Pacific Connections: Making European Union external actions more effective
Submitting Institution
University of St AndrewsUnit of Assessment
Anthropology and Development StudiesSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Studies In Human Society: Anthropology
Language, Communication and Culture: Cultural Studies
Philosophy and Religious Studies: Philosophy
Summary of the impact
Dr Tony Crook's research on knowledge-practices solved a long-standing
theoretical problem in Papua New Guinea (PNG). Key insights have been
developed into a working method for knowledge exchange - `Pacific
Connections' - with application for national and international policy
contexts that confront misunderstandings between Euro-American and Pacific
knowledges.
The EU is the second largest international donor of development
assistance to the Pacific region, contributing €665m between 2008-2013.
Through on-going collaborations, and a series of EU-funded workshops and
high level roundtables, involving EU and European Commission policy makers
and diplomatic counterparts from a range of Pacific states, Dr Crook is
implementing `Pacific Connections' as the method by which social science
research is informing and enabling European external actions to more
effectively connect to Pacific concerns. As a consequence of Dr Crook's
work, Europe's capacity and ability to more effectively engage its Pacific
partners has been significantly enhanced.
Underpinning research
The Min peoples of Papua New Guinea are renowned for their secret male
initiation rituals and have proven to be one of the most enigmatic
cultures in anthropological experience: Min knowledge-practices defeated
anthropologists for over forty years — a long-standing interpretative
impasse known as the infamous `Min Problem'. Since joining St Andrews,
Crook's innovative solution to the Min Problem was recognized in winning
the British Academy Postdoctoral Fellowship Monograph Competition (2007a).
Crook's research argues that the Min Problem was of Anthropology's own
making: what is at stake for the Min is not the content or meaning of
knowledge, but rather the differentiated personal capacities and social
positions that their knowledge-exchange relations create (2009). Pacific
knowledge-exchanges focus on defining and maintaining social positions and
hierarchies — and so previous analytical attempts to meaningfully
reconcile different and incomplete pieces of some knowledge puzzle missed
the point entirely. A key finding and lesson here is that Pacific
epistemologies take the differentiation and incommensurability of knowers
and what they know for granted, and work by accommodating diverse
positions rather than attempting to homogenise them and thus offend and
collapse the very relations through which knowedge is made effective.
Crook's research has involved fieldwork with three Min groups in the
context of villages and a mining township - as an undergraduate in 1990,
postgraduate in 1994-1996, and postdoctorate in 1997, 1999, 2000-1. But
his solution to the Min problem was only finalized since joining St
Andrews in 2003 and confirmed during fieldwork in 2004 and 2006-7 and
published as a monograph in 2007 as Anthropological Knowledge, Secrecy
and Bolivip, Papua New Guinea: Exchanging Skin (British Academy/OUP
2007a). Subsequently, Crook's research has examined the similarly profound
misunderstandings of the Min lifeworld evident in the mis-management of
the social and cultural impacts of the Ok Tedi mine (2004, 2007b, 2007c).
Crook's research focuses on the vernacular terms of indigenous
epistemology—in which 'knowledge' (kál) is a water-like substance
in the skin (kal) that circulates between people, plants and food
gardens—and the knowledge exchanges that take place both outwith and
during male initiation ritual, and amongst both men and women. Min
knowledge practices take incommensurability, asymmetry and incomprehension
for granted: figured as the difference between the crown of a tree—where
multiple branches, twigs and leaves exhibit differentiation and movement
which is likened to confusion—and the base of a tree where the different
`examples' (kukup) come together, aligned in straightness and
stillness. By conceiving of the positions in knowledge in this way, and by
treating knowledge exchange as the skin of one person being laid over the
skin of another person, Min epistemology assumes that positions in
knowledge are inside- out to each other.
