An innovative approach to cooling underground railways through the application of sustainable ground source geothermal engineering.
Submitting Institution
London South Bank UniversityUnit of Assessment
General EngineeringSummary Impact Type
TechnologicalResearch Subject Area(s)
Engineering: Environmental Engineering, Interdisciplinary Engineering
Built Environment and Design: Building
Summary of the impact
This case study demonstrates how research into ground source geothermal
cooling has benefited a public service organisation (London Underground
Ltd (LUL)), an international engineering consultancy (Parsons Brinckerhoff
(PB)) and the safety and comfort of staff and users of the London
Underground.
Impact includes:
- Implementation of the cooling method at Green Park and Oxford Circus
stations in 2012;
- Inclusion of the cooling approach within LUL's £500m Victoria line
upgrade (2013);
- Additional revenues of £500k (PB) and new contract research for LSBU
(£500k);
- A new commercial capability in design and analysis of ground water
cooling (PB);
- Creation of a specialised professional level post (PB);
- A 2012 Rail Business Award for environmental innovation (LUL);
- International adoption and significant interest in the cooling method.
Underpinning research
The impact described in this case study is underpinned by research
carried out over the period from 1999 to the present day by Dr John
Missenden (senior lecturer, LSBU, retired 2010) and Dr Graeme Maidment
(senior lecturer, LSBU). The research was supported by contracts from
London Underground Ltd (LUL, 2002-8; £202k), Parsons Brinckerhoff (PB,
2007-8; £72k) and grants from The Carbon Trust (2005-7; £71k), a Knowledge
Transfer Partnership project (KTP001678; 2006-9; £375k) and an EPSRC DTA
studentship.
The research explored the concept of using low carbon ground source
geothermal cooling to assist in reducing the increasing temperature of the
underground passenger environment [1]. It involved: (i) a review of
measured and reported thermal conditions on the Underground compared with
thermal comfort metrics used by ergonomists [2] (ii) development of
complex simulation models for heat inputs supported by detailed
thermodynamic steady-state and quasi steady-state mathematical models for
wall heat transfer [3, 4]. These permitted additional thermal analysis to
take place; calculations and simulation studies to be performed; and
cooling technology options to be evaluated [5].
This preliminary research led onto a detailed investigation of the
geothermal cooling potential of the aquifer under London (with LUL and PB)
and to a number of innovative cooling techniques being assessed. The
research included the development of novel cooling delivery methods [6].
On the strength of the research findings, the LSBU researchers and PB
collaborated on research to evaluate candidate cooling models. This was
financed through a £375k Knowledge Transfer Partnership (KTP), co-funded
by PB and the Technology Strategy Board which ran from 2006-9.
A key outcome from the KTP was the design and development of a pilot
ground source cooling system which was installed at Victoria station in
August 2007 [5]. The pilot scheme was conducted by LSBU in conjunction
with LUL. It confirmed the promise of the initial research and
demonstrated significant local reductions in platform temperature i.e.
3°C, improving thermal comfort, using a viable, low carbon,
environmentally sound and cost effective technology. The technology was
demonstrated to be three times more energy efficient than a traditional
air cooled chiller system [6].
The pilot scheme affirmed that: 1) the seepage water cooling system was a
sound concept; 2) the cooling efficacy was comparable to traditional
approaches for station thermal control; 3) the system was more sustainable
using less energy than traditional approaches; 4) the air-water heat
exchanger installed at the platform was highly susceptible to fouling
through dust; 5) that the dust problem could be ameliorated through making
the air paths larger.
The research also demonstrated that: 1) there is a complex interaction
between aquifer, near surface watercourses (Tyburn and Fleet rivers) and
the underground railway tunnels; 2) a strong relationship exists between
the need for water to be removed from the underground continuously to
prevent flooding and the cooling needs at Victoria; 3) water temperatures
between 12 and 17°C are appropriate for providing effective cooling.
This research has implications for the cooling of all underground
transport systems where seepage water and the companion technology of
groundwater cooling from an aquifer are available.
References to the research
[1] Maidment G.G., Missenden J.F., Evaluation of an underground railway
carriage operating with a sustainable groundwater cooling system,
International Journal of Refrigeration, 25 (2002) 569-574. Doi:
10.1016/S0140-7007(01)00055-X
[2] Ampofo F, Maidment G.G., Missenden J.F., Underground Railway
Environment in the UK, Part 1: Review of thermal comfort, Applied Thermal
Engineering, 24 (2004) 611-631. Doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2003.10.017
[3] Ampofo F, Maidment G.G., Missenden J.F., Underground Railway
Environment in the UK Part 2: Investigation of heat load, Applied Thermal
Engineering, 24 (2004) 633-645. Doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2003.10.018
[4] Thompson J.A., Maidment G.G., Missenden J.F., Modelling low-energy
cooling strategies for underground railways, Applied Energy, 83 (2006)
1152-1162
[5] Ampofo F, Maidment G.G., Missenden J.F., Underground Railway
Environment in the UK Part 3: Methods of delivering cooling, Applied
Thermal Engineering, 24 (2004) 647-659. Doi:
10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2003.10.019
[6] Ampofo F., Maidment G.G., Missenden J.F., Application of groundwater
cooling scheme for London Underground network, 2011, International Journal
of Refrigeration, 34 (2011) 2042-2049. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2011.05.016
Details of the impact
The underpinning research summarised in this case study has delivered
benefits directly to a public service provider, London Underground Ltd
(LUL) and a leading international engineering consultancy, Parsons
Brinckerhoff (PB). It has also provided professional technical guidance to
building services engineers and influenced the use or consideration of
ground source geothermal cooling in other underground railways and
networks worldwide.
