Groundwater arsenic pollution: Informing policies and mitigation programmes, leading to improved public health security in Bangladesh
Submitting Institutions
University College London,
Birkbeck CollegeUnit of Assessment
Earth Systems and Environmental SciencesSummary Impact Type
EnvironmentalResearch Subject Area(s)
Earth Sciences: Geochemistry, Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience
Engineering: Environmental Engineering
Summary of the impact
UCL research findings about the source, transport and fate of arsenic in
sediments exploited for
water supply in the Bengal Basin have underpinned the development and
implementation of policy
by the Bangladesh government, international donors and non-governmental
organisations (NGOs),
and led to improvements in public health security across southern
Bangladesh. By demonstrating
that arsenic pollution in Bangladesh is not caused by irrigation pumping,
the research countered
popular demands and government intentions to curb irrigation, thereby
supporting the country's
continued food-grain self-sufficiency. Subsequent UCL explanations of the
geochemical and
hydraulic processes controlling groundwater arsenic have underpinned
further revision of the
government's strategies for monitoring groundwater and mitigating the
crisis; the resultant
reduction in arsenic exposure among approximately 10 million people has
significantly enhanced
public health security.
Underpinning research
Arsenic exposure — the adverse effects of which include cancers, diseases
of the vascular system,
and death — presents a serious global threat to public health. Since 1990,
extensive arsenic
pollution of groundwater has been recognised in Quaternary fluvio-deltaic
sediments exploited for
water supply. The problem is especially acute across the densely populated
floodplains of
Southeast Asia, where shallow groundwater constitutes the only
bacteriologically safe source of
water for more than 100 million inhabitants. In Bangladesh and West Bengal
alone — where
shallow groundwater contains arsenic at concentrations up to 100 times the
World Health
Organization (WHO) guideline limit for drinking water — some 70 million
people are affected, and
sustainable mitigation solutions are far from universally implemented.
Research conducted since 1997 by John McArthur and William Burgess in the
Department of Earth
Sciences at UCL has addressed the distribution, source, transport and fate
of arsenic in the Bengal
Basin, taken as a type area for Quaternary fluvio-deltaic aquifers.
McArthur and Burgess' first
published contribution in 1998 (with graduate student Nickson and
collaborators in Bangladesh) set
out their deduction, from the geochemical context and analysis of water
from 46 wells in
Bangadesh, that groundwater arsenic derives from reduction of
arsenic-bearing iron oxyhydroxides
in the sediments [1]. This finding overturned the previous consensus that
arsenic enters
groundwater by oxidation of arsenic-bearing pyrite in response to
water-table lowering by irrigation
pumping. The research demonstrated that arsenic pollution in Bangladesh is
a natural
phenomenon, rather than being caused by irrigation pumping.
Extensive fieldwork and laboratory analysis of groundwater and sediment
cores from West Bengal,
conceived by McArthur and executed in conjunction with lead collaborator
D. M. Banerjee
(University of Delhi) and other collaborators in the UK and India (as
indicated by the author lists on
references [2-4]), were conducted between 2000 and 2008. This work exposed
buried peat as the
main cause of the chemical reaction giving rise to severe arsenic
pollution in the groundwater [2].
Building on this, the research team developed and used their 'palaeosol'
model [3] to demonstrate
that the current distribution of arsenic in groundwater reflects the
distribution of palaeo-channels
and palaeo-interfluves that developed between 125,000 and 18,000 years
ago, as sea-level fell
and a late-Pleistocene landscape developed across the Bengal Basin. This
model applies to delta
regions worldwide, and is valuable as a guide both for groundwater
monitoring and for siting
arsenic-safe tubewells [4].
Also between 2000 and 2008, Burgess worked in an equal collaboration with
P. Ravenscroft
(consultant in Dhaka) and K. M. Ahmed (Dhaka University) on an
interpretation of more than 3,000
groundwater analyses, supplemented by sediment core analysis and
permeability measurements.
