Simulating Knowledge in Innovation Networks
Submitting Institution
University of SurreyUnit of Assessment
SociologySummary Impact Type
PoliticalResearch Subject Area(s)
Economics: Applied Economics
Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services: Business and Management
Studies In Human Society: Policy and Administration
Summary of the impact
In a series of European Union funded projects over the last 13 years, a
computational simulation model (`SKIN') has been developed at the
University of Surrey. SKIN has been used to perform ex post and ex
ante policy evaluation for the European Commission and others to
test proposed innovation policies and the model is now also being used
around Europe for similar purposes at the national level.
These newly developed computational methods have been applied to allow
policy makers to examine and understand the potential effects of
interventions in complex innovation systems.
Underpinning research
Surrey researchers' development of the computational model, SKIN, (see
http://cress.soc.surrey.ac.uk/skin/
) dates back to 1997, when Gilbert published a simulation of the structure
of academic science (Gilbert 1997) and went on to secure a 4th Framework
Programme with colleagues in Germany (Ahrweiler and Pyka) on Simulating
Self-Organizing Innovation Networks (SEIN) during which the first version
of what was to become the SKIN model was formulated.
At the time, the idea that technical innovation is increasingly powered
by network relations was a novelty, but it was to become very influential
in Science and Technology Studies. The idea of developing computational
models to express complex sociological theories of innovation was also
ground-breaking (Gilbert, Pyka and Ahrweiler, 2001). The SEIN project was
followed by one funded by the German DAAD and the British Council in which
the model was augmented by a representation of the market, so that firms
not only had relationships involving the transfer of knowledge but also
traded in a market, exchanging products for money. This was continued with
a further EC-funded project in which the original model was developed
further and applied to the Framework Programme itself.
The model was then made available as program code together with some ten
academic publications from the three developers describing various
`experiments' with the model. This encouraged widespread interest in the
model by research groups around the world (e.g. in China, Chile, the USA
and many European countries), and it now forms the basis of a number of
major research efforts examining topics such as the growth of industrial
eco-parks in South Korea, the future of the European defence industry and
Irish industrial policy (see section 4 for more examples and their
impact). Two workshops (with a third planned for May 2014) for users of
the SKIN model also encouraged take up, and have led to a book to be
published by Springer in 2014 that includes contributions from many users
describing their applications of the model.
SKIN is an agent-based model (see N. Gilbert (2008) Agent-Based
Models. SAGE) in which the agents represent firms. Each firm has a
`kene' (Gilbert 1997) standing for the firm's particular knowledge,
expertise and skills. A subset of the kene is the firm's `innovation
hypothesis', a design for a potentially innovative product. In the basic
model, firms attempt to sell their products to other firms, and have to
source their production requirements from other firms, thus making the
model as a whole a circular economy. Firms are able to develop their kenes
(and thus their innovation hypotheses and products) through incremental or
radical research, and by exchanging knowledge with partner firms. Prices
are set by firms according to market conditions, and firms also have to
learn what a suitable price for their products is. The model allows for
firms to die when they have no more funds, and for start-ups to enter the
market. After calibrating the model with a range of parameters that
represent specific industries or sectors, the model can be used to examine
the effect of policies such as those that encourage knowledge transfer
between firms.
References to the research
2) Vaux, J. and Gilbert, N. (2003) `Innovation networks by design:
The case of the mobile VCE'. In A. Pyka and G. Küppers (Eds.), Innovation
networks: Theory and practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
4) Pyka, A., Gilbert, N. and Ahrweiler, P. (2003) `Simulating
innovation networks'. In A. Pyka and G. Küppers (Eds.), Innovation
networks: Theory and practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
5) Gilbert, N., Ahrweiler, P. and Pyka, A. (2010) `Learning in
Innovation Networks: some Simulation Experiments'. In P. Ahrweiler, (Eds.)
Innovation in complex social systems. London: Routledge (Reprinted
from Physica A, 2007), pp. 235-249.
6) Scholz, R., Nokkala, T., Ahrweiler, P., Pyka, A. and Gilbert,
N. (2010) `The agent-based Nemo Model (SKEIN) — simulating European
Framework Programmes'. In P. Ahrweiler (ed.): Innovation in complex
social systems. London: Routledge, pp. 300-314.
