Small territories, governance, and development: securing their viability
Submitting Institution
University of the West of England, BristolUnit of Assessment
Politics and International StudiesSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Studies In Human Society: Political Science
Law and Legal Studies: Law
Summary of the impact
This case study reports three inter-related impacts from Peter Clegg's
research at UWE, Bristol. Firstly, his research has helped to shape the
reform programme and the return to self-government in the Turks and Caicos
Islands. Secondly, it has helped to frame the United Nations
Decolonisation Committee's views on how best to implement the Third
International Decade for the Eradication of Colonialism. Thirdly, it has
assisted the UK Overseas Territories governments to create an enabling
environment for the protection and promotion of the human rights and
dignity of People Living with HIV. It has done so by ensuring that these
governments' laws and policies facilitate HIV prevention, care, treatment
and support for people living with HIV/AIDS.
Underpinning research
The research underpinning this impact case study was conducted by Dr.
Peter Clegg at UWE, Bristol, Senior Lecturer in Politics from 2005 to the
present. It was initiated as a result of a grant awarded to Dr. Clegg and
Dr. Emilio Pantojas-Garcia (University of Puerto Rico) by the British
Academy's UK-Latin America and Caribbean Link Programme in 2007 on the
topic of `Governance in the non-independent Caribbean: Challenges and
Opportunities' [7]. The award funded two two-day seminars — one in
Bristol and the other in San Juan, Puerto Rico — and resulted in an edited
book (Governance in the non-independent Caribbean: Challenges and
Opportunities in the 21st Century (co-editor with Emilio
Pantojas-Garcia, University of Puerto Rico, 2009) which provided the
foundation for Clegg's subsequent research which specifically led to this
impact.
Clegg's research comprised three inter-related strands:
(i) Corruption and reform in the Turks and Caicos Islands (TCI).
Building on his work in the Caribbean, Clegg's research undertaken
between October 2010 and January 2013 identified a number of deep-seated
political, economic and social factors that have impacted negatively on
standards of governance in the Turks and Caicos Islands. He found that
many of the problems are generic, related to small size and the inadequate
level of oversight provided by the UK. However, several other
characteristics — such as the TCI's limited constitutional and political
history, its transient population, the inter-island parochialism, and the
large number of disenfranchised residents — are quite particular and have
heightened the risks of corruption and bad practice taking hold. Attempts
have been made, led by different UK governments, to improve the state of
public affairs in the TCI, but these attempts have lacked conviction.
Clegg concluded that the reasons for this included an absence of political
will in London, sensitivities in the UK about enforcing change in a
semi-autonomous territory that is financially self-sufficient, and the
loss of institutional memory in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office in
particular. This piece of research underpins Clegg's contribution to the
report for Transparency International [1] and his article in Social
and Economic Studies [2].
(ii) Non-self-governing territories and their quest for
decolonisation.
The key concern of Clegg's on-going research around governance in the UK
Overseas Territories (OTs) (undertaken between January and March 2011, and
updated between February and April 2013) was the extent to which further
constitutional reform can be undertaken and greater autonomy be awarded in
the OTs. Any such reform is problematic because of the UK's reluctance to
offer more concessions which would diminish its powers of oversight.
Further, there is little consensus in the UK or the territories about how
decolonisation can be achieved and how full self-determination can be
exercised. The territories do not want independence, while the UK does not
accept free association or integration. In other words, after the recent
process of constitutional review, what more can be done to advance
self-determination and the achievement of political equality? Clegg found
that in order to make any progress in this Third International Decade for
the Eradication of Colonialism, three separate but related issues must be
addressed: (a) the possible (albeit likely moderate) changes in the
territories' constitutions that would advance self-government, e.g. end
the role of the Governor in chairing the local Cabinet or Executive
Council of Ministers (in Bermuda the Governor does not act as Chair, but
in the other territories he/she does); (b) the ways in which the
territories can further develop and improve their systems of governance,
e.g. strengthen the level of parliamentary oversight of the executives,
for example via more powerful Public Accounts Committees; and (c) the ways
in which the UK government can reform its own administrative structures to
better facilitate the territories progress towards greater self-government,
e.g. territory administration and governance should be
developed as a distinct specialism and career path within Whitehall.
