Samuel Beckett’s Legacies
Submitting Institution
University of ReadingUnit of Assessment
English Language and LiteratureSummary Impact Type
CulturalResearch Subject Area(s)
Language, Communication and Culture: Cultural Studies, Literary Studies
History and Archaeology: Historical Studies
Summary of the impact
The impact activities described in this document are dedicated to
altering cultural perception of the creation, production, and performance
of modern literature through re-presentation of the work of the Irish
writer Samuel Beckett in a variety of informed contexts. Beckett research
at Reading is underpinned by the university's exceptional archival
resources, which include manuscripts of his writings alongside rare
editions, letters, production notes for his dramas, and intriguing
ephemera. Our impact-generating activities around the archive are focused
upon the deployment of those resources in ways which enhance understanding
of the processes behind the creation of literary works and dramatic
performances. This approach to impact has involved researchers in the
Department of English in the curation of exhibitions relating to the
archive; in giving talks at sites crucial to Beckett's literary
development; and also in the digitization of materials relating to
Beckett's major works. Out of this has come testimony from a variety of
people and organisations to the change that has come about in their
attitude and response to a variety of creative phenomena.
Underpinning research
The University of Reading has, across several departments (English; Film,
Theatre and Television; Modern Languages) a diversity of Beckett
scholarship, and Reading contains the highest concentration of Beckett
scholars in the world. These scholars' research activities centre on the
manuscript and book archive of the Beckett International Foundation (BIF)
at Reading. Across past decades, colleagues in English have used and
interpreted the resources of the archive in order to publish a large
number of important research pieces, which primarily aim at increasing the
accessibility, availability, and understanding of Beckett's published
texts, as well as of his manuscripts and other unpublished documents. The
Ideal Core of the Onion: Reading Beckett Archives (Beckett
International Foundation, 1992), edited by Professor John Pilling
(English) and Professor Mary Bryden (French), was an early attempt to
analyse Beckett's manuscripts and abandoned, unpublished work. This was
followed by other scholarship such as Pilling's Beckett's Dream
Notebook (Beckett International Foundation, 1999), which alerted
readers to the complex process by which Beckett evolved his writings from
the outset of his career, as in his `neglected' novel Dream of Fair to
Middling Women. Pilling's work, with Sean Lawlor, on the recent
edition of Beckett's Collected Poems, is the latest example of
this branch of his research and publication activity.
Consequent archival research conducted by Department of English scholars
has led to the publication of many editions of Beckett's works, including
manuscript notebooks. Dr Mark Nixon (2004-present, Reader in Modern
Literature since 2012 and Co-Director of the Beckett International
Foundation) has edited Texts for Nothing and Other Shorter Prose
1950-1976 (2010) in the new Faber edition of Beckett's complete
works, and is editing forthcoming volumes of the previously unpublished Echoes
Bones and of Beckett's German Diaries (2 volumes). A former
member of the Beckett research group in English, Professor Ronan McDonald,
edited, while at Reading during this census period (2003-10), Endgame,
also for Faber (2010).
Latterly, this process of providing accessibility to the choices and
processes behind Beckett's work has taken on a further aspect. Nixon, in
association with Professor Dirk Van Hulle (Centre for Manuscript Genetics,
University of Antwerp and Visiting Research Fellow in the English
Department at Reading) were given exclusive access to Beckett's surviving
library in his Paris apartment. This research consolidated their
scholarship in sourcing Beckett's use of quotations in his work at all
archives (including, of course, Reading) which hold Beckett manuscripts;
this research underpins their co-authored study, Samuel Beckett's
Library (2013). Nixon's collaboration with Van Hulle around the
evolution of Beckett's manuscripts also underpins the initiative behind
the Beckett Digital Manuscript Project, which is detailed below.
Recent additions to the English staff, Dr Conor Carville (2009-present,
Associate Professor since 2012) and Professor Steven Matthews (2013), have
enhanced the impact potential from Beckett at Reading in future years.
Carville's work on Beckett and visual art, included in the `References'
below, has led already to his giving talks on Beckett's visits to the
National Gallery and to the Wallace Collection, in London, at those
venues, and will yield a monograph in the next cycle. Matthews's work
focuses on poetry and Beckett's late style, Beckett and phenomenology, and
Beckett and death. His interests in Beckett's later work will lead to
curation of a public exhibition around Beckett's last, `Sottisier',
Notebook at Reading in 2016, so continuing the long tradition of
research-led re-presentation of Beckett's work and practices to a wide
body of professionals and to a broad public.
