Establishing Social Services work as a Strategic Priority: the case of the European Federation of Public Sector Unions (EPSU)
Submitting Institution
University of GreenwichUnit of Assessment
Business and Management StudiesSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Public Health and Health Services
Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services: Business and Management
Studies In Human Society: Policy and Administration
Summary of the impact
Europe needs better social services as its population ages. However, low
pay and status are making recruitment and retention difficult. EU public
procurement rules are transferring services to the private and
not-for-profit sectors where there is limited scope for effective social
dialogue. Jane Lethbridge's research has led EPSU affiliates to understand
the trends and realise the importance of European-level action. This
awareness informed EPSU's 2009 Congress decisions, which prioritised
future social services social dialogue work. By 2012, EPSU had started to
discuss how to support an EU Sectoral Social Dialogue Committee where it
will be the trade union social partner.
Underpinning research
European countries need more quantity and quality in formal social care
provision. Informal care, previously provided by women, is no longer a
reliable source of care because of women's increased participation in the
labour market. Health and social care is one of the European Union's
fastest growing economic sectors, generating about 5% of total economic
output (European Commission, 2010). However, the sector faces problems of
recruitment and retention because of low pay, the low status of caring as
an occupation and poor working conditions. The workforce has a majority of
women workers in all countries, who are predominantly low paid. It is also
ageing as young people are unsurprisingly reluctant to enter the sector.
The shortage of local labour has led to the use of migrant labour in many
countries. The need for more and better care is especially pressing in the
light of Europe's ageing population: how to meet the needs of older people
is one of the most important political issues facing national governments.
Longer life expectancy means higher levels of disability and morbidity,
increasing demand for social services.
Existing research had focused on local and national situations, and
EU-funded research programmes provided country studies with some synthesis
of results. What was lacking was a trade union perspective which
identified common issues facing social services workers throughout Europe.
Research by Jane Lethbridge, a researcher at the Public Services
International Research Unit (PSIRU), commissioned by the European
Federation of Public Services Unions (EPSU) between 2005 and 2012,
established that social services workers are employed by public, private
and not-for-profit employers, with a trend for greater provision by
private and not-for-profit providers. European level policy has
contributed to this trend, in particular the EU public procurement
requirements which require public services to be put out to tender, to
allow private and not-for-profit organisations to compete.
The research was informed by a survey of national health and social
services trade unions across Europe which received responses from 18
unions covering the following countries: Nordic countries, UK, Ireland,
Italy, Spain, Austria, Germany, France, the Netherlands, Czech Republic,
Slovak Republic and Ukraine, which showed that, with some country
exceptions, the coverage of social services sector workers is lowest in
the private and not-for-profit sectors. Union representation of social
services workers is also lowest in these two sectors. The implication of
this diverse coverage for trade union action was that social dialogue was
necessary if workers and employers were to work together to deliver
quality services with improved working conditions. Social dialogue is the
essential link between quality social services and pay and working
conditions.
EPSU represents 270 trade unions from every European country. They cover
8 million public services workers and organised workers in the energy,
water and waste sectors, health and social services and local and national
administration.
References to the research
(REF1 submitted staff in bold, **REF2 Output)
Provide references to key research outputs, any key research grants, and
evidence of the quality of the research:
Research outputs:
3.2 Lethbridge, J. (2007). Changing care services and labour markets.
London: Public Services International Resarch Unit. Available at: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/2977/
3.3 Lethbridge, J. (2011). Care Services for Older People in Europe -
Challenges for Labour. Public Services International Research Unit.
Available at: http://www.epsu.org/a/7431
3.4 Lethbridge J. (2012) PESSIS - Promoting employers' social services in
social dialogue: Final European Report. European Federation of Public
Service Unions, Brussels, Belgium. Available at: http://www.epsu.org/a/9108
Research grants/ consultancy:
Jane Lethbridge has been commissioned by the European Federation of
Public Service Unions (EPSU) for the following research projects:
3a 2005 Social services 1 - overview €5,000
3b 2007 Social services 2 - labour market €5,000
3c 2007 Care multinational companies eligible for European Works Councils
€2,500
3d 2007-8 Social services 3 Child care services in Europe €8,500
3e 2010 Care multinational companies eligible for European Works Councils
€2,500
3f 2010-11 Social services 4 Care services for older people - the
challenge for labour €15,000
3g 2012 Care multinational companies eligible for European Works Councils
€2,500
3h 2012 European Coordination of PESSIS research - Mapping social
dialogue in the social service sectors in 11 European countries €10,0000
(VS/2011/0428 Project PESSIS `Promoting employers' social services
organisations in social dialogue')
This demonstrates that the EPSU values the research.
Quality of the research:
The report Care Services for Older People The Challenges for Labour was
reviewed as part of the REF process. Reviewer, Dr. Alison Tierney wrote I
"think that this report is really very important in terms of its relevance
to the serious matter of how care for the expanding population of older
people (especially the old old) is going to be managed in coming decades.
Although much is fairly well understood now about the likely type and
extent of care needs, there is little (as far as I know) that links this
with the available workforce, and so it is the analysis of the issues
relating to labour (and especially the female workforce, and the ongoing
shift to home care) that is original - and very important - in this piece
of work. This report makes recommendations about how good quality and
secure employment in the eldercare sector could be secured in the EU, and
this Report really deserves to make an impact on debates and on policy".
