An innovative approach to cooling underground railways through the application of sustainable ground source geothermal engineering.
Submitting Institution
London South Bank UniversityUnit of Assessment
General EngineeringSummary Impact Type
TechnologicalResearch Subject Area(s)
Engineering: Environmental Engineering, Interdisciplinary Engineering
Built Environment and Design: Building
Summary of the impact
    This case study demonstrates how research into ground source geothermal
      cooling has benefited a public service organisation (London Underground
      Ltd (LUL)), an international engineering consultancy (Parsons Brinckerhoff
      (PB)) and the safety and comfort of staff and users of the London
      Underground.
    Impact includes:
    
      - Implementation of the cooling method at Green Park and Oxford Circus
        stations in 2012;
 
      - Inclusion of the cooling approach within LUL's £500m Victoria line
        upgrade (2013);
 
      - Additional revenues of £500k (PB) and new contract research for LSBU
        (£500k);
 
      - A new commercial capability in design and analysis of ground water
        cooling (PB);
 
      - Creation of a specialised professional level post (PB);
 
      - A 2012 Rail Business Award for environmental innovation (LUL);
 
      - International adoption and significant interest in the cooling method.
 
    
    Underpinning research
    The impact described in this case study is underpinned by research
      carried out over the period from 1999 to the present day by Dr John
      Missenden (senior lecturer, LSBU, retired 2010) and Dr Graeme Maidment
      (senior lecturer, LSBU). The research was supported by contracts from
      London Underground Ltd (LUL, 2002-8; £202k), Parsons Brinckerhoff (PB,
      2007-8; £72k) and grants from The Carbon Trust (2005-7; £71k), a Knowledge
      Transfer Partnership project (KTP001678; 2006-9; £375k) and an EPSRC DTA
      studentship.
    The research explored the concept of using low carbon ground source
      geothermal cooling to assist in reducing the increasing temperature of the
      underground passenger environment [1]. It involved: (i) a review of
      measured and reported thermal conditions on the Underground compared with
      thermal comfort metrics used by ergonomists [2] (ii) development of
      complex simulation models for heat inputs supported by detailed
      thermodynamic steady-state and quasi steady-state mathematical models for
      wall heat transfer [3, 4]. These permitted additional thermal analysis to
      take place; calculations and simulation studies to be performed; and
      cooling technology options to be evaluated [5].
    This preliminary research led onto a detailed investigation of the
      geothermal cooling potential of the aquifer under London (with LUL and PB)
      and to a number of innovative cooling techniques being assessed. The
      research included the development of novel cooling delivery methods [6].
    On the strength of the research findings, the LSBU researchers and PB
      collaborated on research to evaluate candidate cooling models. This was
      financed through a £375k Knowledge Transfer Partnership (KTP), co-funded
      by PB and the Technology Strategy Board which ran from 2006-9.
    A key outcome from the KTP was the design and development of a pilot
      ground source cooling system which was installed at Victoria station in
      August 2007 [5]. The pilot scheme was conducted by LSBU in conjunction
      with LUL. It confirmed the promise of the initial research and
      demonstrated significant local reductions in platform temperature i.e.
      3°C, improving thermal comfort, using a viable, low carbon,
      environmentally sound and cost effective technology. The technology was
      demonstrated to be three times more energy efficient than a traditional
      air cooled chiller system [6].
    The pilot scheme affirmed that: 1) the seepage water cooling system was a
      sound concept; 2) the cooling efficacy was comparable to traditional
      approaches for station thermal control; 3) the system was more sustainable
      using less energy than traditional approaches; 4) the air-water heat
      exchanger installed at the platform was highly susceptible to fouling
      through dust; 5) that the dust problem could be ameliorated through making
      the air paths larger.
    The research also demonstrated that: 1) there is a complex interaction
      between aquifer, near surface watercourses (Tyburn and Fleet rivers) and
      the underground railway tunnels; 2) a strong relationship exists between
      the need for water to be removed from the underground continuously to
      prevent flooding and the cooling needs at Victoria; 3) water temperatures
      between 12 and 17°C are appropriate for providing effective cooling.
    This research has implications for the cooling of all underground
      transport systems where seepage water and the companion technology of
      groundwater cooling from an aquifer are available.
    References to the research
    
