Improving policy approaches to Prevent (formerly known as Preventing Violent Extremism)
Submitting Institution
University of HuddersfieldUnit of Assessment
EducationSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Studies In Human Society: Policy and Administration, Sociology
Summary of the impact
Research by the University of Huddersfield's School of Education and
Professional Development has played a significant role in influencing
changes to `Prevent', a key government educational policy aimed at
preventing terrorism. The work of Professor Paul Thomas has reshaped local
approaches in Kirklees and Rochdale local authorities and, following
national media coverage and oral evidence to a House of Commons Inquiry,
has helped influenced policy change at national level. Thomas'
recommendation to focus more on cohesion was largely accepted by the
Coalition government in its review of Prevent, as a result of which the
Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG) has placed renewed
emphasis on the value of cross-community cohesion.
Underpinning research
The Prevent policy, a high-profile and well-resourced programme of
"hearts and minds" community-based education, was introduced in 2007and
aimed to address the risk of young Muslims being attracted to terrorism
and the ideologies supporting it. Charles Farr, Director General of the
Home Office's Office for Security and Counter-Terrorism, subsequently
described the programme as targeting "the pool in which terrorists will
swim". However, Prevent's rapid implementation led to direct interference
with existing cohesion policies and posed real issues in terms of approach
and organisation for local authority and education partners, many of which
immediately recognised the ideological and practical problems the policy
created.
One such authority was Kirklees Metropolitan Council, which, using
Prevent funding, commissioned Professor Paul Thomas (Senior Lecturer
1999-2011, Reader 2011-2013, Professor 2013- ) who already had an emerging
national reputation (Ref.1) as an analyst of community cohesion, to
evaluate its initial year (2007/2008) of Prevent activity. Drawing on
qualitative research interviews with policy officers and youth workers,
Thomas produced a report designed to inform the council's future policy.
As illustrated by the DCLG's 2008 report, Prevent Pathfinder Fund:
Mapping of Project Activities 2007/08, this research represented
virtually the only genuinely independent evaluation of the initial pilot
year of Prevent activity in England.
Also in 2007/8, along with Dr Pete Sanderson (Head of Department, 2007
onwards), Thomas was commissioned by the Rochdale Pride Partnership (Local
Strategic Partnership) to formulate and carry out action research with
young people. Prevent was viewed as highly controversial by Muslim
communities in Rochdale, and this study, again using Prevent funding, was
seen as an "acceptable" way of engaging with the policy agenda. The work
involved training youth workers from both the statutory and
voluntary/community sectors in research approaches, jointly devising
qualitative processes and instruments and implementing those approaches
with young people. In July 2008 the resulting rich data (5, 6) relating to
how young people of all ethnic backgrounds understood their own
"identifications" and those of others, their prejudices and fears and
their experiences of segregation and racial/territorial conflict were
presented to and accepted by the Rochdale Pride Partnership, which used
them to inform future policy approaches to both Prevent and community
cohesion.
The Impact outlined below has been generated by the following research
findings:
- Prevent activity with young people solely concentrated on young
Muslims, contradicting the overarching policy priority of community
cohesion and the result was a detriment to work towards, and
understandings of, community cohesion.
- This Prevent focus on young Muslims reinforced rather than challenged
the significant ethnic segregation that many young people experience,
and the prejudiced and fearful attitudes about `others' that many hold.
- Much of this Prevent activity did not focus on issues related to
terrorism — instead it consisted of normal youth activities for one
community only, funded through anti-terrorism policy channels.
- This Muslim-only focus for Prevent provoked resentment from other
communities not targeted by the funding, and suspicion from Muslims who
were targeted.
- The professional education practitioners asked to operationalise
Prevent felt unclear and unprepared in relationship to the role they
were being asked to play, and wanted much more training and guidance.
These research findings enabled Thomas to make policy change
recommendations to local government funders and to the House of Commons
Communities and Local Government Select Committee Inquiry, arguing that
Prevent should focus much more on cross-community cohesion approaches,
should be dovetailed with wider attempts to encourage political education
and democratic engagement amongst young people, and should be supported by
more training and guidance for education professionals. Such
recommendations have been utilised by the local authorities commissioning
research activity, and accepted by the Select Committee Inquiry in its
Final Report.
