Prevention and management of trigeminal nerve injuries. Changing surgical practice for patient benefit
Submitting Institution
King's College LondonUnit of Assessment
Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and PharmacySummary Impact Type
HealthResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Clinical Sciences, Neurosciences
Summary of the impact
Researchers at King's College London (KCL) have established new surgical
interventions, including coronectomy, to prevent nerve injuries resulting
from wisdom teeth extraction, the most common surgery on the NHS and
worldwide. These interventions have been adopted worldwide, for instance
coronectomy is now a billable procedure in the US, and are also
incorporated into a number of guidelines, for example those by the Royal
College of Surgeons and the British Dental association. The KCL team have
developed a website aimed at providing information for those with
trigeminal nerve injuries, which they can gain both through online content
and by directly emailing the specialist team.
Underpinning research
Wisdom tooth (third molar) surgery (TMS) is one of the most common
surgical procedures in the NHS but complications can include damage to the
trigeminal nerve (TN), the largest sensory nerve in the body, responsible
for supplying sensation to the face and mouth. Research undertaken at the
Institute of Dentistry, King's College London (KCL) by Professor Tara
Renton (1997-present, Professor of Oral Surgery 2006-2013) and Dr Zehra
Yilmaz (2007-2010, Post-Doctoral Research Worker) has underpinned the
prevention and improved management of TN injuries (TNIs) in relation to
TMS and other dental procedures such as implant surgery.
Understanding the Problem: In 2001, research at KCL involving 2134
third molar operations found the incidence of temporary and permanent
damage to the lingual nerve, a component of the third division of the TN,
was 1% and 0.3%, respectively, per tooth. While this percentage is small,
there are 1.2 million operations of this type performed per year in the
UK; hence lingual nerve injury (LNI) can affect many thousands of people.
Risk factors associated with LNI included lingual plate perforation, nerve
exposure, operation difficulty, surgeon and older age (1). Post-traumatic
neuropathy (PTN) can be painful and can interfere with functions normally
taken for granted including speaking, eating, shaving, kissing and
drinking, leading to a significant negative effect on the patient's
self-image and quality of life. To help understand how PTN manifests, a
2011 KCL study investigated 93 patients with LNI and 90 with injury to
another TN component, the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN). Injuries were
mostly caused by surgery, with others due to local anaesthesia
administration or endodontics. Around 70% presented with neuropathic pain
coincident with numbness, abnormal sensations such as pins and needles,
heightened sensitivity and/or some loss of function, including speech,
teeth brushing, drinking and sleep (2).
Further KCL research sought to understand the reasons for injury. In a
study involving 30 patients with neuropathy following an implant, consent,
preoperative planning and appropriate post-operative referral were found
to be inadequate. With regard to the cause of neuropathy, proximity of the
implant bed or implant to the IAN canal was evident radiographically and
showed roof IAN canal contact in 44% of cases, canal protrusion in 20% of
cases and canal crossing in 20% cases (3). In a recent study, a
questionnaire of 415 dentists and oral surgeons found an estimated
incidence of 3,770 TNIs per year associated with local anaesthetic
administration. This has moved previous estimates from 1/600,000
injections leading to a nerve injury to it being 1/14,000 (4).
Studies Demonstrating Improved Outcomes: Much of the work of KCL
researchers is within a specialist TNI clinic at King's College Hospital
(KCH) that seeks ways to alleviate PTN. For instance, in a 2009 series of
four case studies on early implant removal due to IAN injury, researchers
found this procedure led to almost complete sensory recovery in two of the
cases, suggesting immediate removal, though not successful for all, could
be a way of minimising long-term damage. This paper also provided clinical
suggestions for ways to minimise injury during surgery and best practice
for alleviating pain and dysfunction if a TNI did occur (5). KCL
researchers additionally challenged existing policy of waiting for all
branches of the TNI related to any causation to get better. Their study
involving 216 patients with LNIs and 123 with IAN injuries showed that
best results came from a diverse and holistic strategy including
reassurance and counselling, cognitive behaviour therapy, exploratory
surgery, systemic or topical medication or a combination of approaches
(6).
KCL researchers also worked to provide strategies to minimise and avoid
nerve injury. Coronectomy is an alternative to extraction where only the
crown of an impacted mandibular third molar is removed, leaving the root
undisturbed, avoiding TN damage. KCL's pivotal 2005 randomised, control
trial involved patients undergoing extraction (n = 102) or coronectomy (n
= 94, but 36 had dislodged roots so underwent extraction). With a mean
follow-up of 25 months, while 19% of extraction cases had damaged nerves,
no nerve damage occurred in the successful coronectomy patients. This
procedure is now standard practice at KCH for cases where a nerve injury
is predicted to occur with regular third molar surgery (7).