[1] Maidment G.G., Missenden J.F., Evaluation of an underground railway
      carriage operating with a sustainable groundwater cooling system,
      International Journal of Refrigeration, 25 (2002) 569-574. Doi:
      10.1016/S0140-7007(01)00055-X
     
[2] Ampofo F, Maidment G.G., Missenden J.F., Underground Railway
      Environment in the UK, Part 1: Review of thermal comfort, Applied Thermal
      Engineering, 24 (2004) 611-631. Doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2003.10.017
     
[3] Ampofo F, Maidment G.G., Missenden J.F., Underground Railway
      Environment in the UK Part 2: Investigation of heat load, Applied Thermal
      Engineering, 24 (2004) 633-645. Doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2003.10.018
     
[4] Thompson J.A., Maidment G.G., Missenden J.F., Modelling low-energy
      cooling strategies for underground railways, Applied Energy, 83 (2006)
      1152-1162
     
[5] Ampofo F, Maidment G.G., Missenden J.F., Underground Railway
      Environment in the UK Part 3: Methods of delivering cooling, Applied
      Thermal Engineering, 24 (2004) 647-659. Doi:
      10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2003.10.019
     
[6] Ampofo F., Maidment G.G., Missenden J.F., Application of groundwater
      cooling scheme for London Underground network, 2011, International Journal
      of Refrigeration, 34 (2011) 2042-2049. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2011.05.016
     
