Setting national minimum wages
Submitting Institution
London School of Economics & Political ScienceUnit of Assessment
Economics and EconometricsSummary Impact Type
EconomicResearch Subject Area(s)
Economics: Applied Economics
Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services: Business and Management
Studies In Human Society: Policy and Administration
Summary of the impact
Research by Alan Manning and colleagues at LSE's Centre for Economic
Performance (CEP) has contributed to widespread acceptance of the view
that minimum wages set at an appropriate level are a valuable tool of
public policy. CEP researchers had a direct impact on the design of the
UK's National Minimum Wage (NMW) and thus on the living standards of
poorer workers and their families. They provided the intellectual context
for the policy, advised on its implementation and evaluated its effects.
CEP research has had some initial impact on the introduction of the
minimum wage in Hong Kong. It has also influenced debates around the world
about the introduction or modification of minimum wages.
Underpinning research
RESEARCH INSIGHTS AND OUTPUTS: The research has been in three main areas.
1. Monopsony in the labour market: The conventional wisdom that minimum
wages must reduce employment comes in large part from a view that the
labour market is well approximated by the model of perfect competition.
Accordingly, anything that increases wages must then necessarily reduce
employment through a fall in the demand for labour. Manning's work on
monopsony argues that employers have significant market power over their
workers, an important implication of which is that the supply of labour
and how it responds to increasing wages are as important as the demand for
labour (1). Empirical validation of this theoretical analysis has
addressed concerns that minimum wages may destroy jobs and lead to an
increase rather than a reduction in inequality.
2. The effects of the minimum wage on employment: The common argument
against a minimum wage (that it destroys jobs) led in 1993 to the
Conservative government's abolition of the UK's Wages Councils, which had
previously set minimum wages in a number of low-paying industries. CEP
research analysed the effect of the minimum wages set by the Wages
Councils and concluded that there was no evidence that they had cost jobs
(2). Subsequent to the introduction of the NMW in 1999, CEP investigated
the impact on employment in a very low-wage labour market — care workers
in care homes (3). This study found some negative effects on employment
but they were small considering that 30% of workers were directly affected
by the minimum wage (the national average is about 5%).
3. The effects of the minimum wage on wage inequality: CEP research
investigated the short-run effects of the introduction of the UK's NMW on
wage inequality. It concluded that the only effect was to raise the wages
of workers who were directly affected, so the NMW benefitted only about 5%
of workers (4) and (5). More recent research (6) has concluded that, over
a longer time period, the NMW has had some spillover effects, influencing
the earnings of those paid above the minimum. This study found that the
NMW has played an important role in reducing wage inequality at the lower
end of the labour market, an effect that is particularly marked for women
and young people, as well as in low-wage regions.
KEY RESEARCHERS: Alan Manning has been full-time at LSE since 1993. Key
CEP colleagues have been: Stephen Machin (50% at LSE through this period);
Richard Dickens (full-time until 2000, 40% until 2006, now a research
affiliate).
References to the research
2. Dickens, Richard, Stephen Machin and Alan Manning (1999) `The Effect
of Minimum Wages on Employment: Theory and Evidence from Britain', Journal
of Labor Economics 17: 1-23. DOI: 10.1086/209911
3. Machin, Stephen, Alan Manning and Lupin Rahman (2003) `Where the
Minimum Wage Bites Hard: The Introduction of the UK National Minimum Wage
to a Low Wage Sector', Journal of the European Economic Association
1(1): 154-80. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/2452
4. Dickens, Richard and Alan Manning (2004) `Has the National Minimum
Wage Reduced UK Wage Inequality?' Journal of the Royal Statistical
Society Series A 167: 613-26. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2004.aeI2.x
5. Dickens, Richard and Alan Manning (2004) `Spikes and Spillovers: The
Impact of the National Minimum Wage on the Wage Distribution in a Low-wage
Sector', Economic Journal 114: C95-101. DOI:
10.1111/j.0013-0133.2003.00198.x
EVIDENCE OF QUALITY: Publications (2)-(5) are published in
top-ranked peer-reviewed journals and (6) is currently under review. (1)
has nearly 800 Google Scholar citations.
