Development of international policy and strategies for prevention, control and elimination of rabies
Submitting Institution
University of GlasgowUnit of Assessment
Agriculture, Veterinary and Food ScienceSummary Impact Type
HealthResearch Subject Area(s)
Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences: Veterinary Sciences
Medical and Health Sciences: Medical Microbiology, Public Health and Health Services
Summary of the impact
Rabies is the most lethal known infectious disease and kills 55,000
people annually worldwide, mainly in Africa and Asia; however, it is
almost entirely preventable. Effective vaccines for animals and humans are
available, but their use is limited by cost and accessibility. Research
undertaken at the University of Glasgow by Professor Sarah Cleaveland and
her team has led to the development and adoption of new health and
veterinary policies in East Africa, transforming research findings into
practical strategies for rabies prevention and control. These strategies
reduce the cost of medical treatment (such as post-exposure prophylaxis),
increase its effectiveness (by improving compliance) and eliminate the
barriers to receiving treatment in some of the world's most disadvantaged
communities. Research by the Glasgow team on dog vaccination strategies
has also made a major contribution to the recognition by the World Health
Organization (WHO) that global canine rabies elimination is feasible, with
national and global strategies now focussing on dog vaccination as a cost
effective means of reducing human rabies deaths.
Underpinning research
Rabies develops in people who are bitten by animals (usually dogs) that
are infected with the rabies virus. If left untreated, the disease is
fatal in essentially all individuals once symptoms appear. However,
preventative vaccination is almost 100% effective, as is `post-exposure
prophylaxis' (PEP) treatment — but this must be administered within 24
hours of exposure to the virus. Despite comparative successes in the
control of rabies in Central and South America through mass dog
vaccination programmes, the incidence of canine and human rabies in Africa
continues to rise, killing around 24,000 people annually (almost half of
all cases worldwide). The control and elimination of rabies in Africa and
Asia has been hampered by misconceptions about the epidemiology of the
disease, the ecology of domestic dogs and the cost of preventing rabies in
humans. In particular, policy-makers have often opted for culling `stray'
dogs as the principal strategy for canine rabies control and consider
wildlife to be the main source of rabies in Africa.
In on-going research since 2008, a University of Glasgow team, led by
Professor Sarah Cleaveland (Professor of Comparative Epidemiology,
2008-present), with Drs. Katie Hampson (Research Fellow, 2009-present),
Tiziana Lembo (Postdoctoral Research Associate, 2007-present), Darryn
Knobel (Postdoctoral research associate, 2009-2010) has provided key
evidence and insight into canine rabies control strategies. These
demonstrated that: (i) rabies transmission is not dependent on the density
of dogs, therefore the common strategy of indiscriminately culling dogs is
likely to be ineffective for rabies control;1 (ii) contrary to
common perceptions among policy-makers in Africa, very few (if any)
domestic dogs in Africa are ownerless (or stray) and most are accessible
for vaccination;5 and (iii) mass canine vaccination is feasible
and can result in the elimination of rabies in all species, even in
wildlife-rich areas of Africa,3,4 and crucially, is the most
cost-effective means to prevent human rabies in rural Africa.5
Rabies PEP treatment requires multiple doses, is expensive for developing
nations, and places a heavy economic burden on African healthcare systems.
In addition, vaccine shortages often occur in Africa. Therefore, PEP is
often not available, particularly in rural clinics. This, together with
difficulty reaching clinics and poor patient compliance with PEP doses,
means that many people die unnecessarily from rabies, particularly those
from poor families. In high-throughput clinics, often in urban centres,
regimens that use injections into the skin (intradermal delivery) have
been recommended as a cost-saving alternative to the conventional
injections into the muscle (intramuscular delivery); however, these
regimens are rarely used in Africa and have never been evaluated in these
settings. In 2010, the research team (Cleaveland and Hampson) simulated
different PEP regimens in a range of settings (high-throughput urban
clinics and low-throughput rural clinics), identifying the costs to both
the health authority (per treatment) and the bite victims, including
indirect costs such as travel to clinics. The team found that,
irrespective of the type of clinic, a universal switch from intramuscular
to intradermal regimens would reduce the amount of vaccine required (by
20% in low-throughput clinics and by 80% in high-throughput clinics),
resulting in significant savings to public health budgets and mitigating
the vaccine shortages that occur widely in Africa.6
External collaborators: Deborah Briggs (Global Alliance for
Rabies Control) (study of PEP cost-effectiveness); Alena Gsell (Swiss
Tropical and Public Health Institute, STPHI) (study of ownerless dog
populations in Tanzania). The impetus and ideas for the research in the
field studies were largely provided by the University of Glasgow team, and
the STPHI dog ecology study in Tanzania was embedded within the University
of Glasgow field programme.
References to the research
3. Lembo T. et al. (2010) The feasibility of eliminating canine
rabies in Africa: dispelling doubts with data. PLoS Negl Trop Dis.