Details of the impact
    The underpinning research summarised in this case study has delivered
      benefits directly to a public service provider, London Underground Ltd
      (LUL) and a leading international engineering consultancy, Parsons
      Brinckerhoff (PB). It has also provided professional technical guidance to
      building services engineers and influenced the use or consideration of
      ground source geothermal cooling in other underground railways and
      networks worldwide.
    Using LSBU research findings together with data emanating from the KTP
      programme, LUL and its client engineer PB invested significant resources
      and expertise in assessing groundwater movement across the London basin to
      identify potential locations for the implementation of the technology
      (2008-2009). The successful Victoria pilot provided LUL with reassurance
      and confidence that the technology was viable. As a result, LUL has
      incorporated the cooling concept into its £500m plans for the Victoria
      line upgrade [1]. The Victoria pilot also enabled a number of additional
      lessons to be learnt by LUL, including an understanding of the energy
      usage involved, the optimal system design configuration and the most
      appropriate maintenance regime for this cooling technology. These lessons
      have been carried forward by LUL and its engineering contractors into the
      final designs for future station cooling schemes [1]. LSBU research in
      collaboration with PB also indicated a potential benefit for the waste
      thermal energy to provide useful heating output for local infrastructure.
      This offers further carbon savings such that a typical LUL mechanical
      ventilation shaft could be used to produce heat energy for local buildings
      at half the carbon cost of a condensing gas boiler and with one sixth of
      the system energy requirements. LUL are currently investigating the
      commercial prospects of this associated benefit [1].
    LUL are basing most of their current station cooling installations on
      cooling concepts proposed by the LSBU research. In 2012, LUL installed
      such a scheme at Green Park station. This scheme has been recognised for
      its environmental impact, winning an Environmental Innovation award
      sponsored by Eurotunnel at the 2012 Rail Business Awards [2], giving
      exposure and recognition to LUL and its partners. The judge's comments
      included: "A clear need at a customer level requiring an innovative
        solution — clear objective, nicely explained trial and correction
        process of arriving at final workable design, with an excellent
        implementation process and an outcome delivering real benefits — a real
        marvel". Aspects of the technology implemented and developed at the
      Victoria and Green Park schemes have also been adopted by LUL at the
      Oxford Circus installation which was completed in 2012 [1].
    The schemes at Green Park and Oxford Circus reduce the carbon footprint
      relative to other more traditional cooling schemes, providing a more
      comfortable, lower cost and more efficient travelling experience for those
      using Green Park (34m passenger entries and exits per annum) and Oxford
      Circus (81m)) as well as to LUL station staff. [3]
    As a result of the successful KTP collaboration with LSBU and work with
      LUL, PB have created a new professional level post and successfully
      integrated their traditional tunnel ventilation capability with these new
      sustainable cooling technologies. To date this has generated over £500k of
      additional revenue for PB. The ability to successfully design and analyse
      groundwater cooling schemes for underground railway tunnels is now a
      marketable skill [4].
    The strong relationship established between PB and LSBU continues to
      bring mutual benefits. For example, (i) PB are being consulted by other
      metros around the world with similar temperature issues to London [4];
      (ii) LUL has commissioned further contract research with LSBU (2009-2013;
      £500k) to investigate novel cooling processes within underground systems;
      (iii) LSBU have been approached by Crossrail to study groundwater cooling
      systems for, and their potential benefit to, the Crossrail programme; (iv)
      the LSBU research was recognised by the Institute of Refrigeration in
      2008, winning the Ted Perry award for sustainable cooling of underground
      railways through enhancement of the heat sink effect [5]; (v) a number of
      joint conference papers by LUL, PB and LSBU have been produced since 2009,
      including at the CIBSE Technical symposium in 2011 [6,7, 8].
    Two important industry-leading Technical Memoranda have also been
      generated directly as a consequence of the LSBU research on ground source
      cooling [9, 10]. Specifically, the CIBSE Technical Memorandum on Ground
      Water Cooling systems directly refers to the collaboration between LSBU,
      LUL and PB, and refers to the Victoria trial.
    The LUL groundwater cooling system has generated considerable interest
      worldwide. The Naples Metro have applied the method [11] and a number of
      other underground operators are actively contemplating its use. For
      example, the Metropolitan Transport Authority is evaluating its use to
      cool the New York Metro [12], as are metros in Vienna, Glasgow, Beijing
      and Ontario.
    Sources to corroborate the impact 
    [1] Contact: — Programme Delivery Manager, Power, Communications &
      Cooling, Capital Programmes Directorate, London Underground Ltd.
    [2] http://www.railbusinessawards.com/uploads/files/Winner/Rail%20Business%20Awards%202012%20winners.pdf
    [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_busiest_London_Underground_stations
    [4] Contact: Senior Engineer and Professional Associate, Parsons
      Brinckerhoff.
    [5] http://www.ior.org.uk/14EXPOQNAJ
    [6] Thompson J.A., Gilbey M.J. and Maidment G.G., Control of train air
      conditioning in the stalled train event, Proceedings of the 13th
      International Symposium on Aerodynamics and Ventilation of Vehicle
      Tunnels, New Brunswick, 2009.
    [7] Gilbey M.J., Duffy S. and Thompson J.A., The potential for heat
      recovery from London Underground stations and tunnels, CIBSE Technical
      symposium, De Montfort University, 2011.
    [8] Thompson J.A., Missenden J.F. Gilbey M.J. and Maidment G.G., Response
      of wall heat transfer to steady and transient flows along a cylindrical
      cavity, Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Aerodynamics
      and Ventilation of Vehicle Tunnels, New Brunswick 2009.
    [9] Groundwater Cooling Systems TM45 – CIBSE Technical Memorandum, 2009.
      ISBN: 928-1-903287-89-7
    [10] Ground Source Heat Pumps TM51 – CIBSE Technical Memorandum, 2013.
      ISBN: 978-1-906846-32-9
    [11] http://www.maxfordham.com/projects/stazione-av-napoli-afragola
    [12]
http://scienceline.org/2010/02/what-would-you-do-with-eight-million-gallons-of-water-every-day/