Details of the impact
NATURE OF THE IMPACT: Centre for Economic Performance (CEP) research on
minimum wages has: (a) had a direct impact on the initial design of the
UK's National Minimum Wage (NMW), a design that has persisted to the
present; (b) had some initial impact on the introduction of the minimum
wage in Hong Kong; and (c) continues to influence debates around the world
about the introduction or modification of minimum wages.
a. The UK's National Minimum Wage:
LSE research on the effect of minimum wages on employment had a large
impact on the initial deliberations of the Low Pay Commission (LPC) as it
provided the only credible UK evidence at that time. A 2009 report for the
ESRC by Frontier Economics found that `the consensus view from LPC
commissioners and CEP's research peers is that CEP research was the most
influential in terms of setting the minimum wage level' (see Source A).
Further: `in the case of the National Minimum Wage (NMW) we have been able
to provide some indication of the value generated by CEP research. Of
course, it is impossible to attribute with any precision the value
generated, but if we start with a gross benefit of £1.2 billion attributed
to the policy, then even if only 2% of that gross benefit is attributable
to CEP that equates to £24 million in 2008 prices.' Since the initial
structure of the minimum wage has been maintained over time, CEP work
continues to have impact, not least on living standards, as well as on the
thinking of the LPC (Source B).
In April 2012, Manning published a report for the Resolution Foundation's
Commission on Living Standards (Source C) which drew on CEP research to
make suggestions about how the NMW could be modified to have stronger
effects in a recession (Source C). This report attracted considerable
newspaper coverage and led to several radio interviews (28 media mentions
recorded). Its call for a modification of the mandate of the LPC to
recommend higher minimum wages in some sectors (eg banking) was adopted by
the Commission on Living Standards in its final report (Source D). Manning
is currently serving on the Resolution Foundation's expert panel on the
`Future of the National Minimum Wage and the Low Pay Commission', chaired
by George Bain, the founding chair of the LPC.
The impact of the research can also be seen in articles about minimum
wages in the media (Source E). For example, the `Free Exchange' column in
The Economist on 24 November 2012 was devoted to minimum wages. Two
of the seven articles referred to were by Alan Manning and The
Economist column referred to `monopsony' as the main reason why
minimum wages might not reduce jobs. Increasing acceptance among
mainstream economic commentators of the view that labour markets might
have monopsonistic aspects is an important secondary impact of the
underpinning research.
b. Beyond the UK: CEP's expertise on NMWs is in demand from other
countries.
Direct: 1. Hong Kong introduced a minimum wage for the first time
in 2011. The process by which that decision was made involved looking at
research done in other countries, including the research cited here on the
UK. The legislation that was introduced cites references (1), (2), (4) and
(5) from section 3, as well as other research on the topic by LSE-based
researchers (Source F).
Indirect 2i. United States: in his 2013 State of the Union Address,
President Obama proposed raising the federal minimum wage from $7.25 to
$9.00 per hour. Manning's research on monopsony has been cited as one reason
the minimum wage may not destroy jobs — for example, in a document produced
by the DC-based Center for Economic and Policy Research. Manning has also
written about the Obama proposal for the Milken Institute Review (Source G).
2ii. Germany: there has been an active debate in Germany over several
years about the introduction of a minimum wage — as opposed to minimum pay
rates set in local collective agreements — culminating in an announcement
by Angela Merkel on 25 April 2012 of plans to introduce a national minimum
wage.The UK experience has been regarded as of particular relevance for
informing that debate. For example, The Economist of 5 November
2011 wrote that: `the CDU seems to be heeding newer British and American
ideas'. Manning's expertise has been called on by a variety of people in
Germany, as evidenced by his meetings with German civil servants, radio
interviews, quotations in the press and a commission to write an article
on the UK experience for Focus magazine, which has a weekly
circulation of 500,000, the third largest in Germany (Source H).
