Preserving and Presenting Soviet Cultural Heritage
Submitting Institution
University of NottinghamUnit of Assessment
Modern Languages and LinguisticsSummary Impact Type
CulturalResearch Subject Area(s)
Language, Communication and Culture: Cultural Studies, Literary Studies
History and Archaeology: Historical Studies
Summary of the impact
    Access to a rare collection of Soviet war posters — unique in the UK, and
      one of the largest
      internationally — has been facilitated through a process of conservation,
      digitisation and display.
      Research by Professor Marsh underpinned two exhibitions based on the
      collection (one physical
      and one digital) and a linked public engagement programme, creating new
      knowledge and awareness
      of the historical and aesthetic contexts of the posters, Soviet visual
      culture, the Soviet Union
      in the Second World War and the form and role of propaganda in a time of
      conflict. The digital
      resource provides permanent and interactive access to a rare and
      physically fragile element of
      Soviet cultural heritage, inspiring engagement from educators, members of
      cultural and community
      organisations and the public.
    Underpinning research
    Key researcher: Professor Cynthia Marsh (Nottingham 1972- 2010, 2012-)
    The exhibition and the development of its on-line presence which are the
      focus of this case study
      arose from three strands in Marsh's research: the integration of poetry or
      prose with painting in
      Russian culture, involving a study of the history of Russian art; her more
      recent exploration of
      theatre as visual culture; and the translation of culture through the
      medium of theatre.
    Firstly, in her work on the variety of ways in which image and text can
      integrate Marsh has shown
      that the power of such integration lies in its synaesthetic effect in
      reception, where one of the
      receiving senses stimulates another simultaneously or sequentially. As a
      result, there is frequently
      an element of spectatorship in the reception of literary forms which
      relate to the visual arts. This
      research necessitated detailed study of the history of Russian art as well
      as of literature in the
      nineteenth and early twentieth century up to 1930 (research references
      pre-1993).
    Secondly, in her work on Russian theatre, Marsh has focused on the
      relationship between text and
      performance, and, more specifically, on the factors which are the source
      of a visual mode for the
      written dramatic word. She has demonstrated that the key to understanding
      this mode lies in an
      awareness of the spatiality inherent in the dramatic text. This dimension
      is seen in the visual
      impact of the implied staging and the implied fictional worlds (3.1).
      Spatiality can also be seen in
      the use of quotation, in all its forms, and its effects on physical
      performance style (3.2). Finally,
      visual impact is also found in the exploration of the structural aspects
      of the dramatic text which are
      central to performance, such as repetition, power relationships among
      characters and how these
      factors determine the spatial positioning in a performance (3.3). These
      characteristics are central
      to what Marsh sees as the 'theatricality' of a staged dramatic text. A
      significant challenge in this
      research is that the manifestation of these aspects in given productions
      is always, due to their
      performative nature, ephemeral.
    Thirdly, in her study of translated Russian theatre in Britain she has
      shown the complex changes
      which a dramatic text with all its visual implications undergoes in the
      transfer from source to target
      culture. The changes brought to a text in transmission by the chain of
      practitioners who work on a
      production have already been recognised, but Marsh has shown how implied
      stereotypes, for
      example, can fail to migrate successfully from the source culture or are
      added by the target culture
      and occlude aspects of the source text (3.4 & 3.5).
    The key findings from this research base which influenced the original
      exhibition and the on-line
      version are:
    
      - the power generated by linking text and image as the posters do;
- the function of text/image in the posters and its effect on
        spectatorship;
- the centrality of spatial awareness in the visual composition of the
        posters themselves, in
        other words their 'theatricality';
- the posters as vehicles of cultural transfer (however biased);
- the nature of the ephemerality of the posters arising from their
        fragility as artefacts of
        material culture and from their status as responses to the rapidly
        changing events of war.
References to the research
    
3.1 `Design on Drama: V. A. Simov and Chekhov', Russian Literature,
        Modernism and the Visual
        Arts, eds, Catriona Kelly and Stephen Lovell (Cambridge: Cambridge
      University Press, 2000),
      pp.172-96. Available on request.
     
