‘Reading the Riots’ and increasing public understanding
Submitting Institution
London School of Economics & Political ScienceUnit of Assessment
Social Work and Social PolicySummary Impact Type
LegalResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Public Health and Health Services
Studies In Human Society: Criminology
Psychology and Cognitive Sciences: Psychology
Summary of the impact
The Unit's Criminal Justice group has carried out a significant body of
research relating to youth disaffection, anti-social behaviour and
policing. This led to Professor Tim Newburn being approached by The
Guardian to establish a joint research project following the 2011
riots in England. The ensuing research achieved very wide reach via
conventional print and other media, informing public understanding of the
riots and challenging conventional wisdom about their causes. A wide range
of public figures reacted to the research and the Home Secretary's
response included the announcement of a formal review of police `stop and
search' practice. This was published in July 2013, and in a parliamentary
statement the Home Secretary said she anticipated significant reform of
the use of these powers.
Underpinning research
Research Insights and Outputs:
Since 2002, the Unit's Criminal Justice group led by Professor Tim
Newburn has carried out substantial research relating to concerns around
police discrimination and police culture; youth crime; the lives of
disaffected and troublesome youth; and how best such issues might be
tackled. Early work highlighted the clear social patterning of youthful
disaffection, examined the complex character of the nature of
`disaffection' - including factors such as gang membership, and
involvement in group disorder - and identified a heightened likelihood of
problematic relationships with adults in authority, especially the police
[1]. This and subsequent research illustrated the problems of
intervention, particularly when the police were involved, where high
levels of discretion combined with a managerialist target culture led to
disproportionate criminalisation of certain categories of young people
[2]. Other work examined the growing problem of police legitimacy,
especially where minority ethnic communities were concerned [3]. Finally,
a significant body of work examined the discriminatory use of police
powers and how effectively the police service had responded to calls for
radical reform in this area, concluding that despite indications of
progress there remained significant problems, not least in relation to the
use of `stop and search' and related powers [4,5].
As a result of this research, Tim Newburn was approached by The
Guardian when riots took place in London, Manchester, Birmingham,
Liverpool and elsewhere in August 2011. Influenced by a study of the
Detroit riot in 1967, by the University of Michigan and the Detroit Free
Press, The Guardian was keen on the idea of a larger-scale study
of the disturbances. Negotiations between Paul Lewis (of The Guardian),
who was at the forefront of the reporting of the riots, and Tim Newburn
led to the establishment of a joint research project. The highly unusual,
innovative study, Reading the Riots was announced in The
Guardian on 7th September 2011. Critically, financial
support from the Joseph Rowntree and Open Society Foundations was
negotiated within approximately two weeks, enabling staff to be recruited
and trained, and fieldwork to start on 5th October 2011.
The two primary objectives of Reading the Riots were (i) to use
social science to engage with public and political debates around the
disturbances and inform public understanding of the riots; and (ii) to
investigate the validity of some of the assumptions being made about the
riots, notably that they were organised by `gangs', and that social media
such as Twitter and Facebook had played a significant role in the
organisation of the disturbances. (Analysis of social media was carried
out by a team led by Professor Rob Procter, Manchester University.)
The research study, which adopted standard social science research
methods, involved almost 600 interviews with people caught up in the
disturbances. In phase one 270 rioters were interviewed across the five
main cities in which disorder occurred. This was completed and published
by early December 2011. Key findings included concerns about aggressive
and disrespectful policing, particularly focusing on the use of `stop and
search', and no evidence of a central role for gangs in the disorder [6].
The second phase of the study commenced in 2012 and involved almost 300
interviews being conducted with police officers across all the major
cities affected, with the prosecution and defence lawyers who staffed the
courts in the aftermath of the riots, and with victims of the
disturbances. This phase was completed and published by July 2012. In a
departure from standard social scientific practice a deliberate decision
was taken to publish the results of the study entirely in the newspaper,
with a short summary report [6] and an edited collection of articles [7]
being published in December 2011.
Key researcher: Professor Tim Newburn has been full time at LSE
since 2002.
References to the research
[1] Newburn, T. and Shiner, M. (2005) Dealing with Disaffection,
Cullompton: Willan Publishing. LSE Research Online ID: 12419
[2] Newburn, T. (2011) Policing youth antisocial behaviour and crime:
time for reform? Journal of Children's Services, 6, 2, 96-105.
