Healing Heritage: Facilitating and evaluating the impact of museums and museum encounters on health and wellbeing
Submitting Institution
University College LondonUnit of Assessment
Geography, Environmental Studies and ArchaeologySummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Nursing, Public Health and Health Services
History and Archaeology: Curatorial and Related Studies
Summary of the impact
Healing Heritage is a research programme led by Helen Chatterjee and
focused on exploring the
unique role of museums in improving mental and physical health, reducing
social isolation and
building social capital. It has had impacts on: 1) patients in healthcare
settings, residents of care
homes and disability/mental health service users who have demonstrated
improved wellbeing; 2)
museum practitioners and volunteers in museum settings whose skills have
been enhanced; and
3) museums and healthcare professionals whose understanding of the
benefits of this partnership
has been expanded.
Underpinning research
The Healing Heritage research programme led by Helen Chatterjee (Lecturer
since 2004 and
Senior Lecturer since 2009) emerged from earlier work by Chatterjee at UCL
on museum object
handling, the importance of touch for museum audiences, and public access
to collections. This
included a series of research council-funded workshops in 2006-7, which
brought together
academics, museum professionals, volunteering organisations and members of
the public to
examine the role of touch in museums as a social intervention tool. The
resulting volume, Touch in
Museums (2008), edited by Chatterjee, explored different contexts
for object handling, not only
within museums but importantly extended to the wider community, including
hospitals and schools.
A significant insight arising from this work was the therapeutic
potential of museums, and the
potential health and wellbeing benefits of encounters with museums and
their collections. Despite
the existence of a significant body of work relating to the role of arts
in health, this novel area of
research had been largely unexplored. A key aspect of UCL research in this
field was to integrate
rigorous, evidence-based techniques derived from standardised quality of
life and wellbeing
measures developed for health research. These have been used alongside
qualitative techniques
in a mixed methods approach to evaluating the benefits of museum
encounters in healthcare.
To this end, Chatterjee led an investigation of the role of museums, and
museum object handling,
in promoting health and wellbeing, including a three year study focused on
the role of object
handling as a therapeutic intervention in hospitals and residential care
homes (Heritage in
Hospitals (HinH); AH/G000506/1). Using a robust mixed methods quantitative
[c] and qualitative [b]
framework, the research also involved collaboration with a wide range of
partners (academics,
museums/galleries, healthcare providers, Arts Council England, New
Economics Foundation, etc),
as well as the patients, care home residents and healthcare staff who
participated. This approach
afforded a detailed and nuanced view of the discrete ways in which museums
are able to impact
upon health and wellbeing and contribute to building social resilience and
capital [a-e]. The work
provided evidence showing museums' potential to improve health and
wellbeing through positive,
interactive, social experiences [a-d]. Between 2008 and 2011 data were
amassed from 300
patients and residents from oncology, gynaecology, acute and elderly care,
neurological
rehabilitation, A&E admission inpatients, psychiatric in- and
outpatients, and care homes. From
this, the research identified a series of positive therapeutic outcomes:
these included highly
significant improvements in positive emotion, wellbeing and happiness;
improvements in patients'
perceptions of their own health; and optimism about the role of handling
sessions as a distraction
from ward life that impacted positively on relationships among staff,
patients and their carers [b, c].
Subsequent funding (AH/J500700/1) was used to undertake a scoping survey
of health and
wellbeing-orientated programmes across UK and international museums
(2011), which showed the
sector's increasing cognisance of the importance of integrating health and
wellbeing outcomes in
museum programming [e]. This confirmed Chatterjee's belief in the
importance of obtaining robust
evidence to better understand the impact of museum activities on health
and wellbeing. To that
end she collaborated in 2012-2013 with c. 20 museums and other
organisations to develop a new
museum-wellbeing measure to assess impact on visitors' health and
wellbeing (AH/J008524/1) [f].
Key research collaborators included G. Noble (UCL Hospital Arts), L.