4: e626. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0000626
5. Fitzpatrick M.C., Hampson K., Cleaveland, S. et al. (2013)
Cost-effectiveness of canine vaccination to prevent human rabies in rural
Tanzania. Ann Intern Med. (In press Nov 2013, PDF available on
request)
Grant funding
i. Canine Rabies Elimination Demonstration Project, Bill and Melinda
Gates Foundation (2008-2012) $ 9,996,674, awarded to Dr François Meslin,
World Health Organization ($68,312 awarded to Sarah Cleaveland as
technical adviser). (Peer reviewed)
ii. Development and implementation of an effective surveillance system
for rabies in southern Tanzania using innovative technologies. UBS Optimus
Foundation (2008-2011), £487,500 awarded to Katie Hampson and Sarah
Cleaveland as co-PIs. (Peer reviewed)
Details of the impact
The work of Professor Sarah Cleaveland and the University of Glasgow
rabies group has had a strong impact in several African countries and at a
global level. Their research has led directly to major changes in policy,
influencing decisions made by government health and veterinary authorities
in Tanzania and Kenya. In Tanzania, this work led to the development and
adoption of new standard operating procedures for measures that both
control rabies in animal populations and prevent rabies from developing in
humans. In Kenya, the team is currently developing a national rabies
control and prevention plan for the Kenyan government. At the global
level, the team's efforts have led to the drafting of a resolution on the
global elimination of canine-mediated human rabies to be taken forward at
the WHO World Health Assembly in May 2014, which is the vehicle for
controlling the budget and policy decisions of the WHO.
In 2009, Cleaveland helped to develop a cost effective package for
sustainable canine rabies control at a WHO/Bill & Melinda Gates
Foundation Consultation.a The consultation recommended
financial mechanisms by which canine rabies control can be sustained
through cost savings in PEP, essentially adopting a `one health' approach,
where solutions to rabies control are addressed as a joint concern of both
veterinary and medical authorities. Cleaveland's work was debated at the
WHO level, demonstrating both the significant health problem posed by
rabies and the potential for global uptake of the work of University of
Glasgow research, which could lead to effective eradication of the
disease.
Tanzania: Human post-exposure prophylaxis and dog vaccination
Between 2008 and 2012, Cleaveland led the `Canine Rabies Elimination
Demonstration Project', funded by the WHO/Bill & Melinda Gates
Foundation in Tanzania. At the outset of the project period in 2008,
Cleaveland and the Glasgow team (Hampson and Lembo) worked with the senior
health and veterinary authorities in Tanzania to develop new national
Standard Operating Procedures for both human intradermal PEP and mass
canine vaccination, advising on planning, implementation logistics and
vaccine options. These were adopted by the Tanzanian authorities in 2009,
representing a significant achievement in African public health policy.b,c
In 2009 (Nov-Dec), Cleaveland, Hampson and Dr Tiziana Lembo worked with
Tanzanian veterinary officials and collaborators from the WHO and United
States Centre for Disease Control (CDC) Rabies Team to deliver primary
training on the new PEP standard operating procedures to 30 clinicians in
Tanzania and on the delivery of mass dog vaccination schemes to 35
district veterinary officers. These training sessions were complemented by
the training of 22 lab technicians in rabies surveillance techniques (as
part of a separately funded programme of implementing effective rabies
surveillance in Tanzania; UBS Optimus Foundation, 2008-2011). The aim was
for each of these trained professionals to train others and for the nation
to build specialist capacity in the veterinary, medical and surveillance
aspects of rabies control.
The project also included research by both Cleaveland and Hampson
(University of Glasgow) on new strategies for human PEP regimens. Working
in a project area covering the South-East of Tanzania, the team promoted
the use of human PEP vaccination by the intradermal route through training
workshops with medical officers from the Ministry of Health, conducted in
collaboration with the WHO. This was based on research showing it to be a
simpler, cost-effective replacement for intramuscular vaccination, due to
the lower volume dose required. As a result, since early 2010, the use of
intradermal PEP in the project region has increased from 0% to >80% of
PEP vaccinations given (see Figure).d Issues of PEP regimen
compliance to prevent treatment failure have also been improved through a
mobile phone text-based reminder service initiated by Hampson in the
project area.d
Kenya: Informing a national rabies policy
During 2012, Cleaveland was working with the CDC base in Nairobi, which
catalysed the establishment of the Zoonotic Disease Unit (ZDU) within the
Government of Kenya. Through this collaboration, Cleaveland's expertise in
rabies was sought during a large rabies outbreak in the city of Kisumu in
western Kenya, and Cleaveland provided operational advice to the
veterinary field teams, and organised supplies of vaccine. As a result of
this, a plan to develop a national rabies control strategy was initiated
by the ZDU, and Cleaveland invited to develop the outline and framework,
which was presented to the Kenyan Veterinary Association in April 2013.e
The strategy document, which encompasses human PEP, dog vaccination and
rabies surveillance in a step-wise approach, is being finalised within
the Government of Kenya, and has thus been the subject of national policy
discussion.
