Evidence for the Harmful Effect of Stock Enhancement and Commerical Farming on Native Gene Pools of Atlantic Salmon and Brown Trout
Submitting Institution
Queen's University BelfastUnit of Assessment
Agriculture, Veterinary and Food ScienceSummary Impact Type
EnvironmentalResearch Subject Area(s)
Environmental Sciences: Environmental Science and Management
Biological Sciences: Ecology, Genetics
Summary of the impact
The effects of accidental salmon farm escapes, intentional releases of
non-native salmon and
trout, and stocking of fertile farm-reared trout, on the genetic makeup,
fitness and long-term
viability of wild populations has been a matter of increasing concern over
the past two decades.
Ferguson and Prodöhl's group demonstrated that offspring of farmed, first
and second generation
hybrid and backcrossed salmon and trout showed reduced survival compared
with wild native fish,
and that repeated escape/introduction events can cause a reduction in the
biological fitness of
vulnerable wild populations leading to reductions in numbers and
potentially to their extinction.
These findings led directly to changes in regulations and guidelines by
relevant major stakeholders
including the Environment Agency (England & Wales), Wild Trout Trust,
North Atlantic Salmon
Conservation Organisation, World Wildlife Fund, and governments in Europe
and North America.
Underpinning research
Context: Angling for wild brown trout and Atlantic salmon, as well
as farming for direct table
consumption, is worth over £1.5 billion (c. £900 million and c. £650
million for angling and farming
respectively) annually in Britain and Ireland. The salmon farming industry
world-wide is worth £4.2
billion. Due to anthropogenic factors (e.g. habitat degradation,
introduced diseases and parasites,
overfishing) wild stocks of both species have declined throughout Britain
and Ireland and
elsewhere within their ranges. Both socio-economic and environmental
considerations are,
therefore, very important when considering management of these species in
respect to fisheries
and biodiversity. Atlantic salmon and brown trout farming, and stocking
with farm-reared and non-
native salmon and trout, have been the most prevalent methods of
attempting both to meet the
consumer demand for these fish and to mitigate real or perceived wild
population declines.
However, the impacts of salmon farm escapes, intentional releases of
non-native salmon and trout
and stocking of fertile farm-reared trout on the genetic integrity,
fitness and long-term viability of
wild populations have been a matter of considerable debate over many
years, with little empirical
evidence prior to the QUB studies.
Research at QUB: For the last 40 years researchers at QUB, under
the leadership of Professors
Andrew Ferguson (retired 30/11/04, Professor Emeritus until 30/06/14) and
Paulo Prodöhl, have
researched molecular population genetics with a particular focus on the
conservation and
management of salmonid fishes, especially brown trout and Atlantic salmon.
Farm-reared Atlantic
salmon and brown trout differ from their wild counterparts genetically
(primarily due to
domestication in culture), phenotypically, and behaviourally. Individual
wild populations differ
substantially in their genetic make-up as a result of colonisation history
and local adaptation. The
genetic impact on native populations of deliberate and/or inadvertent
introductions of farmed stock
and non-native salmonids has been an area of particular research interest
by the group. From
1993 to 2002 Ferguson and Prodöhl, in collaboration with McGinnity (joint
QUB/Salmon Research
Agency of Ireland, now the Marine Institute of Ireland) and colleagues
from University College
Cork, Scottish Office Marine and Freshwater Laboratories, Norwegian
Institute for Nature
Research, Xunta Galicia, and University of Oviedo, Spain, carried out
novel investigations in this
area. This work was supported by two major EC grants (totalling £3M; QUB
was coordinator of
one), as well as grants from NERC and the Marine Institute Ireland
specifically to QUB. Innovative
common garden experiments were made feasible by the previous development
of single locus
DNA fingerprinting for salmonids (also EC funded); QUB were the first
group worldwide to develop
and publish the application of genetic markers for the elucidation of
previously intractable
ecological questions associated with salmonid biology. DNA fingerprinting
enabled for the first time
common garden experiments to be undertaken under natural conditions from
the egg stage
onwards and continued in subsequent generations. This, along with the
unique freshwater and
marine field facilities of the Marine Institute, enabled large scale
experiments to be undertaken in
the wild that were subsequently of widespread interest to salmonid
biologists and managers in both
Europe and North America. During the same period and subsequently,
research on salmon and
trout involved studies of the distribution and changes in genetic
diversity, and local adaptation, in
natural populations of both species. The unique trout populations of Lough
Melvin were one focus
of such investigations. In 2007, Prodöhl received a 7-year grant (value €1
million - Beaufort Marine
Award) in Fish Population Genetics to continue research on the impacts of
deliberate and/or
inadvertent introductions on native salmonid populations. As part of this
project, additional common
garden studies of native, non-native and farm-origin brown trout are being
undertaken.