This piece of research underpinned Clegg's contribution to the United
Nations Caribbean regional seminar on decolonisation [3] and to the two
articles in Commonwealth and Comparative Politics [4] and Caribbean
Journal of International Relations and Diplomacy [5].
(iii) A sub-regional legislative review to consider the impact of
stigma and discrimination in the UK overseas territories.
Clegg's research in the Winter of 2009/10 focused on the international
treaty commitments of the six UK Caribbean Overseas Territories (OTs)
(including Bermuda) and their potential role in safeguarding the rights of
people living with HIV/AIDS (PLHIV). The research found that several
international treaties, including the International Covenant on Economic,
Social and Cultural Rights, International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights, and European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,
contained a number of articles which were potentially very important in
safeguarding the rights of PLHIV either directly or indirectly. The
research also found that these provisions were not always acknowledged by
the territory governments as being applicable to PLHIV, and greater
efforts were needed by local territory governments and the UK government
in applying the provisions in a universal way. This piece of research
underpins Clegg's contribution to the report for the Department for
International Development and Options [6].
References to the research
[1] Reviewer (noted as External reviewer (anonymous)) and contributor to:
Transparency International, National Integrity System Country Report:
Turks and Caicos Islands, 2011 (http://archive.transparency.org/regional_pages/americas/nis_tci)
(see section 2.i — Corruption and Reform in the TCI). [Available through
UWE]
[2] Peter Clegg (2012) The Turks and Caicos Islands: Why does the cloud still
hang? Social and Economic Studies, 61, 1, 23-47 (see section 2.i — Corruption
and Reform in the TCI). [Available through UWE]
[3] Peter Clegg (2011) `Decolonisation prospects for the Caribbean
Non-Self-Governing Territories of the United Kingdom under the purview of
the Special Committee on the Situation with regard to the Implementation
of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries
and Peoples'.
Paper given at Caribbean regional seminar on the implementation of the
Third International Decade for the-Eradication of Colonialism: goals and
expected accomplishments, Kingstown, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, 31
May to 2 June 2011 (http://www.un.org/en/decolonization/regsem2011.shtml).
[Available through UWE]
[4] Peter Clegg & Peter Gold (2011) The UK Overseas Territories: A
decade of progress and prosperity? Commonwealth and Comparative
Politics, 49, 1, 115-135 DOI:10.1080/14662043.2011.541117
(see section 2.ii — Non-self-governing territories and their quest for
decolonisation).
[5] Parts of paper [3] were published in the Clegg & Gold article [4]
and later in Peter Clegg (2013) `The United Kingdom and its Caribbean
Overseas Territories: Present relations and future prospects', Caribbean
Journal of International Relations and Diplomacy, 1, 2, 2013, 53-64
http://journals.sta.uwi.edu/iir/index.asp
(see Section 2.ii). [Available through UWE]
[6] Contributor and reviewer of: A sub-regional policy analysis and
legislative review to consider the impact of stigma and discrimination
in the UK overseas territories, Department for International
Development and Options, 2010 (the report is not publicly available)
[Available through UWE]
[7] `Governance in the non-independent Caribbean: Challenges and
Opportunities', British Academy grant of £20,000 awarded to Dr Peter Clegg
and Dr. Emilio Pantojas-Garcia (University of Puerto Rico) as part of the
British Academy's UK-Latin America and Caribbean Link Programme (November
2007 to April 2008).
Details of the impact
(i) Corruption and reform in the Turks and Caicos Islands.
As Clegg was undertaking research on the UKOTs in 2007/2008, a
significant corruption scandal was revealed in the Turks and Caicos
islands involving the prime minister, several of his ministerial
colleagues, and a number of other private individuals. Local government
was suspended by the UK and direct rule from London was imposed.
