Introduction of percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation into clinical practice
Submitting Institution
University College LondonUnit of Assessment
Clinical MedicineSummary Impact Type
HealthResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology
Summary of the impact
Percutaneous heart valve implantation is an innovative, minimally
invasive alternative to open-heart
surgery for treating valvular heart disease. Over the last 10 years,
research at UCL has
advanced the original method of minimally invasive valve implantation in
the pulmonary position.
Over 5,000 patients have now benefitted from this procedure and have
therefore avoided open-heart
surgery. The research has been used for regulatory approval of the Melody™
device in
Europe and Canada (CE marking) and has led to FDA approval in the USA for
both the device and
procedure and NICE approval in the UK.
Underpinning research
Dysfunction of the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) with pulmonary
stenosis and/or
regurgitation is a common and challenging condition in children and adults
with congenital heart
defects — of the 8 in every 1,000 live births that have congenital heart
disease, 20% will have an
RVOT problem. Surgical RVOT revision can be performed with a very low
mortality, but valve
conduits that are inserted to connect the right ventricle to the pulmonary
artery have a limited
lifespan, often less than 10 years, and as a result, the majority of
patients with such conduits
undergo multiple open-heart operations. The development of new, less
invasive percutaneous
methods to insert a heart valve without the need for open-heart surgery,
with its potential
complications, long hospital stay and long time off work/school, has the
potential to significantly
alter the life-long treatment of these patients. Research at UCL has
advanced percutaneous
pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI) through meticulous patient follow-up,
computer modelling to
identify procedural complications, technical improvements to the implanted
device and definition of
outcomes of success.
The first PPVI was performed in 2000 in a pilot case (one child) in
Paris, France. In 2002,
Professor Bonhoeffer moved to UCL to assess if implantation of the device
could reduce the need
for open-heart surgery in a broader patient group, taking advantage of UCL
collaborators and the
patient population at Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH). The next 220
patients who were
recruited to studies of this valve implant were patients at GOSH/UCL. The
first series was
published in 2006 [1] establishing the feasibility and safety of
the procedure, and detailed the
haemodynamic consequences [2, 3]. Importantly, we determined that
mechanical failure of one
part of the stent occurred in 25% of cases, but that it was possible to
detect this, monitor it and
intervene in time to prevent adverse consequences [3].
Subsequently we established the optimal
valve design, device implantation technique and patient selection for this
procedure and monitoring
schedule [4, 5]. This device was commercialised by Medtronic
(MelodyTM), with CE marking
obtained in 2006. Our research was the basis for the protocols for
implantation of the valve, and
training of the first 30 centres to use this technique was undertaken at
UCL between 2005 and
2008.
Melody™ is only suitable for implantation into 15% of patients
with pulmonary valve disease,
because in the majority of patients the main pulmonary artery is too
dilated for the procedure and
such patients therefore still require open-heart surgery. We have used
integrated computer-modelling
techniques that utilise patient-specific data to design a new device that
is suitable for a
greater proportion of patients [6]. This new device — Native
Outflow Tract Transcatheter Pulmonary
Valve (TPV) — is in the process of being commercialised with Medtronic,
and is currently in early
phase clinical testing (three patients implanted so far).
References to the research
[1] Khambadkone S, Coats L, Taylor AM, Boudjemline Y, Derrick G, Tsang V,
Cooper J,
Muthurangu V, Hegde SR, Razavi RS, Pellerin D, Deanfield JE, Bonhoeffer P.
Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation in humans &mdah; Results in
59 consecutive patients.
Circulation. 2005 Aug;112(8):1189-1197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.523266
[2] Coats L, Khambadkone S, Derrick G, Sridharan S, Schievano S, Mist B,
Jones R, Deanfield
JE, Pellerin D, Bonhoeffer P, Taylor AM. Physiological and clinical
consequences of relief of
right ventricular outflow tract obstruction late after repair of
congenital heart defects.
Circulation. 2006 May 2;113(17):2037-2044. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.591438
[3] Nordmeyer J, Khambadkone S, Coats L, Schievano S, Lurz P, Parenzan G,
Taylor AM, Lock
JE, Bonhoeffer P. Risk stratification, systematic classification and
anticipatory management
strategies for stent fracture after percutaneous pulmonary valve
implantation. Circulation. 2007
Mar 20;115(11):1392-1397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.674259
[4] Lurz P, Coats L, Khambadkone K, Nordmeyer J, Boudjemline Y, Schievano
S, Muthurangu V,
Yen Lee T, Parenzan G, Derrick G, Cullen S, Walker F, Tsang V, Deanfield
J, Taylor AM,
Bonhoeffer P. Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation: impact of
evolving technology and
learning curve on clinical outcome. Circulation. 2008 Apr
15;117(15):1964-72.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.735779
[5] Lurz P, Nordmeyer J, Muthurangu V, Khambadkone S, Derrick G, Yates R,
Sury M, Bonhoeffer
P, Taylor AM. Comparison of bare metal stenting and PPVI for treatment of
RVOT obstruction:
Utilization of an X-ray/MR hybrid lab for acute physiological comparison.
Circulation.
2009;119(23):2995-3001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.836312
[6] Schievano S, Taylor AM, Capelli C, Coats L, Walker F, Lurz P,
Nordmeyer J, Wright S,
Khambadkone S, Tsang V, Carminati M, Bonhoeffer P. First-in-man
implantation of a novel
percutaneous valve — A new approach to medical device development.