References to the research
1. *McGinnity, P., Stone, C., Taggart, J. B., Cooke, D., Cotter, D.,
Hynes, R., McCamley, C.,
Cross, T. and Ferguson, A. (1997). Genetic impact of escaped farmed
Atlantic salmon (Salmo
salar L.) on native populations: use of DNA profiling to assess
freshwater performance of wild,
farmed, and hybrid progeny in a natural river environment. ICES
Journal of Marine Science 54:
998-1008. (cited 121 times)
2. *McGinnity, P., Prodöhl, P., Ferguson, A., Hynes, Ó Maoiléidigh, R.
N., Baker, N., Cotter, D.,
O'Hea, B., Cooke, D., Rogan, G., Taggart, J. and Cross, T. (2003). Fitness
reduction and
potential extinction of wild populations of Atlantic salmon Salmo
salar as a result of
interactions with escaped farm salmon. Proceedings of the Royal
Society B 270: 2443-2450.
(cited 256 times).
3. McGinnity, P., Prodöhl, P., Maoiléidigh, N. Ó., Hynes, R., Cotter, D.,
Baker, N., O'Hea, B. and
Ferguson A. (2004). Differential lifetime success and performance of
native and non-native
Atlantic salmon examined under communal natural conditions. Journal of
Fish Biology 65: 1-15.
4. Ferguson, A. (2004). The importance of identifying conservation units:
Brown trout and pollan
biodiversity in Ireland. Biology and Environment 104: 33-41.
5. McKeown, N. J., Hynes, R. A., Duguid, R. A., Ferguson, A. and Prodöhl,
P. A. (2010).
Phylogeographic structure of brown trout Salmo trutta in Britain
and Ireland: glacial refugia,
postglacial colonization and origins of sympatric populations. Journal
of Fish Biology, 76: 319-347.
6. Keenan, K., Bradley, C. R., Magee, J. J., Hynes, R. A., Kennedy, R.
J., Crozier, W. W., Poole,
R., Cross, T. F., McGinnity, P., Prodöhl, P. A. (2013). Beaufort trout
MicroPlex: a high
throughput multiplex platform comprising 38 informative microsatellite
loci for use in resident
and anadromous (sea trout) brown trout Salmo trutta genetics
studies. Journal of Fish Biology
82: 1789-804.
