Investigating a Legitimate Contribution for Religious Faith, Beliefs and Values in Schools
Submitting Institution
Canterbury Christ Church UniversityUnit of Assessment
EducationSummary Impact Type
CulturalResearch Subject Area(s)
Education: Curriculum and Pedagogy, Specialist Studies In Education
Summary of the impact
This case study outlines the impact of research investigating the
character of a legitimate
contribution to schools by religious believers. The impact is twofold.
Firstly, it has stimulated
considerable public debate by offering an influential alternative to those
who object to religious
contributions in schools. Secondly, it has influenced the classroom work
of teachers in church
schools by offering a positive rationale and practical model for
developing a distinctively Christian
approach to pedagogy. The main beneficiaries are Anglican and Roman
Catholic dioceses, their
schools and teachers.
Underpinning research
Our overall research question is: `In what ways might religious believers
legitimately contribute to
publicly-funded schools?' This is a question of considerable significance,
given that around a third
(approximately 7000) of state-funded schools in the UK have religious
sponsors and their numbers
are increasing as a consequence of the Coalition Government's policies.
The research was
conducted by members of the Faith, Beliefs and Values research theme group
in the Faculty of
Education at Canterbury Christ Church University (CCCU). It was primarily
conceptual and
analytical with some empirical components, and comprised research
undertaken between 2007
and 2012 by Dr Lynn Revell (Reader) and Dr Hazel Bryan (Head of
Department) (both CCCU 1997
— present) and between 2010 and 2012 by Professor Trevor Cooling (CCCU
01/05/2010 — present).
The questions investigated in this research were:
- What are the objections to a distinctively religious contribution to
education, what impact do
these objections have on teachers who are religiously committed and how
can they be
countered?
- Is there a distinctively Christian approach to education that
generates an educationally
justifiable pedagogy?
Question 1 was first investigated by Revell and Bryan in a study of
initial teacher education
students in two higher education institutions. They investigated the
students' perceptions of the
contribution that their personal beliefs might make to their future role
as professional Religious
Education teachers. The researchers worked with those who self-declared as
Christians and those
who self-declared as atheists or agnostics. Both groups understood
objectivity to be a key
professional virtue. However, Christians saw this as problematising their
personal beliefs, whereas
atheists and agnostics saw it as affirming their personal beliefs since
they were not religious. The
research questioned the helpfulness of these perceptions of objectivity,
since Christian students
were over-sensitised as to the place of their beliefs in their
professional life, while atheists and
agnostics were de-sensitised to the need to treat their own beliefs as
controversial. Revell's
empirical research offered the evidence that the received interpretation
of the `objectivity' concept
is debilitating for Christian teachers.
Question 1 was built on by Cooling in an analytical study of the use of
this conception of objectivity
in the influential British Humanist Association's (BHA) education policy.
This research was
stimulated by the increased tempo of the BHA's campaign against faith
schools mounted in
response to the Free school policy of the Coalition Government elected in
May 2010
(https://humanism.org.uk/campaigns/what-you-can-do-to-help/2012-faith-schools-appeal/).
Cooling's
research was commissioned by Theos, the public policy Think Tank
founded by the Bible
Society, and was carried out and funded after he started his appointment
at CCCU. Given its
political topicality, Theos fast-tracked the research report, Doing
God in Education, which was
published in late December 2010. The research was philosophical and
interrogated the view of
knowledge and belief underpinning the BHA's publications and website. It
challenged the
consistency of the BHA's arguments and the policy conclusions derived from
them. Cooling's
report also offered an alternative model of objectivity, which could
underpin an educationally
legitimate religious contribution.
Question 2 is being investigated by Cooling and Revell in on-going,
pedagogically-focussed
research, The Impact of Christian Ethos on Teaching and Learning,
which takes the view of
knowledge developed in response to the BHA as its starting point and
translates this into an
approach for use in church schools. The research responds to the stated
aspiration of the Christian
churches that their schools should be `distinctively Christian'. It is
both theoretical and practical.