To date, this research has led to a sole-authored Prevent monograph
(Bloomsbury Academic, 2012), a section of a further sole-authored
monograph (6), several articles in leading journals spanning the
disciplines of Politics (2,3), Sociology (5), Social Policy (1) and Youth
Issues (4), and a number of contributions to the national and regional
media.
References to the research
5. Thomas, P, and Sanderson, P (2011): Unwilling Citizens: Muslim Young
People and National Identity, Sociology, (IF 1.352, 29/138 in
Sociology), 45:6, pp. 1028-1044. 5 citations (Google Scholar).
http://soc.sagepub.com/content/45/6/1028
6. Thomas, P. (2011) Youth, Multiculturalism and Community Cohesion,
Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Shortlisted for the British Sociological
Association's 2012 Phillip Abrams Memorial Prize, and positively reviewed
in leading journals, such as `Sociological Review' (5 year
IF:1.184).
http://www.palgrave.com/products/title.aspx?PID=407816
Grants: Rochdale-based Prevent research was funded by the Rochdale
Pride Partnership to the amount of £13,000 in 2007/8; Kirklees-based
Prevent research was funded by Kirklees MC to the amount of £1,500
in 2007/8. In both cases, Professor Paul Thomas was PI.
Local Government Yorkshire and Humber (2009-2010): Evaluation of
Community Cohesion and Prevent Strategies in Kirklees and Bradford
(Regional Improvement and Effectiveness Pilot): qualitative evaluation
with strategic leaders, front-line workers and community members.
Professor Thomas's role: CI, involving data analysis, writing up,
presenting findings and liaising with local government funders: £19,800.
(PI: Dr. Surya Monro, HHS)
Youth Justice Board/Home Office (2009-2011) — Evaluation of
Initial Prevent Activity by Youth Offending Teams (led by Applied
Criminology Centre, HHS).Professor Thomas's role was Literature Review and
writing: £147,000.
Kirklees and Calderdale Councils (2013 — on-going) —
`Understanding perceptions of community relations'. Mixed methods
investigation of attitudes to ethnic diversity and public protest in
mainly white communities. Professor Thomas's role: Joint PI. £20,000
(Kirklees) £10,000 (Calderdale).
Details of the impact
The Prevent policy represents a crucial element of the government's
response to the threat of Islamist terrorism. As such, it is vital that
its conception and implementation are as effective as possible. Thomas's
research has played a major role in highlighting significant flaws and
helping to reshape Prevent on both local and national levels.
The conclusions and associated recommendations of the Rochdale study were
presented to the Rochdale Pride Partnership in July 2008 and subsequently
used by Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council Youth Service and other key
local agencies to orientate their Prevent and cohesion activity with young
people. This included the council's Youth Strategy and 2008-2011 Prevent
programme. This shift was supported by a number of local and regional
briefings on the key findings and insights for 100 key professionals,
including youth workers, teachers, police officers and other professionals
concerned with implementing Prevent approaches and promoting community
cohesion (Source 1).
Through its `Gold' multi-agency coordination structure, which provides
strategic direction and overview and has senior representation from all
statutory stakeholders, Kirklees Metropolitan Council used Thomas's
qualitative evaluation of its first year of Prevent activity as part of
its planning for the subsequent 2008-2011 tranche of government funding
for Prevent (2).
The key findings were also shared with Prevent co-ordinators and elected
members of local authorities from across the Yorkshire and the Humber
Government Office region at a seminar held in Leeds in July 2008 (3).
The findings from both studies and the subsequent theoretical analysis
formed the basis for an evidence submission to the Committees and Local
Government Select Committee Inquiry into Prevent in 2009-2010. A written
submission by Thomas highlighted the conclusions and the recommendations
regarding policy modification, leading to an invitation to give oral
evidence to the Committee at the House of Commons in December 2009.
Thomas's oral and written evidence was reproduced in the Committee's
report of March 2010, which accepted and supported the call for much
greater emphasis on community cohesion and cross-community contact within
policy approaches to preventing violent extremism. Aspects of Thomas's
evidence were quoted and supported by the Committee's report on pages 18
(paragraph 41), 37 (paragraph 92), 45 (paragraph 116) and 59 (paragraph
158). The Committee's conclusions included that "much greater training and
support for front-line workers such as council staff, police, teachers and
youth workers should be provided" (page 49, paragraph 129) and that
"funding for cohesion work in all communities should be increased" (page
62, paragraph 170) (4). Many of the Committee's recommendations were
subsequently enacted by the Coalition government in its re-launch of the
Prevent strategy in June 2011, with the DCLG removed from Prevent activity
and tasked with focusing solely on promoting community cohesion (5).
