2 Enabling the growth of mobile money business in the telecoms industry in new territories in compliance with international banking regulations
Submitting Institution
University of the West of England, BristolUnit of Assessment
LawSummary Impact Type
EconomicResearch Subject Area(s)
Studies In Human Society: Policy and Administration, Political Science
Law and Legal Studies: Law
Summary of the impact
Based on research at UWE into mobile banking regulation, telecoms
companies have been able to contribute to growth in these emerging markets
internationally. The UWE findings have enabled them to understand the
anti-money laundering (AML) and banking regulation implications of their
mobile banking initiatives, giving them confidence and competitive
advantage in negotiations by being fully versed in the local and
international implications associated with mobile money and AML banking
regulation. As a result, the France Telecom Group (FTG) has been able to
successfully launch new subsidiaries in Tunisia, Niger, Armenia and Uganda
which, by bringing mobile money services to new markets, has had a
significant impact on local economies and employment.
Underpinning research
One of the fastest developing areas of banking regulation in the United
States (US), the European Union (EU) and United Kingdom (UK) has been
mobile banking. Mobile banking is seen as a potential area of growth for
many telecommunications companies. FTG approached Professor Nicholas Ryder
(then Associate Professor in Financial Crime, appointed 2006) and Dr Umut
Turksen (then Senior Lecturer in Law, appointed 2005) to conduct research
in the area of national and international banking regulation and its
applicability to mobile banking. This built on the body of research
conducted by Ryder on banking regulation and white collar crime in the UK
and EU. The key findings and conclusions of that body of research related
to the creation and development of a global anti-money laundering policy (3.1
below), comparison of related white collar crime strategies in the US and
UK (3.2 below), the jurisdictional scope and applicability of the
enforcement powers of UK financial regulatory agencies (3.3 below),
and the enforcement policies adopted in the US towards breaches of its
white collar crime and banking regulations (3.4 below).
FTG posed six specific research questions:
1) Do FTG activities in Jordan, Egypt and the Ivory Coast constitute a
banking activity which falls within the regulatory environment?
2) Are there any other activities that FTG needs to consider to avoid
meeting any banking regulation?
3) If FTG were to require a banking licence, what are the key regulations
that would be applicable?
4) Is the legislation and related regulations the same in all three
countries?
5) What are the consequences for non-compliance or part-compliance in
each of the three jurisdictions?
6) Are there minimum standards of compliance?
This research was ground-breaking in that it involved comparative
research on mobile banking and its regulation in Jordan, Egypt and the
Ivory Coast. Furthermore, the project also involved unique research on the
scope and applicability of both US and UK banking regulation and
white-collar crime legislation in respect of the activities of FTG in
Jordan, Egypt and the Ivory Coast. The research:
2.1 established that some of FTGs activities did indeed constitute
a banking service as defined in the banking legislation applicable in the
relevant countries; and determined the scope and applicability of UK and
US banking and white-collar crime regulations on the overseas activities
of FTG;
2.2 outlined the relevant banking regulations that FTG needed to
comply with;
2.3 determined who was legally responsible for the deposit of
money in each of the three countries;
2.4 outlined the relevant white-collar crime regulations that FTG
needed to comply with;
2.5 identified the due diligence procedures that FTG were required
to comply with, and outlined the penalties if they failed to comply with
these regulations; and
2.6 identified the levels of risk for FTG in respect of
non-compliance in each of the three jurisdictions.
Ryder and Turksen played a lead role in the research design,
implementation and analysis in each of the studies.
References to the research
3.1. N. Ryder, Money laundering an endless cycle? A
comparative analysis of the anti-money laundering policies in the United
States of America, the United Kingdom, Australia and Canada
(Routledge Cavendish, 2012).
http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415583732/
3.4. N. Ryder, `To confiscate or not to confiscate? A comparative
analysis of the confiscation of the proceeds of crime legislation in the
United States of America and the United Kingdom' (2013) Journal of
Business Law, Journal of Business Law, 8, 767-798. http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/20290/
Details of the impact
4.1 Contribution towards improving FTG's (employees, agents,
partners and subsidiaries) understanding of the regulatory environment
relating to mobile money in Jordan, Egypt, the Ivory Coast, the United
Kingdom, the United States and internationally
As a result of the research and advice provided to FTG, they were able to
expand, cultivate, promote and explore new business opportunities in
Jordan, Egypt and the Ivory Coast. FTG realised a competitive advantage
with considerable expert knowledge (in the area of banking regulation and
AML) when negotiating with telecoms operators in those three
jurisdictions, providing a superior negotiating position and strategic
competitive advantage. Therefore, the research contributed towards
improving FTG's (employees, agents, partners and subsidiaries)
understanding of the regulatory environment relating to mobile money in
Jordan, Egypt, and the Ivory Coast, and of the applicability of United
Kingdom, United States and international banking regulation in this field.