Phase 1 developed a pedagogical model called What If Learning
based on a theologically-inspired
model of character education, in partnership with Calvin College in the
USA. Phase 2 is a current
project investigating the implementation of What If Learning in
three church secondary schools in
England.
References to the research
Bryan, H. and Revell, L. (2011), `Performativity, faith and professional
identity: student religious
education teachers and the ambiguity of objectivity.' British Journal
of Educational Studies, 59(4),
403-419. REF2, CCCU.
Cooling, T. (2010) Doing God in Education, London: Theos.
Cooling, T. (2012) `What is a controversial issue? Implications for the
treatment of religious beliefs
in education.' Journal of Beliefs and Values, 33(2), 169-182.
REF2, CCCU.
Cooling, T. (2013a) `The distinctiveness of Christian learning in church
schools,' in Worsley, H.
(ed.), Anglican Church School Education: Moving Beyond the First Two
Hundred Years, London:
Bloomsbury. REF2, CCCU.
Cooling, T. (2013b) `Teachers and Christian religious values.' in Arthur,
J. & Lovat, T. (eds.),
Routledge International Handbook of Religion, Education and Values,
London: Routledge. REF2,
CCCU.
Cooling, T. (2013c) `The formation of the Christian teacher: the role of
faithfulness to the Bible in
conceptualising learning.' In A.B. Morris (ed.), Re-Imagining
Christian Education for the 21st
Century. Chelmsford: Matthew James Publishing. REF 2, CCCU.
Quality of the Research
Cooling's publication Doing God in Education was selected by peer
review as the focus of a
keynote symposium at the British Education Research Association (BERA)
conference in
September 2011. This was subsequently selected by BERA to be its sponsored
symposium at the
American Educational Research Association in Vancouver in April 2012 and
the papers presented
in the symposium were published in a Special Issue of the peer-reviewed
journal Oxford Review of
Education: `Trevor Cooling's Doing God in Education', Oxford
Review of Education, 38(5), 511-566.
Bryan and Revell's article (2011) was subject to peer review for the British
Journal of Educational
Studies, as was Cooling's article (2012) for the Journal of
Beliefs and Values. Cooling's chapters
(all published in 2013) were reviewed by peer reviewers and the editors of
the respective books.
Funding
£30,000 from Jerusalem Trust for Christian student religious
education teachers (PI Revell).
£2,000 from Theos for Doing God in Education (received February
2011, PI Cooling).
£51,000 from The Stapleford Centre for the What If Learning phase
1 project (May 2010-
December 2011, PI Cooling).
£195,000 from five charitable trusts for the What If Learning
phase 2 project (September 2012-August
2014, PI Cooling). The charitable trusts are: Jerusalem Trust
(£100,000), Culham St
Gabriel's Trust (£40,000), a Roman Catholic Trust (£25,000), Hinchley
Charitable Trust (£20,000)
and Hockerill Educational Foundation (£10,000).
Details of the impact
a) Impact on public debate about the contribution of religion to
publicly-funded schools
Cooling's report on the BHA's education policy, Doing God in Education,
has had impact of
considerable reach and significance on public debate and engagement in the
UK with the issues it
raises. For example, it was debated at an over-subscribed event organised
by the Royal Society of
Arts at their London headquarters on 23rd February 2011. The
online video recording of the event
(1) has been viewed 10,807 times (accessed 21/10/13). The report was the
focus of the BBC
World Service programme Politics UK (2) on 25th
February 2012 and of a TES two-page feature on
28th October 2011. There has been continuing debate with the
BHA, whose CEO and the chair of
the Humanist Philosophers' Group, Professor Richard Norman, wrote a joint
response for the RSA
event. As a result of continuing engagement with Cooling, the BHA withdrew
from its public
campaigning against the Sevenoaks Christian School (3). Revell's research
was featured in Nicky
Campbell's BBC documentary (4) at Easter 2010, examining whether
Christians are persecuted in
the UK.
The impact from Doing God in Education has also had international
reach. For example it has been
translated into Russian (5) and an edited version produced in German for
Swiss teachers.
