the carbon footprint of
their products. As a result,
they found out that, contrary to their expectations, the GHG emissions
from cultivating raw
materials are typically twice those from the manufacturing process [F]. In
2011 Croda rolled-out
CCaLC across the whole company, training 18 key staff internationally in
its application; CCaLC is
now used routinely to monitor opportunities for carbon reduction [G].
Commenting on the
usefulness of CCaLC not only for identifying improvement opportunities but
also for responding to
increasing requests by their customers for information on the carbon
footprint of their products,
Croda state that "Without CCaLC, Croda would not be able to provide
useful and meaningful
information to our customers without significantly more work and cost,
...which could potentially
result in lost business." [F]
Healthcare Industry: GSK, one of the world's largest health-care
companies, used CCaLC, in
collaboration with the UoA, to estimate the carbon footprint of 20 key
products, including asthma
inhalers and Horlicks. CCaLC showed that, contrary to company's
expectations, the use and end-
of-life of these products add significantly to the company's carbon
footprint. For example, Ventolin,
used by ~300 million asthma sufferers worldwide, is one of the main
contributors to the total
carbon footprint of the company owing to the use of HFA-134a propellant.
To reduce the carbon
footprint, GSK have started to collect and recycle waste inhalers which
still contain a significant
amount of unused HFA — in the UK alone, 90,000 inhalers have been
collected to date, saving
682 t CO2 [H]. CCaLC has also shown that large carbon
reductions can be achieved by replacing
Ventolin with a dry powder inhaler also produced by GSK, saving 630 kt CO2
eq. per year, or 10%
of GSK's total GHG gas emissions. GSK are also working with suppliers to
reduce the carbon
emissions in their supply chain, for example in the production of milk
used in Horlicks, which
contributes more than half of the 800 kt CO2 from this product.
GSK state that "Having a tool like
CCaLC is very powerful as we can quickly get into very detailed
discussions on how to work with
suppliers to reduce supply chain carbon footprint as well as reduce
overall cost." [I]
Food Industry: Kellogg's, one of the world's leading producers of
cereals and convenience foods,
with sales of ~$13 billion, are committed to reducing energy use, GHG
emissions and water use by
15-20% by 2015 (on 2005). The company has been using CCaLC since 2010 to
estimate the
carbon footprint of their entire product range (ca. 2000 products),
allowing them to track the cradle-
to-grave impact for the first time [J]. They were surprised to find that
transport had a low
contribution to their carbon footprint, enabling them to refocus on areas
of product life cycle that
have a higher contribution, such as raw materials, packaging and energy
efficiency. CCaLC
estimates have shown clearly that Kellogg's carbon footprint can be
reduced by up to 20% by
focusing on these life cycle stages, helping the Company meet their 2015
targets [J]. Kellogg's
have also found CCaLC to be useful in product design, helping them choose
low-impact
ingredients and recipes. An example is Special K, for which both
carbon and water footprints were
reduced by up to 20% as a result of using CCaLC [J]. The company state
that "CCaLC has helped
Kellogg's to identify business-wide hot spots and provide focus in terms
of future priorities for
carbon reductions along the entire value chain ... We habitually use
CCaLC in all new food and
packaging innovation and design... We've also found CCaLC is useful to
inform how to design
more sustainable future products and as a vehicle for engagement with
suppliers" [J].
Sources to corroborate the impact
A. Letter from Lead Specialist — Sustainability, TSB [Previously
Sustainability Manager, CIKTN].
Corroborates dissemination routes for CCaLC followed by CIKTN.
B. World Bank, Platform for Climate-Smart Planning. Shows CCaLC as a
partner and a carbon
footprinting tool on the World Bank's Platform for Climate Change.
C. DEFRA (2010). Windows Sustainability Action Plan. DEFRA, London (p24).
Recommends
CCaLC for use in the PVC sector.
D. Letter from Sustainability & Compliance Manager, INEOS
ChlorVinyls. Corroborates the
impacts from using CCaLC in the PVC sector.
E. IB 2025: Maximising UK Opportunities from Industrial Biotechnology in
a Low Carbon
Economy. BERR (p33). Recommends CCaLC as a preferred tool in the
industrial
biotechnology sector.
F. Letter from Research & Technology Director, Croda Europe.
Corroborates impacts from using
CCaLC by Croda.
G. Croda (2011). Sustainability Report. (pg 27). Corroborates evidence
that CCaLC is used by
Croda across the company, globally.
H. GSK (2012). Do More, Feel Better, Live Longer: CR Report (pg 65 &
67). Corroborates the
evidence on recycling Ventolin and impacts of Horlicks, the products
assessed by CCaLC.
I. Letter from Head of Environmental Sustainability, GSK. Corroborates
the impacts from using
CCaLC by GSK.
J. Letter from European Environmental Strategy Manager, Kellogg Europe.
Corroborates the
impacts from using CCaLC by Kellogg.