Biodiversity in Cities: public engagement with the urban environment
Submitting Institution
University of BirminghamUnit of Assessment
Geography, Environmental Studies and ArchaeologySummary Impact Type
EnvironmentalResearch Subject Area(s)
Environmental Sciences: Ecological Applications, Environmental Science and Management
Summary of the impact
Urban biodiversity supports the functioning of the urban ecosystem and
provides recreational opportunities. This is a West Midlands-based public
engagement case study demonstrating both environmental and social impact
through a five-year BIG Lottery-funded project based on research into
urban biodiversity led by Professor Jon Sadler. The project — OPALWM —
focused much of its public engagement activity on some of the most
economically-deprived areas of Birmingham and the Black Country, locations
that the scientific research had identified as having unrealised
environmental opportunities. OPALWM achieved extensive recorded reach (122
organisations; 26,000 people; 60,000 website hits) and active engagement
from schools, volunteers and wildlife groups. It has a sustainability plan
designed to maintain its impact after its BIG Lottery funding ends in
November 2013.
Underpinning research
Urban biodiversity provides recreational opportunities and supports the
functioning of the urban ecosystem, providing potentially valuable, if as
yet poorly quantified, ecological services. The research underpinning this
case study was led by Jon Sadler (Professor of Biogeography) and focused
on the relationships between cityscape habitats and their biodiversity.
Although sustainability features highly in urban planning initiatives, no
clear vision existed of how to optimise urban space to maximise its value
as perceived by local people, planners and ecologists.
The research sought to address this important knowledge gap and modelled
the influence of habitat type, structure and spatial configuration on
plant and animal biodiversity, using Birmingham and the Black Country as a
model global conurbation. The work was funded through RCUK thematic
programmes [NERC's URGENT (Urban Regeneration and the Environment;
1998-01, 2005-08) and EPSRC's SUE (Sustainable Urban Environments)
programmes (2001-11)] and EU FP6 (SWITCH) (2006-11).
The results demonstrated that the type, location and quality of habitats
and their surrounding matrix habitats are the key drivers impacting urban
biodiversity. The focus on connecting features (or greenways) was
innovative and one of the first multidisciplinary studies of what is now
termed green infrastructure (GI). It showed that GI provides habitats as
well as movement conduits, the latter being strongly species specific [1].
A key conclusion of the work was that habitat quality is an important
criterion in determining species presence on sites (e.g. brownfields and
wetlands). The research showed that brownfield sites were important local
biodiversity hotspots [2], and like other local spaces they were highly
valued by the people who live adjacent to them. In other habitats, (e.g.
woodlands), the spatial configuration of the surrounding landscape was
more important and habitat fragmentation plays a more central role in
determining species presence and abundance [3].
Subsequent research carried out under the EPSRC Sustainable Urban
Environments 2 programme (2007-2012) considered what features enhanced
and/or impeded connectivity and linkage in the urban landscape, thereby
improving spatial resilience. It identified treelines as important network
features that linked roosts to foraging sites for bat species [4]. This
key finding is unique and illustrates the importance of greenways in the
cityscape. The work provided important data concerning the links between
habitat composition and biodiversity and emphasised the significance of
green infrastructure in providing key ecological functions, such as the
support of pollinator communities [5]. The importance of building
biodiversity into developments and cityscapes was expounded further,
showing how designed spaces are species-poor replacements, which look and
function very differently to the landscapes they supplant. This paper
published via the Institute of Civil Engineers was awarded the
Halcrow prize for best paper in 2005 [6].
The work described above led to: (i) the formulation of the idea that
peoples' engagement and use of richly biodiverse spaces is important in
their local environment, not something that is external to city living,
and (ii) that greater engagement and understanding helps to formulate
policies that have wide support, challenging established norms for the
management of greenspaces.
References to the research
[1] Angold, PG, Sadler, J.P., Hill, M.O., Pullin, A.S, Rushton, S,
Austin, K, Small, E.C. Wood, B., Wadsworth, R., Sanderson, R. &
Thompson, K. (2006) Biodiversity of urban habitat patches. Science of the
Total Environment. 260, 196-204. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.08.035
[2] Small, E., Sadler, J.P. and Telfer, M. (2003) Carabid beetle
assemblages and successional processes on urban derelict sites in
Birmingham, UK. Journal of Insect Conservation, 6, 233-246.
DOI:10.1023/A:1024491111572
[3] Sadler, J.P., Small, E.C., Fiszpan, H.A. and Telfer, M. (2006)
Investigating environmental variation and landscape characteristics of an
urban-rural gradient using woodland carabid assemblages. Journal of
Biogeography. 33, 1126-1138. DOI:10.1111/j.1365- 2699.2006.01476.x
[4] Hale, J.D., Fairbrass, A.J., Matthews, T.J. & Sadler, J.P. (2012)
Habitat Composition and Connectivity Predicts Bat Presence and Activity at
Foraging Sites in a Large UK Conurbation. PLoS ONE, 7, e33300.
