Responding to Far-Right Extremism: The British National Party and English Defence League
Submitting InstitutionTeesside University
Unit of AssessmentHistory
Summary Impact TypeSocietal
Research Subject Area(s)
Studies In Human Society: Political Science
History and Archaeology: Historical Studies
Philosophy and Religious Studies: Religion and Religious Studies
Summary of the impact
This case study comprises a set of qualitative and quantitative analyses
of contemporary right-wing extremism in Britain. This research has been
extended beyond academia to non-academic beneficiaries in Britain and
continental Europe. The research has informed public debate amongst civil
society (as indicated by take-up in NGO reports and the media). It has
informed policy development (as evidenced by participation in Government
advisory processes and through expert advice to Government). The research
has also responded to personal and professional development needs of young
people. Impact has derived from the quality of the underpinning research
and from a variety of external engagement and knowledge transfer
The key individual researcher is leading scholar of Britain's far right,
Professor Nigel Copsey (appointed Lecturer in History in 1996, conferred
as Professor in 2010). Professor Copsey (with Dr Matthew Feldman) is
co-founder and co-director of the recently established Centre for Fascist,
Anti-Fascist and Post-Fascist Studies (CFAPS). Copsey is the author of a
series of qualitative and quantitative studies into the nature of
contemporary far-right extremism in Britain. These outputs comprise the
underpinning research (a body of work published over a sustained period
between 2004 and 2013):
Output 1, published as Contemporary British Fascism: The
British National Party and the Quest For Legitimacy (Copsey, 2004)
was the first in-depth academic history of the British National Party
(BNP) which became an essential point of reference in the field. A
meticulously researched account of the party's historical development, it
represented a significant contribution to our understanding of the
present-day BNP as a recalibrated form of (neo) fascism.
Output 2, published as `Changing course or changing clothes?'
(Copsey, 2007) examined the ideological makeover of the BNP within a
rigorous conceptual framework of neo-fascism, offering a pioneering and
critical case study of the BNP's ideological `modernisation'.
Output 3 (Copsey, 2008), a second edition of output 1. This
updated and expanded the 2004 monograph, and in so doing, further advanced
knowledge of British (neo) fascism.
Output 4 (Copsey, 2010) — a commissioned report by inter-faith NGO
Faith Matters, it offered the first qualitative analysis of the nature of
the English Defence League (EDL). This report has become a key point of
Output 5 (Copsey, 2013) — a public lecture delivered at
Amsterdam's De Balie (April 2013). This lecture critically assessed
contemporary political science approaches to `radical right-wing
populism', calling for deeper and more penetrating historical
analysis. The full version of the lecture was published in the open source
journal, Fascism: Journal of Comparative Fascist Studies.
Output 6 (Copsey et al., 2013) — a second commissioned report for
Faith Matters (and the first by CFAPS), this text offered a quantifiable
analysis of the extent to which Britain's contemporary far right has been
implicated in anti-Muslim hate crime.
The major conclusions from this body of work were:
- The local electoral successes of the BNP after 2001 marked a
significant turning point in the history of Britain's far right (outputs
- In a comparative context, Britain's far right is not a strictly
`exceptional' case. In relation to other European countries the
historical pattern of electoral failure could be explained more by
supply-side factors (especially the absence of political legitimacy)
than by demand-side factors (outputs 1, 3).
- Although election of any BNP candidates to Westminster remained
improbable, the potential existed for the BNP to break through in a
national `second-order' election (as it did in the European elections in
2009) (outputs 1, 3).
- The `modernisation' of the British National Party has been cosmetic.
The party's attempt to rebrand itself as a party of '21st century
popular nationalism', and thereby locate itself in a wider radical
right-wing populist European trend, has been disingenuous. It is best
understood as a recalibrated form of (neo) fascism (outputs 1, 2, 3, 5).
- The example of the BNP underscores the extent to which `radical
right-wing populism' is not detached from neo-fascism (output 5).
- The English Defence League is not a traditional far-right
organisation. Even though it clearly had links to other far-right
organisations, it should not be viewed through the prism of the
established far right (output 4).
- The English Defence League is best understood as a deeply Islamophobic
new social movement. Although lacking a recognisable fascist or
neo-fascist ideological end-goal, its sometimes violent street presence
presented significant challenges to social cohesion and community
relations, particularly in terms of `cumulative extremism' (output 4).
- The English Defence League (and not the BNP) has been the far-right
organisation most implicated in the propagation of anti-Muslim hate
References to the research
1. Copsey, N., (2004) Contemporary British Fascism: The
British National Party and the Quest for Legitimacy (Palgrave)
2. Copsey, N., (2007) Changing course or changing clothes?
Reflections on the ideological evolution of the British National Party
1999-2006', Patterns of Prejudice, 41, 1. DOI:
3. Copsey, N., (2008) Contemporary British Fascism: The
British National Party and the Quest for Legitimacy (Palgrave)
[Research monograph. Second, updated and extended edition].
