Santa Anna of Mexico and Mexico’s changing perception of six-times president Antonio López de Santa Anna, 1794-1876
Submitting Institution
University of St AndrewsUnit of Assessment
Modern Languages and LinguisticsSummary Impact Type
CulturalResearch Subject Area(s)
Studies In Human Society: Political Science
History and Archaeology: Historical Studies
Summary of the impact
Prof. Fowler's biography, Santa Anna of Mexico, has influenced
current public discourse which has led Mexicans to revise their
"official history" of six-times president Antonio López de Santa
Anna, 1794-1876, by illuminating and challenging cultural values
and social assumptions in the public domain. The work, which
was translated into Spanish and published in Mexico as Santa
Anna (2010; re-issued 2011), alongside other key outputs,
including a TV programme, about Santa Anna and other Mexican
presidents, was at the centre of several state-government-sponsored
events in the build-up to, and as part of, the
Bicentenary of the War of Independence in 2010. It has
succeeded in improving the quality of evidence employed to
enhance public understandings of Mexico's complex past.
Enhanced understanding has led
to a revised interpretation of Santa
Anna in Mexico’s ‘official history’.
Underpinning research
Santa Anna of Mexico (2007; 501pp)1, the key text in
this case study, was published in the United
States and Britain by the University of Nebraska Press (hbk) and by Bison
Books (pbk), and in
Mexico (in Spanish) by the Universidad Veracruzana. At the same time, in
Mexico City, the
Instituto Nacional de Estudios Históricos de la Revolución Mexicana, and
the leading trade
publishing house Fondo de Cultura Económica, published Fowler's Presidentes
mexicanos
(2004)2, 2 vols, and Gobernantes mexicanos (2008)3,
2 vols, respectively. Other contemporaneous
publications included articles in prestigious academic journals on
different aspects of Santa Anna's
political career4-6.
Research for these publications, undertaken in regional and national
archives in Mexico, as well as
in Britain, Spain, and the United States, was carried out by Prof. Will
Fowler at the University of St
Andrews from 1999 onwards. Prior to the dissemination of Fowler's
findings, General Antonio
López de Santa Anna (1794-1876) had been consistently depicted as a
traitor, a turncoat and a
tyrant in the U.S. to justify the Texan 1835-36 War of Independence and
the U.S. military
intervention of 1846-48, and in Mexico to explain and account for the
country's traumatic defeat in
the Mexican-American War. Since the late nineteenth century, he was
therefore presented as the
traitor who allegedly recognized the independence of Texas in captivity
(1836), lost the Mexican-American
War (1846-48) for a fistful of dollars, and shamelessly sold parts of
Mexico to the United
States in the Gadsden Purchase (1853). He was also consistently depicted
as an opportunistic
turncoat who changed sides whenever it suited him, without upholding any
distinguishable political
ideals. Last but not least, he was repeatedly portrayed as the despotic
dictator who terrorized the
country following independence: "a curse upon Mexico".
The importance of Fowler's biography lies in the way that this
inaccurate, simplistic and Manichean
view has since been significantly revised in the historiography and in
Mexico more widely. It has
challenged cultural values and assumptions in Mexican civil society which,
until recently, had
chosen not to think about the early republican period (because it was too
painful), and, when it
had, blamed Santa Anna for everything that went wrong after independence
(including Mexico's
defeat in 1848 — mistakenly claiming Santa Anna lost the conflict on
purpose, — and the traumatic
loss of half of the country's territory to the United States — erroneously
[and deliberately] pretending
he sold it). Fowler's research has forced Mexicans to revise such an
interpretation. It has shown
how Santa Anna was neither a traitor nor a turncoat. Nor was he always a
tyrant. Instead, the
Santa Anna that emerges from Fowler's work was a general, a landowner, and
a nineteenth-century
caudillo whose political ideas evolved with time and who tried to prosper
personally and
help his country develop at a time of severe and repeated crises, as the
colony that was New
Spain gave way to a young, troubled, besieged and beleaguered Mexican
nation.
References to the research
1. 2007 Santa Anna of Mexico, Fowler, W., Lincoln, NE &
London: University of Nebraska Press,
pp. xv + 501 [ISBN: 978-0-80232-1120-9 (hbk)/978-0-8032-2638-8 (pbk)];
2010 Santa Anna.
(Translation of Santa Anna of Mexico), Veracruz: Universidad
Veracruzana. pp. 534 [ISBN:
978-607-502-001-3].