In this light, the problem of Euro-American encounters with Pacific
lifeworlds is not simply a matter of cultural or even epistemological
difference—but rather the problem of assuming that knowledge exchange and
cross-cultural understanding can and should overcome issues of
incommensurability, when in the Pacific actively respecting and
creating this is the very means to knowing another's position and
thereby making knowledge for oneself and making it effective.
In demonstrating his solution to the Min problem, Crook borrowed his
ethnographic method of setting up an exchange between different knowledges
from the Min peoples who taught him the lesson—and has since trialled and
developed a practical method for knowledge-exchange that acknowledges the
value of respecting and creating differentiation as the very relational
basis for meaningful dialogue with Pacific peoples.
References to the research
Relevant publications
2009 'Exchanging Skin: Making a Science of the Relation between
Bolivip and Barth', Social Analysis, 53:2, 94-107. [Outcome of
Wenner-Gren funded dual-sited conference in Lisbon and St Andrews in
2007]. DOI: 10.3167/sa.2009.530206
2007b ``If you don't believe our story, at least give us half of
the money': Claiming Ownership of the Ok Tedi Mine, PNG', Journal de
la Société des Océaniste, 125. pp221-228. [Special Edition
presenting highlights of the European Society for Oceanists conference in
Marseille, 2005]. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/jso.939
2004 `Transactions in Perpetual Motion', Transaction and
Creations: Property Debates and the Stimulus of Melanesia, Hirsch,
E. & M. Strathern eds., Oxford: Berghahn Books. [Summative collection
from the Cambridge-Brunel ESRC funded `Property, Transactions and
Creations: New Economic Relations in the Pacific' project, 1998-2001].
ISBN 9781571816153
http://www.berghahnbooks.com/title.php?rowtag=HirschTransactions
Relevant Awards and Grants
Since appointment to St Andrews in 2002, Crook's research on knowledge
exchange led to him winning the British Academy Postdoctoral Fellowship
Monograph Competition (see 2007a), and to the successful award of several
funding grants associated with this research, and for which end of grant
reports are available: 1. ECOPAS, European Consortium for Pacific Studies,
EU Framework 7 funded project, including €350k for St Andrews work package
`Knowledge Exchange: Research-Policy Interfaces', 2012-2015, 2. 'Dialogues
between Anthropology, Customary Law and Statute Law in Resource
Development Contexts', Leverhulme Trust Visiting Professorship, (James F.
Weiner), Principal Investigator, £52k, 2008-10, 3. 'Exchanging Knowledge
in Oceania', Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research,
Conference Grant, CONF-530, European Society for Oceanists, 8th
Conference, Principal Investigator, US$15k, 2010, 4. 'Pacific
Connections', Russell Trust Development Award, University of St Andrews,
Principal Investigator, £2.5k, 2010.
Details of the impact
This case-study focuses on EU-Pacific international relations and
development policy, and provides evidence that as a result of Crook's `own
research on knowledge practices and method for knowledge-exchanges in a
Europe-Pacific context' we now have `an enhanced effectiveness to the EU's
external actions in the Pacific' [1].
In terms of a widely applicable method for knowledge-exchange, Crook's
research suggests that there is both necessity and real productive virtue
in respecting and maintaining differentiation, and in working with
incommensurability rather than against it: `the acknowledgment and
creation of gaps between the EU officials, the European researchers, and
the Pacific researchers involved in ECOPAS project, i.e. Dr. Crook's
concept of knowledge transfer, has been instrumental in bringing a
critical mass for the process to be launched' [2].
Since joining St Andrews, Crook's development of the `Pacific
Connections' method for knowledge-exchanges has been trialled, put into
practice and impacted upon different kinds of audiences - mining
industry, general public, UK and EU international policy — and met
with different receptions, and led to diverse forms of impact evidence.