5. Copsey, N., (2013) `Fascism but with an open mind? Reflections
on the Contemporary Far Right in (Western) Europe', Fascism: Journal
of Comparative Fascist Studies, 2, 2013. DOI:
Outputs 1, 2 and 3 were peer-reviewed. The research monograph published in
2004 (output 1) was acclaimed by Professor Roger Griffin, widely
acknowledged as one the leading global experts on fascism, as `essential
reading for the journalists of Britain's quality press and media who cover
the BNP, and for all academics concerned with the ways illiberal forces of
ethnocentrism are able to adapt to and by hosted by contemporary liberal
political and civic space', Patterns of Prejudice, 29:1 (2005). In
recognition of the significance of this scholarship, a second revised and
expanded edition was published in paperback in 2008 (output 3). Outputs 1
and 3 have a combined citation count of over 70 on Google Scholar (Nov.
2013) Output 2 is still one of the most widely read online articles in Patterns
of Prejudice (it has been viewed 448 times). Output 4 is being
widely referenced in the emerging scholarly literature on the English
Defence League (it has a citation count of over 15 on Google Scholar, Nov.
2013). Output 5 is the full length version of the inaugural public lecture
of the Fascism journal. Output 6 is a 30-page independent,
quantifiable analysis of data from the TELL MAMA project (a project
organised by NGO Faith Matters). It is the first detailed evidential
report of both online and offline anti-Muslim hate crime in England and
Wales and builds the foundation for further study in this area.
Details of the impact
In the period after 31 December 2007, the research embodied in Professor
Copsey's ground-breaking history of the BNP (2004) complemented by his
widely read 2007 article, continued to feature in national conversations
occasioned by the BNP's electoral emergence. An entire chapter from output
1, on the `modernisation' of the BNP, was taken up and published online by
the Marxist discussion journal, What Next? Although the work was
critical of Marxist perspectives on fascism, the preamble endorsed the
underpinning research: "This is Chapter 5 of Nigel Copsey's excellent book
Contemporary British Fascism and the Quest for Legitimacy (Palgrave 2004)
which is highly recommended, particularly now it is available in a 
paperback edition" .
Extensively referenced prior to 2008 (his 2004 monograph was cited, for
example, in a major public-facing Democratic Audit report into the growing
appeal of the BNP published prior to the 2006 local elections), Copsey's
book continued to draw citation in various reviews, reports, and policy
documents circulated by civil society organisations (and thus contributed
to wider public understanding of the challenges that the rise of the BNP
presented). Examples of the different constituencies reached by this
material include: the legal campaign group, One Law for All; the NASUWT;
as well as various religious congregations . Copsey's book was
also selected for inclusion in the British Library's bibliography on the
BNP one of 21 topical bibliographies that functions as introductory guide
to the public .
In 2010 Copsey was commissioned by NGO Faith Matters to write the first
detailed study of the newly emerging English Defence League. Through
recognition of the quality of his research, Copsey caught the attention of
Fiyaz Mughal, Director of Faith Matters. Working closely on dissemination
with Faith Matters, Copsey's 10,000-word, public-facing report secured
national media coverage (e.g. Independent, 28.11.10; BBC Radio 4,
12.12.10). Over 500 people immediately placed the Independent's
article on their Facebook site. Through this channel alone, between 5,000
and 10,000 people (a conservative estimate) secured links to the report .
The report was cited by five news agencies; there was also take-up by
various websites and campaign groups, including ENGAGE, an NGO working
towards enhancing engagement by Muslim communities in national life,
particularly in politics and the media .
In order to assist with raising awareness of contemporary far-right
extremism amongst young adults, Copsey spoke to the Young Foundation at a
central London event in March 2011. This event — "Are we entering a new
politics of extremism?" — was chaired by Labour MP Rushanara Ali. It
formed part of the UpRising project (a project dedicated to supporting
young adults from diverse backgrounds as future leaders across public,
private and voluntary sectors). Copsey spoke to an audience of around 100
stakeholder participants, mainly young adults from areas particularly
affected by the challenges of right-wing extremism, such as Barking and
Dagenham, Newham and Tower Hamlets.
This event was followed by an invitation from the Research and
Documentation Committee of the Muslim Council of Britain to write a
critical online opinion piece on the latest iteration of the Government's
counter-terrorist Prevent strategy. The piece, which was aimed
specifically at Muslim communities, was published online in June 2011 .
