Carbon and Methane exchanges in wetlands
Submitting Institution
Open UniversityUnit of Assessment
Earth Systems and Environmental SciencesSummary Impact Type
EnvironmentalResearch Subject Area(s)
Earth Sciences: Geochemistry
Environmental Sciences: Soil Sciences
Biological Sciences: Other Biological Sciences
Summary of the impact
Vincent Gauci and The Open University (OU) Ecosystems Research Group have
demonstrated
human influences over exchanges of carbon within vulnerable, temperate and
tropical wetland
ecosystems, which are the largest source of the powerful greenhouse gas
methane to the
atmosphere. The group's work showing that acid rain pollution suppresses
methane emissions
from wetlands has influenced policy in the UK, particularly peatland
restoration, where the group
has had direct interaction with users. The group's work on carbon balance
resulting from
deforestation, drainage and fires in the carbon-rich Bornean peat swamp
has also informed
IPCC methodologies for carbon balance calculations in its 2013 Wetlands
Supplement.
Underpinning research
Wetlands, and peatlands in particular, are among the largest surface
reservoirs of carbon and
the single largest source of methane to the atmosphere. Research by Dr
Gauci and the
Ecosystems Research Group has focused on human influences over the
stability of carbon
within temperate and tropical peatlands that have been subject to human
interference
(principally through drainage) and on the influence of human activity such
as pollution, climate
warming and CO2 enrichment on wetland methane emissions. The
group has been influential in
identifying that the deposition of pollution-derived sulfate in acid rain
dramatically reduces
emission of the powerful greenhouse gas methane (Gauci et al.,
2002) and that this `sulfate
suppression' of methane emissions may have been sufficient to offset
climate-driven growth in
the global wetland methane emission source into the middle of this century
(Gauci et al., 2004).
Critically, and given the reduction of sulfur pollution in industrialised
nations, the group has
identified the long-lived duration of the sulfate-suppression effect, i.e.
that recovery from
methane suppression by sulfate deposition may take several decades (Gauci
et al., 2005). This
is supported by research into the responses of wetland methane emissions
to individual high
sulfur emission events in history, such as the Icelandic Laki eruption of
1783-84 (Gauci et al.,
2008).
The work of Gauci and the Ecosystems Group has also extended to
understanding other forms
of carbon exchange within wetland ecosystems. Their recent work has
focused on variations in
carbon losses of peatlands into rivers, caused by deforestation, drainage
and fires in Bornean
peat swamps. These deposits are a particularly large reserve of carbon,
and the Open
University research demonstrated that these ecosystems are undergoing
instability and collapse
as a consequence of deforestation and land use change (Moore et al.,
2013). This was the first
such study to report fluvial carbon losses from forested as well as
deforested catchments, and
was the first to identify the age of the carbon that was lost. The group
found that the carbon lost
from forested ecosystems is modern and as such is tightly coupled to
current net primary
productivity. In contrast, the carbon lost from deforested and drained
peats was often thousands
of years old, in other words derived from the deep and ancient peat
reserves. Notably, the
oldest carbon lost originated in peatlands that had been converted to oil
palm agriculture. The
work was led by Gauci, who was senior and corresponding author on the
paper.
References to the research
Gauci, V., Matthews, E., Dise, N., Walter, B., Koch, D., Granberg, G. and
Vile, M. (2004) `Sulfate
suppression of the wetland methane source in the 20th and 21st centuries',
Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the USA, vol. 101, no. 34, pp.
12583-7.
Gauci, V., Dise, N. and Blake, S. (2005). Long-term suppression of
wetland methane flux following
a pulse of simulated acid rain', Geophysical Research Letters,
vol. 32(L12804).
Gauci, V., Blake, S., Stevenson, D.S. and Highwood, E.J. (2008) `Halving
of the northern wetland
CH4 source by a large Icelandic volcanic eruption', Journal
of Geophysical Research:
Biogeosciences, vol. 113, G00A11.