References to the research
The references here are the most prominent outputs, under our internal
and external review process, which have been produced by colleagues during
the last REF iteration. They deliberately contain evidence of our
manuscript editing alongside more discursive outcomes of our research in
the Beckett archive.
1. Texts for Nothing and Other Shorter Prose 1950-1976, ed. Mark
Nixon (London: Faber and Faber, 2010).http://www.google.co.uk/
— # ISBN-10: 0571244629 [REF output: of at least 2* quality]
2. Mark Nixon and Dirk Van Hulle, Samuel Beckett's Library
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013) ISBN: 9781107001268 [REF
output: of at least 2* quality]
3. Mark Nixon, ed., Publishing Beckett, British Library, 2011.
ISBN: 9780712358262 [REF output: of at least 2* quality]
4. Mark Nixon, Samuel Beckett's German diaries 1936-37
(Continuum, 2011). ISBN: 9781441152589 [REF output: of at least 2*
quality]
5. The Collected Poems of Samuel Beckett, ed. Sean Lawlor and
John Pilling (London: Faber and Faber, 2012) ISBN-10: 0571249841 [REF
output: of at least 2* quality]
6. Conor Carville, `Autonomy and the everyday: Beckett, late modernism
and post-war visual art.' (Beckett Today/ Aujourd'hui, 23, 2011) [REF
output: of at least 2* quality]
Details of the impact
The University of Reading holds the world's largest archive of materials
relating to the Irish writer Samuel Beckett. The Beckett manuscript and
book archive, housed in the University's Special Collections (http://www.reading.ac.uk/special-collections/collections/sc-beckett.aspx),
is the focus of Beckett-related research at Reading, and is also open to
academic researchers from other institutions and to the public. Each year
it attracts over 250 visitors, including scholars, curators, theatre
practitioners, media, publishers and interested members of the general
public. All visitors to the archive are invited to contact Reading
researchers working in their specific area of enquiry, to support their
visit. The archive itself therefore not only provides a resource for
Reading researchers, but also facilitates their direct interaction with a
broader non-academic constituency of users of the archive and the related
research.
We have chosen to evidence three major recent moments in this REF cycle
as illustrations of the impact that Beckett projects from our staff
continue to make, as well as to suggest the grounds for our future
initiatives. These moments have been selected to demonstrate the range of
our impact initiatives with regard to Beckett and the archive: from making
available the processes of his creativity through manuscript editing; to
public engagement activity derived from material at Reading; to deployment
of the manuscript and documentary materials in the archive to inform new
productions of Beckett's dramatic work. Each area is signalled in the
narratives of specific instances below.
Across this impact census period, however, there have been many other
interventions into a variety of cultural activities related to the case
study — interventions which have altered awareness of the significance of
drama, cultural innovation, and artefacts. Beckett scholarship at Reading
is derived from attention to the processes of creation which underlie the
published works, and it is a shared concern between colleagues to curate
events and display archival materials in informed ways that both speak to
our research, and alter public perceptions of authorship. These
interventions include theatre productions and media events drawing upon
our tradition of engagement with the history of Beckett theatre production
(most recently Waiting for Godot at 60 (2012)). There have also
been significant exhibitions involving curated materials from the archive
relating to the creation of Beckett's unique published work, which have
had key importance in their contexts (e.g., the loan of the `Film'
notebook to Kinemathek Berlin for the exhibition `Experimentelles
Fernsehen' 19 May to late July 2011; and also to the Irish Museum of
Modern Art: `The Moderns', 20 October 2010 to 13 February 2011). The link
between Beckett and Visual Art, integral to Carville's interest and
reflected in `The Moderns', has underscored our various recent loans to
the Beckett Festivals at Enniskillen (2012, 2013). These have excited
theatre practitioners, critics, and local people. The Festival Director,
has noted that `It was the positive feedback on the Beckett archive
presentation last year that has led the festival to commission the much
larger exhibit of `Samuel Beckett: Witness to the Twentieth Century' for
2014'.
