Preserving and Presenting Soviet Cultural Heritage
Submitting Institution
University of NottinghamUnit of Assessment
Modern Languages and LinguisticsSummary Impact Type
CulturalResearch Subject Area(s)
Language, Communication and Culture: Cultural Studies, Literary Studies
History and Archaeology: Historical Studies
Summary of the impact
Access to a rare collection of Soviet war posters — unique in the UK, and
one of the largest
internationally — has been facilitated through a process of conservation,
digitisation and display.
Research by Professor Marsh underpinned two exhibitions based on the
collection (one physical
and one digital) and a linked public engagement programme, creating new
knowledge and awareness
of the historical and aesthetic contexts of the posters, Soviet visual
culture, the Soviet Union
in the Second World War and the form and role of propaganda in a time of
conflict. The digital
resource provides permanent and interactive access to a rare and
physically fragile element of
Soviet cultural heritage, inspiring engagement from educators, members of
cultural and community
organisations and the public.
Underpinning research
Key researcher: Professor Cynthia Marsh (Nottingham 1972- 2010, 2012-)
The exhibition and the development of its on-line presence which are the
focus of this case study
arose from three strands in Marsh's research: the integration of poetry or
prose with painting in
Russian culture, involving a study of the history of Russian art; her more
recent exploration of
theatre as visual culture; and the translation of culture through the
medium of theatre.
Firstly, in her work on the variety of ways in which image and text can
integrate Marsh has shown
that the power of such integration lies in its synaesthetic effect in
reception, where one of the
receiving senses stimulates another simultaneously or sequentially. As a
result, there is frequently
an element of spectatorship in the reception of literary forms which
relate to the visual arts. This
research necessitated detailed study of the history of Russian art as well
as of literature in the
nineteenth and early twentieth century up to 1930 (research references
pre-1993).
Secondly, in her work on Russian theatre, Marsh has focused on the
relationship between text and
performance, and, more specifically, on the factors which are the source
of a visual mode for the
written dramatic word. She has demonstrated that the key to understanding
this mode lies in an
awareness of the spatiality inherent in the dramatic text. This dimension
is seen in the visual
impact of the implied staging and the implied fictional worlds (3.1).
Spatiality can also be seen in
the use of quotation, in all its forms, and its effects on physical
performance style (3.2). Finally,
visual impact is also found in the exploration of the structural aspects
of the dramatic text which are
central to performance, such as repetition, power relationships among
characters and how these
factors determine the spatial positioning in a performance (3.3). These
characteristics are central
to what Marsh sees as the 'theatricality' of a staged dramatic text. A
significant challenge in this
research is that the manifestation of these aspects in given productions
is always, due to their
performative nature, ephemeral.
Thirdly, in her study of translated Russian theatre in Britain she has
shown the complex changes
which a dramatic text with all its visual implications undergoes in the
transfer from source to target
culture. The changes brought to a text in transmission by the chain of
practitioners who work on a
production have already been recognised, but Marsh has shown how implied
stereotypes, for
example, can fail to migrate successfully from the source culture or are
added by the target culture
and occlude aspects of the source text (3.4 & 3.5).
The key findings from this research base which influenced the original
exhibition and the on-line
version are:
- the power generated by linking text and image as the posters do;
- the function of text/image in the posters and its effect on
spectatorship;
- the centrality of spatial awareness in the visual composition of the
posters themselves, in
other words their 'theatricality';
- the posters as vehicles of cultural transfer (however biased);
- the nature of the ephemerality of the posters arising from their
fragility as artefacts of
material culture and from their status as responses to the rapidly
changing events of war.
References to the research
3.1 `Design on Drama: V. A. Simov and Chekhov', Russian Literature,
Modernism and the Visual
Arts, eds, Catriona Kelly and Stephen Lovell (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 2000),
pp.172-96. Available on request.
