Edward Bond’s ‘Accident Time’: the impact of a radical new aesthetic on Theatre in Education practice
Submitting Institution
Newman UniversityUnit of Assessment
English Language and LiteratureSummary Impact Type
CulturalResearch Subject Area(s)
Studies In Creative Arts and Writing: Performing Arts and Creative Writing
Language, Communication and Culture: Cultural Studies, Literary Studies
Summary of the impact
Dr Katafiasz's research followed Edward Bond's seventeen year
collaboration with Big Brum
Theatre in Education Company. Her doctoral thesis (University of Reading,
2011), publications,
and workshops theorise and disseminate the aesthetic of Bond's nine `Big
Brum Plays'. This study
assesses the impact of Dr Katafiasz's work on Big Brum's productions, as
well as on a group of
drama lecturers, theatre education students, and members of a community
drama group. The
study describes the specific impact of the work in 2012-13, when 7,233
people saw Big Brum
perform in the UK, France, Malta, Hungary, Greece, Ireland, China, Sweden,
and Slovenia.
Underpinning research
Dr Katafiasz's research has helped Big Brum and others to establish an
important distinction
between Bondian and Brechtian aesthetics. Geoff Gillham directed Bond's
first play for Big Brum in
1996. It was assumed at the time that Bond, along with other notable
post-war British dramatists,
wrote plays in Brecht's Epic tradition (see Reinelt's After Brecht
and Eddershaw's Performing
Brecht, each in 1996), but Bond disagreed with Gillham's Brechtian
rehearsal methods, defining
alienation in The Hidden Plot as `the theatre of Auschwitz'.
an audience is unsure whether a pause is involuntary (the actor has
`dried'), or intentional (staged)
Bond arguably unleashes the real, or involuntary, more productively for
audiences (i.e. without
postdramatic confusion between fact and fiction), by exchanging what has
been termed an
`aesthetics of undecidability', where an audience is unsure whether a
pause is involuntary (the
actor has `dried'), or intentional (staged), with one of accidents. Dr
Katafiasz draws upon
philosophy, semiotic, and psychoanalytic theory to elucidate the radical
nature of this approach.
Bond's `accident time' can enliven audiences by disturbing their vision;
much as the masks and
skenes of ancient Greek drama contrived gaps and disparities between
signifiers and their objects.
In one play, an immigrant is represented by a dummy and a dummy actor; in
another, a young man
shut out of sight in his bedroom, becomes so disturbed that we see his
face and body coming
through the wall. As actors perform these complex movements between coded
and uncoded states
they dramatise `a state which is loosely referred to as some other
reality' but which Bond asserts is
`not a dramatic abstract' but `psychologically true.' (Bond 05/04/2013,
unpublished email to
Katafiasz). Dr Katafiasz's research argues that this state allows
audiences to dispute the
connections a culture routinely makes between bodies and languages, and in
doing so, to subvert
dominant performative discourses.
The research underpinning this study then, points out hitherto unexplored
associations between
drama and accidents. Both are characterised by a state in which
consciousness and physicality are
out of step; both foreground and challenge our beliefs by destabilising
relationships between
signifiers and objects; both privilege physicality and force us to
re-evaluate our ideas; and both can
provoke involuntary comic and tragic responses. The research suggests that
the notion of
`Accident Time' can reintroduce us to the innate democratic radicalism of
ancient drama.
References to the research
Katafiasz, K. (2004), `The Wound on the Outside of the Bandage' in The
Journal for Drama in
Education, Volume 20 Issue 2 (p7-11)
Katafiasz, K. (2005), `Alienation is the Theatre of Auschwitz', in Davis,
D. (Ed.) Edward Bond and
the Dramatic Child', Stoke: Trentham
Katafiasz, K. (2008), `Quarrelling with Brecht: understanding Bond's
post-structuralist political
aesthetic', in Studies in Theatre and Performance, Volume 28 No. 3
pp237-251. Bristol: Intellect
Katafiasz, K. (2013), `Staging Reality (beyond representation): a
perplexing Bondian body', in
Journal of the German Society for Contemporary Drama and Theatre in
English JCDE: Volume 1,
Berlin: Walter de Gruyter
Katafiasz, K. (2013), `Failed embodiment, silent speech, and ontological
intermediality in Edward
Bond's production of The Under Room, in Body, Space &
Technology Volume 11 No. 2 [online]
Available at http://people.brunel.ac.uk/bst/vol1102/
Details of the impact
In addition to the research publications cited above, dissemination of
research included:
- June 2008, `Metaphor and Metonymy in Bond's plays', a practical
workshop.