Whilst Crook's research insights have, since 1997, been communicated to
the mining industry (in person, and through publications 2004,
2007b, 2007c), the internal corporate impact of research perceived as a
reputational challenge to change behaviour, or as an adversarial critique,
is necessarily harder to evidence than where a more positive user-friendly
relation exists: in 1997 Ok Tedi managers told Crook to disappear, kicked
him out of town in 2001 and withdrew cooperation in 2004; in 2010 Crook
made two presentations to the International Council on Mining and Metals —
evidence of their internal impact took the form of the ICMM's subsequent
disengagement.
In 2010, Crook organized and participated in a series of `Pacific
Connections' public events [6] to coincide with his organization
of ESfO2010, the 8th conference of the European Society for
Oceanists (which he chaired, 2008-10) [7]. These public events
included `Double Visions', an exhibition of contemporary PNG art
(co-organized with Fife Contemporary Arts and Crafts, and shown in
Kirkaldy and St Andrews), and a public talk Crook gave in Kirkcaldy about
the exhibition which drew on the `double visions' required to comprehend
Melanesian knowledge-practices; `Lost Land of the Volcano' which engaged
the BBC producer and a presenter of the TV series and which questioned the
inter-relation between indigenous knowledge and biodiversity; and `Avatar'
which was designed around the participation of the movie's anthropological
consultant, and involved an anthropologist employed by a PNG mine, a PNG
researcher and activist, and Global Witness to discuss the commodity
chains and `resource wars' linking the UK and PNG.
In a UK international policy context, Crook was invited by the
Foreign and Commonwealth Office to speak at a high level roundtable
involving UK Ministers and Pacific Ambassadors, invited by the
Commonwealth Parliamentary Association to speak alongside the Papua New
Guinea High Commissioner in Westminster Hall on the Milennium Development
Goals [`your insight into social relationships in [PNG] society'... were
`fascinating', `we received wonderful feedback' 3], and to provide
a video film to kick-off FCO Minister Swire's debate with University of
Papua New Guinea students in Apr 2013 [8].
However, the central focus of this impact case-study is on the European
Union and highlights the context of a large bureaucracy in which
policy-making is geared to a hierarchy of political decisions and research
evidence. Impacts are made evident in the responses of research users as a
relationship of trust is built up and is manifested by step-wise requests
for subsequent inputs into new contexts and by remarks over previous
inputs.
In early 2010, the EU EEAS Pacific Division, recognized that the research
it drew upon mainly originated beyond Europe, and when Crook sent details
of his research and of the ESfO2010 conference and invited them to attend,
EEAS phoned Crook to discuss the thinking behind the conference rubric:
this derived directly from Crook's Min research [2007a, 2007b]. EEAS and
DG-RTD sent delegates who addressed the opening plenary [7], and
asked Crook to nominate participants for a meeting in St Andrews with
European research leaders, and then again to give a keynote talk, and to
nominate speakers and delegates who would be offered EU-funding for a
large workshop in Brussels [9]. At this workshop, the EU announced
that the ESfO2010 conference had leveraged their policy aim for a research
network and policy interface, and the EEAS Head of Pacific Division
publicly thanked Crook for demonstrating a method for the
knowledge-exchange relations that they could work with, saying it was
`clearly going to be very important and a really key part of making the
proposed network and policy interface a success' [1]. Additional
evidence of impact at the workshop is that EEAS and DG-RES publically
called for St Andrews to play a lead role in responding to their FP7
funding call. This resulted in the ECOPAS consortium with Crook as a point
of contact for DG-RTD and EEAS which expressed a hope that Crook would be
involved in the knowledge-exchange policy interface with several EU and EC
units with a Pacific remit.