2. 2004. (ed.) Presidentes mexicanos, Fowler, W., 2 vols. Mexico
City: Instituto Nacional de
Estudios Históricos de la Revolución Mexicana. (Re-issued 2005): Presidentes
mexicanos.
Tomo I (1824-1911). Mexico City: INEHRM, pp. 376 [ISBN:
970-628-765-5]; Presidentes
mexicanos. Tomo II (1911-2000). Mexico City: INEHRM, pp. 530. 2000
[ISBN: 970-628-767-1].
3. 2008. (ed.), Fowler, W., Gobernantes mexicanos, 2 vols. Mexico
City: Fondo de Cultura
Económica: Gobernantes mexicanos. Vol. 1 (1821-1910), Mexico City:
FCE, pp. 488;
Gobernantes mexicanos, Vol. 2 (1911-2000), Mexico City: FCE, pp.
563. [ISBN: 978-968-16-8503-4]
4. 2000. `Las propiedades veracruzanas de Santa Anna', Fowler, W. Memorias
de la Academia
Mexicana de la Historia XLIII, pp. 63-91.
5. 2002. `Fiestas santanistas: la celebración de Santa Anna en la villa
de Xalapa (1821-1855)',
Fowler, W. Historia Mexicana LII:2 (206) (Oct-Dec), pp. 391-447.
6. 2005. `All the President's Women: The Wives of General Antonio López
de Santa Anna in 19th
century Mexico,' The Feminist Review 79:1 (January), pp. 52-68.
Fowler benefited from significant external funding, including a British
Academy Larger Research
Grant (1999) [£5,500], a research travel grant from the Carnegie Trust for
the Universities of
Scotland (1999) [£1,800], and an Arts and Humanities Research Board
Research Leave Award
(2003) [£13,153]. The reviews Santa Anna of Mexico received in the
leading academic journals in
the field have consistently stressed the importance of this study. A
selection of published review
comments (with sources) follows: `This superb monograph should go a long
way toward stamping
out the still-dominant perception of Santa Anna as the individual
responsible for all the calamities
that befell early republican Mexico. [...] Fowler has produced an
elegantly-written and engaging
study about one of Mexico's most notorious and misunderstood leaders. His
evenhanded
assessment of Santa Anna as more than just a power-hungry, opportunistic,
and corrupt politician
makes this biography a most welcome and valuable addition to Mexican
historiography' (The
Journal of Military History 72:3 [2008], 954); `Fowler has written a
revisionist, balanced, and
excellent biography. [...] The source material is impressive; in addition
to immersion in the Mexican
sources, Fowler has consulted papers in Spain and the United States, and
has extracted excellent
detail from the documents of visiting Britons. The narrative is
outstanding.' (Bulletin of Latin
American Research 29:1 [2009], 112); `Will Fowler's Santa Anna
of Mexico is a [...] is a great book
in all senses of the word: impeccably researched and beautifully written,
it offers a highly detailed
account of Santa Anna's life and in doing so provides an accessible study
of Mexico's long,
difficult, and painful transition from independence to the presidency of
Porfirio Díaz.' (Bulletin of
Spanish Studies LXXXVII [2010], 711-2).
Details of the impact
Fowler has succeeded in improving the quality of evidence employed to
enhance public
understandings of Mexico's complex past. His research on Santa Anna has
influenced current
public discourse in Mexico, by offering a revised interpretation of
Mexico's historical capital that
has presented the country's cultural heritage in a new light,
contributing, in so doing, to Mexico's
processes of commemoration and memorialisation. The knowledge of
individuals, groups of
individuals, and relevant beneficiary communities of place and interest
has thus been enriched,
resulting in a measurable public questioning of Mexico's "official
history." In the words of His
Excellency the Mexican Ambassador in the UK, Fowler's work as a historian:
"helps all of us
understand the present and to clarify the past of our country." (31 May
2012) [S1].
The impact of Fowler's research on Santa Anna was evidenced mainly in the
spheres of Mexican
culture and society, and was articulated through the researcher's active
interaction with a range of
beneficiaries and users outside academia, including those members of the
general public who
attended the state-government-sponsored events that were organized
throughout Mexico, and
which Fowler participated in, between 2008 and 2011, in the build-up to,
and as part of, the
Bicentenary of the War of Independence in 2010. The user feedback provided
in questionnaires at
the end of several of Fowler's public lectures confirmed that 81.3% of the
161 audience members
who completed the forms agreed that Fowler's research was making Mexicans
revise the way they
viewed Santa Anna and their country's past, and that 71.1% believed that
Fowler's research would
result in changes in the way that history was taught in primary and
secondary schools in Mexico
[S9].
