Ordinary lives in the German dictatorships: Public understanding of and education on the Third Reich and the German Democratic Republic
Submitting Institution
University College LondonUnit of Assessment
Modern Languages and LinguisticsSummary Impact Type
CulturalResearch Subject Area(s)
Language, Communication and Culture: Cultural Studies
History and Archaeology: Historical Studies
Summary of the impact
The research has had an impact on public understanding of the contested
German past. Pathways include public lectures, radio broadcasts, newspaper
coverage, and the production of two documentary films as well as A Level
source materials and school textbook chapters. The reach has included
diverse audiences in Europe, the USA, Australasia and elsewhere. It has
improved the knowledge and understanding of students and teachers in the
UK, professionals involved in public history activities in Germany and
interested members of the public. In the Rhineland, it has led to changes
in how the legacies of former officials are commemorated. The research has
been of particular personal significance to people variously grappling
with the continuing legacies of Nazism and the Holocaust, and the East
German dictatorship.
Underpinning research
Mary Fulbrook's research at UCL German has focussed on the ways in which
people are both shaped by the historical periods into which they are born,
and in turn contribute to sustaining, challenging and transforming the
regimes through which they live. She has concentrated particularly on the
German dictatorships of the twentieth century.
Fulbrook's AHRC-funded (2002-06) research project on the German
Democratic Republic (GDR) developed a more complex paradigm than that of
the widely prevalent and politically useful but theoretically problematic
notion of `totalitarianism'. Fulbrook and her team argued (for example
[a], [b] below) that, in contrast to dichotomous approaches focussing on
`state' versus `society', or `regime' versus `people', it is crucial to
explore transformations of social attitudes and behaviour, and the ways in
which East Germans were actively involved in a `participatory
dictatorship'.
Her research on generations in Germany from 1905 to 1995 [c], sought to
bring together the levels of historical events and structures with
patterns of behaviour and culturally filtered subjective experiences,
analysed from the perspective of social generations. This research
analysed the experiences of different age cohorts across the century, but
focussed on two: the first `war youth generation', born in the first
decade of the twentieth century, many of whom proved to be crucial
carriers of Nazism (and a small minority of whom were among the founding
fathers of the GDR); and the `1929ers', born in the later years of the
Weimar Republic and socialised primarily under Nazism, but who in an
extraordinary historical twist became the most reliable and committed
supporters of the subsequent communist dictatorship, the GDR. By analysing
the lives of selected individuals facing challenges distinctive to their
generations, this project developed a new interpretation of experiences of
living through the Third Reich and GDR, and, more generally, a new
historical approach as `history from within'.
In A Small Town near Auschwitz: Ordinary Nazis and the Holocaust
[d], Fulbrook explored the development of Nazi racist policies and
genocide in Będzin, a small town and county in Eastern Upper Silesia, just
25 miles north of Auschwitz. Some 85,000 Jews were deported through the
linked ghettos of Będzin-Sosnowiec; almost all the Jewish citizens of
Będzin, around half the total population of this town, were murdered as a
result of Nazi oppression; yet it has virtually escaped the attention of
historians. Moreover, the role of mid-level civilian functionaries in
creating the preconditions for the Holocaust has only recently become the
subject of historical research. Civilian administrators have also almost
entirely escaped public conceptions of `perpetrators', who are generally
seen as those engaged in direct physical acts of violence rather than the
behind-the- scenes administration of ghettoization and policies of
stigmatisation, exploitation, expropriation and starvation. Fulbrook's
research focused primarily on the role and later self-representations of
the Landrat (chief executive or principal civilian administrator)
of Będzin, Udo Klausa, who went on to a successful postwar career in the
West German civil service as the first Director of the Rhineland Regional
Council. Based on a range of sources, including private letters from the Landrat's
wife during the war, contemporary archival sources, the records of
subsequent legal investigations, the Landrat's 1980 memoirs, and
survivor testimonies and oral history interviews, the book explores the
implications of `systemic violence' and the role of German civilian
administrators as `Hitler's willing functionaries'. It also reflects on
the character of later memories, in an effort to probe beyond the familiar
focus on acts of physical violence and atrocities, and on the subjective
role of the historian in confronting this history.
