Cultural Enrichment Through Public Engagement
Submitting Institution
University of HuddersfieldUnit of Assessment
Art and Design: History, Practice and TheorySummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Language, Communication and Culture: Cultural Studies
History and Archaeology: Curatorial and Related Studies, Historical Studies
Summary of the impact
The two-year ROTOЯ programme of exhibitions and events has been a
cornerstone of the University of Huddersfield's efforts to introduce new
audiences to contemporary art and design, as encouraged by successive Arts
Council policies for enhancing public engagement. As well as raising
awareness, inspiring curiosity and providing cultural enrichment, it has
initiated changes to local authority policies on providing cost-effective,
high-quality cultural services and has functioned as a vehicle for
research into how the impact of such programmes can be captured. As such,
it has served as a model partnership for local authority and university
sectors in offering cultural leadership, generating and measuring
engagement and delivering public services.
Underpinning research
In 2010 a Work Foundation report warned that the UK's creative industries
were at risk of failing to fulfil their potential to drive growth and
innovation. Successive Arts Council policy goals have also underlined the
importance of greater engagement and collaboration with a view to
attracting and inspiring new audiences and so ensuring the arts are
"sustainable, resilient and innovative". Launched in 2012 in partnership
with Huddersfield Art Gallery, the University of Huddersfield's ROTOЯ
programme aimed to address such concerns by providing a broad spectrum of
exhibitions reflecting the breadth of the UK's creative and cultural
industries.
Crucially, the goal was to present work in a manner accessible and
attractive to a wide range of new audiences. To this end, ROTOЯ drew on
national and international exhibition-research by staff at the School of
Art, Design and Architecture. All of this work had a history of public
engagement, which helped establish an evaluative platform from which ROTOЯ
could advance its prime objectives, including measuring impact beyond
academia. All ROTOЯ exhibitions and events were free to the public and
involved researchers working in close collaboration with local authority
cultural service managers. Underpinning research for ROTOЯ I and II
included peer-reviewed exhibitions from national/international cultural
organisations.
Flight, an exhibition of work by Dr Lisa Stansbie (Head of
Department, Art and Communication), launched ROTOЯ I. It formed part of a
wider body of research, including Portmanteau (Halle 14/g39,
Leipzig, Germany, 2011) [1], exploring sculpture and film through the use
of Airfix model aeroplane kits. Comprised of sculptures, photographs,
drawings and a sound piece, the exhibition was staged from January 28
until March 24 2012.
Insufficient Allure, a curated exhibition by Kevin Almond (Head of
Department, Fashion and Textiles) and Kathryn Brennand (Fashion Senior
Lecturer), investigated historical and contemporary aspects of creative
pattern cutting. Underpinned by Almond's article in The International
Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education [2], it
contributed new knowledge to the field and led to the first peer-review
international conference on the subject. The exhibition ran from April 7
until June 6 2012.
Mining Couture, an exhibition by Claire Barber (Lecturer in
Textile Crafts) and Professor Steve Swindells (Director of Research),
explored conceptual connections between coal-mining and fashion through
the metaphor of "seam". It drew on two public art commissions, from
Leicestershire County Council for Snibston Discovery Museum (2011/2012)
and Somerset County Council for Maximum Exposure (2011), and the
publication of Mining Couture: A Manifesto for Common Wear by
Blackdog in 2012 [3]. The exhibition was held from June 16 until August 11
2012.
Patrick Procktor: Art and Life, curated by Dr Ian Massey (Subject
Leader, Communication Arts and Design), was the first exhibition of
Procktor's works since his death in 2002. It highlighted new research on
stylistic developments in 1960s/1970s British art and was underpinned by
Massey's 2010 book of the same title [4], which included primary research
at Vicenza's Galleria Ghelfi, Venice's Galleria del Cavallino and Munich's
Galerie Biedermann, as well as extensive interviews with David Hockney,
Celia Birtwell and others. The exhibition ran from August 25 until
December 1 2012.