2iii. Wider international debates: there is interest in many European
countries about what can and cannot be achieved by minimum wages and
Manning contributes significantly to the public debate. For example, in
December 2011, Manning was invited to speak to a meeting of academics and
trade unionists at the European Trade Union Institute in Brussels about
the UK experience. Globally, organisations like the OECD and the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) have changed their recommendations to be
more supportive of the use of minimum wages. A joint report by the OECD,
the IMF, the World Bank and the International Labour Organization (ILO)
for the G20 labour ministers' meeting in June 2012 wrote that `a statutory
minimum wage set at an appropriate level may raise labour force
participation at the margin, without adversely affecting demand, thus
having a net positive impact especially for workers weakly attached to the
labour market', a markedly more positive view than expressed in the past
(Source I). In March 2012, Manning was invited by Singapore's Ministry of
Trade and Industry and Civil Service College to advise on how Singapore
might combat rising wage inequality, which, combined with a slowing
overall rate of growth, has led to stagnant or even falling living
standards for low-wage workers (Source J).
WHY THE IMPACT MATTERS: Well-organised National Minimum Wage
schemes reduce poverty and wage inequality. LSE research has contributed
to this goal in several countries. In 2010, the Institute of
Government voted the minimum wage the most successful UK policy of
the last 30 years — a view reiterated in the Financial Times in
July 2013.
Sources to corroborate the impact
All sources listed below can also be seen at: https://apps.lse.ac.uk/impact/case-study/view/17
A. The 2009 Frontier Economics report for the ESRC — `Measuring the
Impact of ESRC Funding' — at: https://apps.lse.ac.uk/impact/download/file/1334
B. The 2009 LPC annual report cited publications (1), (2) and (3) from
section 3; the 2010 report cited publications (3) and (5); and the 2011
and 2012 reports both cited publications (1), (2) and (5). The Financial
Times article is available at: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1265614e-f9f0-11e2-b8ef-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2bD28unBq
https://apps.lse.ac.uk/impact/download/file/1335
https://apps.lse.ac.uk/impact/download/file/1336
https://apps.lse.ac.uk/impact/download/file/1337
https://apps.lse.ac.uk/impact/download/file/1338
https://apps.lse.ac.uk/impact/download/file/1339
C. The report for the Resolution Foundation. For evidence of the impact
of the report, see the New Statesman. https://apps.lse.ac.uk/impact/download/file/1341
https://apps.lse.ac.uk/impact/download/file/1342
D. See: the final report of the Commission for Living Standards:
https://apps.lse.ac.uk/impact/download/file/1343
E. The article in The Economist on minimum wages that cites the
underpinning research; this article cites publication (5) from section 3
as well as the report for the Resolution Foundation. https://apps.lse.ac.uk/impact/download/file/1344
F: The Hong Kong Legislative Council Brief citing several CEP
publications is available at:
https://apps.lse.ac.uk/impact/download/file/1345
G. US: The Center for Economic and Policy Research document that cites
the research on monopsony — `Why Does the Minimum Wage Have No Discernible
effect on Employment?'; and Manning's article for the July 2013 Milken
Institute Review `+25%: To Raise, or Not to Raise, the Minimum Wage —
Again'. https://apps.lse.ac.uk/impact/download/file/1346
https://apps.lse.ac.uk/impact/download/file/1347
H. Germany: The Economist is at: http://www.economist.com/node/21536648.
For official references :(http://www.bmwi.de/BMWi/Navigation/Service/publikationen,did=323736.html)
and (http://www.bmas.de/DE/Themen/Arbeitsrecht/Meldungen/evaluation-mindestloehne.html).
Manning
had interviews reported in Die Welt)
(http://www.welt.de/politik/ausland/article13690154/Der-britische-Mindestlohn-Vorbild-fuer-Deutschland.html)
and Frankfurter Algemeine Zeitung
(http://www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/grossbritannien-der-mindestlohn-ist-keine-wunderwaffe-11514284.html).
I. International organisations: for details of Manning's talk to the
European Trade Union Institute, see: http://www.etui.org/Events/What-do-we-and-what-don-t-we-know-about-minimum-wages-in-Europe.
The joint report by the IMF, the OECD, the World Bank and the ILO.
https://apps.lse.ac.uk/impact/download/file/1351
J. Singapore: A summary of one of Manning's talks in Singapore.
https://apps.lse.ac.uk/impact/download/file/1353