8. Cardiff University research on values changes focus of charitable campaigns.
Submitting Institution
Cardiff UniversityUnit of Assessment
Psychology, Psychiatry and NeuroscienceSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Economics: Applied Economics
Studies In Human Society: Sociology
Summary of the impact
Professionals in the third sector have changed the key messages of their
campaigns as a result of
research from Cardiff University. In this research it was shown that
people were more likely to be
eco-friendly when campaigns appealed to their concern for the welfare of
others, rather than
financial savings. The findings have stimulated ongoing debate among
eco-campaigners and a
wider range of professionals in the third sector, government, the national
press and online
publications. Leading international non-governmental organisations (NGOs)
such as Worldwide
Fund for Nature (WWF) and Oxfam have formed the Common Cause
initiative to improve their
communication practices and this has led to changes in campaigning
strategy.
Underpinning research
Before 2009, campaigns promoting eco-friendly behaviour often assumed
that citizens could be
encouraged to engage in green behaviour by arguing that eco-friendly
action was in their own
interests, for example by saving them money or gaining them status.
Charities and NGOs were
unaware of the benefits of emphasising values other than personal,
material gains.
Ambition vs. philanthropy
For more than a decade, Greg Maio (Lecturer in Social Psychology from
1997 to Professor since
2004) and his research team at Cardiff University's School of Psychology
have been conducting
experiments on the psychology of values. Building on promising results
from earlier ESRC-funded
projects linking values to emotion and behaviour,3.5, 3.6 they
conducted a series of experiments
between 2005 and 2009 in which they examined the effects of values on how
people behave.
In one study the researchers asked participants to sort words from a
list. One group was asked to
pick out words like "ambitious" and "successful," while a second group was
asked to find words like
"forgiving" and "honest." Both groups were then asked to complete a puzzle
and to say whether
they would help with further research for free. Those who had been asked
to find words linked to
ambition became better at solving the puzzle, but more importantly they
were less likely to offer
help. The findings and subsequent replications were published in the Journal
of Personality and
Social Psychology.3.1
This research suggested that, counter to assumptions underpinning
campaigning work, an
emphasis on benefits like money or status is not the best way to encourage
behaviour change.
Between 2009 and 2011, Maio's team specifically tested this idea in
relation to `green' behaviour.
In one set of experiments, participants who were asked to think about
financial rewards for car-sharing
subsequently recycled their waste less than participants who thought about
the
environmental benefits of car-sharing. Emphasising self-interest rather
than the environment
resulted in less recycling — a green behaviour that was not even mentioned
to participants during
the experiment. The results of these experiments were published in Nature
Climate Change,3.2 and
pre-publication presentations of this work led to invited blog
contributions on the role of values on
two NGO websites.3.3, 3.4
References to the research
1. Maio, G. R., Pakizeh, A., Cheung, W., & Rees,
K. J. (2009). Changing, priming, and
acting on values: Effects via motivational relations in a circular model.
Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 699-715. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0016420
[ISI Impact factor = 5.07; Ranked 1 of all empirical journals in social
psychology; see
http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/psp/index.aspx]
2. Evans, L., Maio, G. R., Corner, A., Hodgetts, C. J., Ahmed, S.,
& Hahn, U. (2012). Self-interest
and pro-environmental behavior. Nature Climate Change, 3,
122-125.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1662
[New journal from the Nature Publishing Group. Impact factor due in 2013;
see
http://www.nature.com/nclimate/about/index.html]
Note: Cardiff researchers in bold.
Key funding sources
5. Maio, G. R., & Haddock, G. (2003-2005). Implicit
and Explicit bases of values: Implications
for behaviour change. Economic and Social Research Council
(RES-000-22-0519).
£46,890. Graded: "Outstanding". See http://www.esrc.ac.uk/my-esrc/grants/RES-000-22-0519/read.
6. Tapper, K., Maio, G. R., Haddock, G., & Lewis, M.
(2009-2012). Lifestyle change: Values
and volition. Economic and Social Research Council (RES-062-23-1529).
