Shaping Policy, Strategic Planning, and Investment in Transport at City, Regional and National Levels
Submitting Institution
University of GlasgowUnit of Assessment
Business and Management StudiesSummary Impact Type
PoliticalResearch Subject Area(s)
Studies In Human Society: Policy and Administration, Political Science, Sociology
Summary of the impact
University of Glasgow research into public sector governance has
influenced planning and
investment in major transport and infrastructure projects. Transport
Scotland's Strategic Transport
Projects Review was the first nationwide, multi-modal, evidence
based review of Scotland's
transport system; as a member of the Board, Professor Iain Docherty
contributed to its
recommendations, adopted by the Scottish Government in December 2008. His
research also
shaped the Commission for Integrated Transport's negotiations with the
Westminster Government
on the White Paper which underpinned the Planning Bill 2008 and subsequent
Planning Act 2009;
informed the Cabinet Office's 2009 Urban Transport strategy and
recommendations; and
influenced 2012 investment planning discussions by Edinburgh City Council.
Underpinning research
Professor Iain Docherty, Professor of Public Policy and Governance
(University of Glasgow since
1999) researches how the changing institutions, processes and
cultures of public sector
management deliver different policy outcomes and what the implications of
these choices are for
the economy, the environment and social wellbeing. Docherty's work is
concerned, in particular,
with the development and implementation of strategic planning and
transport policies in the UK and
Scotland. Over the period 2001-2011, he undertook a programme of policy
analysis research that
shed light on the mismatch between stated intentions of policy and actual
investment and
government spending decisions.
Docherty has worked collaboratively over this period with fellow
academics Mackinnon (University
of Glasgow, 2009-13), Shaw (Professor, University of Plymouth) and Mackie
(Professor, University
of Leeds). Docherty's distinctive intellectual contribution to the work
stems from his research
expertise in public sector administration, which complements his fellow
researchers' backgrounds
in geography and economics. In particular, Docherty has made important
theoretical contributions
in areas such as multi-level governance and the unfolding of devolution,
the impact of governance
structures on policy outcomes, and the political economy of public
investment decisions.
Over the period, Docherty's research has analysed how systems for
strategic policy formulation
feed through into adopted government policies and industry responses. He
explored how the gaps
between stated strategies and targets and actual outcomes might be closed.
A key strand running
through Docherty's research has been the argument for a stronger focus on
sustainable transport
policies, with empirical analysis and findings demonstrating the failings
of the UK Government to
implement such policies in the past.
The research published in Area in 2001, for example, provided the
first academic critique of the
1997 Government's transport policy as set out in its formal Green and
White papers, and ultimately
its policy decisions. This and subsequent research, including Docherty and
Shaw (2008) and
(2011) examined how political and administrative processes of transport
policy formulation and
implementation shaped policy priorities and the extent to which declared
policy goals were
achieved. This research has been extended to further examine how policy
development and
implementation has unfolded in each of the UK's devolved administrations.
MacKinnon, D., Shaw,
J. and Docherty, I (2008) and Shaw, J., Mackinnon, D. and Docherty, I.
(2009) both report the
outcomes of detailed empirical research, with Diverging Mobilities?(2008)
constituting one of the
first major works on the impact of devolution on any aspect of public
policy.
References to the research
1. Docherty, I. and Shaw, J. (2011) "The Transformation of
Transport Policy in Great Britain? `New
Realism' and New Labour's decade of displacement activity", Environment
and Planning A 43(1)
224-251. (doi:10.1068/a43184)
[journal operates rigorous peer-review]. [REF2]
2. Docherty, I. and Mackie, P. (2010) "Planning for transport in
the wake of Stern and Eddington",
Regional Studies 44(8) 1085-1096. (doi:10.1080/00343400902736550)
[Regional Studies is a
leading international journal in theoretical development, empirical
analysis and policy debate in the
multi- and inter-disciplinary field of regional studies which operates
rigorous peer-review].[REF2]
3. Shaw, J., Mackinnon, D. and Docherty, I. (2009) "Divergence or
convergence? Devolution and
transport policy in the United Kingdom", Environment and Planning C:
Government and Policy
27(3) 546-567. (doi:10.1068/c0899r)
[Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy is a
research-driven, fully refereed international journal which seeks to
advance scholarly debates on a
wide range of contemporary policy issues which sit at the interface
between the economy, society,
and the environment].[REF2]
4. Docherty, I. and Shaw, J. (eds) (2008) Traffic Jam — 10
years of `sustainable' transport in the
UK, Policy Press, Bristol. ISBN 978-1847420725/32. [Available from
HEI]
5. MacKinnon, D., Shaw, J. and Docherty, I. (2008) Diverging
Mobilities? Devolution, Power and
Transport Policy in the UK, Elsevier, Oxford. ISBN:
978-0-08-045354-5. [Available from HEI]
6. Docherty, I. (2001) "Interrogating the 10 year transport plan",
Area 33(3) 321-328.