The combination of factors that led to FTG winning contracts in excess of
€5m included the strong international brand of FTG, the expertise within
the bidding team (that included representation from the FTG's Fraud and
Revenue Assurance team which had commissioned the research from the UWE
team), and the assurance of AML compliance which had been provided by the
commissioned research.
The exact value and details of these contracts cannot be disclosed due to
a strict confidentiality agreement to which UWE were party. However, the
fact that the UWE research team were chosen to conduct two specific pieces
of work, worth in excess of €50,000, is evidence that FTG saw considerable
value in the engagement. The former Knowledge Management Director with the
France Telecom Group, has commented that whilst the financial impact of
the research is `impossible to precisely define', `France Telecom realised
a considerable competitive advantage with expert knowledge when
negotiating with telecom operators in the [relevant] territories' [see
5.1]
4.2 Improving awareness of compliance obligations as they
relate to mobile money applications
The research project informed FTG of all of the risks associated with
money laundering and banking operations in Jordan, Egypt and the Ivory
Coast. This contributed to the realisation of the following further
benefits:
4.2.1 FTG were able to launch new Mobile Money services in
Tunisia, Niger, Armenia and Uganda
4.2.2 FTG were able to continue to manage and limit the threat
posed by, and the associated financial costs of, fraud and revenue
assurance within acceptable levels (this figure is approximately between
0.5-3 per cent of revenues, but cannot be disclosed precisely because of
the confidentiality agreement) by focusing their operational efforts on
fraud and leakage items causing repeated costs. Examples include call
reselling, roaming fraud, telesales fraud, subscription fraud, SAC related
fraud costs, and leakage resulting from change management (including
governance of fraud risk acceptance). In particular, the findings and
conclusions of the research conducted by Ryder and Turksen resulted in FTG
identifying low levels of fraud compliance under obligations imposed by
the then Financial Services Authority under its Senior
Management Arrangements, Systems and Controls (SYSC) Handbook
4.2.3 the UWE findings assisted the FTG to achieve these important
goals by not only identifying the relevant banking, AML and fraud
regulations that they were required to comply with, but also by advising
them regarding best practice
4.2.4 industry standards usually quote fraud and revenue leakage
as affecting between 5- 15 per cent of revenue, depending on geographical
location. As a result of the research conducted by Ryder and Turksen the
FTG were able to continue to maintain their very low level of fraud and
leakage. This was beneficial to the FTG as it enabled them not only to
fully comply with the relevant banking, AML and fraud regulations, but by
also give them a superior competitive advantage, supported by the
provision of expert legal knowledge transfer. As the then Knowledge
Management Director, Group Fraud and Revenue Assurance, France Telecom
Group, has attested, `The impact and benefit [derived from the work] was
that France Telecom realised a considerable competitive advantage with
expert knowledge when negotiating with telecom operators in the named
territories providing a superior negotiating position and strategic
competitive advantage'
The former Head of Global Development for Orange has said of the research
that it `made a significant contribution to the international success of
France Telecom/Orange, not least by improving understanding of the
regulatory environment relating to mobile money applications in a range of
countries, and improving awareness of compliance obligations as they
related to mobile money' [see 5.2]
4.3 Providing a foundation for FTG anti-fraud policy
The research findings were utilised by the FTG to form part of its
counter-fraud strategy documentation. They were adopted by FTG and
circulated to its agents, partners, subsidiaries and overseas offices. The
Managing Director of Newlands Horizons (UK) Ltd., has stated that `knowing
the conservative nature of [FTG's] Fraud and Revenues reporting, we can
assume that loss has been well controlled and to well below industry
standards due in the main to the comprehensive nature of [the UWE]
research....' [see 5.3 below]
Sources to corroborate the impact
5.1. A testimonial available from UWE from the former
Knowledge Management Director, Group Fraud Revenue Assurance, France
Telecom Group, confirming value of contracts gained as a result of
improved negotiating position from UWE research, benefits to their
business(es) and to their customers.
5.2. A testimonial available from UWE from the former Head
of Global Development at Orange, confirming the impact of the research on
understanding of the regulatory environment, and on awareness of
compliance obligations.
5.3. A testimonial available from UWE from the Managing
Director of Newlands Horizons (UK) Ltd. Confirming provision of foundation
for FTG anti-fraud policy, forming part of its counter-fraud strategy
documentation