References to the research
1. Renton T, McGurk M. Evaluation of factors influencing lingual nerve
injury in third molar surgery. Brit J Oral Maxillofac Surg
2001;39:423-428. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjom.2001.0682
(32 Scopus citations)
4. Renton T, Janjua H, Gallagher JE, Dalgleish M, Yilmaz Z. UK dentists'
experience of iatrogenic trigeminal nerve injuries in relation to routine
dental procedures: why, when and how often? Br Dent J 2013;214(12):633-42.
Doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.583 (1 Google Scholar citation)
Grants (PI: T Renton)
• 2005. RCS project grant, £5500. Randomised trial of coronectomy in
third molar surgery
• 2006. British Association Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, £9000.
Evaluation of minimising Inferior alveolar nerve injury in relation to
third molar surgery
• 2011. Royal College of Surgeons, £9500. Evaluation of minimising
radiation dose of cone beam CT scanning in relation to minimising inferior
alveolar nerve injury
Details of the impact
This body of research undertaken by King's College London (KCL) has
fundamentally changed how patients at `high risk' of trigeminal nerve
injury (TNI) in relation to dental procedures are identified and has also
provided alternative surgical and assessment techniques to assist in
preventing TNI in relation to the most common surgical procedures
undertaken in the NHS: third molar surgery (TMS).
Helping Patients
KCL research led to the setting up by Prof Renton and Dr Yilmaz of a
specialist TNI clinic at King's College Hospital Foundation Trust. This
has become a nationally recognised service with around 150 UK patients a
year being referred for assessment and treatment they could not receive
elsewhere. As well as treating patients on an individual basis, the clinic
also provides patient workshops to help alleviate the pain and social
trauma associated with TNIs (1a). With a donation of £50K from a patient
with TNI who was keen to address an unmet need for information for other
such patients, Prof Renton's team developed a website —
trigeminalnerve.org.uk — using the knowledge they had gained through
research to provide accurate and timely information for both clinicians
and patients regarding the aetiology (1b) and management (1c) of TNI. From
its launch in August 2012 to July 2013 it received nearly 230,000 site
visits and 156 clinicians signed up for onsite Continuing Professional
Development. With the ability for patients and clinicians to directly
email the KCL team for advice, in its first year the expert KCL team
behind this site has expedited urgent care and facilitated prevention of a
TNI for over 1200 national and international enquiries.
Use of Coronectomy
TNI is the most problematic consequence of dental surgical procedures and
those related to TMS are a common cause for NHS Litigation Authority or
trust settlement compensation. If the injury is caused by NHS trust staff
then compensation is usually between 5-20K; if caused by private
practitioners, pay-outs have reached nearly £1m. Thus, minimising TNI is
paramount both for patient care and medico-legal reasons. Development of
the coronectomy technique by KCL oral surgeons has underpinned recognition
of the benefits of re-evaluating standard surgical protocols for TMS.
Coronectomy is now an accepted procedure in the NHS (for example, by
Oxford Radcliffe Hospital NHS Trust) (2a) and in private healthcare (for
example, by Love Your Smile Dental Care Practice) (2b) in the UK and is
recognised internationally. That coronectomy has become an accepted
alternative to extraction in suitable cases is shown via a number of
reviews/opinion pieces aimed at oral surgeons. One such piece posited that
"coronectomy should be considered for mandibular third molars when it is
felt there is an increased risk of injury to the inferior dental nerve"
(2c). Another review, from China, said that coronectomy has shown to be
"superior to total removal for reducing inferior alveolar nerve damage"
(2d). These reviews both found only four suitable studies on coronectomy,
one of which was Renton 2005. The practice of coronectomy has also been
disseminated via journal articles such as those in the British Journal of
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, which utilises Renton 2001 and a review by
Renton that discusses Khawaja 2009 and Renton 2005 (2e,f).
Enhancing Clinician Awareness
The body of KCL research has significantly influenced clinician's
awareness and modification in assessment of the patients' risk of TNI. For
instance, the Royal College of Surgeons `Guidelines for Selecting
Appropriate Patients to Receive Treatment with Dental Implants,' which was
co-written by Prof Renton, includes Renton 2012 when discussing using
advanced imaging to "reduce the chance of collateral damage to vital
structures" (3a). In addition, Prof Renton has recently produced
guidelines on diagnosis, risk management, treatment and prevention of IAN
injuries for the Association of Dental Implantology, a UK charity
dedicated to providing both professionals and the public education on
implants (3b). Prof Renton also co-authored, the British Dental
Association's `Clinical Guide to Oral Surgery, which includes a number of
the references detailed above when discussing minimising and managing
nerve injuries and complications (3c). Dissemination of best practice for
TMS detailed in this clinical guide has been included in a series of
British Dental Association continuing professional development seminars
led by Prof Renton (3d). KCL-led work has also been incorporated into
clinical handbooks aimed at dental professionals and students such as
`Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,' which includes treatment-decision
algorithms for clinical practice and risk-management (3e), and in
`Clinical Problem Solving in Dentistry,' which includes a number of
KCL-authored chapters utilising KCL research (3e).