DOI: 10.1108/17466661111149394
[3] Newburn, T. and Reiner, R. (2004) From PC Dixon to Dixon PLC:
Policing and Police Powers Since 1954, Criminal Law Review,
August, 601-618. LSE Research Online ID: 17280
[4] Newburn, T., Shiner, M. and Hayman, S. (2004) Racism, Crime and
Injustice? Strip search and the treatment of suspects in custody, British
Journal of Criminology, 44, 5, 677-694. DOI: 10.1093/bjc/azh043
[5] Foster, J., Newburn, T. and Souhami, A. (2005) Assessing the
Impact of the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry, London: Home Office. LSE
Research Online ID: 13942
[6] Lewis, P., Newburn, T.,Taylor, M., Mcgillivray, C., Greenhill, A.,
Frayman, H. and Proctor, R. (2011) Reading the riots: investigating
England's summer of disorder. Reading the riots, The London School of
Economics and Political Science and The Guardian, London: UK. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/46297/1/Reading%20the%20riots%28published%29.pdf
[7] Lewis, P. and Newburn, T. (eds) (2011) Reading the Riots:
Investigating England's Summer of Disorder, Guardian Shorts.
Available from LSE on request.
Evidence of quality: [2], [3] and [4] are peer-reviewed journal
articles; [5] is a peer-reviewed Government Report. Grants awarded to The
Guardian/LSE (administered by The Guardian): JRF £79,000;
Open Society Foundations £50,000 (Phase 1: 09-12/11); £90,000 (Phase 2:
01-07/12) (£17,000 to Social Policy, LSE). Title: Reading the
Riots/Reading the Riots Phase 2.
Details of the impact
Nature of the Impact: Reading the Riots informed public
understanding of the disturbances in five English cities in August 2011,
challenged conventional wisdom around the events, and had a direct impact
on policy. Reading the Riots deliberately sought to maximise
public engagement. This aim was reflected in the research design and this
in turn led to further public engagement. Being run jointly with a news
organisation meant that the study moved particularly quickly and was
unusually extensive in its reach, utilising both the conventional print
edition of the newspaper, and other media, to reach as broad an audience
as possible in order to improve public understanding of the events. Speed
was vital to its success. The study was launched and, most unusually,
funding secured within weeks of the riots. The ESRC's announcement of its
Pilot Urgency Grants Programme recognised that RCUK need to be able "to
respond to urgent or unforeseen events (for example the August 2011 UK
riots), where there is a strong case for immediate research" [A]. The
research was commended by the Chair of the Home Affairs Select Committee
as being both important and complementary to the work of the Committee
[B].
From 5th to 10th December 2011 The Guardian
ran approximately 34 stories over 23 pages of the newspaper reporting the
results of the first phase, and in July 2012 ran a further 18 stories over
11 pages of the paper, covering the results of phase two. The study
commanded six front page stories. The study was also reported extensively
in other UK media. On the first phase launch day, Paul Lewis and Tim
Newburn appeared on radio and television programmes with a combined
audience of over 30 million. Altogether during 2011 and 2012, 200
references were made to the research in the UK and international media.
The dedicated website for Reading the Riots has received 2.8
million hits.
Reading the Riots informed public understanding and challenged
current wisdom in a number of important ways. First, against a background
of official denial, the study clearly showed that anger against the police
was a specific motivation, particularly in the early days of rioting. This
element of the study was the subject of a special edition of BBC2's
Newsnight (5th December 2011), in which a film made by the Reading
the Riots team illustrating some of the key research findings [C]
was followed by a studio discussion (involving the then Police Minister,
the former Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Lord Ian Blair, David
Lammy MP for Tottenham, and Tim Newburn). This argument was widely
reported across the media [D] and formed the basis of a specially
commissioned verbatim drama, also broadcast on the BBC [E].
Second, and contrary to initial claims made by the Home Secretary, the
research helped establish not only that the role played by gangs in the
riots was minimal, but also that a `truce' existed between gangs during
the disturbances [F]. Third, phase two of Reading the Riots, which built
on previous research on policing, minority communities and disaffected
youth (1-5), turned its attention to the response of the criminal justice
system to the riots, further informing public understanding. In
particular, it identified a series of problems besetting the policing of
the riots, highlighting the shortcomings in police radio technology, and
in the Metropolitan Police's use of mutual aid support from other forces.
The problems with the police tactics in the riots [G], the subject of a
second film made by the research team for a BBC2 Newsnight special in July
2012, were commented upon by the Police Minister, Nick Herbert, by David
Lammy MP and Mark Rowley, an Assistant Commissioner of the Metropolitan
Police in the studio [H], and subsequently also by the outgoing HM Chief
Inspector of Constabulary and by the Metropolitan Police's second in
command during the rioting [I].