3.2 `The Implications of Quotation in Performance: Masha's lines from
Pushkin in Chekhov's Three
Sisters', The Slavonic and East European Review, 84:3 (July
2006), 446-59.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/4214320
3.3 `Claiming Spaces: Enemies', Cynthia Marsh, Maxim Gorky,
Russian Dramatist (Bern, New
York, Oxford: Peter Lang, 2006), pp.175-202. Available on request.
3.4 `Three Sisters as a Case Study for "Making Foreign Theater or
Making Theater Foreign''',
Chekhov for the Twenty-First Century, ed. Appollonio, C.,
Brintlinger, A. (Bloomington, Indiana:
Slavica Publishers, 2012), pp.269-80, figs 3-9. Submitted to REF2.
3.5 `Post-War British Month(s) in the Country', Turgenev
and Russian culture, eds. Joe Andrew,
Derek Offord & Robert Reid (Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi, 2008),
pp.221-36. Submitted to REF2
Evidence of quality
Item 3.1 & 3.3: quality indicated by reputation of publisher; item
3.2 is a peer-reviewed journal;
items 3.4 & 3.5 are submitted to REF2.
Details of the impact
Processes of conservation and digitisation have allowed public access for
the first time to a rare
collection of Soviet war posters — unique in the UK and one of the largest
internationally. As part of
her research interests, Marsh sought access to the posters through the
University's Manuscripts
and Special Collections (MSC) team, thus setting in motion a chain of
events that would eventually
lead to their physical exhibition and subsequent transformation into a
permanent, digitised, interactive
online resource, preserving an element of Soviet cultural heritage whose
physical fragility had
previously precluded the public from accessing it directly. 10,250 people
have thus far visited the
exhibition in either its physical or online form (5.1).
Initiated and curated by Marsh in close collaboration with the MSC team
at the University, Windows
on War: Soviet Posters 1943-45 took place at the Weston Gallery (the
University's public-facing
Lakeside Arts Centre, which draws 90% of its audience from beyond the
University) from
December 2008 to March 2009. The exhibition was underpinned by Marsh's
pre-1993 published
research on poetry and painting and on the ways in which painting inspired
pictorial passages in
Russian 19th-century prose, and her more recent exploration of
visual culture (3.1 & 3.4), bodily
presence (3.2) and spatial awareness (3.2) in the theatre; and the
translation of culture through
the medium of theatre (3.4 & 3.5). This was complemented by recent, as
yet unpublished research
on the nature of the ephemerality of the posters arising from their
fragility as artefacts of material
culture. This research shaped the focus of the exhibition in terms of the
topics highlighted, the
manner in which the material was displayed and the captions created to
guide visitors' under-standing.
The exhibition attracted nearly 5000 visitors (substantial for the
recorded footfall of the venue) and
provoked national and local press interest, attesting to its role in
raising public awareness of and
contributing to a wider public understanding of this previously
un-exhibited aspect of Soviet cultural
heritage. It was recommended for several weeks during December 2008 and
January 2009 in The
Times, The Independent and The Guardian as a top 5
exhibition. The extent of the collection, its
rarity, and specifically its Nottingham location also stimulated the
interest of the local press (5.2).
Visitors to the exhibition found it to be an 'excellent living memory of
war childhood' and a 'peep
into history through war posters'. There were also comments on how the
posters' combinations of
image and text affected Russian emotions toward the enemy, and their
sentiments about home. A
primary school teacher commented that his/her charges learned (after
stencilling in teams) `how
mass production of images can be quite uncreative!' (5.3).
Linked public lectures and education activities engaged children, adult
learners and a broader
general public, contributing to increased knowledge about, awareness of
and interest in Soviet
visual culture, and specific issues such as preservation through
digitisation, and the processes
involved in the creation of the posters. Feedback has been referenced
where this was sought at
the time (5.3):
-
Public lectures, such as `The Soviet War Posters in the Context
of History', by Professor Steven
White (Glasgow) ( 27.01.09; 120 attendees) traced the Russian poster
tradition's frequent reference
to history (e.g. the Napoleonic invasion) providing insights into the
specifically Russian,
rather than Soviet, sense of history in WW2.
