Improving charity reporting and accounting
Submitting Institution
Queen's University BelfastUnit of Assessment
Business and Management StudiesSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services: Accounting, Auditing and Accountability
Studies In Human Society: Policy and Administration
Summary of the impact
For the past decade, a research programme led by Professor Noel Hyndman
has investigated accountability and governance in the UK charity sector.
Outputs from the research have shaped the national draft reporting and
accounting framework, Statement of Recommended Practice (SORP), which
provides a mechanism for charities to meet legal accounting requirements
and provides consistency in the sector's interpretation of accounting
standards. The new framework will apply to more than 200,000 charities in
the UK, which have an estimated total annual income of over £60 billion.
Underpinning research
Since 2003, an important stream of research at Queen's University
Management School has examined charity accounting, accountability and
governance, focusing particularly on performance reporting, stakeholder
engagement, and reporting frameworks. The publications arising from the
research have highlighted the critical importance of the sector's
accountability and have shaped the regulatory framework and reporting
practices of charities.
One facet of the research developed by Hyndman, in conjunction with
Connolly, has explored the accounting methods used by charities to enable
them to be held accountable for their performance (see Outputs 1 and 5). A
key conclusion of this research was that the information provided on
performance in the reports of charities was deficient. On the basis of
this and related research, calls were made (for example, by the Charity
Finance Group and New Philanthropy Capital) for charities to improve how
they reported information on performance and impact.
Complementary research conducted by Hyndman (with McDonnell) explored the
extent and impact of stakeholder engagement in relation to reporting
frameworks; this led to a detailed critique of the `governance' of
charities (see Output 2). Subsequent research by Connolly, Hyndman and
McConville, using a stakeholder salience framework to analyse the
evolution of the UK charity Statement of Recommended Practice, produced
further evidence in support of the critique (see Outputs 4 and 6 below).
The most visible manifestation of this research was seen in work for the
Charity Commission and the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator (OSCR)
(the charity regulators in Britain) in 2009, which resulted in the
publication of the report, Charity Reporting and Accounting: Taking
Stock and Future Reform (see Output 3). This was effected by a team
from QUMS (Connolly, Hyndman and McConville) who used the UK's largest
ever consultation of stakeholders on a charity-related accounting
pronouncement. Key findings of this research included:
- The SORP to date has been a force for good, but any new framework
should be written for small charities with `add-ons' for medium and
large charities;
- There is great value in reporting achievements, and the `story'
approach is particularly useful;
- There is a need to develop clear definitions of the different types of
reserves, especially regarding the calculation of `free' reserves.
The launch of the report was part of a `Roadmap' event hosted by the
Charity Commission and OSCR at Church House Conference Centre,
Westminster, London in December 2009 to guide the development of future
Charity SORPs. The event was attended by about 200 key individuals
connected to the UK charity sector, and the research was subsequently
rolled out in a series of subsequent events throughout the UK and Ireland
(Cardiff, Sheffield, Belfast, Edinburgh and Dublin).
As part of the roll out (and discussion) of the proposed new SORP and
regulatory frameworks for Northern Irish and GB charities, a conference
`Charity Accounting, Reporting and Regulation: Reflections and Imminent
Changes' took place at QUMS on Friday 4th October 2013. This
was organised jointly by QUMS (Hyndman, Connolly and McConville), the
Charity Commission for Northern Ireland (CCNI) and the Charity Commission
(England & Wales). It had plenary speakers from each of these
institutions: Professor Noel Hyndman (QUMS); Ray Jones (Head of
Accountancy Policy, Charity Commission England and Wales); and Frances
McCandless (Chief Executive, CCNI). Participants from the sector and other
key stakeholder groups attended (including politicians, members of the
legal and accountancy professions, and representatives of government
departments). In total, over 150 attended (which was the maximum capacity
for the venue; the conference being significantly oversubscribed). The
feedback elicited was collected for use in the finalising of the new SORP
and regulatory arrangements in Northern Ireland
The coverage, dissemination and contribution of the research were factors
in the appointment of Hyndman to a number of influential committees
charged with steering charity reporting and accounting, including, between
2003 and 2005, the Annual Reporting Advisory Group of the Charity
Commission for England and Wales; and the Charity SORP Committee from 2006
to date.
References to the research
Output 1
Connolly, C. and N Hyndman (2004), `Performance reporting: a comparative
study of British and Irish charities, British Accounting Review,
36(2), 2004, pp. 127-154.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2003.10.004
Output 2
Hyndman, N. and P. McDonnell (2009), `Governance and Charities: An
Exploration of Key Themes and the Development of a Research Agenda',
Financial Accountability & Management, 25(1), pp. 5-31. Listed
in REF2
Output 4
Connolly, C., Hyndman, N. and D. McConville (2013), `UK charity
accounting: An exercise in widening stakeholder engagement', British
Accounting Review, 45(1), pp. 58-69. Listed in REF2
Details of the impact
The analysis provided by QUMS researchers at the request of the Charity
Commission and OSCR strongly influenced the SORP Committee's review and
amendment of the present (2005) SORP. A new SORP, has now been drafted and
is out for consultation drawing heavily on the QUMS research.
