Development of a decision-making resource: Corpus of Scottish Medieval Parish Churches: pilot phase
Submitting Institution
University of St AndrewsUnit of Assessment
Art and Design: History, Practice and TheorySummary Impact Type
CulturalResearch Subject Area(s)
Studies In Human Society: Policy and Administration
History and Archaeology: Historical Studies
Summary of the impact
This case study is based on the pilot phase of the Corpus of Scottish
Medieval Parish Churches project, which provides a detailed
assessment of the medieval fabric of 105 of the c.1,136 parish
churches of pre-Reformation foundation in Scotland. Carried out in 2008-09
with funding from AHRC, it focused on the dioceses of Dunkeld and
Dunblane. The Corpus has been invaluable in broadening knowledge
of the buildings, and hence informing the decision-making processes of a
wide range of bodies and individuals involved in preserving Scotland's
medieval architecture. These include, amongst others: the Royal Commission
on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Scotland and Historic Scotland;
national and local societies from the Royal Archaeological Institute to
the Perth and Kinross Heritage Trust; and professionals called to work on
the buildings.
Underpinning research
The research carried out in 2008-09 was initiated in response to a
widespread assumption that little identifiable medieval fabric has
survived within Scotland's parish churches. This has resulted in a
tendency to disregard those churches in the literature on Scottish
architecture, and a general neglect of their conservation needs.
The researchers, based at the universities of St Andrews and Stirling,
believed that much more medieval fabric has survived than is generally
supposed, and that, even where a church is of post- Reformation date, if
it is on a site known to be of a medieval foundation, its predecessors
might have significantly conditioned the form of the existing building. It
was therefore decided that all parish churches on the c.1,136
sites of medieval foundation should be investigated, and with the
financial support of AHRC, a pilot project in the dioceses of Dunblane and
Dunkeld was conducted in 2008-9.
The principal investigator was Professor Richard Fawcett, who was for
much of his career a Principal Inspector with Historic Scotland, and who
has been a Professor in the School of Art History of the University of St
Andrews since 2006. The co-investigators were Dr Julian Luxford, Senior
Lecturer (now Reader) in the School of Art History of the University of St
Andrews since 2004, and Professor Richard Oram, of the School of History
and Politics of the University of Stirling.
During his years of research on Scottish medieval architecture Fawcett
had become increasingly aware of the problems resulting from lack of
understanding of parish churches. He consequently approached the need to
provide a firmer basis for the understanding of the buildings from a
number of directions, including a chronological survey of the component
elements of the architectural vocabulary, and a study of how the attitudes
of Scottish patrons and masons might be conditioned by a wish to reflect
awareness of earlier models. Having been invited to provide
the entries on all of the churches in the Borders, a particularly
prosperous and architecturally productive area of the country, he was also
able to see the value of considering the ways in which architectural ideas
might be absorbed into and disseminated across one such area in the course
of the middle ages [1].
Fawcett became convinced of the outstanding need for a rigorously
conducted survey of all relevant evidence, and it was to test the
viability of doing so that the pilot project was undertaken. To this end,
Fawcett and Luxford carried out analysis of the upstanding architectural
evidence, took measurements where it appeared these could be of
significance, and carried out a photographic survey. They researched all
accessible sources of information on the structural, ecclesiastical and
archaeological history of the buildings, paying close attention to what
could be ascertained about the consequences of successive post-Reformation
restructuring and re- orderings. Oram investigated all published sources
of documentation, as well as a range of manuscript sources considered
likely to provide information on the structural history of the sites. In a
final stage, detailed introductory pages for the website were written, in
which the findings across the two dioceses were analysed and collated.
The principal output of the research has been a freely accessible website
[2], which can be searched in a range of ways. There is an associated
extended paper by the investigators in a prestigious peer-reviewed journal
[3] and a monograph on Scottish medieval church architecture, the first
such survey for over a century [4]. There have also been a number of
linked papers, including a study of the continuity of medieval forms after
the Reformation [5], and an account of a particularly Scottish
approach to vaulting in churches of middling scale [6].
References to the research
1. K. Cruft, J. Dunbar and R. Fawcett, The Buildings of Scotland,
Borders, New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2006.
3. R. Fawcett, R. Oram and J. Luxford, `Scottish medieval parish
churches: the evidence from the dioceses of Dunblane and Dunkeld', Antiquaries
Journal, vol. 90, 2010, pp. 261-98.
4. R. Fawcett, The architecture of the Scottish medieval Church,
1100-1560, New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2011. (This
monograph has been awarded the 2012 medallion of the Society of
Architectural Historians of Great Britain, the most significant British
award for a work on architectural history.)
5. R. Fawcett, `Gothic or Classical? The continuity of medieval forms in
Scottish church architecture', in R. Suntrup and J. R. Veenstra, eds, Konstruktion
der Gegenwart und Zukunft: Shaping the present and the future,
Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2008, pp. 93-118.
6. R. Fawcett, `Barrel-vaulted churches in late medieval Scotland', in
J.A. Franklin, T.A. Heslop and C. Stevenson, Architecture and
Interpretation, essays for Eric Fernie, Woodbridge: Boydell, pp. 60-
77.
In endorsement of the quality of the research, AHRC has awarded a grant
with FEC of £486,625 for the next phase of the project, which is currently
in progress.
Details of the impact
This research has impacted on the knowledge-based activities of a range
of organisations and individuals involved in the use, enjoyment and
conservation of Scottish church buildings. Beneficiaries form an extensive
user base, ranging from national and regional bodies responsible for
statutory administration, through archaeologists commissioned to
investigate the buildings, to bodies or individuals with an interest in
this aspect of Scotland's architectural heritage. Reactions and a large
body of correspondence, of which only a sample can be mentioned here,
highlight the significance of this work for the cultural heritage of
Scotland as reflected in its diverse range of church buildings. Cultural
heritage is an increasingly valuable contributor to both the economy and
the cultural life of Scotland; it constitutes a central plank of
Scotland's tourist industry, which is currently worth £4.3bn per year.