3.2 `The Implications of Quotation in Performance: Masha's lines from
      Pushkin in Chekhov's Three
        Sisters', The Slavonic and East European Review, 84:3 (July
      2006), 446-59.
      http://www.jstor.org/stable/4214320
     
3.3 `Claiming Spaces: Enemies', Cynthia Marsh, Maxim Gorky,
        Russian Dramatist (Bern, New
      York, Oxford: Peter Lang, 2006), pp.175-202. Available on request.
     
3.4 `Three Sisters as a Case Study for "Making Foreign Theater or
      Making Theater Foreign''',
      Chekhov for the Twenty-First Century, ed. Appollonio, C.,
      Brintlinger, A. (Bloomington, Indiana:
      Slavica Publishers, 2012), pp.269-80, figs 3-9. Submitted to REF2.
     
3.5 `Post-War British Month(s) in the Country', Turgenev
        and Russian culture, eds. Joe Andrew,
      Derek Offord & Robert Reid (Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi, 2008),
      pp.221-36. Submitted to REF2
     
Evidence of quality
    Item 3.1 & 3.3: quality indicated by reputation of publisher; item
      3.2 is a peer-reviewed journal;
      items 3.4 & 3.5 are submitted to REF2.
    Details of the impact
    Processes of conservation and digitisation have allowed public access for
      the first time to a rare
      collection of Soviet war posters — unique in the UK and one of the largest
      internationally. As part of
      her research interests, Marsh sought access to the posters through the
      University's Manuscripts
      and Special Collections (MSC) team, thus setting in motion a chain of
      events that would eventually
      lead to their physical exhibition and subsequent transformation into a
      permanent, digitised, interactive
      online resource, preserving an element of Soviet cultural heritage whose
      physical fragility had
      previously precluded the public from accessing it directly. 10,250 people
      have thus far visited the
      exhibition in either its physical or online form (5.1).
    Initiated and curated by Marsh in close collaboration with the MSC team
      at the University, Windows
        on War: Soviet Posters 1943-45 took place at the Weston Gallery (the
      University's public-facing
      Lakeside Arts Centre, which draws 90% of its audience from beyond the
      University) from
      December 2008 to March 2009. The exhibition was underpinned by Marsh's
      pre-1993 published
      research on poetry and painting and on the ways in which painting inspired
      pictorial passages in
      Russian 19th-century prose, and her more recent exploration of
      visual culture (3.1 & 3.4), bodily
      presence (3.2) and spatial awareness (3.2) in the theatre; and the
      translation of culture through
      the medium of theatre (3.4 & 3.5). This was complemented by recent, as
      yet unpublished research
      on the nature of the ephemerality of the posters arising from their
      fragility as artefacts of material
      culture. This research shaped the focus of the exhibition in terms of the
      topics highlighted, the
      manner in which the material was displayed and the captions created to
      guide visitors' under-standing.
    The exhibition attracted nearly 5000 visitors (substantial for the
      recorded footfall of the venue) and
      provoked national and local press interest, attesting to its role in
      raising public awareness of and
      contributing to a wider public understanding of this previously
      un-exhibited aspect of Soviet cultural
      heritage. It was recommended for several weeks during December 2008 and
      January 2009 in The
        Times, The Independent and The Guardian as a top 5
      exhibition. The extent of the collection, its
      rarity, and specifically its Nottingham location also stimulated the
      interest of the local press (5.2).
      Visitors to the exhibition found it to be an 'excellent living memory of
      war childhood' and a 'peep
      into history through war posters'. There were also comments on how the
      posters' combinations of
      image and text affected Russian emotions toward the enemy, and their
      sentiments about home. A
      primary school teacher commented that his/her charges learned (after
      stencilling in teams) `how
      mass production of images can be quite uncreative!' (5.3).
    Linked public lectures and education activities engaged children, adult
      learners and a broader
      general public, contributing to increased knowledge about, awareness of
      and interest in Soviet
      visual culture, and specific issues such as preservation through
      digitisation, and the processes
      involved in the creation of the posters. Feedback has been referenced
      where this was sought at
      the time (5.3):
    