References to the research
[a] Mary Fulbrook, The People's State: East German Society from
Hitler to Honecker (Yale University Press, 2005). Available on
request.
[b] Mary Fulbrook (ed.), Power and Society in the GDR, 1961-1979: The
`Normalisation of Rule'? (Berghahn, 2009). Submitted to REF2; also
available on request.
[c] Mary Fulbrook, Dissonant Lives: Generations and Violence through
the German Dictatorships (Oxford University Press, 2011). Submitted
to REF2.
[d] Mary Fulbrook, A Small Town near Auschwitz: Ordinary Nazis and
the Holocaust (Oxford University Press, 2012) Joint winner, Fraenkel
Prize in Contemporary History. Submitted to REF2.
[e] Mary Fulbrook and Andrew Port (eds.), Becoming East Germans:
Socialist Structures and Sensibilities since Hitler (Berghahn,
2013). Submitted to REF2; also available on request.
Key grants:
Mary Fulbrook (PI). Reverberations of War: Communities of Experience
and Identification in Germany and Europe since 1945. AHRC 2010-15
£848,828.00 Led to results available in [e].
Mary Fulbrook Generations in twentieth-century Germany.
Leverhulme Trust Three-year Major Research Fellowship. 2006-09 £126,206.
Led to [c] and [d].
Mary Fulbrook (PI) The `Normalisation of Rule'? State and Society in
the GDR, 1961-1979 AHRC 2002-06 £281,106. Graded end of grant report
evaluated as `Outstanding' by the AHRC Panel. Led to [a] and [b].
Details of the impact
Recent German history continues to arouse strong emotions. Fulbrook's
work on the German dictatorships has contributed to enhanced understanding
among a range of beneficiaries, including regional government
representatives, students in secondary, further and higher education,
families of survivors and perpetrators, and members of the public
nationally and internationally.
Fulbrook's research has reached an international public audience, and
in doing so has increased public engagement with an important but little
discussed topic: not only the experiences of victims, but also the
role of functionaries in keeping the machinery of the Third Reich running,
as well as later self-representations. This impact was conveyed through
the publication of a widely read book, substantial media appearances
(including on television and radio and in newspapers) reaching several
million people between 2012 and July 2013 alone [1].
In the few months between publication (September 2012 in the UK, December
2012 in the USA) and July 2013, A Small Town near Auschwitz, sold
5,145 copies worldwide (hardback and ebook). It received acclamatory
reviews in the international literary press. The New York Review of
Books called it a `milestone in Holocaust historiography' (20 June
2013; circ. 135,000). The Times Literary Supplement (15 February
2013, circ. 100,000) suggested that `few bring the professional and the
personal into such compelling conjunction'. Jonathan Yardley, reviewing
what he called `this fine book' in the Washington Post (1 December
2012, digital and print daily readership 474,767), says that the account
is `absolutely necessary to an understanding' of the events and their
wider significance. The Methodist Recorder (8 March 2013, 22,000)
stated the book had relevance for understanding the human capacity for
`complicity in evil acts' [1].
The reach of this engagement was widened through radio programmes in
several countries, including BBC Radio 3 Night Waves (27 September 2012;
1.9m weekly station listeners); City Talk 105.9 (24 October 2012: 60,000);
Radio City 97.7 (24 October 2012; 428,000) Newstalk Radio, Dublin (237,000
daily listeners);. Circulation figures for newspaper coverage, in addition
to the above, include: The Guardian (digital and print monthly
readership 8.95 million), The Observer (223,588); BBC History
magazine (80,009); Who Do You Think You Are? Magazine
(22,642); Camden New Journal (69,323). Cross-media posting further
widened visibility e.g. the Washington Post review was posted on
the Auschwitz Museum Twitter feed (1 December 2012, 3,256 followers) and
included in the American Society for Yad Vashem's bi-monthly journal Martyrdom
and Resistance (January-February 2013). An interview with Marshall
Poe for the `New Books in History' website was downloaded 34,500 times
between December 2012 and July 2013.
