Driving the waste reduction agenda: facilitated uptake by Local Authorities of knowledge, ideas and techniques for developing waste prevention plans
Submitting Institution
University of NorthamptonUnit of Assessment
Geography, Environmental Studies and ArchaeologySummary Impact Type
EnvironmentalResearch Subject Area(s)
Engineering: Environmental Engineering
Summary of the impact
Wastes management represents a major global environmental challenge. In
the early 2000s Defra
recognised that the UK's emphasis needed to change from managing waste to
preventing it
arising, and that Local Authorities must be equipped to produce
cost-effective waste reduction
plans. To this end, WRAP (Waste and Resources Action Programme) financed a
major Local
Authority training programme involving the Centre for Sustainable Wastes
Management (CSWM)
due to its track record of research expertise. Evaluation of this training
demonstrated that over
90% of 204 delegates (from 33% of Local Authorities) developed a deeper
understanding of waste
prevention and 41% consequently upgraded their plans, embedding
sustainable practice into their
organisations and reducing arisings. The ultimate impact of this has been
to save Local Authorities
money and reduce the amount of waste going to landfill.
Underpinning research
The research outputs and expertise of the CSWM form a substantial
resource that has been widely
employed in developing waste strategies and plans and practice in
prevention (hereafter called
plans) for Local Authorities, as well as contributing to the evidence base
in England. This goes
back to the late 1990s where, for example, work by the CSWM published in
2000 (1) on regional
trends in waste minimization policies made clear the need for strategies
to address the emerging
waste prevention agenda.
CSWM research, based on robust design, provided valuable knowledge that
showed for
Local Authority Collected Waste recycling and waste prevention are two
separate and distinct
domains of activity, leading to the corresponding need to design
programmes to utilise pro-environmental
messages that promote prevention activity rather than recycling (2).
This
requirement for validated research on Local Authority Collected Waste led
the CSWM to design
and deliver the `Corby Waste Not' project (2), at that point the
largest prevention project in
England, which synthesised Local Authority Collected Waste and Commercial
& Industrial waste
into a holistic model of waste prevention. The research showed that all
campaigns and public
communication had to be based upon prevention messages rather than
recycling. Using the
Theory of Planned Behaviour to design messages, the `win-win` data from
large savings in
commercial audits were used to encourage, engage and convince a wide range
of community
groups that prevention was the most cost effective and sustainable
practice. This was (at that
point) a highly original approach to understanding the drivers of waste
prevention and facilitating
their deployment. Subsequently, this model guided a significant number of
projects run by the
CSWM and partners both across England (e.g. Betre — see reference
3), and internationally (e.g.
projects in Finland and Mexico). The need to consider Commercial &
Industrial waste issues
together with Local Authority Collected Waste in holistic prevention
projects for Local Authorities
was demonstrated to be essential if a profound alteration in public
behaviour is to occur so as to
have a significant impact on waste minimisation. The model remains an
important point of
reference in this field. This led to CSWM research in 2004 that
contributed to the Defra Waste
and Resource Research Strategy, focusing on public pro-environmental
behaviour, using the
Theory of Planned Behaviour (4).
In 2008, the CSWM published work on household waste prevention, based on
its research
from the Defra-funded Dorset project (2005-2008) that for the first time
in England evaluated a
range of methodologies designed to increase public uptake of waste
prevention (5). This was a
major advance in investigation and analysis techniques that has informed
guidance given by Defra,
through WRAP, for designing public campaigns, and has been used in Local
Authority planning.
The CSWM has been an international leader in the area of Commercial &
Industrial waste
prevention focusing on Resource Efficiency Clubs (RECs) (6). This
paper presented a radical new
approach for regional funding to support RECs in light of changes to the
Landfill Tax Credit
Scheme (2004), in partnership with the then Parliamentary Sustainable
Waste Management
Group, led to a final Defra-funded (£5 million) round of research
(2005—08) for some 1000
companies across the UK which saved those companies over £25 million. The
CSWM was a
major contributor to the successful management of the project, as well as
contributing to data
production and dissemination of key aspects of the methodology required to
reduce Commercial &
Industrial waste on a large scale.
References to the research
1. Phillips, P.S., Adams, K.T., Read A.D. and Green, A. (2000)
Regional variations in waste
minimization in England: Challenges and issues for policy development.
Regional Studies 34: 297-302.