Subsequently a process of constitutional, political and economic reform
was undertaken to address the poor governance in the TCI. Being such an
important development, Clegg's research focused on why significant
problems in governance had developed and what could be done to address
them. His research became known in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office [2]
and Transparency International [1], and he was asked to contribute to
various review processes. These included presenting a paper to the
Overseas Territories Forum at the FCO on 8 December 2009; contributing to
the Transparency International Report published in 2011; supplying on
demand several of his publications on the TCI to FCO officials (see Clegg
2012, Clegg & Gold 2011, and Clegg & Pantojas-Garcia 2009); and
participating in an FCO- sponsored meeting on the TCI on 27 January 2012.
Through these avenues he has worked closely with FCO officials to ensure
balanced debate and helped to develop a better understanding of some of
the underlying issues relating to the Territories, e.g. why the TCI is
particularly prone to sub-standard governance. His work is also
recommended to those diplomats being posted to the Territories in order to
provide them with an insight into the political and economic issues facing
the Territories.
(ii) Non-self-governing territories and their quest for
decolonisation.
As a result of Clegg's research, he was invited to attend a United
Nations Caribbean regional seminar on the implementation of the Third
International Decade for the Eradication of Colonialism: Goals and
Expected Accomplishments, Kingstown, St Vincent and the Grenadines, 31
May-2 June 2011. (An invitation was made to attend the subsequent
Caribbean regional seminar in Quito, Ecuador in May 2013.) Such meetings,
involving UN members and policy experts, are organised to further the
process of decolonisation in seventeen so-called non-self-governing
territories. He had a further separate meeting with UN officials in New
York in August 2011 [3]. His interventions have contributed to the
decolonisation debate and influenced discussion at the regional seminars.
For example, Clegg suggested "holding of formal and/or informal regular
meetings involving the Territories, the Administering Powers and the UN",
and this provided a measure of support to sustained communication and
convening efforts made in that regard. Such engagement helps to deepen the
understanding of the decolonisation process and makes progress on this
very difficult and intractable issue more likely. Clegg's recommendation
was taken on board and incorporated into the Report of the Special
Committee on the Situation with regard to the Implementation of the
Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and
Peoples for 2011 [4].
(iii) A sub-regional legislative review to consider the impact of
stigma and discrimination in the UK overseas territories.
As a consequence of Clegg's research and related publications, he was
asked by the health and social policy consultancy firm Options (www.options.co.uk)
(acting on behalf of the Department for International Development) to
undertake a review of international treaty commitments of the six
Caribbean Overseas Territories (including Bermuda) and their potential
role in safeguarding the rights of people living with HIV/AIDS (PLHIV).
Clegg's work contributed a significant part of the report published in
2010 entitled `A sub-regional policy analysis and legislative review to
consider the impact of stigma and discrimination in the UK overseas
territories' [5]. The report and the related programme then provided
support to the National AIDS Programmes in the OTs. Inspired by Clegg's
contribution to this report, Options, along with its Caribbean partners,
Associates for International Development (AIDInc), worked closely with the
National AIDS Programmes in all project countries, with the goal of
reducing STI and HIV infection rates and improving the quality of life of
those already infected with HIV [6]. Project interventions focused on
several key strategic areas, including developing national
legislation/policies addressing HIV related stigma and discrimination,
which was related directly to Clegg's research on international treaty
commitments.
Sources to corroborate the impact
- All files available through UWE -
1. Corruption and reform in the Turks and Caicos Islands.
1.1. Testimonial: Programme Director, Americas Department, Transparency
International [1 on REF System]
1.2. Testimonial: Overseas Territories Division, Foreign and Commonwealth
Office [2]
2. Non-self-governing territories and their quest for decolonisation.
2.1. Testimonial: Chief, United Nations Decolonisation Unit, Department
of Political Affairs [3]
2.2. Report of the United Nations Special Committee on the Situation with
regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of
Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples for 2011, General Assembly
Official Records, Sixty-sixth Session, Supplement No. 23 (http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/66/23).
3. A sub-regional legislative review to consider the impact of stigma
and discrimination in the UK overseas territories.
3.1. `A sub-regional policy analysis and legislative review to consider
the impact of stigma and discrimination in the UK overseas territories'
(available from UWE)
3.2. Corroborating Contact: Director of Programme, Options [4]