The revised Prevent strategy recognised an existential threat from
far-right radicalisation. Informing implementation of Prevent, the
Home Affairs Committee undertook an inquiry into the root causes of
violent radicalisation. As part of this inquiry, Copsey contributed to the
Home Affairs Conference on Violent Radicalisation in December 2011. In the
subsequent Home Affairs Committee report, which was published in early
2012, Copsey was referenced in terms of reiterating the risks of
`cumulative extremism' .
The point about `cumulative extremism' (one extremism feeding off
another) was also made by Copsey at the Home Office in a closed meeting
with the Research, Information and Communications Unit of the Office for
Security and Counter-Terrorism in January 2012. The following month,
Copsey's influential report on the EDL was selected as a key resource in a
Cross-Government Working Group Report on anti-Muslim hatred .
Copsey also assisted in the drafting of an internal DCLG report on
anti-Muslim hate crime in March 2012. Given his valuable research
examining the rise and impact of the EDL, Copsey was then invited to
participate in a private roundtable meeting of experts, activists and
practitioners at St Ethelburga's Peace and Reconciliation Centre in
In the wake of the Breivik massacre in Norway, Copsey's work on the EDL
featured in forskning.no (an online newspaper devoted to
disseminating Norwegian and international research) . In May
2012 Copsey featured in a Finnish TV documentary — Spotlight — on
the growing anti-Islamic movement in Europe (he had been approached after
the programme's chief reporter had read his report on the EDL). Filmed
extracts from a Copsey lecture on the EDL and an interview were screened
across two separate broadcasts (3.5.12) and (10.5.12) by the Finnish
equivalent of the BBC . Eager to further locate his research
in the broader international context, on 25 April 2013 Copsey delivered a
public lecture at De Balie, Amsterdam, to an audience of around one
hundred. A condensed version of the lecture, which examined continuities
between fascism, neo-fascism and radical right-wing populism, was
published in the Dutch quality daily NRC Handelsblad (circulation
approx. 200,000) .
As a pathway to sustaining future impact in this area, Teesside
University launched the new Centre for Fascism, Anti-Fascism and
Post-Fascist Studies (with Feldman as co-director). The decision to launch
the Centre attracted extensive local, national and international media
coverage (e.g., Independent, 29.12.12; Guardian, 14.1.13; Muslim
Weekly, 18.1.13; BBC Radio 4, 27.1.13; Gulf Times, 30.12.12;
Philippine Times, 13.1.13; FM4 (radio) Austria, 27.4.13). Norwegian
MP, Håkon Haugli (Labour) submitted a question to the Norwegian Minister
of Justice, asking whether a similar research Centre should be established
in Norway .
Coinciding with its formal launch, the Centre published a quantitative
report entitled Anti-Muslim Hate Crime and the Far Right in June
2013, featuring Copsey as lead-author. As part of our on-going engagement
with NGO Faith Matters, this report attracted extensive media coverage,
both nationally (e.g., Independent, 29.6.13; Observer,
30.6.13; Channel 4 News, 1.7.13; ITV Daybreak, 4.7.13) and
internationally (Zeenews.com 29.6.13; Zaman, 1.7.13; The
Nation Pakistan, 2.7.13, Press TV, 8.7.13). During a
parliamentary debate on extremism and integration in early July 2013, the
report was cited by Labour MP Keith Vaz in a question to Eric Pickles,
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government. Pickles
recognised that anti-Muslim hate crime incidents should be graded .
Impact in this area is embedded and on-going. Beyond the impact
assessment period, the resignations of the EDL's leaders in October 2013
involved a belated recognition that the EDL had clear links to the extreme
right, as Copsey had originally identified in his 2010 report. The Centre
once again secured international media coverage . Needless to
say, an occupational hazard of this type of research is that it can impact
upon the far right itself. The standard response is for groups, like the
EDL and BNP, to dismiss it as the work of `biased leftists' or `cultural
Sources to corroborate the impact
2. See `Enemies not Allies: The Far Right' http://www.onelawforall.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Enemies-not-Allies-web-version1.pdf;
4. Email correspondence with Director of Faith Matters, 30.11.10.
5. See http://iengage.org.uk/component/content/article/1-news/1121-new-report-examines-edls-islamophobic-agenda
6. See http://soundings.mcb.org.uk/?p=137
8. See C. Allen, Cross-Government Working Group on anti-Muslim
Hatred: Scoping Exercise Submission (University of Birmingham: February
10. Email correspondence with chief reporter Marko Hietikko,
12.3.12. Documentary online.
11. Copy of article (in Dutch) available on request.
13. See Hansard source (Citation: HC Deb, 8 July 2013, c5)
14. See for example: Reuters 8.10.13; NBCNews 8.10.13; Arab
15. See http://theenglishdefenceleagueextra.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/nigel-copsey-professor-of-anti-fascism.html.