-
A lunchtime talk attracted an audience of 40 people and covered
topics such as preservation
and digitisation as a repair tool; the provenance of a collection saved
by chance; reproducing
posters en masse in wartime conditions; and the paradox of the posters'
war role.
-
School education days (for 386 children and their teachers)
were organised by the Lakeside
Education Officer. Children were introduced to an archive, had a guided
tour of the exhibition,
and made their own posters. They learnt how to stencil and how teams
created the original posters.
Teacher comments: 'the children gained an insight into the poster
collection, and were
especially aware of how violent and aggressive the anti-Nazi campaign
was in Russia. They
produced very striking, if bloodthirsty, graphic images in black and red
paint' (23.2.09). Transforming
their existing knowledge, the children learnt about `persuasive picture
making' (23.02.09);
and also ' learnt a few words of Russian' (23.02.09).
-
Adult study day (28.02.09; 35 attendees, organised by Marsh).
Speakers gave a comprehensive
overview of the posters' role in war, their artistic inheritance as
against contemporary art policy
and their cultural legacy: The day concluded with a guided tour of the
exhibition. Participants
found the day to be `excellent', answering `a good number of questions'.
- The material was utilised by a professional trainer in her
acculturating programme for businessmen
visiting Russia who considers it to have had `a great impact on me and
my work'. The trainer
was preparing a speech on `Russia at War' and subsequently visited the
archive to undertake
further research on the posters which she considered `too striking to
omit!' She has subsequently
embedded the material into three specialist talks she provides (to lay
audiences and the national
Arts charity National Association of Decorative & Fine Arts
Societies (NADFAS)) (5.4).
Using digitisation to widen access and to ensure conservation
Digitisation and online display have provided the ideal medium for the
exhibition of the fragile posters,
addressing what can otherwise be the opposing needs of public access and
conservation. The online
resource (5.1) has transformed the reach of the material, attracting new
audiences to this unique
element of Soviet cultural heritage. Its development called more deeply on
Marsh's research, since
each of the 45 posters has been fully annotated with comments on
provenance, on its role in the
war situation, on the artistic roots of the image and on the artist and
writer (where appropriate), as
well as commentary on the visual and verbal content of each poster.
Interest and use of the site
has been further stimulated by press coverage (5.2).
According to MSC's Digital Development Officer, the resource is proving
to be `exceptionally self-sustainable'
(5.5), already generating interest from educators (5.6), and from a
diverse range of
cultural organisations. It has been endorsed by groups including,
Nottingham Contemporary, the
Irish Association for Russian, Central and Eastern European Studies, the
Russian Embassy in
London, the Soviet Space Program and Academia Rossica — the Russian Arts
and Culture
Foundation. Between its launch date on 26 March 2013 and 31st
July 2013, it had 5,249 visits from
the UK, US, Russia, Canada, Germany, Italy, Australia, Ukraine, France and
Finland (5.7). The
AHRC is featuring this `fantastic' site in its on-line gallery as a model
of best practice in creating a
website and presenting rare materials: `It is witty, informative, and
really gets to the heart of what
images mean and what they do — which is perfect' (5.8).
Sources to corroborate the impact
5.1. Web address of the online exhibition: http://windowsonwar.nottingham.ac.uk/
5.2. Composite press report for both exhibitions (available on file).
5.3. Feedback from exhibition (including visitors' book comments,
collated teacher comments from
School Education Days. And feedback from study days (available on file).
5.4.Factual statement from professional trainer regarding the Russian
acculturation programme
(available on file).
5.5 Factual statement from Digital Development Officer (available on
file).
5.6. Factual statement from US Professor (available on file).
5.7. Social media report on Windows on War resource (available on file).
5.8 E-mail from the AHRC (available on file).