Using data from these studies, they established a hydrogeological
synthesis of arsenic occurrence
across southern Bangladesh [5]. Burgess, with graduate students at UCL,
then developed
conceptual and numerical models to show how groundwater flow controls
present-day arsenic
concentration at shallow pumping wells, and to posit future trends. At
basin-scale, Burgess worked
with UCL research student Hoque and their collaborators in Bangladesh to
determine the potential
for deep groundwater, which is free of excessive arsenic, to provide a
safe alternative water
supply. Via their analysis of more than 2,000 borehole records and
development of numerical
models, Burgess and his collaborators described the major elements of the
Bengal Aquifer System
to >350m depth, its development over Plio-Quaternary time, and the
extent of its vulnerability to
contamination by arsenic as a consequence of excessive pumping [6]. This
evaluation
underpinned recognition of the potential for deep groundwater as a secure
mitigation option;
Burgess and UCL research fellow M. Shamsudduha presented that option to
Bangladesh
government authorities at a workshop in Dhaka in January 2013 (see section
4). The analysis of
the vulnerability of deep groundwater was an equal collaboration between
Burgess, M. Hoque
(UCL graduate student), H. Michael (Univ. Delaware, USA), C. Voss and G.
Breit (US Geological
Survey) and K. M. Ahmed (Dhaka University).
UCL researchers: John M. McArthur (Reader 1997-2000; Professor
2000-present), William G.
Burgess (Senior Lecturer in Hydrogeology 1993-present), and Mohammad
Shamsudduha
(Postgraduate Research Fellow 2012-present).
References to the research
[1] Arsenic poisoning of groundwater in Bangladesh, R. Nickson, J.
McArthur, W. Burgess, M.
Ahmed, P. Ravenscroft and M. Rahman, Nature, 395, 338 (1998) doi:10/fvhjxk
[2] Natural organic matter in sedimentary basins and its relation to
arsenic in anoxic ground water:
the example of West Bengal and its worldwide implications, J. M. McArthur,
D. M. Banerjee, K. A.
Hudson-Edwards, R. Mishra, R. Purohit, P. Ravenscroft, A. Cronin, R. J.
Howarth, A. Chatterjee, T.
Talukder, D. Lowry, S. Houghton and D. K. Chadha, Appl. Geochem.,
19, 1255-1293 (2004)
doi:10/dmzhbv
[3] How paleosols influence groundwater flow and arsenic pollution: A
model from the Bengal
Basin and its worldwide implication, J. M. McArthur, P. Ravenscroft, D. M.
Banerjee, J. Milsom, K.
A. Hudson-Edwards, S. Sengupta, C. Bristow, A. Sarkar, S. Tonkin and R.
Purohit, Water Resour.
Res., 44, W11411 (2008) doi:10/bcjs25
[4] Migration of As, and 3H/3He ages, in
groundwater from West Bengal: Implications for
monitoring, J. M. McArthur, D. M. Banerjee, S. Sengupta, P. Ravenscroft,
S. Klump, A. Sarkar, B.
Disch and R. Kipfer, Water Res., 44, 4171-4185 (2010) doi:10/bp2dkm
[5] Arsenic in groundwater of the Bengal Basin, Bangladesh: Distribution,
field relations, and
hydrogeological setting, P. R. Ravenscroft, W. G. Burgess, K. M. Ahmed, M.
Burren, J. Perrin
Hydrogeol. J., 13(5-6), 727-751 (2005) doi:10/dst9cs
[6] Vulnerability of deep groundwater in the Bengal Aquifer System to
contamination by arsenic, W.
G. Burgess, M. A. Hoque, H. A. Michael, C. I. Voss, G. N. Breit and K. M.
Ahmed, Nature Geosci.,
3(2), 83-87 (2010) doi:10/c7zfmc
References [1], [3] and [5] best indicate the quality of the
underpinning research.
Grants: The research has been supported by the award of grants to
McArthur of more than
£750,000 from NERC (2003-2010), with additional funding from the United
Nations Children's Fund
(UNICEF); and of £58,000 awarded to Burgess from the EPSRC (2012), with
additional funding
from the UK's Department for International Development and the British
Geological Survey.
Details of the impact
Between 2008 and 2013, UCL's research into arsenic pollution of
groundwater has had significant
impacts on policy, practice and public health security in Bangladesh.
Specifically, it has guided the
development and refinement of policy on groundwater pumping in response to
the groundwater
arsenic crisis and underpinned practical approaches towards arsenic
mitigation and groundwater
monitoring; as a result, it has improved public health security across the
region. Globally, the
research has contributed to the development by UNICEF of policies relating
to the investigation
and mitigation of arsenic contamination. Key research findings were shared
widely with
stakeholders beyond academia, partly as a natural outcome of the
collaborative nature of the
research, to which Bangladesh government departments and NGOs contributed
through their
provision of access and data. The reach of the impact was further extended
by UCL contributions
to national meetings and workshops in Bangladesh, including a workshop
titled Deep groundwater
in Bangladesh: UCL research in support of policy development in
January 2013 in Dhaka.