(doi:10.1111/1475-4762.00035)
[Area publishes ground breaking geographical research and
scholarship across the field of geography].
Details of the impact
Docherty's research has had an impact on transport policy across several
jurisdictions. This impact
arose from his sustained engagement with policy makers, as detailed below.
Rail Devolution: Foundation for Impact
Rail devolution was the biggest transfer of power to Scotland from
Westminster since 1999, giving
powers to Scottish Ministers to specify what the rail industry should
deliver in Scotland. The
Scottish Parliament proposed the Transport (Scotland) Bill in 2004 to
incorporate these additional
devolved powers. On the basis of his research expertise, Docherty acted as
Special Adviser to the
Scottish Parliament's Transport and Local Government Committee on the
Transport (Scotland) Bill,
providing extensive oral evidence to the Committee on 21 December 2004 [1].
During that
meeting, Docherty advised the Committee on several issues raised by the
Bill. In particular,
Docherty advised the Committee that the level of powers attributed to the
Regional Transport
Partnerships (RTPs) which were to be established under the Bill might not
be strong enough to
enable them to make a difference to the delivery of transport policy
throughout Scotland. Drawing
from his research based knowledge, Docherty advised the Committee about
arrangements for
equivalent organisations in England, explaining that `not only is funding
proportionate to the size of
the councils, but representation is proportionate, too, and there is a
requirement on organisations
to try to reflect the politically partisan as well as the geographical
nature of the areas that they
cover' [1].
The final report by the Transport and Local Government Committee cites
Docherty's evidence on
12 occasions and draws on his insights on these matters to recommend that
greater powers for
RTPs be investigated as well as a greater level of proportionality in the
size, political representation
and funding for such organisations be considered by Ministers as the Bill
progressed [2]. During its
second
stage of passage through the Scottish Parliament, amendments were
made to the Bill, in
order to address the Committee's concerns, including those about political
representation in RTPs;
the Bill was subsequently enacted in the Transport (Scotland) Act 2005.
The impact of the transfer of powers under rail devolution has extended
well beyond the initial
introduction of the new legislation. Docherty's research based expertise
has continued to
contribute to ongoing developments in transport policy and planning since
2008, which have only
been possible due to rail devolution.
In recognition of his research expertise, Docherty was appointed as one
of two non-executive
Directors of Transport Scotland, serving in this role until 2010.
Commenting on Docherty's
appointment, the Chief Executive of Transport Scotland noted that his
skills and knowledge would
`benefit not only the Agency but also the businesses and communities of
Scotland that were
dependent on its trunk road and railway networks' [3]. Over
the course of his appointment,
Docherty drew from his research to shape and influence Transport
Scotland's major transport
plans, policies and strategies [4]. A key example from this period
is the Strategic Transport
Projects Review.
Strategic Transport Projects Review, 2008
Transport Scotland's Strategic Transport Projects Review (STPR) was the
first nationwide, multi-modal,
evidence based review of Scotland's transport system. Launching the STPR
on 10
December 2008, Transport Minister, Stewart Stevenson MSP, noted that it
was Scotland's largest
and most ambitious Transport Plan. The STPR recommended a programme of
interventions that
included new infrastructure projects, better incentives for sustainable
travel and more carefully
targeted investment across the country.
Docherty was appointed as a member of the STPR Board, which was
responsible for approving
the finalised STPR plan sent to Scottish Ministers in 2009. Docherty made
specific contributions
based on his research on processes of transport policy formulation and the
politics of public
investment decisions to the following proposals:
- The adoption of the strategic transport service objective for the £1bn
Replacement Forth
Crossing project, to maintain cross-Forth transport links for all modes
to at least the level of
service offered in 2006;
- The adoption of the primary strategic objective for the Edinburgh
transport improvement
package to maintain the 60-minute commutable labour market area at the
current level, with a
particular focus on linking areas of economic activity [4].
The STPR identified 29 major transport investment priorities across
Scotland involving a multi-billion
pound spend by the Scottish Government over 20 years. Key projects
identified by Transport
Scotland in STPR were prioritised by Scottish Ministers, with the
Replacement Forth Bridge
Crossing scheme proving a core focus of investment and change. The Forth
Replacement
Crossing is Scotland's biggest infrastructure project in a generation,
with the transformation to the
Forth Bridge Crossing underway and due to be completed in 2016. The
Scottish Government
recognised the significance of this STPR recommendation by committing to
enact legislation,
bringing the Forth Road Bridge Act 2013 into force in March 2013.