Between November 2012 and July 2013 Fulbrook also delivered public talks
at home and abroad, including two of the biggest UK literary festivals at
Oxford and Hay-on-Wye where audience numbers averaged some 400 and
included members of the general public, along with historians, educators
and people with personal connections to the Holocaust. Other events were
organised by: the Pears Institute for the Study of Antisemitism; Spiro
Ark; the Wiener Library; and the Institute for Jewish Studies. In New
York, Fulbrook was invited to speak to public audiences at the Jewish Book
Council in May 2012; Queens New York Jewish Community Council on 28 March
2013; and the Fraternal Order of Bendiner-Sosnowicer on 31 March 2013,
where survivors and members of families from the Będzin area were present
[4].
The significance of this impact was as diverse as the audiences.
Individuals from both Jewish and non-Jewish backgrounds around the world
have emphasised how much the book has affected their understanding of
themselves, their families and communities. In the German press, for
example, an open letter to Fulbrook in a Rheinland newspaper thanked her
for both enlightening the writer about the `the big question of how it was
ever possible for the "Third Reich" to have developed in what was a
"Kulturnation"` as well as making aspects of the writer's own troubled
relationship with his `ordinary perpetrator' father more comprehensible.
Fulbrook has also received many personal e-mails. One German wrote: `On a
personal level it was a veritable eye opener of how we as a family have
rationalised my own grand-father's role in the fascist system'. An
American wrote: `Most importantly, you have made me ask myself a very
uncomfortable question. Where in 2012 are our blinkers?' A child of
survivors wrote that this is `a personal and important book that should
generate a lot of discussion about the German organizational structure
that allowed the murder of our Polish Jewish families to happen with
bureaucratic precision and antiseptic decision-making. And then convinced
themselves that they were innocent.' Many more could be quoted [5].
Fulbrook's research also contributed to changing the way in which the
legacy of a German administrator was commemorated by his successors.
Central to Fulbrook's research [d] was the complicated legacy of Udo
Klausa (the former Nazi civilian administrator of Będzin and the first
post-war Director of the Rhineland Regional Council (LVR) in North-Rhine
Westphalia 1954-1975). On 30 May 2012 Fulbrook delivered a public lecture
at Düsseldorf University to an audience including current representatives
of the Rhineland Regional Council. As a result of Fulbrook's research the
Rhineland Regional Council withdrew from their website an adulatory
biography of Klausa and amended their public exhibitions [6].
Research on the GDR also reached a wide public through panel events and
media presentations, leaving an online legacy in podcasts and transcripts.
These ranged from an event with the President of the Humboldt University
Berlin, through small discussions with former dissidents and Christians in
a church in East Berlin, to an interview with Geraldine Doogue on
`Saturday Extra', Australian Broadcasting Corporation's Radio National, 7
November 2009 (weekly audience 126,000). The significance of Fulbrook's
work on `perfectly normal lives' in the GDR for German self-understandings
and public debates is reflected in both popular and scholarly reviews,
including the prestigious daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (14
Jan 2009), the Göttingen Institute for Research on Democracy (18 May 2010)
and the Institute for Civic Education [7].
Fulbrook's research has influenced the teaching of modern German
history in secondary schools, and been used to develop widely
used educational resources. In 2007, she released a documentary film
on the GDR, Behind the Wall: `Perfectly Normal Lives' in the GDR,
based on the AHRC-sponsored collaborative research project and using
archival material, location footage, and oral history interviews. 1,000
copies of the film were distributed and it has been adopted for teaching
and extracurricular purposes in universities and public education centres
in the USA, Europe and the UK, such as Queen Mary University of London
(QMUL); benefits for learning outcomes include the `appeal to students to
learn about individual experience via filmed interviews' [8]. Sections of
the film were also adopted as teaching materials for the OCR A Level
history syllabus.