Using LSBU research findings together with data emanating from the KTP
programme, LUL and its client engineer PB invested significant resources
and expertise in assessing groundwater movement across the London basin to
identify potential locations for the implementation of the technology
(2008-2009). The successful Victoria pilot provided LUL with reassurance
and confidence that the technology was viable. As a result, LUL has
incorporated the cooling concept into its £500m plans for the Victoria
line upgrade [1]. The Victoria pilot also enabled a number of additional
lessons to be learnt by LUL, including an understanding of the energy
usage involved, the optimal system design configuration and the most
appropriate maintenance regime for this cooling technology. These lessons
have been carried forward by LUL and its engineering contractors into the
final designs for future station cooling schemes [1]. LSBU research in
collaboration with PB also indicated a potential benefit for the waste
thermal energy to provide useful heating output for local infrastructure.
This offers further carbon savings such that a typical LUL mechanical
ventilation shaft could be used to produce heat energy for local buildings
at half the carbon cost of a condensing gas boiler and with one sixth of
the system energy requirements. LUL are currently investigating the
commercial prospects of this associated benefit [1].
LUL are basing most of their current station cooling installations on
cooling concepts proposed by the LSBU research. In 2012, LUL installed
such a scheme at Green Park station. This scheme has been recognised for
its environmental impact, winning an Environmental Innovation award
sponsored by Eurotunnel at the 2012 Rail Business Awards [2], giving
exposure and recognition to LUL and its partners. The judge's comments
included: "A clear need at a customer level requiring an innovative
solution — clear objective, nicely explained trial and correction
process of arriving at final workable design, with an excellent
implementation process and an outcome delivering real benefits — a real
marvel". Aspects of the technology implemented and developed at the
Victoria and Green Park schemes have also been adopted by LUL at the
Oxford Circus installation which was completed in 2012 [1].
The schemes at Green Park and Oxford Circus reduce the carbon footprint
relative to other more traditional cooling schemes, providing a more
comfortable, lower cost and more efficient travelling experience for those
using Green Park (34m passenger entries and exits per annum) and Oxford
Circus (81m)) as well as to LUL station staff. [3]
As a result of the successful KTP collaboration with LSBU and work with
LUL, PB have created a new professional level post and successfully
integrated their traditional tunnel ventilation capability with these new
sustainable cooling technologies. To date this has generated over £500k of
additional revenue for PB. The ability to successfully design and analyse
groundwater cooling schemes for underground railway tunnels is now a
marketable skill [4].
The strong relationship established between PB and LSBU continues to
bring mutual benefits. For example, (i) PB are being consulted by other
metros around the world with similar temperature issues to London [4];
(ii) LUL has commissioned further contract research with LSBU (2009-2013;
£500k) to investigate novel cooling processes within underground systems;
(iii) LSBU have been approached by Crossrail to study groundwater cooling
systems for, and their potential benefit to, the Crossrail programme; (iv)
the LSBU research was recognised by the Institute of Refrigeration in
2008, winning the Ted Perry award for sustainable cooling of underground
railways through enhancement of the heat sink effect [5]; (v) a number of
joint conference papers by LUL, PB and LSBU have been produced since 2009,
including at the CIBSE Technical symposium in 2011 [6,7, 8].
Two important industry-leading Technical Memoranda have also been
generated directly as a consequence of the LSBU research on ground source
cooling [9, 10]. Specifically, the CIBSE Technical Memorandum on Ground
Water Cooling systems directly refers to the collaboration between LSBU,
LUL and PB, and refers to the Victoria trial.
The LUL groundwater cooling system has generated considerable interest
worldwide. The Naples Metro have applied the method [11] and a number of
other underground operators are actively contemplating its use. For
example, the Metropolitan Transport Authority is evaluating its use to
cool the New York Metro [12], as are metros in Vienna, Glasgow, Beijing
and Ontario.
Sources to corroborate the impact
[1] Contact: — Programme Delivery Manager, Power, Communications &
Cooling, Capital Programmes Directorate, London Underground Ltd.
[2] http://www.railbusinessawards.com/uploads/files/Winner/Rail%20Business%20Awards%202012%20winners.pdf
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_busiest_London_Underground_stations
[4] Contact: Senior Engineer and Professional Associate, Parsons
Brinckerhoff.
[5] http://www.ior.org.uk/14EXPOQNAJ
[6] Thompson J.A., Gilbey M.J. and Maidment G.G., Control of train air
conditioning in the stalled train event, Proceedings of the 13th
International Symposium on Aerodynamics and Ventilation of Vehicle
Tunnels, New Brunswick, 2009.
[7] Gilbey M.J., Duffy S. and Thompson J.A., The potential for heat
recovery from London Underground stations and tunnels, CIBSE Technical
symposium, De Montfort University, 2011.
[8] Thompson J.A., Missenden J.F. Gilbey M.J. and Maidment G.G., Response
of wall heat transfer to steady and transient flows along a cylindrical
cavity, Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Aerodynamics
and Ventilation of Vehicle Tunnels, New Brunswick 2009.
[9] Groundwater Cooling Systems TM45 – CIBSE Technical Memorandum, 2009.
ISBN: 928-1-903287-89-7
[10] Ground Source Heat Pumps TM51 – CIBSE Technical Memorandum, 2013.
ISBN: 978-1-906846-32-9
[11] http://www.maxfordham.com/projects/stazione-av-napoli-afragola
[12]
http://scienceline.org/2010/02/what-would-you-do-with-eight-million-gallons-of-water-every-day/