Improving hospital performance through enhanced Health Intelligence
Submitting Institution
University of SurreyUnit of Assessment
Business and Management StudiesSummary Impact Type
HealthResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Nursing, Public Health and Health Services
Economics: Applied Economics
Summary of the impact
Events in the UK NHS have shown the need for a robust understanding of
hospital mortality rates.
Surrey's research produced "a unique web-enabled pattern analysis system
that is specifically designed to enable clinicians and their teams to view
in detail their in-house mortality patterns in the national context" (a).
Launched on a national scale in Ireland in 2013, it has already
identified `mortality outliers' and been described as a `game changer' for
improving service quality at national level. The tool's impact stems from
its ability to translate statistical patterns into a form readily usable
by health professionals to improve care quality and sharing best practice.
Underpinning research
The Problem
Comparative hospital mortality has been recognised as a key method to
monitor quality of care within hospitals by identifying hospitals that
appear as mortality outliers (references 3.1; 3.3). Although increasingly
significant, the methods of calculating and then acting upon such data are
contentious, especially in health systems that are national in scale and
funded primarily from the public purse. Even if the data collected is
robust, the statistical interpretation is difficult and can lead to false
positive and false negatives. Such errors incur significant costs, in
terms of the initiation of unnecessary or incorrect measures, anxiety
caused to patients and staff, and organizational disruption (reference 3).
In the Republic of Ireland to date, there has been no national system in
place to compare hospital mortality across the publicly funded health
service. This project has provided such a system
The Research
This project (led by Professor Simon Jones) has refined the statistical
processes involved and, uniquely, developed a user-interface that enables
more reliable interpretation of results by practitioners and
non-statisticians. The objective was to create an intelligent
infrastructure to compare hospital mortality nationally on an on-going
basis. The research was based on all patients discharged from hospital in
Ireland between January 2005 until the 31 December 2011. The following
predictor variables were included in the model: Type of admission; Source
of admission; Number of admissions in the previous 12 months; Age on
admission; Gender; Medical card status; A modified version of Charlson
co-morbidity score (reference 2). For each group with greater than 40
deaths per analytical cell within the time interval, a unique logistic
regression equation is calculated using the predictor variables; when a
group contains fewer deaths, the crude death rate is employed as logistic
regression models would tend to fail to converge or result in an
intercept- only model. The expected number of deaths per hospital is
calculated by summing the predicted number of deaths per group for each
institution. The hospital standardised mortality ratio (HSMR) is
calculated and plotted against the expected number of deaths for each
hospital to produce a funnel plot with 95% and 99.8% confidence
intervals/control limits. Those hospitals outside the 99.8% interval/limit
are referred to as "outliers", where there is a one in 500 chance that the
result is due to randomness. Computations are carried out using R (version
2.12.1).
The research involved setting up a secure infrastructure to analyse over
12 million patient records from 70 hospitals and 250 medical conditions
(reference 2)
Relevance
The robust statistical techniques coupled with a novel user-interface and
self-generated feedback methodology provides a unique way of sharing
safety-critical data with practitioners in a form that empowers action.
This allows national, regional/specialty and individual hospital views of
comparative mortality patterns close to "real time". The unique
web-enabled pattern analysis system enables clinicians and their teams to
view in detail their in-house mortality patterns in the national context
and to identify areas of good practice or in need of investigation.
References to the research
1. Jarman B, Pieter D, Veen A A van der, Kool R B, Aylin P, Bottle
A, Westert G P and Jones S (2010), The Hospital Standardised Mortality
Ratio: a powerful tool for Dutch hospitals to assess their quality of care?
Quality and Safety in Health Care, 19 (1), pp. 9-13
2. Fitzpatrick G, Jones S, Johnson H, DeLa Harpe D, Donohue F,
Crowley P (2013) National Quality Assurance Intelligence System
Comparative Hospital Mortality NQAIS-CHM, Confidential early draft
available.
3. Jones S (2009) Intelligent Use of Intelligent Data,
Royal College of Physicians of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland, 26 November 2009
Details of the impact
The research has had impact in three of the areas:
Health and Welfare.
This project extends statistical approaches to hospital mortality data by
combining mathematical rigour with strong information governance and
unprecedented usability for practitioners not trained in advanced
statistical techniques. This translates into health and welfare impacts in
the form of: rapid (i.e., close to real-time) identification of unexpected
mortality patterns and the type of investigatory measures required. These
impacts result from the identification of positive and negative mortality
patterns: positively, it allows the identification of best practice, the
sharing of which can improve outcomes for patients; negatively, by
allowing the rapid investigation of excessive mortality rates, it has the
potential to prevent needless deaths (reference 2). The quantification of
the relationship between statistically anomalous mortality rates and
needless deaths is highly contentious, but it is plausible to assert that
rapid investigation is likely to be of benefit to patients, potentially in
significant numbers.
Economic, commercial, organizational.
In addition to alleviating human suffering, the better understanding of
hospital mortality rates has economic and organizational impacts. As
reported by The Clinical Lead for Health Intelligence at the Irish Heath
Service Executive (the body that commissioned this work), the "statistical
model was developed appropriate for the Irish context. Because generic
models are often viewed with suspicion by practitioners, a tailored model
has allowed the resulting data to gain credibility on the ground,
resulting in a greater willingness to engage with the process and act on
its outcomes" (a). Because the results are available in close to real time
and accessible to clinicians in a comprehensible form, health
organizations gain from speedy adoption and from enhanced staff commitment
to improvement, translating into real but not easily quantifiable saving
in resources. In addition, the system has been made available to every
public hospital in the country and its "drill down" functionality allows
each hospital to view and extract record-level data that underpins local
audits of data and care. This unique feature offers significant gains in
speed, efficiency and validity of assessment. As such its impact at
national level is substantial (access to the live web-site is restricted
on confidentiality grounds but can be accessed if necessary for audit).
Practitioners and professional services.
As indicated above, the system's unique user interface allows
unprecedented levels of involvement in data interpretation across
clinical, administrative and management groups. As such, it has been
claimed to be a "game changer" in developing the ways in which health
professionals collaborate across institutions and professional groups to
provide improved patient services (a).
Reach and Significance.
The reach of this project is significant: according to
Dublin Health Services Executive (a): these tools "will reach into every
public hospital in the country [Republic of Ireland]".
In terms of significance, this model and its resulting
applications have the potential form major gains in the areas outlined
above. Firstly, it is a new development in the Irish public health system
that not only brings it in line with other developed countries (reference
1), but also goes beyond what is available elsewhere through its unique
user interface. Although only in live operation since August 2013, it has
already indicated cases for investigation and initial results indicate its
effectiveness in engaging practitioners. As maintained in the evidence
letter (a): these tools are "game changers in terms of promoting patient
safety by empowering targeted quality assurance from the national to local
levels".
Sources to corroborate the impact
a) Dublin Health Services Executive. (provided statement)
b) Assistant Director, Health Intelligence Unit. (contact details
provided)
c) Confidential web site (access available for audit purposes
only; details with University of Surrey)