Moore, S., Gauci, V., Evans, C.D. and Page, S.E. (2011) `Fluvial organic
carbon losses from a
Bornean blackwater river', Biogeosciences, vol. 8, pp. 901-9.
Boardman, C.P., Gauci, V., Watson, J.S., Blake, S. and Beerling, D.J.
(2011) `Contrasting wetland
CH4 emission responses to simulated glacial atmospheric CO2
in temperate bogs and fens', New
Phytologist, vol. 192, no. 4, pp. 898-911.
Moore, S., Evans, C.D., Page, SE., Garnett, M.H., Jones, T.G., Freeman,
C., Hooijer, A., Wiltshire,
A.J., Limin, S.H. and Gauci, V. (2013) `Deep instability of deforested
tropical peatlands revealed by
fluvial organic carbon fluxes', Nature, vol. 493, pp. 660-3.
Relevant grants:
2012-15 £597,425 awarded by NERC to Gauci for a project entitled `The
contribution of trees
to tropical wetland methane emissions' (total ~£750k to all partners —
Universities of
Bristol, Leicester and Nottingham).
2011-15 £157,170 awarded by Defra to Gauci for a project entitled `Lowland
peatland
systems in England and Wales — evaluating greenhouse gas fluxes and carbon
balances', competition code CTE1103 (total grant value: £1,750,783).
2010-14 £184,543 awarded by Defra to Gauci for a project entitled
`Investigation of peatland
restoration (grip blocking) techniques to achieve best outcomes for
methane and
greenhouse gas emissions / balance', competition code: CTE0945
(total grant
value: £1,065,519).
2010-14 £306,512 awarded by NERC Network to Gauci for a project entitled
`MethaneNet'.
2009 £69,624 awarded by NERC to Gauci for a project entitled `Urgency:
Quantifying
fluvial carbon losses following the catastrophic 2009 peat swamp forest
fires of
Kalimantan, Borneo'.
2007-09 £23,347 awarded by The Wildlife Trusts and EEDA to Gauci as PI
and consultant
for a project entitled `Carbon balance and C offset potential of the Great
Fen
Project'.
2007-10 £21,008 awarded by NERC to Gauci for a project entitled
`Dissolved organic carbon
losses from natural and degraded tropical peatlands'.
Details of the impact
The impact of work by Dr Gauci and the Ecosystems Group has influenced
several groups of
policymakers and users, often by direct interaction and targeted research.
The research of Gauci and the Ecosystems Group demonstrated that acid
rain pollution
suppresses methane emissions from wetlands, and was featured in a US
Environmental Protection
Agency Report to Congress (Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions From
Natural Sources. United
States Environmental Protection Agency Report: Office of Atmospheric
Programs (6207J) EPA
430-R-10-001, Washington, DC 20460 April 2010). This led Defra to
investigate the potential role
of sulfur pollution in mitigating emissions from restored UK peatlands.
The economic potential of
understanding peatland carbon dynamics and the role of sulfate in
mitigating emissions has been
recognised by the Great Fen Project, which is taking the carbon balance
and offsetting of a great
swathe of the Cambridgeshire Fens into account in its future plans
(http://www.greatfen.org.uk/about/studies).
The work helped the Great Fen Project to recognise
that while its `re-wetting' conservation restoration strategy arrests
carbon loss by reducing carbon
oxidation, the high sulfate concentrations that exist within the fen peats
means that there are likely
to be lower methane emissions than could normally be expected to occur as
a consequence of
elevating the water-table. The work was influential in planning the
purchase of much of the area for
conservation, in part through marketing the scheme's carbon offsetting
potential and avoid carbon
losses.