-
Manuscript editing: The Beckett Digital Manuscript Project
makes available to the broader international public the writer's
manuscripts in an accessible electronic format (www.beckettarchive.org)
with accompanying print analyses. Tools available on the site allow
visitors to see Beckett's manuscripts in their original, handwritten,
format; in a variety of languages; and through a print transcription.
The project is opening up the archive to a wide range of constituencies
(including theatre directors, education professionals, therapists,
language specialists, and artists). The project also generates new ways
of thinking about Beckett's work, especially for users in the field of
creative practice, by enhancing understanding of his compositional
strategies and his engagement with advances in the arts, technology,
media and science. The release of the first three modules (Stirrings
Still, The Unnamable, and Comment Dire), has reached
constituencies including, for example, theatre practitioners working
with the public sector, in schools, hospitals and prisons. Responses
from various areas of interest have been positive: one arts website
urges `I hope this is the wave of the future and that more libraries and
estates will enter into projects such as this one. I encourage readers
to go check out the impressive demo.'
Another writers' and artists' site praises the `rather wonderful
resource that has just debuted on the World Wide Web.' As further
modules are added to the Beckett Digital Manuscript Project site (the
project runs to 2037), it is anticipated that the impact of the
initiative will expand significantly, with regard to thinking about the
processes of creation of text, theatre performance, and film.
-
Public Engagement: A further key aspect of our impact activity
involves intervention in those places and sites crucial for the
development of Beckett's distinctive writing across genres. Carville has
created outreach events around his research on Beckett and Visual Art.
This has involved talks at the venues where Beckett himself had been a
visitor in the 1930s, venues which provided him with indelible images
that then recur in his work. Carville spoke to audiences of 50+ at the
Wallace Collection, London in March 2013, and at the National Gallery,
London, in April 2013, drawing attention to the correlation between
those paintings which we know that Beckett admired, and the occurrence
of similar images in the novels, and in the design of the production of
several of Beckett's dramas. Carville's research, which draws upon the
notebooks held at Reading, is therefore being carried into the original
contexts Beckett was familiar with. In the process, people's perception
of particular art collections, and of the relation between the visual
and the verbal, is changed. The Education Officer at the Wallace
Collection, has noted that `Dr Carville's lecture was a fascinating
insight into how the art of 17th century Holland influenced one of the
greatest writers of the 20th century. It challenged both the museum and
our visitors to interpret and engage with our collection in new and
interesting ways and encouraged us to make new connections between art
and literature that we hadn't made before.'
-
Theatre Productions: English staff frequently host theatre and
film directors and producers at Reading. Staff deploy their research
into the development of Beckett's own plays and past international
productions of his dramas, in order to inform new productions of his
work through textual and theatre history, including the author's own
decisions about staging and performance. These discussions frequently
involve close consideration of the manuscript record. That material, in
its turn, is frequently curated or re-presented in connection to
specific productions. A recent instance of this is in connection to
Beckett's Not I, which was performed by Lisa Dwan at the
University in April 2013, and subsequently at the Royal Court Theatre.
The performances were staged (and filmed for Sky Arts) against
the backdrop of a curated exhibition, which included Beckett's original
manuscripts for the drama alongside materials relating to its
performance history, to create a unique event attended by over 200
people. The aim was to alter public perception of the immediacy of
performance by placing it within various creative histories. Feedback
taken subsequent to the events recognised the ways in which they had
changed peoples' sense of the possibilities of relating the writing
process per se to performance, and the alteration the
performances had made for a sense of what art is and can achieve.
Examples include: `Having the original manuscripts helps to
bridge the gap between what was in Beckett's mind and what the audience
experiences on stage'. `I had the opportunity of having contact with a
new kind of theatre performance I wasn't familiar with.' `It made me
realise that most of even our unconventional theatre is conventional.'
Our intention is to continue these links of performance to manuscript
text and theatre history in future international biennial Festivals, and
to expand our outreach to include younger viewers during the next
iteration.
Sources to corroborate the impact
For Not I:
On Enniskillen exhibitions: correspondence from Beckett Festival
Director, available on request. For Carville talks at National Gallery,
London and Wallace Collection, London: correspondence with Education
Officer at the Wallace available on request. For blogs on BDMP: