The Reception of Classical Antiquity: Raising Public Awareness and Influence on Higher Education
Submitting Institution
University of BristolUnit of Assessment
ClassicsSummary Impact Type
CulturalResearch Subject Area(s)
Language, Communication and Culture: Cultural Studies, Literary Studies
History and Archaeology: Historical Studies
Summary of the impact
The Bristol department of Classics and Ancient History has long been well
known for its work on
the reception of antiquity. In addition to scholarly publication it has
sponsored a great many public
events on reception topics, bringing aspects of the classical heritage to
the attention of diverse
audiences. The first aspect of the impact therefore relates to "creating
and interpreting cultural
capital" (Main Panel D Criteria, para 84). The second aspect is the
influence this research has had
on education during the REF period in HEIs both in the UK and North
America with respect to the
undergraduate curriculum.
Underpinning research
Nearly every member of the department publishes on reception and one
could in a sense cite the
entire body of work, since it is this shared commitment to a
reception-based approach to antiquity
that has determined the prevailing ethos in the department. This has been
a dominant focus since
the early 1990s, leading first to the foundation of the Centre for the
Classical Tradition and then of
its successor the Bristol Institute of Greece, Rome and the Classical
Tradition (BIGRCT, founded
in 2000). The research has been both theoretical, with ground-breaking
studies defining the
concepts and models of reception, and empirical, with substantial work
devoted to nineteenth-century
Britain, modernism, film and other areas. Some specific outputs
are highlighted here. For
general influence pride of place goes to C. Martindale's Redeeming the
Text: Latin Poetry and the
Hermeneutics of Reception (1993) [1] (Martindale was at
Bristol from 1990-2013). A programmatic
manifesto, it is one of the most important books in the field. It lays out
a (for the time) radical
hermeneutics based on the reception theories of Wolfgang Iser and
Hans-Robert Jauss. Volume
5.2 of The Classical Receptions Journal (2013) was devoted
entirely to an assessment of the
impact of this work, twenty years on. Another pioneering project in the
mid 1990s was `Receptions
of Rome', a three-year, Leverhulme-funded research project (£100,000) led
by Martindale and C.
Edwards (then at Bristol). A major exhibition at the Bristol City Museum
and Art Gallery 3 May-23
June 1996 was part of the project; alongside the exhibition catalogue, the
edited volume Roman
Presences [2] was the principal published output of this
research programme. More recently,
Classics and the Uses of Reception [3], edited by
Martindale and R. Thomas (Harvard), may be
cited as an exemplary work with a typically strong Bristol contribution.
For more specific influence, three programmes of research are cited which
were presented at
public events. First is the Oxford History of Classical Reception in
English Literature, co-edited by
Martindale and D. Hopkins (Bristol, English) [4]. This five-volume
project is one of the largest ever
undertaken in the field. Volume 3 (1660-1790), the first to be published,
appeared in 2012. The
second example is the work of P. Michelakis (Bristol since 2002) on
antiquity in silent cinema [5].
Together with M. Wyke (Professor of Latin, UCL) Michelakis has been
recovering what has
become since the invention of talkies a vast forgotten territory. The
project has identified some 800
films in archives when previously only a handful were known. A rich
chapter in the history both of
classical reception and of modern culture is here being written for the
first time. Third, the AHRC-funded
project (£461,000) of N. Morley (Bristol since 1995) on the
reception of Thucydides [6]. The
extent of Thucydides' influence stretches well beyond historiography to
embrace political
philosophy, international relations, war theory and military strategy. He
has been central to debates
about citizenship, the functioning of democratic constitutions, and the
causes of war, but one of the
paradoxes of his reception is how selective (and inaccurate) the knowledge
of his text often is. The
project has brought to light forgotten and surprising chapters in the
history of Thucydides'
influence.
References to the research
[1] C.A. Martindale, Redeeming the Text : Latin Poetry and the
Hermeneutics of Reception
(Cambridge 1993). Can be provided on request.
[2] C. Edwards (ed.), Roman Presences:Receptions of Rome in
European Culture, 1789-1945
(Cambridge 1999). Can be provided on request.
[3] C.A. Martindale & R. Thomas (eds.), Classics and the
Uses of Reception (Oxford 2006) incl.
contributions from the editors and Bristol colleagues Kennedy, Leonard,
Lianeri, Liveley,
Michelakis, Saunders, Zajko. Can be provided on request.
[4] C.A. Martindale & D. Hopkins (eds.), Oxford History of
Classical Reception in English Literature
Volume 3 (1660-1790) (Oxford 2012) with contributions from the
editors and former BIGRCT
fellow H. Power. Can be provided on request.
[5] P. Michelakis and M. Wyke (eds.), The Ancient World in
Silent Cinema (Oxford 2013)
(Michelakis REF Output 2)
[6] K. Harloe & N. Morley (eds.), Thucydides and the
Modern World (Cambridge 2012). Harloe (co-editor)
and contributor E. Potter are former BIGRCT fellows. (Morley REF
Output 3)
All of these publications were submitted in previous RAEs or are being
submitted in the REF.
Morley's project is supported by an AHRC grant Thucydides: reception,
reinterpretation and
influence (£461,000; 01/12/2009—30/11/2013).
Details of the impact
Reception is a major part of what Classicists do nowadays compared to
twenty years ago. Bristol
has been a leading player in this trend from the start, in its research,
teaching and institutional
arrangements. Throughout the REF period, and long before, it has been
standard practice in the
department to share our work with the public, principally through the
Bristol Institute of Greece,
Rome and the Classical Tradition [a] and its predecessor the
Centre for the Classical Tradition.
The Institute supports research into any aspect of Greco-Roman
civilisation, but places particular
emphasis on the links that bind the ancient and modern worlds. 9 of its 15
postdoctoral fellows
have done research on reception. In the REF period it sponsored 45 events,
many of them
extending over several days ([b]). Of these, 33 were on reception
topics. The public is invited as a
matter of course but they are most in evidence at the two annual
showcases, the Blackwell-Bristol
Lectures (four lectures annually since 2008) and the annual Donors' Event.
The Lectures and the
Donors' Event consistently attract audiences of between 50 and 100 people
including many people
from outside the University. At the Donors' Event, a public thank-you to
supporters, some aspect of
the Institute's current research is presented in a way that is accessible
yet without sacrificing
academic quality. Three of the Donors' Events have highlighted the
research programmes
mentioned above: `Milton at 400', 12 November 2008, with papers from
Martindale and Hopkins of
Bristol, and S. Brown of Anglia Ruskin (former Bristol undergraduate and
postgraduate); `Greece
and Rome in Silent Cinema', 3 December 2011 (speakers Michelakis and Wyke,
featuring excerpts
from films and live, improvised piano accompaniment); `Constitutionalism:
Ancient, Modern and
American', 8 December 2012 (speaker P. Rahe, Hillsdale College, Michigan;
the lecture was part
of a meeting of the Legacy of Greek Political Thought network, hosted by
Morley in the context of
the Thucydides project). All of these events contribute to the public
understanding of classical
reception, linking directly to longstanding core research of the Bristol
department.
Feedback from these events is consistently enthusiastic (and audiences
keep returning).
Comments are often heard, particularly from alumni, about the change in
Classics since their day
and about how reception studies have vastly expanded the subject's reach
and their own
appreciation of it. Perhaps the most tangible and persuasive evidence of
impact is that people are
inspired to donate financially. Operating costs of the Institute, which in
the REF period has raised
£422,000, are met entirely from charitable donations from individuals and
corporations. A typical
supporter writes that the work of the Institute has "broadened my
horizons" and "educated me in an
area of which I knew little... I am sufficiently impressed with what has
been achieved and is
planned to be achieved to want to help fund the work, which I have just
done for this academic
year". The Institute receives annual donations of approximately £15,000
from individuals; we have
also had an individual gift of £100,000 and another of £50,000. The A.G.
Leventis Foundation
acknowledges the Institute's distinctive approach and commitment to the
classical tradition as a
reason for its ongoing and substantial support.
The second aspect of impact in this case study is the way reception is
now embedded in the
curricula of classics departments. A survey of teaching carried out by the
Classical Reception
Studies Network found that 18 of 23 departments in the country offered
reception-focused
undergraduate modules (41 between them) in 2008-09 and a further 45
modules that had a
significant element of reception. 5-10 students every year in these
departments write a final-year
dissertation on a reception theme. One-third of departments see reception
as integral to the
curriculum, not an add-on ([c]). This is a complete transformation
of the pedagogical landscape.
Bristol, being among the first to develop this approach, has been a leader
in effecting this change.
In the nature of things such indirect causal links are hard to prove, but
the close association of
Bristol Classics and reception is long-standing and acknowledged
nationally and internationally. As
a concrete example we offer the impact of Martindale's Redeeming the
Text. A special issue of the
Classical Receptions Journal (5.2, 2013) marked the 20th
anniversary of its publication and
includes a chapter on teaching in which the author, a scholar teaching in
Vassar College,
acknowledges Martindale's decisive influence ([d]). Recent
testimonials from both sides of the
Atlantic assert that Martindale `led and did not simply contribute to the
trend of reception study'
([e]); that Redeeming the Text is `one of the most
important and influential books in classical
reception studies' whose teaching would look `very different' without it ([f]);
that the book has been
`utterly formative' of the author's teaching ([g]); that the change
in classical pedagogy `is in no
small part due to the echo Martindale's work has had' [h]); that
it has `helped to reconfigure the
modern discipline of Classics', and is a `permanent fixture on the
critical bibliography of key works'
given to students [i]. This colleague also refers to a panel on
teaching classical receptions at the
2013 meeting of the American Philological Association, where Redeeming
the Text began the
discussion. `It is no exaggeration to say,' this colleague concludes,
`that all my teaching in Classical
Reception Studies is in dialogue with RTT.'
Reception studies are inherently interdisciplinary, aiming to equip
students with a broad outlook
and the skills needed to pursue further work. They also lead readily to an
engagement with the
world outside the academy and an enhanced awareness of the historical
environment. Apart from
the purely academic rewards offered by reception studies, they have proven
a highly successful
response in educational terms to changing circumstances, refreshing our
curricula, forging links
with the whole range of arts and humanities, and underscoring the
continuing relevance of Classics
and Ancient History.
Sources to corroborate the impact
Corroborating reach and extent of Institute activities:
[a] Website of the Bristol IGRCT http://www.bristol.ac.uk/arts/birtha/centres/institute/
[b] List of Institute events 2008-2013 (available from UoA
coordinator) Corroborating impact of reception work on higher education:
[c] CRSN 2011 Survey http://www.open.ac.uk/arts/research/crsn/files/crsn/file/ecms/web-content/CRSN-Report-TeachingCRS.pdf
[d] Classical Receptions Journal vol. 5.2 (2013) http://crj.oxfordjournals.org/
[e] Testimonial: Professor, University of California Irvine
[f] Testimonial: Professor, University of Reading
[g] Testimonial: Lecturer, Open University
[h] Testimonial: Associate Professor, Princeton University
[i] Testimonial: Professor, Yale University
Items [e] through [i] available from UoA coordinator.