Fulbrook was requested to write chapters 5 and 6 in Dictatorship and
Democracy in Germany 1919-1963 (Heinemann: OCR History A Level,
2008), and collate research-based sources for the accompanying LiveText
materials and CD Rom. These materials were based on Fulbrook's GDR
research, and constituted a major section of the module `Germany under
Democracy and Dictatorship' in the OCR History A Level Board's revised
syllabus. Since its adoption in 2008, over 6,500 copies have been sold and
the newly revised materials have been positively reviewed by secondary
educators for The Historical Association [9].
Between 2008 and 2013 Fulbrook delivered 15 lectures in Sovereign
Education programmes around the UK to audiences averaging 200-300 A level
students and teachers. Sovereign Education state that her presentations
`have always been a highlight for the students and their teachers' and
that students and teachers `are aware of the valuable contribution she has
made to their A level understanding and performance'. Indeed, `many go
away inspired to continue their studies in history at university'. Their
evaluation records cite an `animated and enthusiastic speaker who engaged
the students with a good range of useful, relevant material and ideas'
[10].
Sources to corroborate the impact
[1] An estimate of around 12 million can be calculated from all known
media viewership and listenership figures, available on request.
Sales figures corroborated by Academic and Trade Department, Oxford
University Press.
NYRB, 20 Jun 2013: http://bit.ly/1cCD3IN
and circulation: http://bit.ly/15OJt5M;
Jane Caplan, `Balancing Acts', Times Literary Supplement, 15 Feb
2013; TLS circulation: http://bit.ly/18t86pO;
Washington Post, 1 Dec 2012: http://wapo.st/16kVXzf;
circulation: http://bit.ly/1d3aOpl. Methodist
Recorder circulation: http://bit.ly/1i2c89N.
[2] Radio station audiences: BBC3 http://bit.ly/19QlX81;
City Talk http://bit.ly/1fIGwte;
Radio City
http://bit.ly/H5NwCb; Newstalk Radio,
Dublin: http://bit.ly/18a71io.
Newspaper articles and readership: The Guardian, 16 September
2012: http://bit.ly/1c2k5P0;
readership: http://bit.ly/1au9Ex5; The
Observer: http://bit.ly/19RoVXz;
for BBC History Magazine and Who do you think you are?
Magazine see `PPA Marketing Combined Circulation Chart', 14 Feb
2013, available online; http://bit.ly/19eDGH3.
Washington Post review reprinted in:
http://bit.ly/19YaIwn [PDF]. NBH
interview: http://bit.ly/16gAmgM.
[4] Examples of talks at festivals: http://bit.ly/1fIJeyX;
Bendin-Sosnowicer Fraternal Order: http://on.fb.me/1c2n21U.
[5] Open letter (2 Jan 2013): http://bit.ly/1fIJmyk;
Personal e-mails: examples available on request.
[6] Statement provided by the Director, Landschaftsverband Rheinland.
Changes in presentation of Udo Klausa's contribution described in news
article in Neue Rheinische Zeitung 1 Dec 2012:
http://bit.ly/H8fpIV.
[7] Interview in a Cologne newspaper: Kölner Stadt Anzeiger: http://bit.ly/18tdo4E. GDR podium
discussion at Humboldt University: http://bit.ly/19Rrr05.
Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 14 Dec 2009: http://bit.ly/19Qr489;
http://www.hu-bildungswerk.de/onlinearchiv/themen-ddr-geschichte.pdf.
[8] For example, a syllabus and statement from a QMUL lecturer on use of
Behind the Wall is available on request. GDR Museum recommendation
of film: http://bit.ly/16kZtJP.
[9] OCR syllabus: http://bit.ly/GU8kMn
[PDF], p. 46. Historical Association Review:
http://bit.ly/19YcHkf. Sales
corroborated by Product Manager, History, Pearson PLC.
[10] Statement from Sovereign Education confirming reception of
Fulbrook's lectures to secondary school students.