P. Phillips is Professor of Waste Management at Northampton; K. Adams was
a Research
Assistant at Northampton 1999 — 2002; A. Read was a Research Assistant at
Kingston University;
A. Green was a Senior Lecturer at the University of Warwick
2. Phillips, P.S., Holley, K., Bates, M.P. and Freestone, N.
(2002) Corby Waste Not: An appraisal
of the UK's largest holistic waste minimisation project. Resources,
Conservation and Recycling 36:
1-31. P. Phillips is Professor of Waste Management at Northampton. K.
Holley was a Research
Assistant at Northampton 1998 — 2011. M. Bates is Professor of Waste
Management at
Northampton. N. Freestone is Head of Department of Environmental and
Geographical Sciences
at Northampton
3. Ackroyd, J., Coulter, B., Phillips, P.S. and Read, A.D. (2003)
Business excellence through
resource efficiency (Betre): An evaluation of the UK's highest recruiting,
facilitated self-help waste
minimisation project. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 38: 271-299.
J. Ackroyd and
B. Coulter were consultants in EcoSys Environmental Management and
Education in Brighton.
P. Phillips is Professor of Waste Management at Northampton. A. Read was a
consultant with
Environmental Resources Management, Oxford.
4. Tonglet, M., Phillips, P.S. and Bates, M.P. (2004) Determining
the drivers for householder pro-environmental
behaviour: Waste minimisation compared to recycling. Resources,
Conservation
and Recycling 42: 27-48. M. Tonglet was a Senior Lecturer at Northampton
2000 — 2006. P.
Phillips is Professor of Waste Management at Northampton. M. Bates is
Professor of Waste
Management at Northampton
5. Read, M., Gregory, M.K. and Phillips, P.S. (2009) An evaluation
of 4 key methods for
monitoring household waste prevention campaigns in the UK. Resources,
Conservation and
Recycling 54: 9-20. M. Read was a consultant in Mike Read Associates,
Rowde, Wiltshire.
M. Gregory is a member of the waste management team at Dorset County
Council. P. Phillips is
Professor of Waste Management at Northampton
6. Coskeran, T. and Phillips, P.S. (2005) Economic appraisal and
evaluation of UK waste
minimisation clubs: Proposals to inform the design of sustainable clubs.
Resources, Conservation
and Recycling 43: 361-374. T. Coskeran was a Senior Lecturer in Liverpool
John Moores
University. P. Phillips is Professor of Waste Management at Northampton.
Details of the impact
Informing strategy and policy
Research on Local Authority Collected Waste and Commercial &
Industrial waste by CSWM led to
contributions such as the Defra Waste and Resource Research Strategy (1),
and Developing the
Future, the East Midlands Waste Strategy (2) and other regional
research projects (3). Since then
the CSWM has been working in partnership with Defra on the design of Waste
Places criteria and
practice, using analysis to guide future strategy and plans (4, 5, 6).
This on-going body of work
has established CSWM as one of the leading research and training groups
within wastes
management.
In the early 2000s Defra recognised that ever-increasing waste arisings
was a significant
environmental issue and that Local Authorities needed to be equipped with
knowledge, ideas and
techniques, if they were to produce cost effective plans to reduce Local
Authority Collected Waste
arisings as required by European Directives and national targets. One
component of this would be
to develop networks of Local Authority staff that could synthesise
available best practice into their
plans.
Training local authority staff
To facilitate this, WRAP financed a major Local Authority training
programme between 2005
and 2013 which drew heavily on the findings of CSWM research as a
significant amount of the UK
research evidence on the topics of waste reduction and waste prevention
has come through work
published by the CSWM. The training on wastes prevention was designed and
produced by the
CSWM and included a module called Strategic approach to waste
prevention. This module used
the findings from CSWM research as case studies that enabled Local
Authority staff to
demonstrate a critical understanding of research findings related to waste
prevention. Examples of
the CSWM research used in the training included the Defra funded Dorset
project (3) that explored
methodologies designed to measure the impact of prevention activities, and
the `Defra `Zero Waste
Places` initiative, 2009—12. Training was delivered via a mix of online
tutoring followed by two days
of face-to-face seminars, using a dedicated research manual, produced by
the CSWM. Over a
period of 3 months, delegates produced an initial waste prevention plan
for their Local Authority
that was then analysed and amended by CSWM members. Delegate feedback from
this was
extremely positive (see below).
In England currently there are about 360 Local Authorities involved in
waste management.
Between 2005 and 2011 the Northampton CSWM team trained 260 Local
Authority delegates (≈
45% of England). Between 2007-2011 some 204 delegates were trained from
120 Local
Authorities (≈33% of England).