An indicator of the public debate provoked by Reading the Riots
is the broad range of policy makers and others who reacted to its findings
in a variety of forums including LSE's conference in December 2011, and in
articles published in The Guardian and other media. They included:
the Home Secretary [J]; the Leader of the Opposition and Shadow Home
Secretary [K]; the Deputy Assistant Commissioner of the Metropolitan
Police Service [L]; the Archbishop of Canterbury [M]; the Mayor of London
[N]; the President of the Association of Chief Police Officers, and the
Chairman of the Police Federation [J]; the Director of Public Prosecutions
[O]; the Chairman of the Government's post-riots Victims and Communities
Panel [P]; and Louise Casey, the Government's then lead on the response to
the riots [Q].
The most significant direct policy response to Reading the Riots
came at the LSE's conference on 14th December 2011. In her
speech, the Home Secretary announced a formal review [R] of best practice
in relation to police stop and search powers. A major element of this was
a review undertaken by Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary, a
primary prompt for which was the LSE and Guardian report [S]. HMIC
published their review in July 2013 [T], and in a statement in the House
of Commons on 2nd July 2013 the Home Secretary said she
anticipated significant reform of the use of these powers [U].
Recognition of the innovative partnership with The Guardian,
designed to increase public understanding of the 2011 riots, was
demonstrated by the award of `Innovation of the Year' at the British
Journalism Awards, the `Innovation Award' at the European Press awards,
and shortlisting for the THES `research project of the year, all in 2012.
The research has had substantial reach with media coverage and engagement
in France, Italy, Germany, Sweden, Australia, India, New Zealand,
Singapore, the US, Canada, Russia, Zimbabwe.
Wider Implications: The Unit's work on understanding the riots is
important to the communities affected by the violence and destruction; to
the policy-makers with responsibility for responding to the issues raised
by the disorder, and to the police and other members of the criminal
justice system tasked with dealing with such an emergency. By helping
provide a more effective understanding of these major events, the Unit's
research is helping address the policy and practice issues raised by the
riots.
Sources to corroborate the impact
All Sources listed below can also be seen at https://apps.lse.ac.uk/impact/case-study/view/107
[A] ESRC Pilot Urgency Grants Programme http://www.esrc.ac.uk/funding-and-guidance/funding-opportunities/27006/urgency-grants-mechanism.aspx
[B] House of Commons Home Affairs Committee, Policing Large Scale
Disorder: Lessons from the disturbances of August 2011, 16th
Report of Session 2010-12, Volume II, Oral/written, Ev 90. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmhaff/1456/1456ii.pdf
[C] The initial Newsnight film on Reading the Riots, broadcast on
5th December 2011 can be seen at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/9656166.stm
[D] For example, by the BBC: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16018215
[E] The Riots: In Their Own Words was first broadcast on BBC1 in August
2012.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01l3y0v
[F] Newburn, T. et al. (2011) `The four day truce', Guardian, 6th
December
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/dec/06/gang-truce-english-riots
[G] Reading the Riots: Investigating England's summer of disorder:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/video/2012/jul/02/policing-england-riots-video
[H] England Riots: Police feared for their lives: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18653530;
[I] Reading the Riots - live Q&A with Sir Hugh Orde, Paul McKeever
and Sir Denis O'Connor: http://bit.ly/MVUtU8
[J] Theresa May to review stop and search in wake of Reading the Riots
study http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/dec/14/theresa-may-stop-search-review;
[K] Reading the Riots: Investigating England's summer of disorder:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/video/2011/dec/14/ed-miliband-riot-report-video
[L] Met police must 'do things differently' after riots, says senior
commissioner:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/dec/14/met-police-riots-response-review
[M] Rioting is the choice of young people with nothing to lose/
Archbishop of Canterbury says riots will return unless we reach out to
young. https://apps.lse.ac.uk/impact/download/file/1186
[N] Riots report shows London needs to maintain police numbers, says
Mayor
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/jul/04/riots-report-london-police-numbers
[O] Rapid riot prosecutions more important than long sentences, says Keir
Starmer
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/jul/03/riot-prosecutions-sentences-keir-starmer
[P] Reading the riots - reaction
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/blog/2011/dec/05/reading-the-riots-reaction
[Q] Reading the Riots conference - Wednesday 14 December 2011.
http://www.theguardian.com/uk/blog/2011/dec/14/reading-the-riots-conference-live-blog
[R] Theresa May announces review of police stop-and-search powers - video
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/video/2011/dec/14/theresa-may-police-stop-search-video
[S] Explicit reference to the LSE research is made in the Background
Paper. The Management Team briefing document mentions `two reports into
the riots' (one of which was Reading the Riots) but not by name. This
source is confidential Available from LSE on request.
[T] HMIC (2013) Stop and Search Powers: Are the police using them
effectively and fairly? London: HMIC. http://www.hmic.gov.uk/media/stop-and-search-powers-20130709.pdf
[U] House of Commons Debates 2nd July 2013.
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmhansrd/cm130702/debtext/130702-0002.htm