In June 2013, Audit Scotland estimated that £7.5bn investment had been
committed by the
Scottish Government to five of the main projects recommended in the STPR,
including the Forth
Replacement Crossing, over the next 30 years.
Urban Transport , Cabinet Office, 2009
Drawing on his transport appraisal and prioritisation research, Docherty
provided evidence to the
Prime Minister's Strategy Unit in 2009 to support its preparation of a
report on urban transport and
its contribution to the economy and quality of life. Docherty met with the
Senior Civil Servant within
the Strategy Unit to inform and review the report. The evidence presented
in the Strategy Unit's
review, to which Docherty contributed, suggested a growing need for
government to define a long-term
vision for urban transport which would rebalance its competing demands,
allowing cities to:
- enable mobility by promoting a wider choice of journey;
- aim to reduce congestion and increase reliability, whilst promoting
greater levels of walking and
cycling; and
- assist streets and public spaces to become more enjoyable places to
be, where exposure to
harmful emissions is reduced, and quality of life is transformed.
The final report, An
Analysis of Urban Transport, was published by the Cabinet
Office in December
2009, setting out recommendations to the Westminster Government,
demonstrating Docherty's
research contribution to strategic discussions and planning by policy
makers and politicians at UK
level.
Planning Act 2009
From 2004-2010, based on his established research expertise in transport
policy, Docherty served
as a member of the Commission for Integrated Transport's (CfIT) Academic
panel. CfIT was an
independent public body established to advise the Government on the
implementation of
integrated transport policy, monitor developments across transport,
environment, health and other
sectors and to review government progress towards meeting objectives. As
part of his role
Docherty prepared a synthesis of his work to inform the CfIT's response to
the Government's 2007
White Paper on Planning for a Sustainable Future. The proposed
legislation sought, among other
things, to speed up the process for approving major new infrastructure
projects, including airports,
roads, and harbours.
Docherty's synthesised research [5] was discussed at the
Commission's Plenary meeting of 19
July 2007 where the Commission noted that key issues he raised would
inform the CfIT response
to the White Paper [6]. The CfIT response [7] borrows
directly from Docherty's paper where it
discusses, for example, assumptions the White Paper makes about
population, future demand for
land, and housing which were directly taken from earlier government
reviews. Following Docherty,
the CfIT response argued for greater scrutiny, and sensitivity testing,
before such assumptions
could be used in national policy and planning. The CfIT response directly
influenced the CfIT's
input into the Planning Bill 2008 (subsequently Planning Act
2009).Docherty's research thus had
an impact during the review period through the influence of the CfIT on
this legislation [8].
City of Edinburgh Council 2012
Docherty's research-driven expertise on the development of urban and
transport planning and
policy has recently helped inform the City of Edinburgh Council's future
development strategies
and plans [9]. His research was used to make recommendations on how
radical transport and
related policies could revitalise Edinburgh's city centre, whilst ensuring
the sustainable
development of Edinburgh's infrastructure and making it an innovative and
economically vibrant
space. Docherty's engagement with Edinburgh City Council has also included
a seminar
presentation (22 February 2012) delivered to the members of the Council
and the business
community at an event focused on Restoring Edinburgh as a City for
People.
Sources to corroborate the impact
1. Docherty's Oral Evidence to Transport and Local Government
Committee December 2004
[Available from HEI]
2. Transport and Local Government Committee Report on the
Transport Scotland Bill (Link)
3. Quote from news release re: appointment of Docherty as
non-executive Director of Transport
Scotland,
(Link)
4. (Former) Chief Executive of Transport Scotland can attest to
the impact of Docherty's research
based contributions as a non-executive director from 2006-10 as well as
his contributions to the
STPR Board. [Contact Details Provided]
5. Professor Docherty Report to CfIT on Planning for a
Sustainable Future, White Paper
published May 2007 [Available from HEI]
6. Minutes of CfIT Plenary Meeting 19 July 2007 [Available from
HEI]
7. CfIT response to the White Paper Planning for a Sustainable
Future (Link)
8. Former Chair of the UK Commission for Integrated Transport can
attest to the impact of
Docherty's synthesised research paper on the Commission's work on the
Planning Bill.
[Contact Details Provided]
9. Head of Economic Planning, City of Edinburgh Council can attest
to the impact of Docherty's
presentation on the planning of improvements to the city centre [Contact
Details Provided]