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0033300
[5] Bates, A.J., Sadler, J.P., Fairbrass, A.J., Falk, S.J., Hale, J.D.
& Matthews, T.J. (2011) Changing Bee and Hoverfly Pollinator
Assemblages along an Urban-Rural Gradient. PLoS ONE, 6, e23459.
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0023459
[6] Donovan, R., Sadler, J.P. and Bryson, J.R. (2005) Urban biodiversity
and sustainable development: an ecological perspective. Engineering
Sustainability, 158, 105-114. DOI:10.1680/ensu.2005.158.2.105
Details of the impact
This is a West Midlands-based public engagement case study demonstrating
environmental and social impact through delivery of a six-year BIG
Lottery-funded project that drew specifically on the scientific findings
of the University of Birmingham research.
The findings from the Birmingham research were used by Sadler and twelve
collaborators from other UK higher education institutions to design an
innovative proposal: Open Air Laboratories (OPAL). OPAL was a national
programme primarily delivered through regional projects and a series of
national surveys [source 1]. The OPAL proposal was backed by the BIG
Lottery following a rigorous assessment process; it was awarded £12
million in 2007, with its initial success leading to a further £6 million
award in 2010 to support the regional teams for an additional two years.
Sadler and his colleagues at the University of Birmingham led the
implementation of the West Midlands regional component (£599,000; December
2008 to November 2013) and it is the impact of this activity, which is
described here.
Design of OPAL West Midlands
The OPALWM project was primarily concerned with urban ecology, focusing
much of its public engagement activity on children and adults in some of
the most economically-deprived areas of Birmingham and the Black Country.
The findings from the University of Birmingham research were specifically
mapped into the design of the OPALWM public engagement activities and
delivered through four themes. The relationship between the research
findings and the OPALWM themes is shown below:
Research finding |
OPALWM theme |
Brownfield sites demonstrated extensive biodiversity |
Getting ‘biodiversity science’ out of the classroom into the city |
Brownfield biodiversity hotspots were valued by local residents |
Adoption of local wildlife patches by residents |
Treelines were important linking networks |
Promoting biodiversity in Birmingham parks (linear features) |
Gap in quantification of biodiversity and urban ecological
function/services |
Training informed citizen scientists to record and monitor their
local environment |
Reach of OPALWM
OPALWM was intended to engage a diversity of West Midland communities
including black and minority ethnic groups as well as deprived communities
rarely associated with natural history and environmental initiatives. A
particular feature of the work of OPALWM was engaging with "hard to reach
groups" in inner urban areas, which was precisely where the scientific
research had indicated there were unrealised environmental opportunities.
The resulting engagement was rigorously monitored and reported to the BIG
Lottery on a quarterly basis throughout the project. The monitoring showed
that OPALWM met its aims and associated milestones. [source 2]
An extensive range of agencies were engaged with this work to make sure
that it reached the targeted communities: these included 41 primary
schools, six secondary schools and one special school; ranger services;
local Wildlife Trusts and other third-sector organisations; voluntary
bodies, such as amateur national history groups and allotment societies;
businesses such as environmental educationalists; and local councils.
There was also a website (http://www.opalwestmidlands.org/)
that showed users how they could get involved with this activity and has
received more than 60,000 hits. Media coverage through radio, television
and the press, is estimated to have reached 450,000 people. [sources 2 and
3].
In total, OPALWM worked directly with 122 groups and organisations and
engaged with over 26,000 people through more than 370 public engagement
events and activities. Events included work to support the science
associated with bird and bat research, with 62 bird and 25 bat training
and monitoring events and an OPALWM patch network was created using 151
events to help people record and appreciate biodiversity in local spaces
and places, especially linear parks. Monitoring returns showed that 10.3%
of those engaged were from hard-to-reach groups, achieved through
co-operation with particular voluntary groups and through schools in
deprived areas and/or who worked specifically with those children. [source
2]
Public response and significance
There is strong evidence set out below to show that OPALWM is leaving an
extensive legacy in terms of participant's changed attitudes to their
local spaces; improved environmental education in schools through new
curriculum materials, demonstrations and, in some cases, enhancement of
school grounds, and through new trained citizen scientists.
In general terms, responses to programme surveys, event evaluations and
website responses show that engagement has reached new groups and
suggested that this was prompting further involvement. Half of the people
surveyed said that they had never been involved in this kind of activity
before and 43% said it had influenced the way they viewed the environment;
37% of people stated it would lead to changed behaviour and greater
involvement in environmental activities; 90% of the people completing
national surveys said they had learnt something new; and 83% stated they
had developed new skills [source 1].
