Performing the Archive: Bristol research projects make live art and performance archives accessible and inspire their creative re-use in performances and exhibitions
Submitting Institution
University of BristolUnit of Assessment
Music, Drama, Dance and Performing ArtsSummary Impact Type
CulturalResearch Subject Area(s)
Studies In Creative Arts and Writing: Film, Television and Digital Media
Language, Communication and Culture: Cultural Studies, Linguistics
Summary of the impact
Two strands of research were developed within the Performing the
Archive portfolio of projects,
focusing on conservation, accessibility and the creative use of culturally
significant and unique
archives of live art and performance. These have impacted on professional
artists, curators and
producers working in live art and contemporary performance, on archivists
and conservators and
on the general public. Through a range of events, workshops, exhibitions
and performances held
between 2008 and 2013, partner arts organizations have also benefited,
including Arnolfini, Bristol
Old Vic Theatre (BOVT), In Between Time Productions (IBT) and the National
Review of Live Art
(NRLA). The influence of the research has been felt regionally, nationally
and internationally.
Underpinning research
The two strands were addressed across four related projects, involving
three groups of non-
academic beneficiaries identified above, both in carrying out the research
and in its dissemination.
Conservation and accessibility: Two projects (see P1 and P3
in Section 3) researched existing
methodologies and developed a best-practice model for the digital
preservation of the audiovisual
archive of the NRLA, one of the UK's foremost performance festivals
(1986-2010), held in the
University of Bristol's Theatre Collection and consisting of over 1,700
tapes in various video
formats. This research into the conservation of fragile analogue
videotapes, some of which were
becoming unplayable, led to innovative approaches to storage, ensuring
that no data was lost from
the original recordings and securing their long-term preservation. P3
completed the preservation of
the entire archive and made it accessible online to registered users
through a website, which
integrated the Performance Art Data Structure (PADS) and Semantic Tools
for Arts Research
(STARS) [5]. PADS had been developed in P1 by Stephen Gray
(technical lead on the digitisation
project, now Research Fellow and Senior Data Librarian) and Paul Clarke
(Research Fellow on
Performing the Archive (P2) and now Lecturer in Performance) as a
way of structuring, cataloguing
and describing data designed specifically for performance archives [1].
STARS, created in earlier
JISC- and AHRC-funded projects hosted by the University, were further
developed by ILRT (the
research and development division of Bristol's IT Services) and Angela
Piccini (Senior Lecturer in
Screen) to produce an online workspace for users, including new tools for
adding descriptions,
annotating videos and making and visualising links between works, both
within and beyond the
digital archive. Case studies, made available through the website, detail
models of best practice for
documenting performance and conserving and managing its digital
documentation. These case
studies also contain findings on the online accessibility of performance
documents and how digital
archives can facilitate the research and re-use of such documents [5].
Creative re-use: Two further projects (see P2 and P4
below) focused on how to engage as a
creator or curator with these performance archives, modelled through
dialogues and workshops
with professional practitioners, curators and researchers. For P2, artists
(Franko B, Robin Deacon,
Mike Pearson and Martha Wilson) were invited to screen material from the
archives in public
dialogues. With Performance Re-enactment Society (PRS) and Arnolfini,
Clarke explored curating
documents from Arnolfini's archive alongside exhibiting a series of
public, participatory re-
enactments (The Cover of a Book is the Beginning of a Journey,
2008-09 and Cover-ed, 2011). In
P4, three workshops each explored a particular engagement through creative
practice: Remake
focusing on artists working with the archives of others, undertaken by
Clarke with Every House
Has A Door and PRS; Redux on artists returning to their own
archives, undertaken by Simon
Jones (Professor of Performance, Bristol) with Bodies in Flight and Blast
Theory [6]; and Replace
on curators and producers working through exhibition, undertaken by Nick
Kaye (Professor of
Performance and co-investigator, University of Exeter) with Arnolfini and
IBT. Findings resulted in
articles [3&4], public talks, performances, installations [2],
exhibitions, symposia (September and
December 2012) and a conference (April 2013), producing the first
systematic consideration of the
theoretical, methodological and curatorial implications of these questions
around creative use and
re-use of archival material.
References to the research
[3] Clarke, Paul (2008) `Archival Events and Eventful Archives' in Arkive
City, ed. Julie Bacon,
Belfast/Newcastle: Interface and Locus+, pp. 162-173.
[4] Clarke, Paul and Warren, Julian (2009) `Ephemera: Between Archival
Objects and Events', in
Journal of the Society of Archivists, Taylor & Francis, Vol.
30, No.1, pp 45-66.
Research project and grants
P1 2006-08: Capturing the Past, preserving the Future (PI
2006-07 Barry Smith, PI 2008 Jones,
AHRC, £297,000).
P2 2007-10: Performing the Archive (PI Jones, Research
Fellow Clarke, Great Western Research,
£105,000).
P3 2010-12: Into the Future: Sustainable Access to the
National Review of Live Art Digital
Archives (PI Jones, CIs Clarke & Piccini, AHRC, £115,356).
P4 2011-14: Performing Documents: modelling creative practice
and curatorial engagements with
live art and performance archives (PI Jones, CIs Clarke & Kaye
[Exeter], AHRC, £453,581).
Details of the impact
The projects shared findings with three distinct groups of non-academic
beneficiaries:
i) professional artists, arts organisations, performance curators
and producers
ii) archivists/ conservators
iii) the general public.
To reflect the research's practice-based methodologies, which involved
creative-industry
collaborators, dissemination was predominantly achieved through events.
These were mostly open
to the public, although some targeted specific groups, e.g. training
opportunities for emerging
practitioners, museum/gallery-based archivists. Collaborators' practice
was directly influenced by
working alongside researchers within projects, while others' practice was
indirectly influenced by
the events. For the Director of Live Art Development Agency (LADA,
London), the research was
`ambitious and influential. [...] [It] addressed and advanced many [...]
issues and took the debates
about the relationship between performance and the archive to a new
level.'
Strand one: conservation and accessibility
i) arts professionals/organisations:
P1: Richard Layzell, collaborator on P1's case study around his
1996 NRLA work, I Never Done
Enough Weird Stuff, wrote: `My thinking has changed in relation to
earlier works and especially
seeing them within their own historical context. [...] As a result I
performed and designed a new
piece called Assisted Power (2010), which engaged directly with
video work from 1980/1. This was
shown at the 30th Anniversary NRLA and Whitstable Biennale.'
P1/P3: Curating Artistic Research Output (CAiRO) delivered
data-management skills tailored to
the requirements of arts professionals in a four-day summer school (2011),
attended by 23
professional artists, curators and practitioner-researchers, and in an
online postgraduate teaching
resource, with 1,280 visits and 68 module downloads by July 2013, thus
introducing many
professional artists to the value and uses of online archiving.
i/ii) arts professionals/organisations and archivists/conservators:
P1/P3: raised the Live Art Archives' profile and resulted in high
profile new archives being
deposited by artists and organisations, such as Franko B, Greenroom, Hull
Time Based Arts,
Queer Up North, and What's Welsh for Performance?
P3: [5] the `incredible online [NRLA] archive' (artist, Search
Party performance company) was
launched in November 2012. It already has 682 registered users, including
132 freelance artists,
35 from arts organisations and 26 from museums/galleries. Feedback has
been entirely positive,
enriching practising artists understanding of live art, with one
contributing artist thanking the team:
`for your work in constructing and safeguarding this special archive [...]
[I]t's brilliant that [the
resource is] interactive and so will continue to be live.'
P2: The curatorial workshop, Conserving and Archiving
Ephemeral Artworks (2008), involved 24
invited participants from significant cultural institutions, e.g. Bristol
Museum, FACT, the V&A.
Digital Documentation and Performance (2009) comprised three days
of workshops/seminars for
37 researchers, artists, curators, archivists and collection managers. The
events shared findings
and exchanged best practice for archiving and digitizing [1], with
attendees stating: `On a practical
level, Bristol's approach to the digitization of analogue videotapes fed
into the Library's then-
nascent policy in this area.' (Lead curator, British Library, Drama and
Literature Recordings). For
Professor Sarah Whatley (Siobhan Davies Archive), Clarke and Gray's input
was `valuable in our
early stages [...] in the area of digitization formats, curatorial
processes [...] taxonomies for
performance/ephemeral content, data storage methods, metadata [and]
user-generated content.'
ii) archivists/conservators:
P1: In In Time: A Collection of Live Art Case Studies,
published by Live Art UK, Arnolfini Archivist
discussed P1 as a model for their approach to conserving audiovisual
documentation: `As a
commissioning and presenting organisation, Arnolfini is keen to trial PADS
from the beginning of
the research and development of a new piece of Live Art work through to
its presentation.'
Strand two: creative re-use
i) arts professionals/organisations:
P2/P4: For the director of IBT: `Research around live
documentation and performance archives
has been invaluable in informing my professional practice as a curator of
performance. [Performing
the Archive] has acted as an important catalyst, [...] which has resulted
in the creation of We See
Fireworks, a large-scale memory project [touring] to the US, Europe,
Australia and Brazil to critical
acclaim. [P2] has created a wealth of inspiration for professionals,
academics and audiences and
the work the department continues to lead in this area resonates across
the world.'
P4: Two one-day symposia and one three-day conference (September
and December 2012, and
April 2013) were held to disseminate the findings around creative
engagement with archives [6],
as well as facilitate knowledge exchange between arts practitioners and
scholars. Attendance
figures were 76, 89 and 113 respectively, of whom 55 were artists or
practitioner-researchers and
11 were from arts organisations including Theatre Bristol, Cube Cinema
[Bristol], Plymouth Arts
Centre, Live Art Development Agency. The director of Arnolfini says: `Performing
Documents was
an exemplary research partnership, which culminated in a series of
internationally-significant live
art commissions, a major group exhibition entitled Version Control.
[The] project had a direct
impact in providing an extended period of inquiry into these practices, in
the context of a shared
research culture. It has enabled the institution to examine its own
assumptions and conventions in
relation to the archive and live art ...[and] led to a continuing strand
of research looking at the
changing relationship of performance and exhibition.'