Sisyphus, an exhibition by Dr Jill Townsley (Course Leader,
Contemporary Arts and Illustration), launched ROTOЯ II in 2013. It
explored repetition and labour through appropriated materials and was
underpinned by research previously shown at, among others, the Gallery
Athens Institute of Contemporary Art, Georgia, USA (2012) [5]. The
exhibition was staged from January 26 until April 13, 2013.
References to the research
Outputs:
Grants, funding etc:
Leicestershire County Council public art commission for Snibston
Discovery Museum, Barber- Swindells, Mining Couture, 2011 -
£20,000
Somerset County Council public art commission for Maximum Exposure,
Barber-Swindells, Mining Couture, 2012 - £6,500
Lectra sponsorship for Creative Cut peer-review international
conference on creative pattern cutting, February 2013 - £3,000,
Details of the impact
ROTOЯ has transformed public views on the significance of contemporary
art and design and initiated change to local authority policy decisions to
provide cost-effective, high-quality cultural services. It has also
generated practical models, best practice and further research on public
engagement strategies for partnerships between universities and cultural
sectors.
ROTOЯ I attracted more than 14,300 visitors. Another 1,100 attended
related talks, interpretation tours, workshops, film screenings, reading
groups and other accompanying events designed to encourage further public
participation. A number of methods were used to gauge the extent and
success of the engagement arising from each exhibition, including
questionnaires to gather quantitative feedback from visitors and gallery
staff; the devising and incorporation of relevant information systems;
evaluation reports; and workshops, both "in-house" and public, to assess
objectives and outcomes. Feedback demonstrated how ROTOЯ increased access,
opportunity and understanding for a wider audience and shaped attitudes
and knowledge.
Hundreds of responses collected at Huddersfield Art Gallery indicated a
diverse range of ages (from as young as four) and nationalities (e.g.
French, American, Finnish, Irish) among visitors to the exhibitions [a].
This feedback also revealed different interpretations of content, the ways
in which visitors had been informed and inspired and how people's views of
the gallery and art in general had been changed. Comments included "Lots
of wonderful inspiration to take away", "Amazing and thought-provoking",
"A revelation" and "Great work — might help me with my ambitions". In an
online follow-up survey 60% of respondents said visiting the exhibitions
had changed their opinion about art and/or design, while 90% said they had
learnt something new [b]. Kimiyo Rickett, Assistant Director of Leisure
Services at Kirklees Council, has remarked: "ROTOЯ... has attracted new
audiences to the gallery and into the town centre. It has allowed people
to engage with research outside of the academic institution and has
provided new opportunities for people to share in and understand the
School's research. The exhibitions have been thought-provoking and
memorable." [c] Ruth Gamble, Huddersfield Art Gallery Manager, states,
`The partnership's really important — we're very aware at the moment that
we don't want the Art Gallery to be...standing alone in Huddersfield. We
want to be part of a bigger discussion about visual art, and involvement
and engagement...[ROTOЯ] meets a lot of our aims in terms of going
forward.' [g]
ROTOЯ has also strengthened community links and benefited a range of
local organisations, such as the Workers' Educational Association. Judith
Boardman, a tutor for Speakers of Other Languages with the WEA's Crosland
Moor branch, who led a group of multi-ethnic, adult learners on a visit to
a ROTOЯ exhibition, said: "[Before] they believed art was for other people
and not for them. This was completely changed by the visit. It was a
hugely successful trip and provoked lots of discussion... [which] further
enhanced learners' understanding of each other and helped cement
relationships of trust and respect." [c] The group's experience was later
used as a topic for discussion in a functional skills speaking and
listening exam and was also shared with and praised by WEA regional and
national managers. Other groups to have drawn on the ROTOЯ experience
include local performance dance group Turvey-World Dance, which
incorporated Sisyphus into two of its performances, and West
Yorkshire art and health organisation HOOT, which took inspiration from Sisyphus
for a workshop at the 2013 Grassington Festival and for work with people
with dementia [d]. ROTOЯ also collaborated with Kirklees Library to
disseminate exhibition content, leading to new book purchases and