Supporting UNICEF policy and directives: UNICEF has been a leading
international provider
and facilitator of mitigating actions responding to the arsenic crisis in
Southeast Asia. The
organisation has adopted UCL's explanation of the underlying processes and
causes of
groundwater arsenic in the Bengal Basin as the standard paradigm for
understanding arsenic
pollution in alluvial aquifers worldwide [A]. UCL research provided
fundamental support for
UNICEF's assessment of global health impacts of groundwater arsenic, which
underpinned its
development of policies and directives for its country offices, published
in 2008 [B]. By
demonstrating that the existing state of contamination in Bangladesh was
both predictable and
manageable, UCL research particularly facilitated UNICEF's proposals for
rational and effective
responses [A]. Significant projects supported by UNICEF since 2008, and
reflecting or responding
to those proposals, include the Bangladesh Government's Department of
Public Health
Engineering (DPHE) 15-year water supply and sanitation `Sector Development
Plan' [C], published
in 2011 by the DPHE Policy Support Unit (PSU). The Sector Development Plan
describes national
strategy for the investment of approximately $20 billion in the water,
sanitation and health (WASH)
sector. UNICEF Bangladesh's Water and Environmental Sanitation Specialist
stated: "Completely
outside academic circles, the UCL work, both directly, and indirectly by
shaping DPHE reports,
quite simply transformed the policy debate in Bangladesh and India, and
indeed beyond because it
guided my 2007/08 global predictive modelling for UNICEF" [A].
Guiding Bangladesh government policy development: The DPHE Policy
Support Unit leads the
development of government policy in the water supply and sanitation sector
in Bangladesh. The
January 2013 Dhaka workshop on Deep groundwater in Bangladesh,
co-convened by UCL, Dhaka
University and the PSU, was attended by representatives of the DPHE, the
Bangladesh Water
Development Board (BWDB), the Bangladesh Agricultural Development
Corporation, the
Geological Survey of Bangladesh, the Water Resources Policy Organisation,
and the donor
(including UNICEF and WaterAid) and NGO communities [D]. It resulted in
the submission of an
advisory policy statement ('Deep Groundwater in Southern Bangladesh - a
vital source of water')
[E] to the PSU [D]. This statement promotes deep groundwater as a
long-term secure water source
to mitigate the effects of arsenic and salinity in southern Bangladesh,
and identifies seven points of
consensus around which policy should be framed. According to the PSU
Director, the UCL
research has "made a highly regarded impact in helping the Government of
Bangladesh develop
its policy towards deep groundwater pumping and water quality protection"
[D].
Support for arsenic mitigation programmes: The DPHE is the
Bangladesh government
authority with principal responsibility for arsenic mitigation through
provision of safe water supplies,
and BRAC (formerly the Bangladesh Rural Advisory Committee) is the leading
NGO in the WASH
sector. UCL research has been used by the Arsenic Management Division of
the DPHE to develop
deep groundwater pumping as a mitigation strategy [F], and informed deep
tubewell mitigation
provisions developed by BRAC [G]. Decisions on the optimum depth of
arsenic mitigation wells in
the DPHE 2011 Sector Development Plan [C] and the BRAC 2011 WASH Programme
II [H], have
been supported by the research on the spatial and depth-distribution of
the arsenic source, and the
hydraulic structure of the Bengal aquifer system [F, G].
Contributions to public health security: Deep groundwater in
Bangladesh is free of excessive
arsenic. The implementation of deep groundwater pumping strategies by DPHE
and BRAC
between 2000 and 2013, to designs informed by UCL research [F, G], is
estimated to have
reduced arsenic exposure — thereby enhancing health, welfare and quality
of life — among a
combined total of some 10 million people across southern Bangladesh [F,
G]. The BRAC WASH
Programme alone involved the drilling of 3,966 deep tubewells between 2006
and 2011, targeting
8.5 million people, mostly living in rural areas [H]. Public health
security has also been protected by
the UCL research finding that arsenic pollution in Bangladesh is natural,
and not caused by
pumping for irrigation (reference [1] above). This finding has helped
underpin the maintenance of
food-grain self sufficiency in the country from 1998 to the present day.