P2: Jones was invited to share findings [1&5] at Making
Artistic Enquiry Visible, an international
project based in Thompson Rivers University (Canada 2009-11), and in the Intercultural
Performance
Project (National University of Singapore 2009), speaking on
archiving performance
and the role practice-as-research can play in developing
academic-creative-industry exchange.
ii) archivists/conservators:
P2/P3/P4: Clarke and Gray's work [1,3,5] fed into
consultancy on Battersea Arts Centre's (£2.5m)
Heritage Lottery Fund project (2012), part of which was devoted to
creating a publicly accessible
digital and physical archive, and into Asia Art Archive's development
(Hong Kong, October 2010).
iii) general public:
P2/P4: Knowledge developed in both projects was applied by Clarke
and Gray in partnership with
theatre company Uninvited Guests, who were commissioned by Tate Britain to
produce The Last
Judgement audiovisual installation [2], as part of the John
Martin: Apocalypse exhibition
(September 2011 - January 2012). Visited by 150,000 people, `The show
pushes at the
boundaries of conventional gallery experience and will create, we hope,
fresh insights into this
singular figure from art history.' (Tate curator, Daily Telegraph,
2011.)
i/iii) arts professionals/organisations & general public:
P2: Models for creative re-use of archives [2-4] were
disseminated through a series of public
exhibitions and performances by Clarke with PRS: The Cover of a Book,
at Arnolfini (2008-09)
attracted 16,415 visitors, toured to Leeds Met Gallery and was seen by
45,418 at New Art Gallery,
Walsall (2011). Cover-ed (Arnolfini, 2011) remade Ed Ruscha's 1969
photo novel Crackers,
selected from the archive, as Salad Dressing, a new bookwork,
installation and event, attended by
7,543 people. Salad Dressing was included in Ed Ruscha Books
& Co at New York's Gagosian
Gallery (2013). Commissioned for The Pigs of Today are the Hams of
Tomorrow, curated by
Plymouth Arts Centre and Marina Abramovic (2010) with Clarke as curatorial
advisor, Untitled
Performance Stills enabled public participants, scholars, curators
and artists to remake moments
from past performances to camera, with photographer Hugo Glendinning.
P2/P4: Memory of Theatre, Clarke's Heritage Sandbox
project for Bristol's Knowledge Exchange
Hub for the Creative Economy (REACT), was a collaboration with the
artistic director of BOVT,
producers MAYK (Mayfest), Pyxis Design and mobile software company
Calvium. A new archive
was created of audiences' memories of theatre and made publicly accessible
in situ. The software
innovations made it possible for Calvium to `offer this solution to other
customers interested in an
indoor location-aware app.' MAYK director wrote: `We are excited by the
potential of the project to
transfer to other heritage contexts and developing the business model for
how this might happen.'
P1-P4: Presentations disseminated findings [1-5] to
wide-ranging audiences of arts professionals,
archivists and researchers: Jones at NRLA (Glasgow 2009), the Digital
Echoes symposium on
online archives (2013), attended by organizations including V&A and
BBC; and Clarke
`Remembering Performance' (NRLA 2010), re.act.feminism, Berlin
(2009), Archiv/Praxis,
Tanzarchiv Leipzig (2009), School of the Art Institute Chicago (2009).
P4: Clarke worked with collaborators from PRS on Group Show,
and Jones with Bodies in Flight
on Do The Wild Thing! Redux, producing performances and an
installation (Arnolfini 2012) inspired
by archival documents [6]. These were conducted in dialogue with
professional artists from Every
House has a Door and Blast Theory, who produced their own new works, 9
Beginnings (two
performances) and Jog Shuttler (installation), which 3,463 people
saw. Arnolfini's curator of
performance wrote: `The project successfully brought unique debate,
discourse and performance
commissions to Arnolfini that would not have happened otherwise, bringing
many stimulating ideas
to the table that will go on to resonate with the artistic and curatorial
performance community.'
Sources to corroborate the impact
[a] Freelance curator, formerly Plymouth Arts Centre, co-curator of The
Pigs of Today Are The
Hams of Tomorrow.
[b] Archivist at Bristol Record Office, formerly Arnolfini's archivist,
collaborator on The Cover of a
Book is the Beginning of a Journey (quoted above).
[c] Lead curator, British Library. Attendee of symposia/workshops (quoted
above).
[d] Freelance artist whose work was a case study on P1, presented with
Clarke on `Remembering
Performance' panel (NRLA Festival 2010) (quoted above).
[e] Curator of the John Martin exhibition, Tate Britain (quoted above).
[f] Freelance curator, previously artistic director of NRLA, collaborator
on P1 and P3.
[g] Director of Arnolfini, collaborator on P2 and P4 (quoted above).
[h] Curator of performance, Arnolfini, collaborator on P2, now at
Lancaster Nuffield (quoted above).
[i] Artistic director of In Between Time Festival, collaborator on P4
(quoted above).
[j] Artistic director of BOVT, cultural-industry collaborator on Memory
of Theatre.
[k] Memory of Theatre reviewed in Wired: http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-
05/03/heritage-sandbox/page/2