Interrogating Penal Power and Developing Policy Responses to Deaths in Custody
Submitting Institution
Liverpool John Moores UniversityUnit of Assessment
Social Work and Social PolicySummary Impact Type
LegalResearch Subject Area(s)
Studies In Human Society: Criminology
Law and Legal Studies: Law
Summary of the impact
This case study reflects on Professor Joe Sim's work, and his public
engagement with the
academic, political, public and policy debates, around penal policy and
deaths in custody. The
underpinning aims of Sim's research are to: alleviate the pains and harms
associated with deaths
in custody for bereaved families; highlight the experiences of those staff
committed to humane
reform; engage critically with policies around penal reform in order to
develop alternatives to
custody based on humanity and social justice; and attempt to hold to
account those who deliver
penal policy. The ultimate aim is to heal the individual offender, reduce
victimisation and protect
wider society.
Underpinning research
Consistent with the Centre for the Study of Crime, Criminalisation and
Social Exclusion's
(CCSE) aim to represent marginalised voices within the criminal justice
process, this case study
draws on the underpinning research, activism and published work which Sim
has undertaken since
1993. This work itself has developed from his original research interest
regarding the delivery of
medical care in prison, its impact on prisoners and, more specifically,
its contribution to deaths in
prison. This research culminated in his book Medical Power in Prisons
(Sim, 1990), which is
recognised as one of the most important histories of the prison ever
written, and a Nuffield
Research Fellowship in 1999 focussed on researching the delivery of prison
health care. This, in
turn, led him into the debates around deaths in custody more generally and
to his involvement with
the charity INQUEST, first as a member of its advisory board and
subsequently as a Trustee.
Overall, his work has been built on a number of interrelated themes:
i. Providing critical commentary on penal policy and practice,
particularly with regard to the
delivery of prison health care and interrogating deaths in custody through
a rigorous
deconstruction of historical and contemporary state documents;
ii. Articulating the challenges posed to official/dominant discourses of
punishment and penal
policy by prisoners' rights organisations thereby providing an alternative
account of prison
reality from below;
iii. Confronting the stigmatisation and `othering' of prisoners and
prisoners' families as well as
the 'othering' of those prison staff interested in rehabilitation and
reform;
iv. Suggesting reforms which have sought to impact on the delivery of
penal policy, making it
more effective and accountable.
Sim's scholarship has developed critical and historically informed
theoretical insights concerning
imprisonment and, in particular, the central, but contradictory, role of
the state in shaping and
legitimating penal order. His research demonstrates that underlying prison
priorities of order,
security, discipline and classification are regimes which are often
alienating, harsh and harrowing
for many of the confined; that these priorities undermine the efforts of
progressive prison staff to
engage humanely and empathetically with prisoners and that such regimes
have, in some cases,
contributed to deaths in custody. A central theme has been the recognition
that while popular and
academic debates point to the profound political, economic and social
changes that have occurred
since the 1970s, the justifications mobilised to defend the continuing
existence of prisons, the
populations it incapacitates and its often detrimental policy
interventions, have remained consistent
since the late eighteenth century. (See Sim, 2008a, 2008b and 2009).
Sim's work has contributed to, and been instrumental in developing, a
more critically engaged
and interventionist public criminology through highlighting the
experiences of some of society's
most vulnerable groups and signposting ways to develop humane policy
responses (see Sim, 2009
and Cooper and Sim, 2013). Historically, his engagement with the wider
policy community can be
seen in a number of different arenas: his invitation to deliver the annual
Perrie Lecture in 1994; his
membership of the North West Healthy Prisons Task Force in 2001; and his
membership of the
External Advisory Group for the Cabinet Office's highly regarded report on
Reducing Re-Offending by
Ex-Prisoners published in 2002.
References to the research
Cooper, V. and Sim, J. (2013) `Punishing the Detritus and the Damned: Why
Prison in
Liverpool?' in D. Scott (ed.) Why Prison? Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press. ISBN
978-1107030749
Sim, J. (2009) Prisons and Punishment: Power and the Carceral State,
London: Sage. ISBN
9780761960041
Sim, J. (2008a)`"An Inconvenient Criminological Truth": Pain, Punishment
and Prison Officers', in
Bennett, J., Crewe, B. and Wahidin, A. (eds) Prison Staff,
Cullompton: Willan. ISBN 978-1-84392-274-2.
Sim, J. (2008b) `Pain and Punishment: The Real and the Imaginary in Penal
Institutions in Carlen,
P. (ed) Imaginary Penalties, Cullompton: Willan. ISBN
978-1-84392-375-6.
Sim, J. (1990) Medical Power in Prisons: the prison medical service in
England 1774-1989, Milton
Keynes: Open University Press. ISBN 0-335-15182-5.