EuroIntervention. 2010
Jan;5:745-750. http://dx.doi.org/10.4244/EIJV5I6A122
Details of the impact
The research described above has resulted in a paradigm shift in the
treatment of valvular heart
disease. The wealth of data and experience generated through research at
UCL was used for
regulatory approval of the Melody™ device in Europe and Canada in 2006.
The safety and
effectiveness of PPVI have since been demonstrated in several additional
studies performed by
other investigators, including an FDA-sponsored trial in the US [a].
Importantly, the FDA trials were
designed using our PPVI protocols and our imaging and clinical pre- and
post-PPVI assessments.
In 2007, NICE interventional procedure guidance (IPG 237) approved the use
of the PPVI, with
subsequent update in 2013 (IPG 436) [b]. FDA approval was obtained
in the USA in 2010 for both
the device and procedure [c]. Our data and subsequent protocol for
monitoring valve fracture were
instrumental in FDA approval.
Following approval, we were responsible for training practitioners from
the first 30 centres to
implement the procedure. All sites planning to implant the Melody™ device
had to visit UCL/
GOSH prior to becoming and approved implantation site, and for many sites,
members of the UCL/
GOSH team visited the site at the time of their first implantation [d].
As a result of our invention, optimisation of implantation and
monitoring, and training of
cardiologists, the device and procedure is now used routinely in cardiac
centres worldwide to treat
patients with either narrowed or leaky pulmonary valves [e]. By
July 2013, over 5,000 valves had
been implanted in 35 countries worldwide [f]. Patients have
therefore avoided open-heart surgery
with its greater risk of mortality and morbidity, its longer stay in
hospital and its prolonged
recuperation time. In 2012, the Melody device was awarded the Prix Galien
USA 2012 award for
Best Medical Technology [g].
The Melody device has also had significant commercial and economic
impacts. With each device
costing £17,000, total sales to date have been around £85m. There are also
wider economic
benefits due to the avoidance of open-heart surgery. A recent cost
evaluation conducted in the US
found that PPVI holds a significant cost advantage over the surgical
approach for both health
services and patients, since it requires fewer hospital days, and incurs
less patient wage loss [h].
Moreover the introduction of cardiac valves that can be implanted without
the need for open-heart
surgery has transformed the landscape of the management of valvular heart
disease throughout
the world, and is a paradigm shift in this field of cardiovascular
medicine. Our work on the PPVI
device has been at the forefront of this new wave of treatments. Although
developed for the
relatively small population of congenital heart disease, PPVI has
established the way forward for
much more common valve diseases in adults (transcatheter aortic valve and
mitral clip). We have
also influenced the way devices are designed, how they are introduced into
man (`first-in-man'
implantations), how patients are investigated prior to implantation and
how they are followed up.
The PPVI programme has gone hand-in-hand with the development of
transcatheter aortic valve
implantation (TAVI). Indeed, without the success of the PPVI programme,
TAVI may not have
developed as quickly, because in its early stage of development, TAVI
mortality rates were very
high (>60%), and the whole TAVI programme underwent ethical review in
France. Our successful
PPVI programme at UCL, with very low complication rates, permitted the
TAVI programme to
continue [i].
The new device we have developed with Medtronic (Native Outflow Tract
Transcatheter Pulmonary
Valve (TPV) — shared IP with UCL/ GOSH) is in the process of being
commercialised by Medtronic,
and is currently in early phase clinical testing, with three patients
implanted so far [j]. This new
device can be used for many of the patients with right ventricular outflow
tract disease (~1 in every
1,000 live births [f]) who are not suitable for Melody™, replacing
open-heart surgery in these
patients.
Sources to corroborate the impact
[a] Results from FDA-sponsored clinical trial:
- Zahn EM, Hellenbrand WE, Lock JE, McElhinney DB. Implantation of the
melody
transcatheter pulmonary valve in patients with a dysfunctional right
ventricular outflow tract
conduit early results from the U.S. Clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol
2009; 54(18):1722-1729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.034
- McElhinney DB, Hellenbrand WE, Zahn EM et al. Short- and medium-term
outcomes after
transcatheter pulmonary valve placement in the expanded multicenter US
melody valve
trial. Circulation 2010; 122(5):507-516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.921692
[b] IPG436 Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation for right
ventricular outflow tract
dysfunction: guidance. http://guidance.nice.org.uk/IPG436/Guidance/pdf/English
[c] http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/DeviceApprovalsandClear
ances/Recently-ApprovedDevices/ucm199258.htm
[d] Example of training at one centre:
http://www.dhzb.de/patients_visitors/dhzb_news/detail/ansicht/pressedetail/258/
[e] http://www.medtronic.com/melody/melody-system.html
[f] Email from Medtronic reporting that over 5,000 valves had been
implanted by July 2013. Copy
available on request.
Article reporting valves implanted in 35 countries by end of 2012:
McElhinney DB, Hennesen
JT. The Melody® valve and Ensemble® delivery system for transcatheter
pulmonary valve
replacement. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013 Jul; 1291:77-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12194.
[g] http://www.galienfoundation.org/hall-of-fame/pgu.php
[h] Vergales JE, Wanchek T, Novicoff W, Kron IL, Lim DS. Cost-analysis of
percutaneous
pulmonary valve implantation compared to surgical pulmonary valve
replacement. Catheter
Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jul 15. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.25128.
[i] 'Innovation and Fragility.' Somerville lecture, Capetown 2013.
Phillip Bonhoeffer explains the
history of the two programmes (see minutes 26-30) https://vimeo.com/76872760
[j] http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01762124