Boosting poor households’ incomes through temporary worker schemes in the Pacific
Submitting Institution
University of SussexUnit of Assessment
Economics and EconometricsSummary Impact Type
EconomicResearch Subject Area(s)
Economics: Applied Economics
Studies In Human Society: Demography
Summary of the impact
Thousands of poor rural workers from 11 island states in the Pacific have
benefited from the
findings of twin research programmes led by Alan Winters of the University
of Sussex — one on
small island economies and one on the temporary mobility of labour. New
Zealand's Recognised
Seasonal Employers Scheme (RSE), which welcomes workers from poor Pacific
Islands for the
agricultural season, is a direct outcome of his research. Winters was also
instrumental in designing
and implementing the RSE in a way that permitted formal evaluation and
which has become an
exemplar of good practice. The evaluation shows that households in Vanuatu
and Tonga benefiting
from the scheme have experienced average increases in income of 35-40 per
cent.
The RSE has been described by World Bank staff as `among the most
effective development
projects ever evaluated'. Persuaded by the positive evaluation, the
Australian government has
overcome longstanding reservations and introduced a nearly identical
scheme, which is potentially
much larger. The RSE also inspired the imaginative US response to the 2010
earthquake in Haiti,
providing 1,000 temporary visas for unskilled Haitian workers. And
Winters' research on temporary
labour mobility and the RSE underpins developing countries' efforts to
start serious negotiations on
the issue in the WTO's Doha Round of trade negotiations.
Underpinning research
Between 2000 and 2003, the Commonwealth Secretariat (ComSec) approached
Alan Winters at
Sussex to help to analyse two pressing policy issues: how to promote
growth in small remote
economies, and whether developing countries would benefit from the
liberalisation of temporary
international labour mobility. The approaches reflected Winters' extensive
experience in applied
international trade research and his strong network of contacts in the
policy world around trade and
development. The results of the commissioned research have since been
published and become
widely cited.
The first stream of research concerned the excess production costs faced
by very small and
isolated economies, which Winters and Pedro Martins (then a Research
Assistant at Sussex and
now at the Overseas Development Institute) were able to measure more
carefully than previously
[see Section 3, R1]. With their small consignment sizes and great
distances from economic
centres, these countries face massive trading costs. As a result, imported
goods (most goods for
these small economies) are much more expensive, as are the locally
produced goods that use
imports as inputs. Similarly, most goods cannot be exported because, in
addition to high
production costs, the price in destination markets needs to cover the cost
of transporting them to
market.
As Winters and Martins showed, the outcome is that real wages in these
economies are very low
and will become lower as the rest of the world becomes more efficient and
island states lose their
tariff preferences in major markets. In many manufacturing activities,
even if wages fell to zero, the
island economies would still not be able to match world prices because
they pay so much more for
inputs. The researchers concluded that, if real wages were not to fall to
subsistence levels,
migration would have to play a fundamental role in income growth. Such
views have now become
widely accepted: one manifestation is in Chapter 1 of the World Bank's
2006 report, Home and
Away, which argues for a migration solution in the Pacific Islands
[see Section 5, C1].
The second stream of work — with Terrie Walmsley (Purdue), Zhen Kun Wang
(Sussex) and
Roman Grynberg (ComSec) — analysed the economic benefits of liberalising
the flow of temporary
workers between economies [R2-R6]. Mobility moves workers from places with
low productivity to
those with high productivity, with a resulting large gain in world output.
The research provided the
first numerical estimates of the benefits of mobility, which hugely exceed
those associated with
removing remaining barriers to trade in goods. It also analysed the
practicalities of introducing
temporary mobility schemes and showed that any potential problems would be
far from
insurmountable. This work was taken up by developing-country groups — for
example, in the
Commonwealth, UNCTAD, the WTO, the World Bank, the International
Organization for Migration
and the OECD — and by specific countries in their negotiations with
partners.
References to the research
R1 Winters, L.A. and Martins, P.M.G. (2004) `When comparative
advantage is not enough:
business costs in small remote economies', World Trade Review,
3(3): 347-83.
R2 Winters, L.A., Walmsley, T.L., Wang, Z.K. and Grynberg, R.
(2003) Liberalising Labour
Mobility under the GATS. London: Commonwealth Secretariat, Economic
Paper No. 53.
R3 Winters, L.A., Walmsley, T.L., Wang, Z.K. and Grynberg, R.
(2003) `Liberalising temporary
movement of natural persons: an agenda for the development round', The
World Economy,
26(8): 1137-62.
R4 Walmsley, T.L. and Winters, L.A. (2005) `Relaxing the
restrictions on the temporary movement
of natural persons: a simulation analysis', Journal of Economic
Integration, 20(4): 688-26.