      - 
Public lectures, such as `The Soviet War Posters in the Context
        of History', by Professor Steven
        White (Glasgow) ( 27.01.09; 120 attendees) traced the Russian poster
        tradition's frequent reference
        to history (e.g. the Napoleonic invasion) providing insights into the
        specifically Russian,
        rather than Soviet, sense of history in WW2.
- 
A lunchtime talk attracted an audience of 40 people and covered
        topics such as preservation
        and digitisation as a repair tool; the provenance of a collection saved
        by chance; reproducing
        posters en masse in wartime conditions; and the paradox of the posters'
        war role.
- 
School education days (for 386 children and their teachers)
        were organised by the Lakeside
        Education Officer. Children were introduced to an archive, had a guided
        tour of the exhibition,
        and made their own posters. They learnt how to stencil and how teams
        created the original posters.
        Teacher comments: 'the children gained an insight into the poster
        collection, and were
        especially aware of how violent and aggressive the anti-Nazi campaign
        was in Russia. They
        produced very striking, if bloodthirsty, graphic images in black and red
        paint' (23.2.09). Transforming
        their existing knowledge, the children learnt about `persuasive picture
        making' (23.02.09);
        and also ' learnt a few words of Russian' (23.02.09).
- 
Adult study day (28.02.09; 35 attendees, organised by Marsh).
        Speakers gave a comprehensive
        overview of the posters' role in war, their artistic inheritance as
        against contemporary art policy
        and their cultural legacy: The day concluded with a guided tour of the
        exhibition. Participants
        found the day to be `excellent', answering `a good number of questions'.
- The material was utilised by a professional trainer in her
        acculturating programme for businessmen
        visiting Russia who considers it to have had `a great impact on me and
        my work'. The trainer
        was preparing a speech on `Russia at War' and subsequently visited the
        archive to undertake
        further research on the posters which she considered `too striking to
        omit!' She has subsequently
        embedded the material into three specialist talks she provides (to lay
        audiences and the national
        Arts charity National Association of Decorative & Fine Arts
        Societies (NADFAS)) (5.4).
Using digitisation to widen access and to ensure conservation
    Digitisation and online display have provided the ideal medium for the
      exhibition of the fragile posters,
      addressing what can otherwise be the opposing needs of public access and
      conservation. The online
      resource (5.1) has transformed the reach of the material, attracting new
      audiences to this unique
      element of Soviet cultural heritage. Its development called more deeply on
      Marsh's research, since
      each of the 45 posters has been fully annotated with comments on
      provenance, on its role in the
      war situation, on the artistic roots of the image and on the artist and
      writer (where appropriate), as
      well as commentary on the visual and verbal content of each poster.
      Interest and use of the site
      has been further stimulated by press coverage (5.2).
    According to MSC's Digital Development Officer, the resource is proving
      to be `exceptionally self-sustainable'
      (5.5), already generating interest from educators (5.6), and from a
      diverse range of
      cultural organisations. It has been endorsed by groups including,
      Nottingham Contemporary, the
      Irish Association for Russian, Central and Eastern European Studies, the
      Russian Embassy in
      London, the Soviet Space Program and Academia Rossica — the Russian Arts
      and Culture
      Foundation. Between its launch date on 26 March 2013 and 31st
      July 2013, it had 5,249 visits from
      the UK, US, Russia, Canada, Germany, Italy, Australia, Ukraine, France and
      Finland (5.7). The
      AHRC is featuring this `fantastic' site in its on-line gallery as a model
      of best practice in creating a
      website and presenting rare materials: `It is witty, informative, and
      really gets to the heart of what
      images mean and what they do — which is perfect' (5.8).
    Sources to corroborate the impact 
    5.1. Web address of the online exhibition: http://windowsonwar.nottingham.ac.uk/
    5.2. Composite press report for both exhibitions (available on file).
    5.3. Feedback from exhibition (including visitors' book comments,
      collated teacher comments from
      School Education Days. And feedback from study days (available on file).
    5.4.Factual statement from professional trainer regarding the Russian
      acculturation programme
      (available on file).
    5.5 Factual statement from Digital Development Officer (available on
      file).
    5.6. Factual statement from US Professor (available on file).
    5.7. Social media report on Windows on War resource (available on file).
    5.8 E-mail from the AHRC (available on file).