Details of the impact
European Union (EU) legislation and policy has powerful repercussions for
national governments and their people. The European Federation of Public
Sector Unions (EPSU) recognised more than ten years ago that many of the
problems faced by workers in the social service sector were common across
Europe and were being exacerbated by EU policy. Research by Jane
Lethbridge, presented during four seminars between 2005 and 2009, led EPSU
affiliates to realise that EU public procurement rules in particular,
which require governments to open up public services to competition from
profit and not-for-profit providers, were having a negative impact on
employees. They began to understand that quality services depended on
improved working conditions, training and registration. Supported by
Lethbridge's research at each step, EPSU is now exploring how it can
support a Sectoral Social Dialogue Committee (SSDC) for the social
services sector. SSDCs are an important governance tool and pillar of the
European social model: the European Commission (EC) established them to
promote dialogue between employers and workers in order to agree social
policy. An SSDC can improve terms and conditions for social care workers
which will benefit recruitment and retention in the sector and in turn
drive up standards of care. In short, Lethbridge's research has exerted a
pull on the levers that slowly but surely turn the great wheels of
European governance, which affects the lives of millions.
EPSU moves to strengthen industrial relations and social dialogue
This awareness by EPSU affiliates informed motions and subsequent
decisions at the 2009 EPSU Congress, which agreed that EPSU priorities
should include organising, lobbying, mobilising, policy development and
social dialogue in several areas of social services. Congress agreed
specifically to:
10: "Strengthen industrial relations in the health care and social
services sectors at European, national, regional and local level, and
set up joint activities and projects with relevant employer
organisations."
11: "Promote the implementation of cross-sectoral and sectoral
European Social Dialogue texts."
14: "Build on the existing work and networks in the area of social
services and develop further activities to strengthen trade union and
EPSU involvement in the area of social services".
This was the first time an EPSU congress had given such specific emphasis
to working with different types of social services. Congress
resolutions were translated into a work plan for social services work,
which union officers had to implement. The resolutions changed the way
EPSU operated in relation to the social services sector. More staff
time and resources were devoted to working with social services affiliates
and collaborating with non-governmental social services organisations.
To inform the development of the EPSU social services strategy, in
November 2009 Lethbridge presented a review of EPSU's actions on social
services since 2005. She stressed the importance of developing a European
strategy which recognised some sub-sectoral differences, eg childcare and
social care, and that development of social dialogue should be the next
priority, which would have to involve identifying and working with social
partners.
Research on care for older people makes case for European-level social
dialogue
In April 2010, following the EPSU Congress recommendation for work with
specific social services, Lethbridge was commissioned to research social
services for older people, mapping types of social services and providers
for older people by country; identifying employment trends and industrial
relations, and identifying issues for trade union strategies. In October
2010 she presented results of the research: `Care Services for Older
People in Europe - Challenges for Labour'3.4 to both the EPSU
Local, & Regional, Government Health and Social Services Committees,
with EPSU affiliates from across Europe attending. She recommended that
EPSU should explore the development of social dialogue in the care sector
at European level, building on national and local arrangements.
EPSU plans a Sectoral Social Dialogue Committee
In 2011, EPSU became part of the EC-funded project PESSIS (Promoting
employers' social services organisations in social dialogue), working with
partners in the non-governmental sector. This was a significant step in
establishing partnership working in social services, with the potential
for social dialogue. The PESSIS project contracted Lethbridge to
coordinate national researchers mapping social dialogue in the social
services sector in 11 European countries. Lethbridge presented the results
to the EPSU Health and Social Services Committee in October 2012, which
then discussed the options for a future European social services dialogue
committee. This represented an important development in EPSU social
services work. EPSU has moved from raising awareness with affiliates about
the need for work on social services, to discussing how to support a
European level sectoral social dialogue committee where it will be the
trade union social partner.
Sources to corroborate the impact
EPSU Adopted Resolutions EPSU 2009 Congress - Health and Social
Services section
http://www.epsu.org/a/5535
Lethbridge J. (2012) PESSIS - Promoting employers' social services
in social dialogue Final European Report http://www.socialserviceseurope.eu/images/pessis/Documents/Reports/pessis%20pdf_small.pdf
The 2012 PESSIS Final- Promoting employers' social services in social
dialogue European Report was commissioned by an alliance of
organisations, including EPSU, which was exploring how to set up a
Sectoral Social Dialogue Committee for the social services sector. This
was the first step for EPSU in working towards setting up a Sectoral
Social Dialogue Committee at European level and the report was the product
that came from this first step.
Deputy General Secretary, European Federation of Public Service Unions
(EPSU)
Jan Willem Goudriaan has been Deputy General Secretary of EPSU since 2001
and has a detailed knowledge of how EPSU has increased its work on social
services issues. He was present at the 2009 Congress and is aware of the
value of my work to EPSU.
Previous Head of Health (now Assistant General Secretary, UNISON) and
previously EPSU Chair of Health and Social Services Committee 2006-11
Karen Jennings was Chair of the EPSU Health & Social Services (HSS)
Committee during the period 2006-2011 and observed the increased focus on
social services work as a result of my research reports. She understands
the significance of moving the HSS Committee to address social services
issues.
General-Secretary, EASPD (European Association of Service Providers
for People with Disabilities
Luk Zelderloo has worked in partnership with EPSU, through the PESSIS
project, and appreciates EPSU's commitment to social services social
dialogue. He is aware of the significance of the changes that EPSU has
made and he is familiar with the quality of my research.