Gauci and the Ecosystems Group's work on the fluvial carbon losses of
pristine and degraded
tropical forested peatlands in Borneo feeds directly into the IPCC
(Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change) and REDD (UN Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and
Forest Degradation
programme) processes, since they have provided the only currently
available data on dissolved
organic carbon (DOC) exchanges for such ecosystems. This understanding of
the carbon
dynamics of the ecosystems is essential in subjects covered by protocols
such as REDD, including
carbon offsetting, avoided carbon losses and mitigation of carbon losses,
because dissolved
organic carbon is the single largest carbon fraction lost from these
ecosystems via river drainage.
The Open University-led study was discussed in detail at three IPCC
workshops in Brazil,
Tanzania and Japan and is central for establishing the baseline for
natural DOC losses within the
IPCC Wetlands Supplement and for identifying a scaling factor for DOC
losses from drained
tropical peatlands. Annette Freibauer (one of the Coordinating Lead
Authors of Chapter 2 `Drained
Inland Organic Soils' of the 2013 Supplement to 2006 IPCC Guidelines for
National Greenhouse
Inventories: Wetlands), points out that the work:
`has been a very important scientific source in the development of
methodologies and
emission factors for DOC for drained and rewetted organic soils. The paper
has been quoted
in the scientific background text and has been used as one out of four
tropical studies for
DOC losses from natural ecosystems and as one out of two tropical studies
on which the
methodology for anthropogenic DOC losses was based. As these numbers show,
the
scientific literature on anthropogenic DOC losses in the tropics is very
limited so that this
paper has been of particularly high value for the 2013 IPCC Wetlands
Supplement.'
Given the contribution of DOC to understanding carbon balance within
these ecosystems, the
findings reported by Moore et al. (2013) will directly feed into future
REDD demonstration
projects that will have both local development and positive climate
benefits.
In the UK, findings of Gauci and The Open University group have helped
shape a Defra-supported
research programme to look at the carbon dynamics response to peatland
restoration
work that has been highlighted in a government Natural Environment White
Paper `Natural
Choice: Securing the value of nature'. The OU component of the research
was to work on intact
and restored lowland fen sites at Wicken in Cambridgeshire to understand
the exchanges of
greenhouse gases including methane, N2O and CO2. The
project has been identified in the
White Paper as research that will demonstrate `...how best to manage our
lowland peatlands in
a way that supports efforts to tackle climate change'. The group's
research into controls on
methane emissions feeds directly into an Open University-led international
research network on
methane (www.methanenet.org), which has hosted a discussion meeting on
methane mitigation
(November 2011) and a session on the same subject at a major international
meeting (Planet
Under Pressure 2012) associated with the UN `Rio+20' meeting. The meetings
involved
policymakers and Planet Under Pressure 2012 was specifically geared to
communicating
science to policymaking bodies and NGOs.
Sources to corroborate the impact
External sources corroborating impact:
- Eastern Research Group inc. (2010) Methane and Nitrous Oxide
Emissions. In: Natural
Sources. United States Environmental Protection Agency Report: Office of
Atmospheric
Programs (6207J) EPA 430-R-10-001, Washington, DC 20460 April 2010.
- IPCC Wetlands Supplement. Ch. 2 Drained Inland Organic Soils. http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/home/wetlands.html
- Open University report to the Great Fen is referred to prominently in
the master plan for the
area provided by LDA Design. http://www.greatfen.org.uk/great-fen-masterplan
- The Open University work is central to providing evidence in support
for the 2nd (climate
change) of 7 strategic drivers of the Great Fen plan
http://www.greatfen.org.uk/sites/default/files/Great%20Fen%20Masterplan_%20Section%203_Strategic%20Drivers%20444Kb_1.pdf
Beneficiaries who could be contacted to corroborate impact:
- UK scientific representative, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change expert group
- Lead coordinating author of IPCC Wetlands Supplement report
- Director of Living Landscapes, The Wildlife Trusts for Bedfordshire,
Cambridgeshire and
Northamptonshire
- Great Fen Project Manager (testimonial available on request)