The research findings also contributed to and informed the evaluation of
Prevent activity by Youth Offending Teams nationally. The University of
Huddersfield's Applied Criminology Centre carried out this research from
2008 to 2011 for the Youth Justice Board, with Thomas participating in the
literature review and analysis process. The key findings of the evaluation
were also highlighted and accepted by the government when Prevent was
re-launched in 2011 (page 91, paragraphs 182,183 and 186)(5), with the
review observing: "Many of the problems identified by the University of
Huddersfield could have been overcome with greater clarity from the
outset."
In addition, Thomas collaborated with colleagues from the University of
Huddersfield's School of Human and Health Sciences to evaluate progress by
two West Yorkshire local authorities around community cohesion and
Prevent. The findings were presented to representatives of regional local
authorities and police services at a seminar in December 2010 (6). This
research relationship with regional policy-makers and practitioners has
continued with Thomas and colleagues being commissioned in 2013 by two
West Yorkshire local authorities to devise field research approaches to
investigate feelings and dispositions within marginalised, mainly white
communities, including the degree of sympathy for the positions and
actions of extreme groups like the English Defence League. This data will
be utilised to inform community-based policy and practice responses going
forward.
Continuing to raise wider awareness of the key issues, Thomas also made a
number of media appearances to discuss his research and its implications.
He was quoted by the Financial Times Magazine in February 2010 (7)
and the Financial Times in March 2011(8) and was also interviewed
on BBC Radio 4's Analysis in March 2011(9) and live on BBC2 TV's
`Newsnight' in May 2011 (10). All these media appearances have contributed
to greater public understanding both of the Prevent/Cohesion policy
operations and controversies themselves, and so to greater public
understanding of academic research. In October 2013 Thomas shared his
research findings and analysis with elected members and educationalists at
a conference staged at the Welsh Assembly, Cardiff, and with international
academic colleagues at a seminar staged at Sciences Po, Paris.
Sources to corroborate the impact
- Factual statement from: Dave Baker, Senior Youth Officer, Rochdale
Metropolitan Borough Council (Contact 1)
- Factual statement from: Andrew Pennington, then-Assistant Director for
Commissioning, Kirklees Metropolitan Council (Contact 2): Can be
confirmed by: Michael Greene, Head of Safe and Cohesive Communities,
Kirklees MC (Contact 3)
-
Evaluation of the `Preventing Violent Extremism' Policy Initiative
to Date — report prepared for Association of West Yorkshire
Authorities Community Cohesion Seminar, Leeds, July 2008.
-
Communities and Local Government Select Committee: Preventing
Violent Extremism: Sixth Report of Session 2009/10, House of
Commons (2010)
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmcomloc/65/6502.htm
- Her Majesty's Government (2011): Prevent Strategy, London: The
Stationary Office http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/counter-terrorism/prevent/prevent-strategy/prevent-strategy-review?view=Binary
- Monro, S, Razaq, U, Thomas, P, and Mycock, A (2010): Regional
Improvement & Efficiency Partnerships (RIEPs): Community Cohesion
(PREVENT) Pilot — report prepared for Local Government Yorkshire
and Humber, Huddersfield: University of Huddersfield. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/9219/
-
Financial Times report, `Preventing Violent Extremism in
Britain', February 26 2010
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/1e684162-1f94-11df-8975-00144feab49a,Authorised=false.html?_i_location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ft.com%2Fcms%2Fs%2F
0%2F1e684162-1f94-11df-8975-00144feab49a.html&_i_referer=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.ft.com%2Fsearch%3FqueryText%3Dprev
enting%2Bviolent%2Bextremism%2Bin%2BBritain#axzz2AhCpIYzw
-
Financial Times report, `May revisits policy on extremism',
June 8 2011.
- BBC Radio 4, Analysis, `Muscular Liberalism', March 14 2011
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006r4vz/broadcasts/2011/03
- BBC 2 TV Newsnight, 26th May 2011, `The Oldham
Riots: Ten Years on' http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/9497066.stm
https://www.hud.ac.uk/news/allstories/paulonnewsnight.php