The impact of Installation art on Curating, Collaborations between artists and curators and Artists’ Writing
Submitting Institution
London Metropolitan UniversityUnit of Assessment
Art and Design: History, Practice and TheorySummary Impact Type
CulturalResearch Subject Area(s)
Studies In Creative Arts and Writing: Art Theory and Criticism, Film, Television and Digital Media, Other Studies In Creative Arts and Writing
Summary of the impact
This case study demonstrates the impact of the Cass' research that has
promoted and supported the now pivotal role of Installation art and
Artists' Writing on the wider field of artistic and curatorial practice
over the last decade and more specifically since 2008.
The body of research based on de Oliveira/Oxley's activities as curators
and writers has been instrumental in the development of emerging forms of
practice and critical discourse. Installation art highlighted significant
changes in the understanding of the idea of the `medium', the institution
and the relationship between artists, curators and audiences. This
research is documented on their website www.writinginstallation.org.
Underpinning research
Key Findings and Insights
Installation art moved from a more marginal practice in the1980s and
became ubiquitous in the new millennium. Nicolas De Oliveira and Nicola
Oxley's research looked at the expansion beyond the confines of the
gallery space, and, crucially, artists' desire for greater control over
the physical space, the context and content of their exhibitions. The
gallery culture at the time offered very few opportunities for artists to
make new, experimental work in situ, and very little in the way of
sustained collaborative practice and engagement with other artists,
curators and audiences. Documentation of artworks in gallery spaces was
mostly poorly executed. These factors led de Oliveira/Oxley's decision to
co-found a number of spaces in a new collaborative and artist-run model
including Unit 7 Gallery (1986-1989) the Museum of Installation, MOI
(1990-2004) and SE8 Gallery (2009-13). Models for exhibitions and projects
were developed over sustained periods in collaboration with individual
artists, and later with larger groups of artists, performers and other
participants. This collaborative approach meant that members shared a
stake in the decision-making, research, creative endeavour and outputs.
The exhibitions were commissioned and attracted funding from different
bodies (see Section 3: References) who were increasingly interested in the
interdisciplinary and contextual approach. Today, Arts Council England's
`Grants for the Arts' consistently stress the importance of developing
networks and working closely with audiences (see also section 4).
The research was ground breaking by including scientists, structural and
sound-engineers, architects, designers, photographers and writers in the
team working on projects. De Oliveira/Oxley's exhibition spaces functioned
as laboratories, populated and visited by a growing community of
participants who could witness and contribute to installations,
performances, readings, screenings, lectures and symposia.
De Oliveira/Oxley's activities and publications have had a wide reach and
influence. Their promotion of the role and function of documentation and
the archive has supported a shift in contemporary practice; indeed, many
artists now see the archival process as an artform in its own right. De
Oliveira/Oxley maintain a significant archive of their activities recently
collated as a website and resource for researchers.
Concurrently, de Oliveira/Oxley co-authored 2 major books on Installation
art, (1994 and 2003) both pioneering volumes, the first at a time when
there were no other publications specifically discussing this artform. The
impact of these publications resulted in an expansion in Installation art
being taught, made, shown, and discussed and led to several other
publications by other authors on the subject to the present day.
The blending of participants' roles in the visual arts has also led to
expanded forms of writing, which are no longer limited to catalogue essays
written by art historians, but include the writer as a further partner in
the process of the work, as is demonstrated by de Oliveira/Oxley's texts
and publications.
As a result, we see a downturn in professional, value-based criticism in
favour of more speculative forms of writing, undertaken by artists and
curators- who frequently cross over from one domain to the other; here,
the text does not serve as an explanation of the work, but rather, it
offers a parallel output; this new form of writing opens up the field of
art-writing,
Key researchers: Nicolas de Oliveira, 0.75 Course leader MA Curating the
Conetmporary
Nicola Oxley, formerly Course Leader BA (Hons) Fine Art (left August
2012)
References to the research
1. Nicolas de Oliveira, Nicola Oxley, Michael Petry, Installation art
in the New Millennium: Empire of the Senses — Thames & Hudson,
London and New York, 2003
2. Nicolas de Oliveira, Nicola Oxley, Hans Op de Beeck: On
Vanishing — Mercatorfonds 2007
3. Nicolas de Oliveira, Stefan Bruggemann — Kunsthalle
Bern/JRP Ringier, Zurich, 2007 (Co-Editor and Writer of Monograph/Single
Artist's Exhibition Catalogue)
4. Nicolas de Oliveira, Nicola Oxley, The Door Ajar:Patrick Jolley
— Gandon Editions 2011
5. Nicolas de Oliveira, Nicola Oxley, Hans Op de Beeck: Sea of
Tranquillity — Ludion 2011
6. Nicolas de Oliveira, Nicola Oxley, The Mulberry Tree Press:
Partial Fictions , SE8 Gallery,London, 2011.