INFORMING THE WORK OF STATE BODIES:
The Corpus has met an urgent need for accurate information as a
basis for reaching properly informed decisions on developments at Scottish
churches of medieval origin. This was affirmed on 30 November 2011 by
Historic Scotland's Director of Policy and Outreach that `the material
is an enormous help as we prioritise and distinguish candidates for
designation and ensure that their entries are accurate, informative and
helpful' [S1]. The national recording body, the Royal
Commission on the Ancient and Historic Monuments of Scotland, also
welcomed information on the churches that is based on firmly grounded
research. The Secretary (chief officer) of the Commission stated on 5
December 2011 that `the survey work and documentation produced by the
project to date is providing original and valuable research that
advances our understanding of the sites' [S2].
SUPPORTING THE ACTIVITIES OF LEARNED BODIES AND LOCAL SOCIETIES
The increased information on the churches has met a major need for both
national learned societies and local historical societies, and has made it
easier for those bodies to provide informed views on the churches.
Enthusiasm for the project is evidenced by the twelve illustrated lectures
that the investigators have so far been asked to provide. These have
varied from a formal lecture on 3 October 2012 to the British
Archaeological Association in Burlington House in London, to a talk to a
local church group in Cupar on 24 April 2013.
Confirmation of the positive impact is provided by a letter of 24
November 2011 from the president of the Royal Archaeological Institute, to
which one lecture was given, which affirms `the signal importance of
such recording work which will form the basis for a wider understanding,
better appreciation of the conservation and management needs and the
springboard for suture actions' [S3].
PROVIDING AN AUTHORITATIVE BASIS FOR THE WORK OF PRACTITIONERS IN THE
FIELD
The architect of the Perth and Kinross Heritage Trust, an arm of Perth
and Kinross Council that is deeply involved in conservation of church
buildings, stated on 30 September 2011 that `the excellent work that
you and your colleagues have done...has been enormously useful in not
only helping us to make early assessments and prioritise the best
`targets' for our work...[but in] informing and developing the
interpretation material which we are developing' [S4].
Archaeologists commissioned to investigate and record the structures and
underlying deposits of churches likewise welcome the Corpus as a
resource to aid efficient and timely searches. AOC Archaeology, a leading
body in such work in Scotland, referred to the Corpus on 15
October 2012 as being `an invaluable resource...with excellent
information and images provided by acknowledged experts, all of it
readily accessible to the researcher. It provides a definitive statement
of...each church' [S5].
Further evidence of the increasingly diverse uses of the information
assembled in the Corpus, are the requests to take local history
and other groups on visits to churches in order to provide guidance on the
interpretation of architectural and documentary evidence, and also to give
those groups the confidence to provide their own guidance on questions of
conservation when the need arises. Four of these have been a direct result
of talks about the project to local societies.
THE WEBSITE
The principal means of disseminating the findings of the project is the
freely available web site, which has an extended page for each of the 105
sites in the pilot phase area, together with an introductory
synthesis of all the information that has been gathered. Between January
2010 and July 2013 the site had over 23,000 hits, with a steady
year-on-year increase. Links to the website have been made available
through a number of online networks, including arts-humanities.net.
Links have also been requested by a number of bodies, including the Royal
Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Scotland, and
Scottish Churches Architectural Research.
FURTHER EVIDENCE OF POSITIVE RESPONSE
There is an evident need for ongoing engagement with a range of interest
groups, and it was pleasing that the London-based Ecclesiological Society
selected the website as one of their websites
of the month (http://www.ecclsoc.org/).
One of the most significant indicators of the value placed on this work
was the invitation to Fawcett to deliver the prestigious six Rhind
lectures on 3-5 May 2013 to the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, with
the support of (and in the lecture theatre of) the Royal Society of
Edinburgh (`Magnificent for the beauty and extent of its buildings and
worthy of everlasting fame' - the architecture of the Scottish late
medieval Church). These lectures drew heavily on material assembled
in the course of the project.
As a particularly gratifying indication of positive reception, the pilot
phase of the project was so highly rated by AHRC's peer reviewers that a
grant with full economic costs of £486,625 has been made for the second
phase of the project, running from 2012 to 2015, and covering the diocese
of St Andrews and Brechin. The project has also been brought to wider
attention in a number of newspaper reports, as well as in a range of
electronic or published forms, including the following:
ScARF (Scottish Archaeological Research Framework),
www.scottishheritagehub.com/content/medieval
Salon (The Society of Antiquaries of London Newsletter), issue 265, 14
November 2011,
www.sal.org.uk/sandbox/salon/
The Society of Antiquaries of Scotland Newsletter, issue 265, 14 November
2011.
The Society for Medieval Archaeology Newsletter, no 43, April 2011.
Sources to corroborate the impact
The impact of the pilot phase has been corroborated by a considerable
number of letters from a range of national and local bodies, including
those cited in section 4:
S1. Dr Debbie Mays, Director of Policy and Outreach of Historic Scotland
(the national body responsible for listing of historic buildings and
scheduling of ancient monuments and for dealing with the statutory
processes)
S2. Diana Murray, head of the Royal Commission on the Ancient and
Historical Monuments of Scotland (the national recording body)
S3. Professor David Breeze, President of the Royal Archaeological
Institute
S4. Andrew Driver, architect to the Perth and Kinross Heritage Trust (the
conservation arm of Perth and Kinross Council)
S5. Dr Anne Crone of the AOC Archaeology Group