Further, in 2013, a series of countrywide Dental Commissioning Workshops
were hosted by NHS England. Here, specialists including Prof Renton
participated in discussions with and presentations to NHS England staff
and key providers together to ascertain how the commissioning of dental
services should develop in the future and how they can work together to
achieve the best outcomes for everyone. Part of this included presentation
of the new Gold Guide NHS commissioning for Oral Surgery, which is
co-authored by Prof Renton and references KCL's risk management research
(3g).
National and International Dissemination to Professionals and the
Public
Since publication of the prospective randomised study on coronectomy this
novel technique has been adopted internationally. In the USA, the American
Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons initially produced a White
Paper on TMS in 2007, which cited Renton 2005 when discussing coronectomy,
and then a further White Paper in 2011 that states that "appropriate
treatment options include coronectomy" (4a). Recognition of the use of
coronectomy in the US was sealed when in 2011 the American Dental
Association added it to its list of recognised, billable procedures (4b).
The work of KCL has also featured in news items, spreading awareness to
the public. For instance, their 2012 study on the risks of implant surgery
was featured in a BBC News Health article (4c).
Sources to corroborate the impact
1. Helping Patients
a) Nerve injury patient workshops: http://trigeminalnerve.org.uk/patient-resources/nerve-injury-patient-workshop/
b) Information about trigeminal nerve injuries. http://trigeminalnerve.org.uk/patient-resources/what-are-tn-injuries/
c) How do we manage trigeminal nerve injuries? http://trigeminalnerve.org.uk/professional-resources/manage-nerve-injuries/
2. Use of Coronectomy
a) Oxford Radcliffe Hospital NHS Trust. Removing Wisdom Teeth leaflet:
http://www.ouh.nhs.uk/patient-guide/leaflets/files%5C101104wisdomteeth.pdf
b) Private Practice use of coronectomy: http://www.loveyoursmile.co.uk/our_services.php?id=55
c) Patel V, Moore S, Sproat C. Coronectomy — oral surgery's answer to
modern day conservative dentistry. Br Dent J 2010;209(3):111-4. Doi:
10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.673.
d) Long H, Zhou Y, Liao L, et al. Coronectomy vs. Total Removal for Third
Molar Extraction: A Systematic Review. J Dent Res 2012;91(7):659-65. Doi:
10.1177/0022034512449346
e) Gleeson CF, Patel V, Kwok J, Sproat C. Coronectomy practice. Paper 1.
Technique and trouble-shooting. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
2012;50(8):739-44. Doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.01.001.
f) Patel V, Gleeson CF, Kwok J, Sproat C. Coronectomy practice. Paper 2:
complications and long term management. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
2013;51(4):347-52. Doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.06.008.
3. Enhancing Clinician Awareness
a) Royal College of Surgeons. Alani A, Bishop K, Renton T, Djemal S.
Update on Guidelines for Selecting Appropriate Patients to Receive
Treatment with Dental Implants. Br Dent J. 2012. http://www.rcseng.ac.uk/fds/publications-clinical-guidelines/clinical_guidelines/documents/guidelines-for-selecting-appropriate-patients-to-receive-treatment-with-dental-implants-priorities-for-the-nhs
b) Association of Dental Implantology: IANI Guidelines in the members'
area of the ADI website available on request.
c) British Dental Association. A Clinical Guide to Oral Surgery. T Renton
and M Hill. (Chapter 8) http://www.bda.org/Shop/Products/Oral-Surgery-Book-1__J46.aspx
d) British Dental Association CPD seminars:
http://trigeminalnerve.org.uk/userfiles/Modern%20oral%20surgery%20FINAL.pdf
e) Oral and Maxilofacial Surgery. 2010. Wiley-Blackwell. (Chapter 14).
ISBN: 978-1-4051-7119:
http://eu.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-1405171197.html
f) Clinical Problem Solving in Dentistry. 2010. Churchill Livingstone.
ISBN: 9780443067846:
http://www.elsevierhealth.co.uk/product.jsp?isbn=9780443067846&dmnum=NEW2013&gclid=CMq75sb0rrkCFSGWtAodwkEA-Q
g) Dental Commissioning Workshops: http://www.nhsevents.org/event_detail.asp?event_id=598
4. National and International Dissemination to Professionals and the
Public
a) AAOMS White Paper on Third Molar Data: www.aaoms.org/docs/third_molar_white_paper.pdf
and Evidence Based Third Molar Surgery:
http://www.aaoms.org/docs/evidence_based_third_molar_surgery.pdf
b) American Dental Association change to US code:
https://pattersonsupport.custhelp.com/euf/assets/Eaglesoft/ServiceCodes/CDT_2011_Chapter2.pdf
c) BBC News: Dental implants can cause nerve damage, warn study. Aired
8.6.2012:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-18366437