Lanceley and U. Menon
(UCL Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health), R. Mason
(Newcastle University)
and J. Dodd (Leicester University).
References to the research
[b] Ander, E., Thomson, L., Lanceley, A., Menon, U., Noble, G. and
Chatterjee, H. J. (2012)
Heritage, health and wellbeing: Assessing the impact of a heritage focused
intervention on health
and wellbeing. International Journal of Heritage Studies. DOI:
10.1080/13527258.2011.651740.
[c] Thomson, L., Ander, E., Lanceley, A., Menon, U., Noble, G. and
Chatterjee, H. J. (2012)
Quantitative evidence for wellbeing benefits from a heritage-in-health
intervention with hospital
patients. International Journal of Art Therapy. 17(2): 63-79. DOI:
10.1080/17454832.2012.687750.
[d] Ander, E., Thomson, L., Lanceley, A., Menon, U., Noble, G. and
Chatterjee, H. J. (2011)
Generic Wellbeing Outcomes: Towards a conceptual framework for wellbeing
outcomes in
museums. Museum Management and Curatorship. 26(3), 237-259. DOI:
10.1080/09647775.2011.585798.
[e] Chatterjee, H. J. and Noble, G. (2013) Museums, Health and
Well-Being. Ashgate Publishing.
Farnham, UK; Burlington, VT. Available on request.
Key peer-reviewed research grants:
AH/G000506/1. Heritage in Hospitals. Grant holder: Dr Helen Chatterjee.
Duration: 1 Dec 2008 -
31 Dec 2011. Amount: £293,142. Outputs: [a, b, c, d, e]
AH/J500700/1. Heritage, Health and Wellbeing — Mapping Future Priorities
and Potential. Grant
holder: Dr Helen Chatterjee. Duration: 1 June 2011-31 Dec 2011. Amount:
£31,177. Outputs: [e]
AH/J008524/1. Developing a heritage focused wellbeing measure: from
Generic Social Outcomes
to Generic Wellbeing Outcomes. Grant holder: Dr Helen Chatterjee.
Duration: May 2012-April
2013. Amount: £86,782. Outputs: [d, e, f]
YH-09-05360. Touching Heritage. Grant holder: Dr Helen Chatterjee.
Duration: 1 May 2012-31
Aug 2013. Amount: £50,000. Outputs: [e]
Details of the impact
In a ground-breaking collaboration between health and cultural
organisations, the Healing Heritage
research programme has provided new tools for improved service delivery.
By developing rigorous,
evidence-based measures of patient wellbeing, it has further ensured that
object handling is now
recognised by both the public health and the arts and heritage sectors as
an important channel for
collaboration to improve service delivery and quality of life.
Improving patient health and wellbeing: The Heritage in Hospitals
(HinH) project, 2008-11,
examined the effects of museum object handling on psychological and
subjective wellbeing and
happiness. The underpinning research for this project included work with
various hospitals
(University College Hospital, the National Hospital for Neurology and
Neurosurgery in London,
Prospect Park Psychiatric Hospital in Reading and Oxford's John Radcliffe
Hospital) and
residential care homes in London, Oxford and Reading, as well as with four
partner museums
(UCL Museums, The British Museum, Oxford University Museums, Reading
Museums Service)
and the Museums, Libraries and Archives Council (now part of Arts Council
England). Its most
direct benefits were the enhanced health and wellbeing experienced by the
300 or so hospital
patients and care home residents who participated in it. The significance
of the health and
wellbeing impacts on the hospital patients and care home residents who
took part in object
handling sessions is indicated by the highly significant (p<.001)
increase in positive emotions
among the participants who demonstrated a 22% increase in positive
emotions between pre- and
post- object handling session scores [c]. Many of those who participated
in the sessions were
suffering from mental or physical conditions with detrimental effects on
their wellbeing. The object
handling protocol designed by the research proved to have tangible effects
on how they perceived
their own health. During these 45 minute sessions, researchers encouraged
participants to discuss
and handle objects such as Egyptian amulets, geological minerals,
potsherds and printed artworks.