*References that best indicate the quality of the underpinning research
Related Research Grants:
• 1993-1996; Sponsor: EU AR1; "An assessment of the genetic consequences
of deliberate and
inadvertent introductions of non-native Atlantic salmon into natural
populations [£400,000]
• 1994-1996; Sponsor: EU FP4; "Hybridisation between escaped farmed
Atlantic salmon and
brown trout: frequency, distribution, behavioural mechanisms and effects
on fitness"
[£114,800]
• 1996-1997; Sponsor: EA England & Wales; "Genetic stock
discrimination in Atlantic Salmon &
Sea Trout" [£6,788]
• 1996-1997; Sponsor: NERC; "Nucleotide sequence analysis of brown trout"
[£26,121]
• 1998-1999; Sponsor: EA England & Wales; "Mitochondrial DNA analysis
of scale tissue from
brown trout" [£13,200]
• 2000-2001; Sponsor: NERC; "The genetic impact of escaped farmed
Atlantic Salmon"
[£36,073]
• 2000-2001; Sponsor: Marine Institute (Ireland); "Genetic Impact of the
introduction of ranched,
farmed and non-native Atlantic salmon into a salmon population" [£27,190]
• 2007-2015; Sponsor: Marine Institute (Ireland); "Beaufort Marine -
Fisheries Genetics" [€1M]
• 2008-2011; Sponsor: EU FP7; "Atlantic Salmon SALSEA-MERGE" [£81,141]
• 2010-2013; Sponsor: EC (non-framework projects); "Celtic Sea trout" [£23,700]
• 2012-2013; Sponsor: Inland Fisheries Ireland (Ireland); "Irish brown
trout population structure
and genetic stock identification" [£24,000]
Details of the impact
Current farm production of Atlantic salmon in the North Atlantic is about
1 million tonnes per year.
Marine cages are vulnerable to damage by storms, predators and collisions,
and escapes
inevitably occur. It is estimated that some two million Atlantic salmon
escape each year in the
North Atlantic, which is equivalent to about 50% of the total number of
wild adult salmon in the
area. Escaped salmon enter rivers where they breed and interbreed with
wild salmon, thereby
changing the genetic make-up of wild populations. Farm-reared brown trout
are stocked in most
European countries where native populations are also present. In Britain
and Ireland over two
million such trout are stocked each year. Many local angling groups also
maintain hatcheries for
stocking both species.
The key findings of our salmon studies were that offspring of farmed,
first and second generation
hybrids, and backcrosses both to wild and farmed salmon showed reduced
survival compared with
wild salmon, and that repeated escape events can cause a reduction in
survival and reproductive
success of vulnerable wild populations potentially leading to their
extinction. Brown trout
investigations showed four detrimental impacts of stocking farm-reared
brown trout into wild
populations: (1) Loss of genetic diversity among wild populations, such
diversity being essential for
long-term survival and continued adaptation to changing conditions; (2)
Reduction in fitness due to
loss of local adaptations as a result of interbreeding with farm-reared
trout; (3) Reduction in fitness
as a result of interbreeding with farm-reared trout, which are maladapted
for life in the wild due to
domestication; (4) Loss of key life history types, and consequent
reduction in diversity of angling
opportunity and experience.
Due to the fact that almost all the brown trout population genetic
research in the UK and Ireland
had been carried out at QUB, together with key inter-related work on
Atlantic salmon, Ferguson
was asked by the Environment Agency (England & Wales) to produce a
report on genetic impacts
of stocking on indigenous brown trout populations. Ferguson's (2007)
report is one of the main
sources listed under Research References by the Environment Agency (EA) in
their 2008 Review
of Brown Trout Policy. It was described by the EA as part of their "work
with leading authorities on
trout fisheries management, analysis of scientific research, and an
extensive consultation
process". Ferguson's report examined evidence on the impact on wild trout
stocks of stocking
domesticated fertile brown trout and on the potential alternative use of
sterile fish. This policy
review was pivotal for the change of brown trout stocking policy in
England in Wales. The
Environment Agency made the decision in 2008 to stop giving consent to
stock rivers and lakes
with fertile (diploid) farm strain brown trout in England and Wales from
2015, only stocking with
infertile (female triploid) brown trout or the progeny of local broodstock
reared under a suitable
regime being permitted.
As a direct result of work carried out at QUB and in response to the
Species and Habitats Review
Report, published in 2007, brown trout has been added to the list of
priority fish species in the UK
Biodiversity Action Plan, which is the UK Government's response to the
Convention on Biological
Diversity, signed in 1992 in Rio de Janeiro. Following advice to the
Northern Ireland Department of
the Environment's Environment and Heritage Service (EHS), later NI
Environment Agency (NIEA),
on the existence of unique brown trout populations, Lough Melvin was
declared an Area of Special
Scientific Interest (ASSI) in 1997. Under ASSI status, no stocking with
farm strain trout is allowed.