EEAS also invited Crook to assist them in organizing a High Level Panel
focused on the Pacific at the European Development Days event in Warsaw
(Dec, 2011) and were so taken with Crook's `Pacific Connections' method
(which won a competitive slot at EDD2011) to create a dialogue between EU
attempts to connect development ideas to Pacific ways, and Pacific
attempts to connect to development initiatives, that they asked to merge
this HLP with their own. `Pacific Connections' responded to EEAS' request
for recommendations to the EU as it seeks to renew its development
partnership with the Pacific. The EC's Commissioner for Development asked
Crook to draft his introductory remarks, and of his own accord praised the
research linkages between different scales. The EU Ambassador to the
Pacific closed the event by acknowledging the profound insight it had
given him into Pacific people's lives and future EU-Pacific relations, and
summing up that `this marks the day Europe was initiated into the Pacific'
[2, 10]. The deputy head (Pacific, EEAS) wrote to Crook thanking
him for his work and results in delivering the EDD event, which he
described as `excellent', and as indication of the impact on EEAS policy
thinking, asked Crook to provide advice on how policy related to the
Pacific (which is covered by the Cotonou Agreement with the ACP regions),
might be accommodated by the EC's internal re-organization (in 2011) which
has separated the Pacific from other ACP regions and re-aligned it in with
Asia.
ECOPAS was awarded FP7 funding and, since the project started in December
2012, Crook has been engaged in close cooperation with EEAS and
knowledge-exchange with various EC units, has chaired a series of Pacific
Connections events in Brussels (at the European Parliament and EEAS), and
in St Andrews on gender inequality and on sustainable development attended
by EEAS [2]. For example, in May 2013, two roundtables held in
EEAS focused on sustainable development and gender issues attracted 48
participants from 24 units and organizations across and beyond the EC,
including four Pacific ambassadors and the Director General of the
Secretariat of the Pacific Community: `the success of such an event is
normally very difficult to ensure', `Dr Tony Crook...managed to transfer
knowledge and inform policy stakeholders successfully, creating moreover
significant and sustainable links' and `All these successes were down to
the design of the format based on the method for knowledge exchange
designed by Dr Tony Crook' [4].
Each of these events have involved diplomats, policy-makers and regional
organizations from the Pacific who have endorsed the Pacific Connections
approach, and encouraged and commended the EU for making their external
actions more effective in this manner. Indeed, the language of `Pacific
Connections' has been adopted by an internal EU review, and now provides
the terms in which European external actions are conceived. Crook's
research insights into, and method based upon, Melanesian
knowledge-exchange have been `instrumental' [5] in making EU
external actions in the Pacific more effective.
Sources to corroborate the impact
- Impact Evidence Letter 1 (Head of Pacific Division, European External
Action Service).
- Impact Evidence Letter 2 (ECOPAS liaison and Pacific Desk Officer,
European External Action Service).
- Impact Evidence Letter 3 (Commonwealth Parliamentary Association UK).
- Impact Evidence Letter 4 (ECOPAS Research Programme Officer, DG
Research and Innovation).
- Impact Evidence Letter 5 (incoming Head of Pacific Division, European
External Action Service).
- Pacific Connections: Anthropology and Pacific Peoples, public events,
Kirkaldy and St Andrews.
http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/esfo2010/docs/pacific_connections.pdf
& Fife Contemporary Arts and Crafts, `Double Visions' exhibition,
talk by Dr Tony Crook, Fife TV clip
http://www.fcac.co.uk/fcac_programme/search_archive/detail/?nojs=1&pid=44
- ESfO2010 `Exchanging Knowledge in Oceania', conference, St Andrews.
Includes video of Crook's keynote introduction, and of plenary address
by DG-RTD and EEAS (DG-DEV).
http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/esfo2010/
- `Re-Thinking Gender in the Pacific', short film made for FCO at
request of British High Commissioner in Port Moresby http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/pacificstudies/news/gender.html
- `EU Research and External Relations:Together in the Pacific',
workshop, Brussels, 2010. Includes video interview with Head of Pacific
Division, EEAS.
http://ec.europa.eu/development/services/events/eupacific/index_en.html
- Official EDD 2011 Pacific Connections video report, and High Level
Panel speaker videos including EC Commisioner for Development and EU
Ambassador to the Pacific http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/pacificstudies/news/connections.html