The evidence of impact was most obvious in the wealth of articles,
interviews, and reviews that
Fowler's findings generated in the media (press, radio, TV, and online
blogs), which are listed
below and in turn provide a particularly meaningful and resonant measure
of the extent to which
his research has resulted in a major mind-shift in the manner in which the
Mexican public domain
has come to regard Santa Anna.
Users belonging to the policy-making community such as the deputy and
president of the Special
Support Commission of the Celebrations of the Bicentenary of Independence
and Centenary of the
Revolution of the State Congress of Puebla also interacted with Fowler
during his impact-generating
public engagements, producing documents and statements that embraced the
researcher's revisionist interpretation of this long misrepresented and
misunderstood historical
figure [S6].
Other beneficiaries have included a novelist, author of Santa Anna,
El Lencero y yo. Así me lo
contó Antonio López de Santa Anna (Mexico City: SITESA, 2010), in
whose mind "the Mexican
people's understanding of Santa Anna is beginning to change, in no small
measure thanks to
works such as Fowler's biography," [S3], and a playwright, author of Santa
Anna, la tentación del
engaño, who has gone as far as to state that "Santa Anna of
Mexico is one of many worthy works
that are paving a new road for democratic education in Mexico" [S3]. Both
authors have
acknowledged, moreover, that their creative activities and fictional
portrayals of Santa Anna were
significantly influenced by Fowler's biography. Santa Anna's descendants,
who did not know of
each other's existence until Fowler put them in touch with each other,
because they were ashamed
to let it be known that they were related to the general, have since
actively participated in public
engagements that have drawn on Fowler's research to vindicate their
ancestor [S4, S5]. As noted
by the descendant of Santa Anna's younger daughter, "Fowler's balanced
account has allowed me
to stand up for my ancestor in public, as his findings and interpretation
of Mexico's past have
started to significantly impact upon the manner in which the educated
population of the country
have come to understand his actions" [S5].
Fowler's interaction with his beneficiary communities of place and
interest in Mexico arose, initially,
organically and without a conscious impact-driven strategy. His research
on Santa Anna had, in
fact, started to make a cultural impact beyond academia as his findings
were cited, reviewed, and
reported outside academic literature in Mexican national newspapers such
as Crónica (26/01/05),
and in a series of TV and radio interviews which culminated in Fowler's
appearance in the TV
documentary film Presidentes mexicanos, shown on the weekly
"Archivo Abierto" programme at
9.00 pm on Canal 11 TV (6/2/2005). However, it was in 2008, coinciding
with the book launch of
Gobernantes mexicanos3, which took place in the
auditorium of the Fondo de Cultura Económica's
Octavio Paz bookshop in Mexico City (24/11/08), that, building on the
noted earlier interactions,
Fowler's research started to receive significant national coverage in the
media with interviews
featuring in several leading national newspapers and cultural magazines
(e.g., El Universal,
26/11/08 and Metapolítica, vol. 62 [November-December 2008] [S7]).
The fact that he was one of
three Mexicanist scholars invited to represent British academia at the
State Banquet that was held
in Buckingham Palace on 30 March 2009 in honour of the State visit of
Mexican President Felipe
Calderón is in itself evidence that his work on Santa Anna and Mexican
presidents was beginning
to have a cultural impact in Mexico.