Details of the impact
Sim's analysis of penality has attempted to hold to account politicians,
policy makers and prison
staff through interrogating the impact of their respective roles and
responsibilities on the
experiences of for prisoners and their families (5a-h). Indeed a
representative of the HM
Inspectorate of Prisons (5e) has lauded Sim's scholarship as providing
`the kind of concise,
articulate and powerful critique of apparent criminological realities,
which is necessary to motivate
genuine reform and can help to ensure that practitioners and others do not
forget the big picture'
(Bhui, 2010:94). The Governor of HMP Grendon (5d) notes that the
intellectual attention that Sim's
work has brought to the issue of deaths in custody has contributed to `a
climate' that has not only
enabled significant improvements in the processes for managing prisoners
who are at risk of
suicide and self-harm, but also raised the public profile of this issue so
that it has been necessary
for these improvements to take place. For example, HMP Grendon's suicide
and self-harm
prevention policy is subject to regular review and the institution was
described by the HM Chief
Inspector of prisons, in 2011, as a `fundamentally safe prison' which,
given the nature of its
population, is `a significant achievement'.
While impact can sometimes be traced directly in terms of a causal link
between research
conducted and public policy, academic impact on social policy can also be
traced through
proactive involvement in policy making processes which subsequently feed
into the broader policy
and popular debates in an area of significant public concern. In Sim's
case, there is evidence to
suggest that his research has been beneficial through making a distinct
and material contribution to
INQUEST's campaign activities and, by association, to the policy processes
and reforms which
have emerged directly as a result of the charity's campaigns (5a,b,c,f).
INQUEST is a small charitable organisation which provides a specialist,
comprehensive advice
service on contentious deaths and their investigation to a range of key
stakeholders. INQUEST
provide briefings for Parliamentarians, policy makers, the media, legal
representatives and other
interested parties including penal reform groups. Thus these stakeholders,
alongside bereaved
families, comprise the key beneficiaries with respect to the impact of
INQUEST's work.
INQUEST's recognition of the significance of Sim's research led to him to
become involved with
the organisation initially as a member of the charity's advisory board and
subsequently, via an
interview process, as a Trustee of the charity. In this role his research,
expertise and critical
criminological perspective has contributed directly to INQUEST policy with
respect to deaths of
children and women in custody while his critiques of penal policy and
practice, and his
championing of progressive reforms, have enabled him to play a key role in
helping to strategically
guide INQUEST's highly effective evidence based campaigning alongside
families to secure a
number of significant policy successes and changes to the legal landscape.
These reforms include the establishment of independent investigation
processes following
deaths in police custody and in prison and legislative reform including
the Corporate Manslaughter
and Corporate Homicide Act 2007, enacted in 2011, which lifts crown
immunity from the prison
service in relation to custodial deaths, and the Coroners and Justice Act
2009 which is notable for
successfully saving the post of Chief Coroner. These policy reforms were
accomplished at the
same time as successfully campaigning to elicit cross party opposition
against government
proposals to introduce secret inquests: firstly in the Counter Terrorism
Bill 2008: secondly in the
Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and most recently in the Justice and
Security Green Paper 2012.
In additional to his academic expertise on penal policy, Sim provided
practical help to support
INQUEST's campaigns on these issues (5a, b). For example his attendance at
board meetings has
ensured his research has helped to formulate and develop INQUEST's
policies and approach; he
has written briefing papers for the charity (2008); he has commented on
INQUEST's briefings to
policy makers, practitioners, and the media; and he has offered advice to
INQUEST's case workers
and Co-Directors via email and telephone discussions.
It has also been a mark of Sim's work that he has attempted to
disseminate it to the widest
possible practitioner and popular audience. He has had a number of letters
published in the
Guardian relating to penal and wider criminal justice matters (1 July
2012; 19th July 2011; 14th
April 2009, with others). He has utilised other media outlets for
dissemination purposes such as:
documentaries (See Punishment: A Failed Social Experiment, October
2013 which was listed as one
of the top 100 documentaries 'inspiring the shift to a sustainable
paradigm'); blogs (October 2012);
and writing for Criminal Justice Matters, a journal that is concerned with
engaging with practitioners
(March, 2010; December, 2010; September, 2012; June 2013). It is through
his proactive
engagement across these diverse areas that Sim's impact can be traced and
gauged.
Sources to corroborate the impact
a. Director, INQUEST, http://www.inquest.org.uk/
b. Chair of INQUEST, INQUEST Lawyer's Group. http://www.inquest.org.uk/
c. Former HM Chief Inspector of Prisons, House of Lords.
d. Governor HM Prison Grendon Underwood, HM Prison Service.
e. I Team Leader, HM Inspectorate of Prisons.
f. Former Director National Association for the Care and Resettlement of
Offenders, NACRO.
g. Joint Director of Public Health for NHS Cumbria and Cumbria County,
North West Public
Health Observatory.
h. Senior Associate at the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, Reclaim
Justice Network, ,
http://downsizingcriminaljustice.wordpress.com/