Rabies Blueprint
The `Rabies Blueprint' is a web-based resource
(caninerabiesblueprint.org), launched in June 2010, providing a
step-by-step guide for health authorities in rabies-endemic areas. It was
conceived and steered by Lembo and the Glasgow team in collaboration with
the Partners for Rabies Prevention, an independent group of rabies experts
from international agencies. The Rabies Blueprint combines all of the
relevant existing rabies control guidelines, addressing the
responsibilities of each stakeholder, legislative frameworks, costs and
implementation strategies. Within the first year the site had 46,000
visitors (over 2,000 per month) from 157 countries, 1,719 cities and five
continents.f The Blueprint has been used in many regions with a
high incidence of rabies, such as Africa (Uganda and Benin) and Asia
(Afghanistan and Indonesia). For example, the Asia co-ordinator of the NGO
`Global Alliance for Rabies Control' uses the Rabies Blueprint for
planning their programmes and operational activities in the Philippines
and Indonesia, describing it as a `valuable tool for training and
implementation of dog rabies control programs' and has cited its use
in the WHO strategic framework for rabies elimination in South East Asia
(2012).g,h
Influencing strategic policy on global health
In September 2012, Cleaveland and Hampson were invited to a WHO Expert
Consultation on rabies held in Geneva, Switzerland, bringing together the
leading practical evidence for discussion and providing a platform to
ratify operational recommendations to be advocated at government level.
This Consultation urged the WHO to continue to advocate human rabies
prevention through the elimination of rabies in dogs and to promote wider
use of the intradermal route for human PEP, which University of Glasgow
research has shown to reduce the volume and therefore the cost of the
cell-cultured vaccine by up to 80%.i
`The research conducted by the team has contributed substantially to
progress on for example the global burden of rabies and the
cost-effectiveness of intradermal rabies post-exposure prophylaxis and
rabies surveillance. The published results of that research have
contributed to updating relevant recommendations of the WHO Expert
Consultation on Rabies.' — Director, Dept. of Control of Neglected
Tropical Diseases, WHO.j
Owing to the significant body of work on rabies from Cleaveland, Hampson
and Lembo, and the resulting impacts on rabies control in East Africa,
Cleaveland has become a prominent expert adviser at the world health
level. She is the leading international adviser for rabies on the WHO
Neglected Zoonotic Disease working group of the Scientific and Technical
Advisory Group for Neglected Tropical Diseases (STAG-NTD); Glasgow
research has thus been pivotal in the prioritisation of canine rabies
elimination as a top priority of the working group.j,k
The report by the STAG-NTDk has resulted in global canine
rabies elimination being identified as a priority of the WHO and
contributed to a WHO resolution on rabies in Africa being officially
tabled for discussion at the World Health Assembly in May 2014, thereby
stimulating policy discussion at the highest inter-governmental level.
Sources to corroborate the impact
a. Human
and dog rabies prevention and control. Report of the WHO/Bill &
Melinda Gates Foundation Consultation. Annecy, France, 7-9 October 2009
WHO/HTM/NTD//NZD/2010.1
b. Rabies Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Standard Operating Procedures (2009),
Ministry of Health and Social Welfare and Ministry of Livestock
Development and Fisheries, Tanzania; available on request.
c. Dog Vaccination Campaigns Standard Operating Procedures (2009),
Ministry of Livestock Development and Fisheries, Tanzania; available on
request.
d. Zacharia Mtema (2013) PhD Thesis, University of Glasgow (Data also
presented in: `Data review report for the WHO-BMGF rabies elimination
demonstration project in Tanzania', 2013); available on request.
e. Statement provided on behalf of the Kenyan Ministry of Health and
Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock development and Fisheries; available on
request.
f. Lembo T, on behalf of the Partners for Rabies Prevention (2012) The
Blueprint for Rabies Prevention and Control: A Novel Operational Toolkit
for Rabies Elimination. PLoS Negl Trop Dis
6(2): e1388. (doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001388) (Rabies
Blueprint website)
g. Statement provided by Coordinator for Asia, Global Alliance for Rabies
Control, Philippines; available on request. h.
Strategic Framework for Elimination of Human Rabies Transmitted by Dogs
in the South-East Asia Region, WHO (2012) (Rabies Blueprint cited on
p.13).
i. WHO Expert
Consultation on Rabies, 2nd report (2013) WHO Technical Report
Series No. 982.
j. Statement provided by Director, Department of Control of Neglected
Tropical Diseases, WHO, Geneva; available on request.
k. Report
of the WHO Strategic and Technical Advisory Group for Neglected
Tropical Diseases (2012).