£424,490. See
http://www.esrc.ac.uk/my-esrc/grants/RES-062-23-1529/read
Details of the impact
`Adding value' to environmental campaigning
The experiments conducted by Maio's team showed that environmental
campaigns that seek to
encourage greener behaviour by appealing to self-interest run the risk of
backfiring, and that they
are more likely to be effective if they appeal to altruistic values.
The findings of Maio's research were brought to the attention of campaign
professionals at WWF
by an American psychologist (Prof. Tim Kasser, Knox College). Maio was
then invited to explain
his work to NGOs (esp. WWF and Scope), campaign professionals and
practitioners through
contributions to key publications, workshops and blog contributions, the
most important of which
are highlighted below.
Establishment of Common Cause
Perhaps most significantly, the research helped to provide impetus for a
project called Common
Cause for Nature, which is now a network comprising people around
the globe (in excess of 1100
Twitter followers, 600 Facebook likes), organisations in seven principal
nations (Australia, Austria,
Belgium, Brazil, South Africa, Sweden, UK), three sponsor NGOs (Oxfam,
Public Interest
Research Centre, and WWF-UK), and many other NGOs that have contributed
financially or in kind
(e.g., Friends of the Earth, Scope). With help from Maio and other
academics, Common Cause
produced a guide to disseminate the evidence of values-based communication
to diverse public,
commercial, and third-sector groups; the Cardiff evidence is cited
frequently in the section "How
We Use Values",5.1 and this guide has been downloaded more than
7000 times.5.2
The influence of the Cardiff research is also documented in the full
report, Common Cause: The
case for working with our cultural values.5.3 Section 2.4
of this publication describes the Cardiff
experiments in detail and cites the research as evidence that it may be
counter-productive to
attempt to motivate behaviour that addresses societal problems by using
strategies that activate
values related to self-interest (p. 34).
New campaigning focus
Through Common Cause, NGOs and environmental organisations have
re-configured their
environmental campaigns. The Change Strategist for WWF-UK says that the
Cardiff research has
"directly informed WWF's work on Earthbook, and [led to] a change in the
way that Waste Watch
campaigns on recycling. In the case of Waste Watch's work on recycling,
for example, it has led to
a move away from a focus on information provision, and towards the
engagement of audiences
through appeal to self-transcendence values (through, for example, making
concerns about
community more salient)... it has also led to the initiation of a wide
range of enquiries that are likely
to influence future campaigns and communications."5.4 An
extended discussion of the implications
of the Cardiff research, written by the same commentator, can be found in
an article in Nature
Climate Change.5.5
Global policy re-think
These ideas have also stimulated policy debates on the environment with
government (especially
the Scottish and Welsh Assemblies), diverse NGOs and the general public
through a number of
practice and policy workshops, many of which are documented in an
independent impact
assessment by PIER Logistics.5.6 This assessment involved
interviewing 10 prominent
stakeholders, including the Welsh and Scottish Assemblies, environmental
NGOs, and
independent research and strategy consultancies. The interviews yielded
ample evidence that
Maio's research has influenced approaches to government policy and to
campaigning. For
example, with respect to policy, a Senior Policy Officer for WWF Scotland
noted that Maio's
research has "gone into the Scottish government's strategy for meeting its
climate change targets."
With respect to campaigning, a Principal Research Officer with the
Scottish Government stated
that Maio's research has had "a profound effect on Scottish government ...
the way we
communicate about climate-change behaviours," while the Director of Waste
Watch noted that the
research "had proven powerful in getting NGOs to rethink the
market/consumer approach to
consciousness raising."