Conversations recorded during the sessions demonstrated the impacts of
object handling on
individual patients' perceptions of their health. One mental health
service user, for example, said: `I
can't listen to pop music at the moment because it reminds me of certain
situations that I'm in and
having to deal with, whereas this sort of stuff gets you thinking, but
because it's 5000 years old...
you can't be depressed by looking at a piece of Egyptian pottery,
doesn't work that way.' [1, p. 211]
Enhancing health service provision — benefits to healthcare staff:
As well as contributing to
improvements in the health and wellbeing of patient participants, the
Healing Heritage research
(including projects following HinH) also delivered important benefits to
about fifty healthcare
practitioners and various healthcare organisations who have been involved
in it over the course of
the past five years, particularly in terms of enhancing the service
delivery they offered. The
professionals interviewed as part of the research reported positive
impacts both on their clients and
service users and, subsequently, on the quality of the service they felt
able to provide. As a mental
health occupational therapist at the Prospect Park Psychiatric Hospital,
Reading, explained: `These
sessions... encouraged social interaction and engagement in meaningful
occupation, supporting
recovery from illness. Feedback from patients indicated an improvement
in mood and a reduction
in the symptoms of depression or anxiety following participation in
these sessions' [2]. When
questioned about the impact on their working relationships, all healthcare
practitioners surveyed
reported benefits: `seeing people [service users] interact, discuss and
have interests in new things
is just amazing. [The staff] are more motivated and interested in the
work they do.' (Disability
Centre staff member) [3].
Partnerships developed through the project resulted in collaborations
with around 50 institutions
across the museum and health sectors, both in the UK and overseas; these
have significantly
extended the reach of the initial project's impacts to many more staff and
patients at participating
institutions. Thus, the improvements in service delivery and in the
quality of participants' lives may
be extrapolated to individuals in contact with these other programmes
based on the research
outcomes, some of which are described below.
Changing museums practice: The success of the HinH museum
object handling protocol led to
its adoption by several other museums looking to expand their programmes
to cover health and
wellbeing. For example, since 2010, South Australia Museum has been
working with the 580-bed
Flinders Medical Centre (FMC) to run its own museum object handling
sessions as part of medical
student training, inspired by the UCL research [4]. Closer to home,
Tunbridge Wells Museum cited
Chatterjee's work as providing a framework for and practical guidance on
developing its own
sessions for those suffering from dementia from 2013 [4].
In 2012-13 more than 20 UK museums working, in total, with over 200
museum visitors adopted
the museum-wellbeing measure and toolkit developed by Chatterjee's team.
Museum staff used
the measure to evaluate the impact of their work on various audiences,
including general visitors,
older adult groups from care homes, and young people with learning
difficulties. Feedback from
museum staff [3] gives some indication of the value of the research to
them. Staff at the British
Museum wrote: `Something is happening in sessions that's important to
capture, e.g. with the early
stages of dementia', and the Worcester Infirmary Museum added: `...it
is great for us (a small,
provincial museum with limited budget and limited reach) to be linked to
a UCL project'.
The contribution made by the research was recognised by the award to
Chatterjee in 2012 of a
Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) grant to train museum volunteers to deliver
museum object handling
sessions in health and social care settings, using the tools developed at
UCL. Fifteen volunteers
were recruited to work with twelve different London organisations,
including disability centres,
residential care homes, sheltered housing schemes, hospitals and Age UK
Camden to provide
object handling activities for over 500 service users. As well as
benefitting service users, this
project increased volunteers' object handling and facilitation skills,
improved their communication
skills and developed confidence in working with people in healthcare
settings. Of 9 volunteers
interviewed, all answered `agree/strongly agree' when questioned about
their skills acquisition [3].