- November 2012, a paper on `Bondian Accident Time' presented at the
University of
Warwick Symposium `Bond@50'.
- January 2013, a practical workshop on `The Edge' by Edward Bond, which
was toured by
Big Brum in 2012/13.
To assess impact, a range of audiences were invited to comment on how
useful they had found the
research and to what extent the research had impacted their practice. A
combination of
questionnaire and focus group methods were used to assess impact with the
data being
scrutinized using both qualitative and quantitative techniques.
All four Members of Big Brum, who are active in working with communities
in acting and teaching
roles, completed an open ended questionnaire. The artistic director (who
also undertakes freelance
director, trainer, workshop leader, and consultancy work in a variety of
countries), and schools
workshop leader (responsible for the theoretical and practical development
of the Company's
work), participated in a follow-up focus group discussion.
The participants agreed that Dr Katafiasz's workshop had helped them
understand Bondian drama,
which had a direct impact on their rehearsal preparation. From a
directorial perspective, Dr
Katafiasz's research added theoretical depth on the dramatic-enactive
moment and this new
thinking now underlies and informs how parts of the plays are approached
and interpreted. The
director said that he used what he had learnt about the `underlying
mechanics' of metaphor and
metonymy to grasp how objects are viewed by an audience, and understand
more about the
structure of plays he later directed. Participants further commented that
the research addresses
questions which ordinarily create challenges for those involved with
creating a meaningful
theatrical experience. Dr Katafiasz's research is therefore a useful tool
for actors who wish to
engage with Bond's plays. The workshop had also highlighted useful
connections between theatre
and education, for use in schools workshops.
In terms of changed practice, the participants explained that an entire
production (Frankenstein,
2011) had been defined around the concept of identity, and this could not
have been achieved
without a thorough grounding and understanding of Bondian concepts such as
Accident Time, the
Drama Event, and the Invisible Object provided by Dr Katafiasz. The
company are especially keen
to work with Dr Katafiasz because her research focuses particularly upon
the plays which Bond
has written specifically for Big Brum, as part of their sixteen year
collaboration. Other academics
have tended to focus on work from twenty-five years ago, or longer. They
believe that by working
together, they are breaking new ground. As a result of their collaboration
with Dr Katafiasz, the
Company has developed a unique approach to Bond's work, which will
undoubtedly have had an
effect on the audiences across the world that has seen their work.
Participants of Dr Katafiasz's workshop on `The Edge' by Edward Bond,
were invited to common the value of the session through the medium of an
open-ended questionnaire (n=35).
Participants were drama lecturers, drama education students and members of
a community theatre
group. The workshop introduced semiotic theory as a useful approach to
understanding the three
dimensions of dramatic texts in general, and Bond's plays in particular.
When asked "Would you
say the workshop has developed your understanding of drama in any way?"
100% agreed. 57%
indicated that the session had raised their awareness of semiotics and
convinced them of the
application and validity of semiotic analysis to drama practice. A further
31% commented that the
session had given them new knowledge in addition to semiotic theory. 32
participants' comments
indicated that the workshop had in some way brought about a change towards
their own analytical
approaches and interpretation of texts. For a minority (9%) this meant a
clarification of semiotic
theory, building on previous knowledge. Whilst others (49%) commented that
the workshop had a
direct impact on how they would analyse texts in future. In addition to
the value of semiotic
analysis, six participants (17%) commented that their analysis of stage
direction would also change
as a direct result of the workshop.
Authors Lynne Bradley (2010: 132-134), Sean Carney (2013: 303) and James
Hudson (2013: 13)
all cite Dr Katafiasz's research on Bond. They refer respectively to her
work as `an immensely
useful study of Bond's technique'; to her `recent analysis of Bond's
critical distance from Brecht';
and to her understanding of Bond as a `pioneering theoretician of the
status of the body in
performance'.
Sources to corroborate the impact
- Questionnaires with Big Brum.
- Focus group discussion with Big Brum.
- Questionnaires from `The Edge' workshop with drama lecturers, drama
education students
and members of a community theatre group.
- Bradley, L. (2010) Adapting King Lear for the Stage Farnham:
Ashgate.
- Carney, S. (2013) The Politics and Poetics of Contemporary English
Tragedy Toronto:
University of Toronto Press.
- Hudson, J. (2013) `Absent Friends: Edward Bond's Corporeal Ghosts', in
Platform, Volume
7 No 1, Royal Holloway, University of London.