The significance of this impact is that the public discourse surrounding
the research has helped
create a context where those involved in religiously sponsored schools can
be more confident in
the validity of their contribution, as illustrated by the independent
review posted by a former Chief
Executive of the Association of Christian Teachers, who described the
report as the `one book' to
read for a Christian standpoint on education (6).
b) Interim impact on distinctively Christian teaching and learning
practice in church
schools
The pedagogical research is disseminated through a website, produced in
UK and US versions
(www.whatiflearning.co.uk
and www.whatiflearning.com)
that went live in April 2012. The website
is for schools that wish their Christian ethos to shape their teaching and
learning by using the
approach developed in the phase 1 research. Its impact is significant,
albeit interim, in offering
these schools a distinctively Christian pedagogy not previously available
and thereby providing
justification for their claim to promote a Christian ethos in their
classrooms.
The usage statistics for the UK site to the end of October 2013 are a
total of 11,431 visits from 125
countries with 60,278 page views. Of these, 36% were return visits and the
average pages viewed
per visit were 5.27. For the US site, the equivalent figures were 15,318
visits from 133 countries
with 51,173 page views and 39% return visits, and the average pages viewed
per visit were 3.34.
The high percentage of return visits and page views per visit indicates
sustained use rather than
casual visits.
The reach of the What If Learning impact has been to a variety of
schools, such as Roman
Catholic and Adventist denominational schools and individual Free schools.
For example, the
Church Free secondary school (7), which opened in Sevenoaks in September
2013, is basing its
teaching and learning strategy on What If Learning. Since joining
the University in 2010, Cooling
has led events for 20 organisations responsible for groups of schools and
is working with three
schools in an intensive programme focussed on each school's pedagogical
practice. The approach
has been particularly influential on the Church of England (8), the
largest UK provider of schools
with a religious sponsor (nearly 4,600 schools). In March 2013, Cooling
organised a training
conference for Church of England diocesan education teams wishing to use
the approach with
their schools. 50 delegates attended representing over 75% of the 43
dioceses. Participants are
now setting up training events in their local area and a grant of £27,000
from the Jerusalem Trust
has been secured to support this dissemination in 2014. Examples of
dioceses running their own
What If Learning CPD programme are Oxford, York, and Peterborough.
In June 2013, a booklet
designed for Church school head teachers, staff and governors called
Distinctively Christian
Learning? was published by the Association of Anglican Diocesan
Directors of Education, so as to
offer Church of England schools an accessible introduction to the
approach. EdisonLearning (9),
the school improvement partner working with the Church of England, is
adopting the approach in
its work with church schools.
The reach of the impact is also international. For example the Diocese of
Sydney has created its
own URL address for the website and has an officer whose responsibility is
to support schools in
using it (10). She is introducing the approach in six schools, with a
further six expressing interest.
In addition, Cooling has spent two separate weeks in St Andrews Cathedral
School in Sydney
introducing the staff to What If Learning, as well as speaking at a
national conference for Christian
teachers in Darwin in 2011. In America, Calvin College is conducting its
own programme of training
for schools in the US and overseas, including Indonesia, Norway, South
Korea, and South
America.
Sources to corroborate the impact
(1)
http://www.thersa.org/events/audio-and-past-events/2011/is-there-a-place-for-god-in-education
for the video of the panel debate at the RSA.
(2)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/p00dwqfb/Politics_UK_25_02_2011_Doing_God_in_education/
for the BBC world Service programme.
(3) Chief Education Officer, British Humanist Association. (Contact
ID.1)
(4)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/7540609/BBCs-Nicky-Campbell-Christians-feel-persecuted-by-human-rights-law-and-councils.html
for the programme on Revell's research.
(5) http://www.acsi.org.ua/images/Doing_God_in_Education.pdf
to see the Russian translation
of Doing God in Education.
(6) http://www.amazon.co.uk/Doing-God-Education-Trevor-Cooling/dp/0956218237
for an
independent review.
(7) Headteacher, Trinity School, Sevenoaks. (ContactID.2)
(8) Head of School Policy, Church of England. (Contact ID.3)
(9) Managing Director, EdisonLearning. (Contact ID.4)
(10)Director of Education, Anglican Education Commission, Diocese of
Sydney. (Contact ID.5)