Both Installation Art and Empire of the Senses are widely
cited in other publications. These include entries in books on visual art,
psychology, cultural studies, museum studies and encyclopaedias. Installation
art: Empire of the Senses: 17 editions published and held by
1108 libraries worldwide (source Worldcat) Both books are also stocked by
major booksellers including international museum bookstores in Europe, the
USA and Japan.
Exhibitions curated by de Oliveira/Oxley supporting this research
attracted the following grants and financial support from (selected):
Lottery Funding — £30000, Arts Council — £23000, Henry Moore Foundation —
£16000, Goethe Institute-2000, Elephant Trust — £1000, Canadian High
Commission — £900, Visiting Arts — £2000, British Council — £3000,
Conaculta/INBA — £5000, Jumex Collection — undisclosed, Mondriaan
Stichting — £4000, Office for Contemporary Art Norway and
Billedkunstnernes Vederlagsfond — £3500, Greek Ministry of
Culture/Ministry of Finance/National Bank of Geece/Alpha Bank/Baron
Tossizza Foundation — €350000 combined total, Higher Education Archive
Community Fund (HEAFC) — £8800, NEC UK — £2700, South-East London
Community Fund (SELCF) — £2700
Citations since 2008 include:
Dalia Judovitz, Drawing on art: Duchamp and company (University of
Minnesota Press, 2010) cited on p.264.
Rebekka Denz (ed), Geographical Turn (University of Potsdam, 2010)
p.146.
Faye Ran, A history of installation and the development of new art
forms (Peter Lang, Bern, 2009), preface written, p.1 and 2.
Cameron Cartiere, ra ti i art (Psychology Press, 2008) p.53.
Reviews and interviews of MOI, SE8 Gallery since 2008:
Preece, Robert // Sculpture; Mar2008, Vol. 27 Issue 2, p56-60
Musson, Karl, Into the Field: David Price, at SE8 Gallery, in: This Is
Tomorrow Contemporary Art Magazine,2012.
Resonance FM 104.4, Ravelength, Broadcast from Raven Row Gallery, 60
minute interview with de Oliveira on Installation art, Broadcast on 17
June 2011.
Resonance FM 104.4, Wavelength (William English) 60 mins discussion with
de Oliveira and artist Tina Gverovic on SE8 Gallery projects, Broadcast on
31 May 2013.
Web-Links showing sources and citations since 2008:
Museum of Installation
Robert Preece: Museum of Installation, Interview with Nico de Oliveira and
Nicola Oxley (2008)
http://www.artdesigncafe.com/museum-of-installation-nico-de-oliveira-nicola-oxley-2008
Robert Preece, Feeding the Spirit of Adventure
http://www.sculpture.org/documents/scmag08/mar_08/installation/installation.shtml
Installation art in the New Millennium: Empire of the Senses
Anne Ring Peterson, RIHA Journal 0009, 7 October 2010
http://www.riha-journal.org/articles/2010/ring-petersen-attention-and-distraction
Professor Louise Amoore, Lines of Sight: on the Visualization of unknown
Futures, Routledge, 2009
http://dro.dur.ac.uk/6732/1/6732.pdf
Niamh Ann Kelly, "What is Installation art? IMMA
http://www.imma.ie/en/downloads/what_is_installationbooklet.pdf
Roann Barris, Empowerment and Manipulation:the Seductive Betrayal of Art
http://www.radford.edu/rbarris/Seductivieness%20of%20the%20Interval%20essay.pdf
Silvana Rezende, Ecoarte, http://ecoarte.info/ecoarte/2010/10/installation-art-in-the-new-millennium-the-empire-of-the-senses-nicolas-de-oliveira-nicola-oxley-michael-petry/
Alana Keres, Artlies http://www.artlies.org/article.php?id=44&issue=43&s=
http://www.hoepli.it/libro/installation-art-in-the-new-millennium/9780500284513.html
Emma Leaper, http://emmalleaper.wordpress.com/
Performative Installation Course
https://sites.google.com/site/performativeinstallation/
Details of the impact
The impact of the research can be seen in the enhancement of `cultural
life' and `education' through the creation and evidenced support of new
artistic practices.
The 2 books on Installation art were instrumental in narrating the
importance of Installation art as a form and a critical discourse, at a
time when no such international surveys had been published. The first book
initiates this important polemic and discusses the history of Installation
art while contrasting it with new works of the time, while the second book
examined Installation art's progression from a marginal discipline to the
centre of the visual arts.