Having said this, it was throughout 2010, following the publication of
the translation of Santa Anna,
and benefitting from the School of Modern Languages' impact strategy (see
REF3a) that Fowler's
interpretation of the man and his times really started to resonate in the
public domain. The
publication of Santa Anna, integrated as part of the Mexican state
government-sponsored events
organized to mark the Bicentenary of Mexico's independence from Spain, was
carefully planned by
the author, publishers, and his allocated St-Andrews-based impact-team, in
order to maximise the
impact, making the most of the general interest in memorializing Mexico's
past that was generated
by the 2010 celebrations. Fowler gave a series of public lectures in high
profile cultural locations,
namely, the Cultural Centre IVEC (Veracruz), the Anthropology Museum of
Xalapa, the State
Congress of Puebla, the Universidad Iberoamericana in Puebla, and the
Salón de Actos of the
UNAM (Mexico City). The book presentations and lectures were covered in
the media (press and
radio) and generated widespread interest on the internet, inspiring
several blogs as well as the
creation of a Santa
Anna Facebook page and group
[S8]. By the time Fowler returned to Mexico in
November 2011 to give a further series of nine public lectures in Mexico
City, Morelia, Zamora, and
San Luis Potosí, it was clear that his research was reshaping the
Mexicans' understanding of
Santa Anna's historical role. As may be appreciated from the newspaper
headlines that appeared
in 2010 and 2011, Fowler's view that Santa Anna was not the villain he had
been made out to be
resonated in the public domain, featuring prominently in an extensive
range of regional and
national newspapers: "Historian rehabilitates the image of Santa Anna," (Plumas
libres, 18/10/10);
"Santa Anna did not sell half of the country, states William Fowler" (E-Consulta.com,
19/10/10);
"Santa Anna was not a traitor: Fowler" (Milenio, 22/10/10); "Santa
Anna was no traitor, states
Scottish Academic Will Fowler in controversial book" (Azteca 21,
22/10/10); "Neither a monster nor
a saint" (Mi espacio libre, 25/10/10); "Interview with British
historian Will Fowler. Santa Anna: `Was
no angel, but he wasn't a monster'" (Universo. El periódico de los
universitarios, No. 418,
25/10/10); "Santa Anna, synthesis of the political class of the nineteenth
century, says expert"
(Crónica, 2610/10). Two renowned publicists, the one writing for
the cultural magazine
Performance (16/9/10), and the other, in the Zócalo de Saltillo
(8/03/11), influenced by Fowler's
research, declared that the author had succeeded in shining light on one
of the darker periods of
Mexican history and, were inspired to ask whether the time had come for
Mexicans to move
beyond their official history of heroes and villains. [S7]
Sources to corroborate the impact
Independent citations attesting to the benefits of clarifying
misinformation in historical
understanding — in policymaker, creative writers, and descendants'
testimonies/correspondence:
[S1] His Excellency the Mexican Ambassador in the UK;
[S2] novelist and author of Santa Anna, El Lencero y yo. Así me lo
contó Antonio López de Santa
Anna (Mexico City: SITESA, 2010);
[S3] playwright and author of Santa Anna, la tentación del engaño;
[S4] descendant of Santa Anna's eldest daughter;
[S5] descendant of Santa Anna's younger daughter.
[S6] Diputada and President of the Comisión Especial de Apoyo a los
Festejos del Bicentenario de
la Independencia y Centenario de la Revolución; corroborated that the work
has shed new facts on
Santa Anna to enable a better understanding of his actions.
[S7] Citations in reviews outside academic literature attesting
mind-shift in public domain
regarding Santa Anna's historical role — Mexican press 2008-2013: El
Universal, 26/11/08;
Performance, 16/9/10; Proyecto Veracruz, 12/10/10; La
Jornada de Veracruz, 13/10/2010; Diario
de Xalapa, 16/10/10; Plumas libres, 18/10/10; E-Consulta.com,
19/10/10; Milenio, 22/10/10;
Azteca 21, 22/10/10; Mi espacio libre, 25/10/10; Saber
sin fin, 25/10/10; Universo. El periódico de
los universitarios, No. 418, 25/10/10; Revista Digital Justa,
25/10/10; Crónica, 26/10/10.
[S8] Reviews, blogs, and postings further attesting mind-shift —
including Facebook groups,
and pages http://chequesjems.wordpress.com/2007/05/23/70/,
and
http://www.microplagio.com/articulos/antonio-lopez-de-santa-anna/.
http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Santa-Anna/313716068643348
[S9] User feedback corroborating impact among audience members:
161 completed
questionnaires handed out in November 2011, at the end of the lectures
Fowler gave at the
Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas de la UNAM (15/11/11), the
Instituto Mora (16/11/11), the
Dirección de Estudios Históricos del Instituto Nacional de Antropología e
Historia (16/11/11), El
Colegio de México (17/11/11), the Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de
Hidalgo (18/11/11),
El Colegio de Michoacán (21/11/11), El Colegio de San Luis (23/11/11), and
the Universidad
Autónoma de San Luis Potosí (24/11/11).