7) Ahrweiler, P., Pyka, A. and Gilbert, N. (2011) `A new Model for
University-Industry Links in knowledge-based Economies', Journal of
Product Innovation Management, 28 (2): 218-235.
Details of the impact
The mechanisms of knowledge creation and utilization in knowledge-based
economies have been changing, with an increasing emphasis on the formation
of innovation networks, that is, networks that connect innovative firms,
government agencies, research institutes and sources of venture capital.
Knowledge-intensive industries such as information and communication
technologies (ICT) and biotechnology (`biotech') have already undergone
structural changes in the direction of these collective modes of knowledge
production and application. The SKIN model allows decision makers to
examine the potential effect of policy changes. For example, the model has
been utilised in the Innovation Policy Simulation for the Smart Economy
(IPSE) project funded by the Irish PRTLI and the European Regional
Development Fund. The project is using a version of the SKIN model to
assist policymakers to `turn Ireland into a global hub for innovation as a
strategy for stimulating economic recovery'. As an example of the type of
impact that this project is making, the CEO of Nua Venture Innovations
Ltd., a Dublin company that focuses on early-stage technology-enabled
ventures across a broad spectrum of sectors including information and
communications technologies, sensors and material science, medical devices
and ocean technologies and advises at a Government level on the creation,
development and evolution of innovation clusters, wrote that the project
provides "important strategic guidance for our innovation cluster work at
Nua Venture and helps us to better clarify and measure the impact of our
innovation activities".
Surrey's research has also been applied by DG CONNECT to examine the
possible effects of various proposed modifications to the European
Commission's rules for funding projects in the forthcoming Horizon 2020
programme. Gilbert, Ahrweiler and Pyka were contracted by the programme
Evaluation Unit of DG-INFSO (now DG CONNECT) to carry out an `ex ante'
evaluation of the effect of changing the rules to have, for example, more
or less thematic areas, encourage larger or small consortia, have more or
less funds per Call, and require the participation of SMEs in all
consortia, as compared in each case with a baseline scenario of containing
the policies implemented in the current Framework 7 (FP7). By adapting the
SKIN model to simulate project participants, rather than firms, and making
other adaptations, a version was constructed that could reproduce the
actual network structure and dynamics of FP7 projects and consortia. The
effect of the policy changes of interest to the Commission could then be
simulated. The results were reported to the Commission in late 2011 and
there is evidence that they are influencing the design of Horizon 2020
(which has a budget of €70 billion).
Other studies that are having an impact on innovation policies across
Europe, all of which are based on variations of the SKIN model include:
- A SKIN Model Analysis of the European Defence Industry (Norwegian
Institute of International Affairs)
- Modelling the Emergence of a General Purpose Technology from a
Knowledge Based Perspective: The Case of Nanotechnology (University
College, Dublin)
- Simulating the Effects of Public Funding on Research in Life Sciences:
Direct Research Funds Vs. Tax Incentives (Austrian Institute of
Technology)
- The Evolution of Innovation Networks in the Nordic Internet Service
Industry (University of Oslo)
- The Evaluation of Value Chain Marketing Strategies (Hamburg University
of Technology)
Sources to corroborate the impact
Sources in connection with the IPSE project are
C1) CEO of NuaVenture (NuaVenture is an innovation management
company supporting venture capital funds). Contact details provided.
C2) Forfás, Ireland's policy advisory board for enterprise, trade,
science, technology and innovation. Contact details provided.
The following staff at the European Commission may be contacted to
corroborate the impact of the work on policy options for Horizon 2020 (the
work is documented in the final report of the study:
"Using network analysis to monitor and track effects resulting from
changes in policy intervention and instruments" — SMART 2010/0025):
C3) 1st Representative of the EC. Contact details
provided.
C4) 2nd Representative of the EC. Contact details
provided.
C5) 3rd Representative of the EC. Contact details
provided.
C6) The SKIN model has been cited by the Commission (in
https://etendering.ted.europa.eu/document/document-file-download.html?docFileId=3808,
2013) as follows:
"Work conducted by the EC DG INFSO (now EC DG CONNECT), (Project INFSO
SKIN), investigated the structuring effects of Framework Programme ICT
research. It showed that FPs facilitated more intense and inclusive
collaborations over time, and were effective in bringing together
different types of actors and integrating European players into global
networks."