The achievement of this research has been the cementing of Installation
art both as an artform, and, crucially, as part of a curatorial strategy
devised by artists (in collaboration with curators) to control the context
and visibility of their work. The research gave a visibility and authority
to the discipline that it did not previously have. It influenced other
scholars, artists, curators, art students, and made Installation art
accessible to a wider public. Indeed, university courses proliferate today
that teach Installation art, and actively list these books on their
reading lists and course curriculum. The books were produced in different
language editions (English, French, Turkish) and sold in large numbers.
Section 3 indicates some of the citations in books, conference papers,
scholarly articles and blogs. Equally, the Irish Museum of Modern Art's
(IMMA) series of booklets explaining key contemporary developments in art
'What is Installation art?' (2011), draws on and quotes from de
Oliveira/Oxley's works on the subject.
De Oliveira has been invited to give papers at prestigious International
and National conferences, to discuss the development of Installation art
and Curatorial Practice. These are the direct outcome of the curatorial
projects and publications and include Artist's St di at the
V&A Museum (2002) Installation art (ICA and Whitechapel
Gallery, both 2003) and Treason of Images (Tate Modern, 2004). De
Oliveira also addresses the work and writing collaborations with different
artists in other symposia such as Words don't come Easy, (at
Kunsthalle Lissabon, Lisbon, 2010), Collaborative Practice,
(Modern Art Oxford, MAO , 2010), Habitus in Habitat II: Other Sides of
Cognition, Zentrum fuer Literatur und Kunstwissenschaft (ZFL),
Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Medizinhistorisches Museum der Charité,
Berlin, 2010), Tickle your Catastrophe: Imagining Catastrophe in Art,
Architecture and Philosophy (at Vooruit Art Centre/Ghent
University , 2009).
Other publications from this research relate to the development of
writing about art and artists; here, the artist and his/her work is seen
as the inception of the texts, rather than as an outcome, as a starting
point rather than a goal. The monographic writings, in particular, do not
attempt to draw comparisons with other contemporary artists, instead
building a broader cultural framework and set of references around the
featured artist including critical theory, philosophy, literature and
sociology. In this way the reader is invited to undertake a wider, more
open-ended reading of the work, in which meaning is often circumstantial
and implicit, rather than explicit. Here, the texts serve to embed the
artists' work in a different cultural landscape as it moves from criticism
or theoretical engagement towards other references and forms of writing.
This move can be seen in the work by a number of writers linked to
exhibitions at SE8 Gallery, such as Sean Borodale, Jeremy Millar, Ruth
Beale, Tamarin Norwood & Patrick Coyle (Antepress), Richard Dyer,
George Quasha, Katie Guggenheim, Geopolyphonies and Tom Chivers.
The different models of professional curatorial practice developed by de
Oliveira/Oxley through their diverse exhibitions, projects and expanded
writing have resulted in taught Modules for UG Fine Art Degrees at LMU and
de Oliveira's development and leadership of a unique collaborative
master's programme at London Metropolitan University and Whitechapel
Gallery. The course foregrounds students' professional engagement and
employability through direct partnership with this major exhibiton venue.
http://www.thecass.com/courses/postgraduate/ma-curating-the-contemporary
Students on the 'MA Curating the Contemporary' (MACC) have curated
exhibitions of professional artists such as Jeremy Deller, Lothar Goetz,
Langlands & Bell, among many, with the following partners: The
Government Art Collection (GAC), the Me-Collector's Room/Stiftung
Olbricht, Berlin, the Zabludowicz Collection, and other organisations. In
September 2013 de Oliveira is collaborating with Berlin-based Researcher
Dr Annette Loeseke and students from the MACC in undertaking a study of
Audience Reception at Whitechapel Gallery.
The impact of this new programme can be seen in the enhanced employment
opportunities for the students which have seen recent graduates take up
curatorial posts at Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art, Whitechapel
Gallery, the Royal Academy, as well as curating numerous independent
exhibitions.
Sources to corroborate the impact
Sources to corroborate the impact who have provided a statement:
- Eisler Curator and Head of Curatorial Studies at the Whitechapel
Gallery, http://www.whitechapelgallery.org/
- Independent Curator and Editor in Chief of `Color Logics' at
Hogeschool voor de Kunsten, Utrecht, http://www.hku.nl/web/HKUHome.htm
Contactable sources to corroborate the impact:
- Director of Irish Museum of Modern Art IMMA, http://www.imma.ie/en/index.htm
- Board Member of Momentum, http://momentumworldwide.org/momentumboard/
- Director of the Chisenhale Gallery, http://www.chisenhale.org.uk/
Further sources to corroborate the impact:
- Director of Me-Collectors Room/Stiftung Olbricht, http://www.me-berlin.com/
- Documentation of impact is available at: http://www.writinginstallation.org/?page_id=146