In 1998, there were
demands both within civil society and at ministerial level for a ban on
groundwater irrigation, then
thought to be the cause of arsenic pollution. The UCL discovery catalysed
and informed public
debate about the issue, supporting counter-demands that ensured the
continuation of groundwater
irrigation. The enduring impact of this reversal is affirmed by UNICEF
Bangladesh's Water and
Environmental Sanitation Specialist, who notes that "UCL research was
central to this process",
which has itself been "critical to maintaining food-grain self-sufficiency
in Bangladesh and a
substantial part of India" [A].
Influence on groundwater monitoring practice: The BWDB is the
Bangladesh government
authority with responsibility for monitoring the quality and quantity of
the groundwater resources
nationally. McArthur's research findings on the rate of groundwater flux
at the arsenic source
regions (reference [4], above), and Burgess's research on the rate of
migration of arsenic towards
pumping wells (references [5] and [6] above), alerted BWDB [I] and UNICEF
[A] to the
requirements and timescales for groundwater monitoring. The research
findings influenced the
BWDB's approach to groundwater monitoring, specifically regarding the
security of deep
groundwater, and informed their establishment in 2012 of a coastal
groundwater network of over
120 monitoring points [I]. BWDB continues to appraise the design of its
national deep groundwater
monitoring programme in the light of UCL research, most recently through
consultation at the
January 2013 Dhaka workshop. That workshop, according to the BWDB Deputy
Director (Ground
Water Hydrology), "gave the opportunity for us to consider the
contributions of UCL research and
their implications for our approach towards groundwater monitoring. Our
joint effort has been
guiding BWDB to plan and develop appropriate investigation and monitoring
technologies in order
to generate good quality hydrogeological data and information for the
sustainable use of limited
fresh and safe groundwater resource" [I].
Sources to corroborate the impact
[A] Correspondence from Water and Environmental Sanitation Specialist,
UNICEF Bangladesh — corroborates
the impact on UNICEF policy design, the continuing benefits of UCL's role
in stopping
a ban on groundwater irrigation in Bangladesh, and the influence on
groundwater monitoring
practice. Available on request.
[B] The Arsenic Primer - Guidance for UNICEF Country Offices on the
Investigation and Mitigation
of Arsenic Contamination, UNICEF, New York (2008), available online: http://uni.cf/1bB2iKx.
(UCL
research influenced chapters 1, 2 and 7)
[C] Sector Development Plan, PSU (part of DPHE) (2011), available online:
http://bit.ly/18ojqDC — corroborates
that the DPHE made decisions on the optimum depth of arsenic mitigation
wells
(these decisions have been supported by the UCL research), e.g. see pages
33, 34 and 50.
[D] Supporting statement from Project Director (Joint Secretary), PSU —
corroborates the
contribution of UCL research to Bangladesh government policy development
and the details of the
2013 workshop. Available on request.
[E] Appendix H in `UCL, 2013. The Security of Deep Groundwater in
Southeast Bangladesh:
Recommendations for Policy to Safeguard against Arsenic and Salinity
invasion. Final Report,
EPSRC/UCL-BEAMS Knowledge Transfer Project, London.' — corroborates that
UCL research
informed the development of an advisory policy statement. Available on
request.
[F] Supporting statement from Executive Engineer, DPHE — corroborates the
influence of UCL
research on DPHE deep groundwater pumping mitigation actions, and confirms
that approximately
5 million people benefit from these actions. Available on request.
[G] Supporting statement from Senior Director, BRAC — corroborates the
influence of UCL
research on decisions at BRAC about the depth and locations of deep wells
for arsenic mitigation,
and confirms that approximately 5 million people benefit from these
actions. Available on request.
[H] For corroboration of the details of the WASH Programme see Chapter 1
of Achievements of
BRAC Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Programme towards Millennium
Development Goals and
Beyond, Research Monograph Series No. 60. Research and Evaluation
Division, BRAC (May
2013): http://bit.ly/16PXocD.
[I] Supporting statement from Deputy Director (Ground Water Hydrology),
BWDB — confirms the
contributions of UCL research to BWDB's approach to groundwater monitoring
(specifically deep
groundwater security). Available on request.