R5 McKenzie, D., Martinez, P.M.G. and Winters, L.A. (2008) `Who is
coming from Vanuatu to New
Zealand under the new Recognised Seasonal Employer (RSE) Program?', Pacific
Economic
Bulletin, 23(3): 205-28.
R6 Walmsley, T.L., Winters, L.A. and Ahmed, A. (2011) `The impact
of the movement of labour:
results from a model of bilateral migration flows', Global Economy
Journal, 11(4): 1-24.
Outputs can be supplied by the University on request.
Details of the impact
The two streams of research led by Alan Winters came together to underpin
New Zealand's
establishment of the Recognised Seasonal Employers Scheme (RSE) [see
Section 5, C2]. This
scheme, operational since 2008, allows recognised agricultural employers
to recruit workers from
certain Pacific Islands for a season's work subject to the workers meeting
certain (mild) criteria and
to the employers providing reasonable working and living conditions.
Workers with good records
can return in subsequent seasons.
Evaluation of the scheme in two of the island economies that have
benefited shows massive
effects: the per capita incomes of participating households have
risen by an average of 35-40 per
cent in Vanuatu and Tonga. Workers remit money to their families while
they are away and carry
income and goods back home when they return at the end of the season.
According to Vanuatu's
Labour Commissioner [C3], `The scheme has raked in around Vt 3.8 billion
so far for the country'
(approximately $40 million) and around 11,000 temporary placements have
been made. Virtually
all of the benefit was reaped over the period 2008-13, although the data
include a few hundred
workers who moved under the 2007 pilot scheme.
The key innovation of the RSE was that it not only suited New Zealand
farmers but that it also drew
on research to assuage society's fears about migration and to show
explicitly how it would foster
development in the Pacific region, a major foreign-policy objective for
New Zealand. The research
was central to these innovations, motivating migration as a development
policy and defining the
practical needs for success for both host and home countries. Its role is
evident in the World
Bank's report Home and Away [C1] and in the accounts of the RSE in
the evaluation documents by
John Gibson and David McKenzie [C4].
The confluence of the two research streams came in the Home and Away
report, following which
the New Zealand government sought the World Bank's help in constructing a
temporary-migration
scheme for the Pacific Islands. Winters worked closely with the senior
economist involved (Manjula
Luthria), especially on the design of the scheme and the presentation of
the case for what was a
very innovative and potentially contentious piece of policy. Winters was
also largely responsible for
persuading the parties to set it up with a proper evaluation process — a
first for a national migration
policy. Demonstrating the scheme's effectiveness objectively was important
politically and enabled
the idea to be exported to Australia (which adopted a similar small pilot
scheme in 2008 and a full
scheme in 2013 [see C5, C6] and elsewhere (see the testimonial from
Michael Clemens [C10]).
McKenzie et al. [R5] reports the RSE baseline survey for Vanuatu.
After leaving the Bank in 2007,
Winters passed the project to his co-author of that study, David McKenzie
who, with John Gibson,
has continued the evaluation. They write [C4]:
The RSE ... is viewed as a possible model for other countries [in the ILO
good
practices database]. ... Our evaluation was designed prospectively,
alongside the
launch of the program [with] baseline surveys ... before workers left to
work in New
Zealand, and then re-interview[s] ... 6, 12 and 24 months later. ... The
results show
that the RSE has had large positive effects on sending households in Tonga
and
Vanuatu. We find per capita incomes of households participating in
the RSE to have
increased by over 30 per cent relative to the comparison groups in both
countries...
Subjective economic welfare is estimated to have increased by almost half
a standard
deviation in both countries... School attendance rates increased by 20
percentage
points for 16- to 18-year-olds in Tonga... Overall these results show that
the seasonal
worker program has been a powerful development intervention for the
participating
households.
On the fifth anniversary celebration of the RSE in 2012, New Zealand High
Commissioner, Bill
Dobbie, said [C3]:
RSE is a very important scheme because it is a huge initiative for New
Zealand and
Vanuatu. Every year 2500 plus workers are recruited to work in a New
Zealand farm.... For the last five years Vanuatu has over 11,000 RSE work
placements in New
Zealand. RSE also contributed greatly to the Vanuatu's economy. Each year
RSE
workers contributed over Vt 1 billion to the economy.
The New Zealand scheme has been closely copied in Australia. After a
pilot scheme between 2008
and 2012, Australia introduced a full scheme in 2013 [C5]. The pilot,
which naturally had only
modest coverage, suggests that Tongan participants increased the per
capita income of their
households by 36 per cent [C6].
The New Zealand experience also provided inspiration for the imaginative
US response to the
Haitian earthquake of providing 1,000 temporary unskilled-worker visas
specifically for Haitians.
The champion of this policy change — Michael Clemens of the Center for
Global Development
(CGD) — acknowledges the inspiration of the RSE for policy work in his
testimonial [C10].