In the foreword to the 2009 report, Charity Reporting and Accounting:
Taking Stock and Future Reform, Andrew Hind (Chief Executive,
Charity Commission) and Jane Ryder (Chief Executive, OSCR) wrote:
"The Charity Commission and the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator,
as the joint SORP-making body, welcome this insightful and independent
analysis of the SORP research undertaken with the assistance of the SORP
Committee and our sector partners....We would like to thank Professor Noel
Hyndman and the team at Queen's University Belfast for their report... We
commend this thoughtful report.... As the evidence demonstrates,
high-quality charity reporting is essential to maintaining public
confidence in the work of charities."
The impact of the QUMS research is evidenced in the minutes of SORP
Committee, which are publicly available. Two of many examples of extracts
from these minutes that show the impact of the research are:
Minutes of 22nd September 2009
"3.8 The Committee concluded that:
- The findings of the report were extremely valuable in identifying the
strengths of SORP and those
areas where improvements could be made;
- The outcome should be shared with the sector. The Charity Commission and
OSCR will publish
the report as the joint SORP making body, acknowledging the role of
Queen's University Belfast, in
analysing and summarising the findings;
- The overwhelming support for SORP shows that a SORP or similar framework
is essential to
underpin confidence in charity reporting and accounting."
Minutes of 13th October 2010
"Item 7: New SORP module — Fund Accounting
7.1 Nigel Davies introduced this module. He noted that the 2008-09 SORP
research findings had identified that the analysis of funds was an
essential aspect of charity accounting and that real difficulties existed
in practice in properly identifying the funds held."
The research has also been widely cited and used by other accounting
bodies.
The Charity Commission has cited Charity Reporting and Accounting:
Taking Stock and Future Reform in responses to a range of
consultations to outside parties, including to the:
- Accounting Standards Board consultation on the future of UK GAPP on
27th January 2010;
- Financial Reporting Council's discussion paper Cutting Clutter
on 30th September 2011; and
- the International Accounting Standards Board in their 'Exposure Draft:
revenue from contracts with customers' on 9th January 2012.
In addition, it has been promoted and used by other parties, including:
- the Welsh Audit Office in responding to the Accounting Standards Board
consultation on the future of UK GAPP (26th January 2010); and
- Howieson, B. in an agenda paper to the Australian Accounting Standards
Board `Defining the Reporting Entity in the Not-for-Profit Private
Sector (including consideration of the concept of control) Part 1 of
Phase 1 — Identification of Issues Associated with the Application of
Control' at their meeting of 18-19 April 2012.
Sources to corroborate the impact
- As a basis for corroboration of impact of the Charity Reporting
and Accounting: Taking Stock and Future Reform report on the
development of the revised SORP, a testimony has been provided by Head
of Accountancy Policy at the Charity Commission
- The Foreword to Charity Reporting and Accounting: Taking Stock and
Future Reform (Charity Commission and OSCR) by Andrew Hind (Chief
Executive, Charity Commission) and Jane Ryder (Chief Executive, OSCR),
outlining the research's importance to the development of appropriate
accounting and reporting by charities, can be accessed at:
http://www.charity-commission.gov.uk/Library/publications/pdfs/rs21text.pdf
- Minutes of SORP Committee 22nd September 2009 (Charity Commission and
OSCR), referring to the importance and potential use of the research,
can be accessed at:
http://www.charitycommission.gov.uk/Library/minutes220909final.pdf
- Minutes of SORP Committee 13th October 2010 (Charity Commission and
OSCR), illustrating how the research influenced the development of a
draft module of the new SORP, can be accessed at:
http://www.charitycommission.gov.uk/Library/minutes131010.pdf
- The use of the research by the Charity Commission on the Accounting
Standards Board's consultation on the future of UK GAPP on 27th January
2010 can be accessed at:
http://www.charitycommission.gov.uk/Library/about_us/paper10obm03.pdf
- The use of the research by the Charity Commission and OSCR on the
Financial Reporting Council's discussion paper Cutting Clutter
on 30th September 2011 can be accessed at:
http://www.charitycommission.gov.uk/library/FRC_paper.pdf
- The use of the research by the Charity Commission in responding to the
International Accounting Standards Board's `Exposure Draft: revenue from
contracts with customers' on 9th January 2012 can be accessed at:
http://www.fasb.org/cs/BlobServer?blobcol=urldata&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobkey=id&blobwhere=1175823633209&blobheader=application%2Fpdf
- The use of the research by the Welsh Audit Office in responding to the
Accounting Standards Board consultation on the future of UK GAPP (26th
January 2010) can be accessed at:
http://www.frc.org.uk/Our-Work/Publications/ASB/Consultation-Paper-Policy-Proposal-The-Future-of-U/UK-GAAP-August-2009/CL31-Wales-Audit-Office.aspx
- The use of the research in an agenda paper to the Australian
Accounting Standards Board `Defining the Reporting Entity in the
Not-for-Profit Private Sector (including consideration of the concept
of control) Part 1 of Phase 1 — Identification of Issues Associated
with the Application of Control' at its meeting of 18-19 April
2012 can be accessed at:
http://www.aasb.gov.au/admin/file/content102/c3/2012_Apr_AP_6.3_Howieson_NFP_Private_Sector_Paper.pdf