Public debate
According to the Director of the Public Interest Research Centre, Maio's
participation in Common
Cause workshops across the UK has helped to make campaigners in the
third sector and in the
public sector more mindful of the role of values: "It's clear that
delegates are more persuaded by
hearing the evidence first-hand from scientists than through an
intermediary. As a result,
campaigners and professionals in the third sector and public sector have
become much more
mindful of the values that they engage in their campaigns and projects."5.7
The Common Cause website,5.2 set up by the sponsoring
NGOs in July 2011, also plays a
prominent role as a public discussion forum on the topic of values-led
communication. It contains
relevant readings, audio and video (including a Tedx talk citing Maio's
research and a brief
illustration of the evidence by Maio). As documented by the PIER Logistics
report,5.6 the Common
Cause organisation has become a key independent vehicle for the
international impact of Maio's
research "in for instance, Sweden, Australia, South Africa, Brazil,
Brussels" (p. 7). Its international
footprint is evident with over 4484 visits per month to its website in the
past year, and 40% from
overseas.5.7 The report also notes that, through Common
Cause, the implications of Maio's
research for environmental campaigning have stimulated public debate via
national media interest
in the UK, in newspapers such as The Guardian and Wired. For
example, a feature article by
George Monbiot drew directly on research conducted by Maio and others and
in doing so
referenced the Common Cause report.5.8
Sources to corroborate the impact
- Common Cause Handbook. http://valuesandframes.org/handbook/.
Download data under
http://valuesandframes.org/learn/.
Confirms the contribution of Maio to the Handbook (p. 4)
and to the corpus of evidence (see pp. 18, 26, 27, 58; Refs 17 [erratum
16 in bibliography],
18, 38-40, 49, 50, 77), as well as the high readership. [Handbook saved
as pdf on 17.1.12
and available on request from the HEI]
- Main site: http://valuesandframes.org/.
Website (column on the right-hand side) confirms
download statistics for the Common Cause Handbook, which was aided by
Maio and other
academics (see source 5.3). Video presentation of Maio discussing his
research under
http://valuesandframes.org/event/common-cause-workshop/,
with link to Tedx talk citing
Maio's research (right column) or directly stored at http://tedxtalks.ted.com/video/The-Conscience-Industry-Tom-Cro;search%3ATom%20Crompton;
[Main site saved as pdf on
18.7.13 and available on request from the HEI]
- Crompton, T. (2010). Common Cause: The case for working with our
cultural values.
http://assets.wwf.org.uk/downloads/common_cause_report.pdf.
Section 2.4 of this
publication describes the Cardiff experiments in detail and cites the
research as evidence
against motivating behaviour to tackle societal problems by using
strategies that activate
values related to self-interest (p. 34). [Saved as pdf on 21.9.10 and
available on request
from the HEI]
- Statement from Change Strategist, World Wildlife Foundation. Confirms
that the Cardiff
research changed NGO approaches to communication, for example, by
directly informing
WWF's work on Earthbook and the way that Waste Watch campaigns on
recycling.
- Crompton, T. (2011). Values matter. Nature Climate Change, 1,
276-277.
http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v1/n6/full/nclimate1196.html?WT.ec_id=NCLIMATE-201109".
Article in new premier international journal on climate change
independently
attests to the relevance of the Cardiff research for environmental
behavior change. [Saved
as pdf on 3.5.13 and available on request from the HEI]
- Watermeyer, R. (2013). Changing how campaigns tackle environmental
degradation. PIER
Logistics Impact Reconnaissance Report. Independent research audit
confirms impact
among user-communities, discussion in online news media, and global
reach, through a
series of interviews with stakeholders, web links to articles, and
Google analytic data.
[Available on http://psych.cf.ac.uk/via/news_events/,
"Encouraging Impact Report from
PIER Logistics"] [Saved as pdf on 18.7.13 and available on request from
the HEI]
- Statement from Director of Public Interest Research Centre (http://www.pirc.info/about/).
Confirms
that Maio's presentations at workshops have helped make campaigners in
the
third sector and public sector more mindful of the values that they
engage in their
campaigns and projects.
- An example article from The Guardian can be found here:
http://www.monbiot.com/2010/10/11/the-values-of-everything/.
[Saved as pdf on 13.9.13
and available on request from HEI]
All publications and evidence available on request from the HEI.