increased lending. Kirklees Library assistants have reported a 50% rise in
borrowing for the books selected for the ROTOЯ reading group, including
some that were rarely borrowed previously, noting: "[ROTOЯ] has been very
positive... It brings the University into a different space." [g]
ROTOЯ has provided further cultural enrichment by acting as a conduit for
bringing nationally and internationally commended work to Huddersfield and
West Yorkshire. Sisyphus won the 7th International Arte
Laguna Prize, Venice, in March 2013, while Insufficient Allure
became a permanent exhibition (Behind the Seams) when it was
acquired by Leeds' Armley Industrial Museum following its ROTOЯ
appearance. ROTOЯ exhibitions have been reviewed in ROTOЯ Review
by (among others) art historian Jonathan Harris, feminist art critic
Griselda Pollock and Art Monthly's Peter Suchin, as well as in
(among others) The Independent, The Guardian and Frieze
[h]. Online surveys have shown ROTOЯ has strongly influenced views about
local culture, with visitors' comments including "It's more cutting-edge
than I had realised", "My ideas about its role in Huddersfield have
changed" and "[ROTOЯ] makes [the work] relevant to the broader public in
terms of cultural ownership" [b]. Rickett has noted: "We have a
huge number of creative industries [which] can benefit enormously from
having an interaction with the University. ROTOЯ helps to make that
connection and bring the work out to those people." [c]
Drawing on the ROTOЯ experience, in May 2013 the School organised a
symposium at London's Institute of Contemporary Arts to examine
methodologies of measuring public engagement to inspire new audiences and
practitioners via cost-effective public services [i]. Speakers at the
event, entitled Public Engagement and Impact: Articulating Value in
Art and Design, included Dr Claire Donovan, Reader in Assessing
Research Impact at Brunel University; Dr Sarah Shalgosky, Curator of the
Mead Gallery at the University of Warwick; Peter Murray CBE, Executive
Director of Yorkshire Sculpture Park; and Dr Paul Manners, Director of the
National Coordinating Centre for Public Engagement. Some 80% of delegates,
including artists, academics, cultural researchers and representatives of
national and international art venues, recognised a change in their
understanding of "public engagement". The related Engage website
attracted more than a thousand visits from 17 countries, while the ROTOЯ
weblog has received more than 4,000 visits from over 50 countries [j]. Dr
James Harvey, a research impact specialist at consultancy CommsConsult
Ltd, used ROTOЯ as a case study for an article on the Research to Action
website as an exemplar case study for other organisations involved in
partnerships.
Sources to corroborate the impact
a. Visitor transcripts and analysis: written-in-gallery feedback age
range, nationalities, cultural enrichment etc.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2-kBScAaLCYLXE1UDNMT0I3Tlk/edit?usp=sharing
b. Exhibition visitor feedback — transcripts and analysis of online
survey
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B2-kBScAaLCYRlFCSG82MFNNNVU/edit?usp=sharing
c. Stakeholder testimonials: Kimiyo Rickett, Assistant Director Kirklees
Communities and Leisure Communities, and Judith Boardman, ESOL and
functional skills tutor, Workers' Educational Association, Crosland Moor
group
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B2-kBScAaLCYLWtKZU1OUnlZeEE/edit?usp=sharing
d. Images of public engagement — evidence of interaction and
participation with school groups, Saturday Art Club, young people and
family workshops
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B2-kBScAaLCYb0RCMnBaalF4NEU/edit?usp=sharing
e. Images of artist/designer-led events (public talks, launch events,
reading groups, film screenings etc.)
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B2-kBScAaLCYV2tFbWJ2MVlSOWM/edit?usp=sharing
f. Images of public marketing, audience development and outreach
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B2-kBScAaLCYMXF5YjJ2OTlZeWM/edit?usp=sharing
g. Transcribed stakeholder interviews demonstrating changes in awareness
and understanding of art and design research, university/cultural sector,
developing cultural infrastructure etc.
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B2-kBScAaLCYeVJmZ2V0WU14M1U&usp=sharing
h. Media reviews (sample):
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B2-kBScAaLCYb0VXb0pvN2RhZlE/edit?usp=sharing
i. ICA symposium summary
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B2-kBScAaLCYay1KMHo4V1JWZTA/edit?usp=sharing
j. ROTOЯ weblog
www.transdisciplinarydialogueanddebate.com