Winters' research findings on small economies and on temporary migration
have both been
disseminated widely as separate themes — not only in academic outlets, but
personally at
conferences, seminars and policy meetings (for example, OECD, UNCTAD,
World Bank, IOM,
ComSec) and as policy briefs and by ComSec staff (notably Roman Grynberg)
in their operational
work. The work particularly underpins developing countries' efforts to
raise temporary labour
mobility as a significant element of the Doha Round; this goal still
informs many developing country
policy positions, although it has not yet borne fruit at the WTO.
Sources to corroborate the impact
C1 The World Bank (2006) Home and Away: http://archives.pireport.org/archive/2006/August/08-16-rp.htm
C2 New Zealand, Regional Seasonal Migration Scheme:
http://www.immigration.govt.nz/employers/employ/temp/rse/
C3 Vanuatu Daily Record: http://www.dailypost.vu/content/vt38-billion-rse-5-years
C4 Gibson, J. and McKenzie, D. (2011a)
http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10289/4944/Economics_wp_1008.pdf
?sequence=1
C5 Australia, Pacific Seasonal Worker Pilot Scheme:
http://deewr.gov.au/pacific-seasonal-worker-pilot-scheme
C6 Gibson, John and David McKenzie (2011b):
http://siteresources.worldbank.org/DEC/Resources/Australia_Pacific_Seasional_Worker_Pilot_Scheme.pdf
Four people have provided Testimonials (available in full from the
University):
C7 Roman Grynberg, who commissioned both sets of work while at
ComSec, now in Botswana as
a Senior Research Fellow. In an unsolicited email to Winters (27 April
2012) he wrote: `I
thought I would send you this just to show you what your research on
temporary movement
has done in the Pacific. While failure is an orphan and success has many
fathers, you are
definitely the intellectual father of this program. You have good cause to
be proud because this
has benefited so many thousands of poor rural workers in the Pacific
Islands region and has
shown that a real and balanced globalisation can benefit the poor directly
and quickly.' And in
an email on 14 Aug 2013, `There can be no doubt that your work had a
direct impact on the
developments on the ground in the Pacific. Both the New Zealand and
Australian programs
were developed as a direct result of the research you did on temporary
movement. The course
in terms of the impact on Australia is certainly more direct. Your papers
on the subject shifted
thinking inside the World Bank on this subject.'
C8 Yurendra Basnett (Research Fellow, ODI, wrote on 26 October
2012, `I was at the Department
of Trade in Vanuatu (as an ODI fellow) when the RSE was being launched...
I got to interact
with most of the key actors (including the First Secretary at NZ High
Commission... With re: to
your work on RSE I could definitely say that it had huge impact not just
on Vanuatu (or PICs)
but also in shaping the thinking at the NZ side. It was frequently
referenced by all parties. But
not just on RSE, your work on GATS-Mode 4 (with Roman Grynberg et al)
informed much of
Vanuatu's position on trade negotiations. While I was there, Vanuatu had
increasingly
articulated Mode 4 [on labour mobility] as a key offensive position on all
trade negotiations it
was part of — EPA, PACER+, PICTA etc.'
C9 Manjula Luthria, the World Bank staff member who wrote `Home
and Away' and led on the
RSE and the related Australian scheme writes (email 2 Sept 2013), `the
entire aid paradigm
had been built around preventing migration by putting aid money into
competiveness-enhancing
projects in the hope of mitigating the need for labor mobility. As the
Bank's front line
economist in the EAP region, I struggled to reverse the tide of thinking
but didn't feel equipped
with the analytical or empirical tools which I could use as a game changer
in policy circles.
Alan's paper was just that'; and `Alan also took on the task of advising
us on M&E methods.
This entailed a long-term investment and Alan was certain it would pay
off, and it did. Today, it
is entirely because we collected data in the manner than Alan advised,
that these schemes are
now considered one of the most development friendly interventions that has
ever been
evaluated.'
C10 Michael Clemens, Senior Research Fellow at CGD, writes
(letter, 26 August 2013) of the huge
success of the RSE, `I have observed first hand that the RSE scheme and
evaluation set up by
Winters have influenced other major countries to copy the program. Top
government officials
in Canberra, Australia who run Australia's own Seasonal Agricultural Visa
told me that they
created it in 2009-2010 following the proof of concept by Winters's work
in New Zealand... It's
my assessment that this international replication would never have
occurred but for the sound
design and rigorous evaluation of New Zealand's RSE scheme put in place by
Winters. I have
participated in countless policy discussions in which someone claims that
guestwork schemes
cannot work... after which someone has cited Winters's work on New Zealand
as proving that
indeed they can work if correctly designed. Evaluation evidence has been
critical to those
conversations.' He also notes that his `own research on the development
impacts of temporary
labor visas in the Philippines, India, and Mexico... is simply an
extension of Winters's
unprecedented and foundational work'.