The specific response to the West Midlands activities can be seen through
the work with schools; with volunteer recorders; and in its community
engagement, particularly with children. There is both empirical and
testimonial evidence to support this; much of the latter was gathered as
part of an independent external evaluation of OPALWM which is currently in
progress [source 4].
Schools: Schools and individual teachers became enthusiastic
participants in the project. Pollinator activities were particularly
successful in generating this response. 44 primary schools entered a
competition run by OPALWM to win a pollinator education pack, with 3 of
the 12 winning schools in locations which were amongst the most deprived
areas in the country. To support this work, the project created a
factsheet on bee hotel construction and use which was downloaded 1100
times from the website. The project also created the impetus for ongoing
activity, such as working with a local voluntary group to provide an
outdoor biodiversity space for a primary school in Bearwood in Birmingham
with a wildlife pond, a bee hotel and bee-friendly plants. [source 5]
Typical of the testimonials gathered was a response from a school where
OPALWM ran lessons and practical activities: "Thank you so much for
your visit, talk and science kit on Thursday. The children were really
enthused about Science at school and are looking forward to setting up
the bee hotels. .... your visit has really enhanced our curriculum"
[source 6].
Volunteers and local wildlife groups: Many of the West Midlands
activities were based around engaging with citizens to observe, collect
and record species in their local spaces. This produced an extensive
response, including encouraging over 4,500 people to submit data for the
seven surveys in the region [source 7]. OPALWM has also engaged 56
volunteers who have been trained to a high skill base (moths, bats,
birds). Four of these now hold full BTO C ringing licences, allowing them
to work independently of their trainer; this is an important and long-term
contribution to the citizen science base in the Midlands.
The project has co-operated with voluntary bodies to ensure that its
impact connected to national initiatives. For instance, OPALWM has worked
closely with the Garden Moth Scheme (GMS), a national grass-roots group
that record moths in gardens. OPALWM purchased 26 moth light trap starter
kits, loaned them to first time moth recorders and supported five training
events with 20 people per event; and created three guides to help people
start moth recording (>2,000 downloads). The GMS national coordinator
welcomed this activity and said that: "... analyses of the dataset are
also illustrating the importance of citizen science showing that
managing your garden can help attract moth species, but also that
urbanisation has a significant impact on local moth diversity."
[source 6].
Activities with local wildlife trusts and other groups helped take
forward their work to align with the team's scientific findings. For
instance, the Friends of a major Birmingham park said that OPALWM moved
their neighbourhood bat programme "..to a wider level of seeing and
recording the urban countryside patchwork. We have brought 1000s of
people together with seasonal nature discoveries and resulting in a
strong sense of natural identity with their local patch". [source
6].
Community engagement: Children have featured highly in OPALWM
community-based activities, and they have co-created films to document
their thoughts on the activities [source 8]. The project was successful in
targeting children from hard-to-reach communities, increasing both their
appreciation and enjoyment of the environment: A typical reflection on
this activity noted "The community's been very, very damaged by what's
going on, and it remains so, and I thought something like OPAL could
help heal it, something with the children in the natural world, it would
be some way of just lessening the tension...it was a different way of
engaging people and it was so much healthier." [source 6].
Sustainability
The impact of the project will be sustained in a number of ways. OPALWM
had a sustainability plan to ensure that all teaching and science outreach
materials remain on the national and regional websites for five further
years from November 2013. The websites will be maintained to provide
additional feedback to the user communities through storage of existing
materials, new and forthcoming papers, lessons learned from the OPAL
experience and new teaching and activities materials for use by schools.
Trained volunteers will continue to be able to apply and develop their new
skills. Wildlife groups and other local agencies will be able to continue
to apply and extend the expertise they have developed from engagement with
the project and its underpinning science. The OPAL programme also has led
to the development of a European Citizen Science Association (formed March
2013), which seeks to engage 5 million people across Europe over the next
4 years in citizen science.
Sources to corroborate the impact
- OPAL Community Environment Report (2013) http://www.opalexplorenature.org/CEreport
- OPALWM MEV returns to the BIG Lottery; available from the University.
- Information on bees on "Bang Goes the Theory"
(http://www.opalexplorenature.org/BangGoesTheoryNews)
and Midlands today (http://news.bbc.co.uk/local/birmingham/hi/front_page/newsid_8703000/8703839.stm)
- External interviews / focus group responses collected by Dr Glyn
Everett to evaluate the impact of OPALWM activities available from the
University
- OPALWM Year end (3) report to the BIG Lottery. Case Study 1; Appendix
III
- Testimonials to OPALWM on the value and impact of their activity;
available from the University
- Total number of national survey results uploads/returns to the OPAL
national website for the West Midlands region. Spreadsheet created by
OPAL Dec 2011
- Film -[text removed for publication]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEfKlKaTGT0
and local films made by children at Castle Vale: http://www.environmentaltrust.org.uk/Media.html