Indeed any change in management requires NIEA permission. The Wild Trout
Trust, a major
charity dedicated to the conservation of brown trout in Britain and
Ireland, produced a statement in
2012 providing background and advice to fishery managers on brown trout
genetics and stocking.
This 15-page document includes five citations of QUB work and, as a
scientific adviser to the Trust,
Ferguson made a substantial contribution to drafting it.
Following concerns about the impact of salmon farm escapes, the WWF set
up a dialogue
involving key scientists and farm industry representatives. Ferguson was
invited to be a member of
the working party. The final global standards for the industry (published
February 2012) in respect
of genetic impacts are based substantially on QUB publications. The North
Atlantic Salmon
Conservation Organisation (NASCO), an international body established by
inter-governmental
convention, sought QUB advice on genetic impact of escaped farm salmon and
on supportive
breeding (use of offspring of native broodstock) on various occasions over
the past 20 years.
Current (2009-2011) NASCO international guidance draws significantly on
this advice and our
publications.
European government agencies (e.g. Scotland, Norway) have implemented
advice on trout
stocking and farm escapes. New legislation came into force on August 1,
2008, regulating the
introduction the stocking of all species of freshwater fish within
Scotland, including trout and
salmon. Internationally, results of QUB studies on salmon escapes have
been central to the
development of a national policy for the farming of European origin salmon
in Canadian waters
commissioned by the Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat (Verspoor et
al., in press:
corroborated by Professor, University of the Highlands and Islands) on
behalf of the Canadian
Government.
Sources to corroborate the impact
- Ferguson, A. (2007). Genetic impacts of stocking on indigenous brown
trout populations.
Environment Agency Science Report SC040071/SR, 93pp. ISBN
978-1-84432-798-0. Available
at: http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/research/library/publications/39903.aspx
- Environment Agency (2008). Brown Trout Stocking Review 2007/8. Review
Outcome and
Summary of Consultation Response (available at:
http://www.environmentagency.gov.uk/static/documents/Leisure/consultation_summary_2026751.pdf)
- The UK Biodiversity Action Plan (UK BAP). A list of UK BAP priority
fish species is available at:
http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-5164.
- Advice to DOE on Lough Melvin brown trout is available at
http://www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/lough_melvin_assi_citation.pdf
and
http://www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/print/lough_melvin_assi_vam.pdf.
- The Wild Trout Trust statement on trout stocking available at: http://www.wildtrout.org/node/748
- WWF salmon aquaculture global standard available at:
http://www.worldwildlife.org/what/globalmarkets/aquaculture/dialogues-salmon.html
- NASCO Final Report of the Aquaculture, Introductions and Transfers and
Transgenics Focus
Area Review Group (http://www.nasco.int/pdf/2011%20papers/CNL(11)11.pdf)
- Regulation of trout and salmon stocking in Scotland available at:
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/marine/Licensing/fishintros
- NASCO (2008). Interim Report of the Socio-Economics Working Group
(2008). An
Economic/Socio-Economic Evaluation of Wild salmon. Available at:
http://www.nasco.int/pdf/socioeconomics/se_rep2008.pdf
- Verspoor, E., McGinnity, P., Bradbury, I and Glebe, B. (in press).,
The Potential Direct and
Indirect Genetic Consequences for Native North American Atlantic Salmon
from Interbreeding
with European-Origin Farm Escapes. Report commissioned by the Canadian
Science Advisory
Secretariat on behalf of the Canadian Government.
- EFSA GMO Panel (EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms), 2013.
Guidance on the
environmental risk assessment of genetically modified animals. EFSA
Journal 2013 11(5):3200,
190 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3200 Available online: www.efsa.europa.eu/efsajournal.
- Research Director, The Atlantic Salmon Trust.
- Professor, University of the Highlands and Islands.
- Secretary, the North Atlantic Salmon Conservation Organization.