A detailed independent evaluation was carried out, via in-depth
interviews of delegates of the
prevention training (7). Delegate responses regarding the perceived
value of training, were as
follows:
- 96% stated that it enabled them to evaluate the role of waste
prevention;
- 95% stated that it enabled them to identify and appraise barriers;
- 99% stated that it enabled them to develop skills to critically
evaluate the applicability of
a range of options and techniques and tools;
- 92% stated that it enabled them to develop a critical understanding of
research
outcomes and their application to pro-environmental behaviour;
- 99% stated that it enabled them to evaluate approaches that have been
developed to
monitor and measure the impact of waste prevention;
- 99% stated that it enabled them to critically analyse the role of
Local Authorities and
partners in promoting waste prevention.
In total, 92% of all delegates produced an outline waste prevention plan
for their Local Authority
area, based on the training they undertook with CSWM. These plans were
examined by CSWM
members, revised and returned, for implementation by the staff in their
Local Authorities.
The impact of the training
The training that CSWM conducted for Local Authority staff had a
significant impact on the
behaviours of those staff (8). Some 41% of those trained said that
they made significant changes
to their waste management policies, such as development of a more
cost-effective research-led
prevention plan. For those making changes, evidence was provided that:
- 71% had diverted more waste from landfill;
- 28% increased the tonnages recycled;
- 33% stated changes could not have occurred without the research-based
training
- 45% took part in informal networks to share best practice.
Over the period 2008-12, the volume of Local Authority Collected Waste in
England fell by
some 10%. At the Local Authority level, it is clear, using a range of
Defra metrics, that those Local
Authorities with robust waste prevention plans are seeing the largest
decrease in waste arising per
head of population. In 2010, five of the Local Authorities that had been
trained, and then produced
a new or amended waste prevention plan, were in the top 10 of Local
Authorities with greatest
reduction of household waste arising (using BVPI 84a - kg per head). These
were Peterborough (-11.1%), Bromsgrove (-9.7%), Colchester (-9.3%), North Kesteven (-8.6%) and
Ealing (-8%).
These statistics, together with letters of support (8-10), provide
evidence that the training of
Local Authority staff provided by the CSWM has had a significant impact on
the policies and
procedures which Local Authorities across England have developed in order
to minimise waste
generation. As one of the letters of support (8) states: "it is
clear, from both the continuous
feedback and the independent evaluation, that the research work conducted
by The University of
Northampton, and delivered in the training, had a major impact upon the
delegates....enabling
them to adopt best practice in developing effective plans for their
employing authorities."
Sources to corroborate the impact
- Waste and Resource R&D Strategy (2004/05 — 2006/07) Defra London,
UK
http://archive.defra.gov.uk/environment/waste/residual/wrep/documents/rdstrategy.pdf
- The
first Waste Research Strategy for England (2004 — 2007). CSWM worked on:
Theme 1 — Sustainable
resource consumption, Theme 5 — The social dimension, and Theme 7 -
Economics and prevention.
- East Midlands Regional Waste Strategy (2006) - East Midlands Regional
Assembly, Melton
Mowbray. http://www.leics.gov.uk/regional_waste_strategy-2.pdf
- CSWM developed Priority
Issue 2 - Behaviour, Priority Issue 3 - Efficiency of resource use, and
Priority Issue 5 - Prevention
of municipal solid wastes.
- Household Waste Prevention Activity in Dorset: Monitoring and
Evaluation. Defra Research
Project WR0116 (2008). Defra, London. Final Report
http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Default.aspx?Menu=Menu&Module=More&Location=None&Completed=0&ProjectID=14710
- Zero Waste Places Application Form (2010) WRAP/BREW,
Northampton/Banbury, UK.
- Mattsson, L.T., Phillips, P.S. and Read, A. (2010) A critical review
of the largest Resource
Efficiency Club Programme in England (2005-2008): Key issues for
designing and delivering cost
effective policy instruments in the light of Defra's Delivery Landscape
Review. Resources,
Conservation and Recycling 55: 1-10.
- Phillips, P.S., Tudor, T., Bird, H. and Bates, M.P. (2011) A critical
review of a key waste
strategy initiative in England: Zero Waste Place programme 2008 — 2009.
Resources,
Conservation and Recycling 55: 335-343.
- WRAP: Evaluation of WRAP`s Local Authority Training Programme
Strategic Approach to
Waste Prevention 2008/11 (2011) EVA095-000. Banbury, UK.
- Letter of support from WRAP (key Defra delivery body)
- Letter of support from Oakdene-Hollins Ltd (key Defra research
contractor)
- Letter of support from AEA technology (key Defra delivery body for
Commercial & Industrial
waste)