Contribution to debate in policy on arts and health: The
research has stimulated debate on,
and provided a robust evidence base for, object handling as a therapeutic
tool. As a result, it has
been widely cited as an example of best practice across the heritage and
the public health sectors,
in policy documents and reports, and in policy debate. Since 2008,
Chatterjee has been invited to
speak at over 25 conferences and workshops, and to write for numerous
sector-wide publications
[5]. In June 2013, for example, she gave an invited keynote speech at an
International Wellbeing
conference in Birmingham, attended by over 100 international delegates
including practitioners and
scholars in public health, hospitals and arts-in-health. Citations in
policy documents demonstrate
the interest across sectors. Thus, in a report that repeatedly
acknowledges Chatterjee's
contribution to the development of evidence-based tools, the Royal Society
for Public Health's
(RSPH) Arts, Health and Wellbeing Policy Paper describes it as `a
foundation for new health and
wellbeing practice opportunities for museums and health care sectors to
work in partnership' [6, p.
50]. The research is also cited in the AHRC/RCUK's 2013 document `Health
and wellbeing: The
contribution of the arts and humanities' [7, p.16] and at an RCUK
parliamentary event in June 2013
on wellbeing and health. This demonstrates the impact of the research in
raising awareness of the
role of culture, and specifically museums, across UK funding councils,
which has in turn led to
increase funding for this aspect of the arts and humanities. In 2013
Ashgate Publishing, which
produces books for museum professionals and scholars, published [e],
showing the interest in the
research by the wider sector, which is supported by the praise received
from cultural (e.g. Glasgow
Life, which delivers cultural services in that city) and public health
organisations (e.g. the RSPH).
In some instances, there is evidence of the ways in which these
contributions to policy discussion
and debate are translated into impacts on museum practice. The UK Medical
Collections Group, a
subject specialist museums group, recommended in its History to Health
Report that museums
follow `UCL's best practice and take objects into hospitals and other
healthcare settings for
therapeutic purposes' [8, p.14]. This suggests the role of the research as
a tool for encouraging
museums to work in healthcare settings and in providing them with new best
practice examples to
guide their activities. The significance in this context is suggested by
the fact that, in 2011, HinH
received an RSPH `Arts and Health Award', with a special commendation for
innovative and
outstanding contribution to arts and health research [9]. The RSPH has
since worked with
Chatterjee to expand the reach of these beneficial impacts by
disseminating research findings
through its journals, and to target practitioners through its New Horizons
series [9].
Sources to corroborate the impact
[1] For patient participant quotation: Ander, E., Thomson, L., Lanceley,
A., Menon, U., Blair, K. and
Chatterjee, H. J. (2013) Using museum objects to improve wellbeing in
psychiatric and
rehabilitation patients. British Journal of Occupational Therapy.
76(5): 208-216, p. 211. DOI:
10.4276/030802213X13679275042645.
[2] Benefits to patients described by Mental Health Occupational
Therapist, Prospect Park
Psychiatric Hospital, available on request.
[3] A compilation of staff and volunteer feedback forms is available on
request.
[4] Impacts on museum practice can be corroborated by the Coordinator,
Arts in Health at Flinders
Medical Centre, and the Audience Development Manager, Tunbridge Wells
Museum.
[5] Examples of invited contributions to sector journals include:
Chatterjee, H. J., Can museums
heal the nation? Museums Journal, April 2013, p. 18, available on
request; and Chatterjee, H.J.
`Museums, Health & Wellbeing: Exploring the therapeutic potential of
museums and their
collections', Irish Heritage Council eZine 8 Nov 2012. Available
at: http://bit.ly/18KPmRQ.
[6] The RSPH report on Arts, Health and Wellbeing is available at: http://bit.ly/17clYAT.
[7] The AHRC/RCUK document `Health and wellbeing is available at: http://bit.ly/1e4BpAf.
[8] Bodley, A. (2012) History to Health: Research into changing health
agendas for the UK Medical
Collections Group. UKMCG. Available at: http://bit.ly/1b4DvhK.
[9] The expansion of the research impacts through the RSPH's New Horizons
series and other
pathways can be corroborated by the Development Director, Royal Society
for Public Health, who
also corroborates the Arts in Health Award.