09: Maudsley family therapy for adolescent anorexia nervosa
Submitting Institution
King's College LondonUnit of Assessment
Psychology, Psychiatry and NeuroscienceSummary Impact Type
HealthResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Public Health and Health Services
Summary of the impact
Anorexia nervosa affects 1-4% of people over their lifetime with
approximately half of all
adolescents with anorexia requiring inpatient treatment. A specific form
of family therapy,
developed at the Maudsley Hospital and evaluated by researchers at King's
College London
through a series of randomised controlled trials, has been widely
acknowledged as the principal
evidence-based treatment for adolescent anorexia nervosa. The treatment is
recommended by
NICE in the UK and clinical guidelines in other countries and is strongly
supported by advocacy
and carer groups. It has influenced service commissioning with a growing
number of specialist
family-oriented outpatient services being developed in the UK and abroad.
The Maudsley service
model has been adopted by the Department of Health's Increased Access to
Psychological
Treatments programme as a specialist component of Systemic Family Therapy
training.
Underpinning research
Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a life threatening illness with high morbidity,
significant mortality and a
lifetime prevalence of between 1-4%. In the UK, 40-50% of children and
adolescents with AN are
treated as inpatients for an average of 4-5 months. More psychiatric beds
are occupied by young
people with AN than any other diagnostic group. However, while inpatient
care is effective in the
short term, it has high relapse rates (25-30% for first admission and
50-75% for subsequent
admissions) leading to prolonged illness. Over the past 30 years,
Professor Ivan Eisler (1982-
present, Professor of Family Psychology and Family Therapy), Dr
Christopher Dare (1991-2001,
Research Fellow) and colleagues at the Institute of Psychiatry, King's
College London (KCL) and
the Maudsley Hospital have developed, tested and refined a family-oriented
specialist service
model for adolescents with AN that can be used on a largely outpatient
basis, reducing the need
for costly hospital admissions.
KCL researchers show long-term efficacy of family therapy: The
Maudsley model of family
therapy for AN is a non-blaming, collaborative therapy that focuses on
family resources and family
strengths. In the early stages of treatment, parents are supported to
manage their child's eating at
home with the family attending weekly sessions (or more frequently if
necessary). In later stages,
with less frequent sessions, the focus moves away from the eating
disorder, towards exploring
adolescent issues and restoring normal family life. The initial study of
this therapy (in the 1980's)
involving patients with AN or bulimia nervosa, showed that family therapy
is more effective than
individual therapy, especially in those whose illness was not chronic and
had begun before the age
of 19. A 5 year follow-on study, of 80 patients found the significant
benefits from previous
psychological treatments were still evident. Published in 1997, this was
the first clinical trial of a
psychological treatment for anorexia demonstrating maintained benefits
over the course of 5 years,
suggesting family therapy for people with early onset and a short history
of anorexia was the most
effective treatment (1).
Tailoring treatments to meet patients' needs: KCL researchers have
refined family therapy for
different needs. For instance, in a study in 2000, 40 adolescent patients
with AN received either
"conjoint family therapy" (CFT, where patient and parents are seen
together) or "separated family
therapy" (SFT, where they are seen separately). While both forms of family
therapy led to
considerable improvement in nutritional and psychological state and on
global measures of
outcome, SFT was superior for patients with high levels of maternal
criticism. Symptomatic change
was more marked with SFT but there was considerably more psychological
change with CFT (2).
In a 5 year follow-up of this study, more than 75% of participants were
free of eating disorder
symptoms, with only 8% of those who had achieved a healthy weight by the
end of treatment
reporting any kind of relapse. There were no deaths and only 10% required
hospital admission (3).
Researchers at KCL also developed a more intensive multi-family therapy
(MFT) format of the
treatment where up to eight patients and their families participate
initially in 4 days of day-long
sessions, followed by further one day sessions for 6 months. A pilot trial
of this form of therapy,
which is combined with individual family therapy for a year, suggested the
programme to be
beneficial with a very positive response from participants (4).
References to the research
1. Eisler I, Dare C, Russell GFM, Szmukler GI, Dodge E, Le Grange D.
Family and individual
therapy for anorexia nervosa: A 5-year follow-up. Arch Gen Psychiatry
1997;54:1025-30. Doi:
10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830230063008 (247 Scopus citations)
2. Eisler I, Dare C, Hodes M, Russell GFM, Dodge E, Le Grange D. Family
therapy for adolescent
anorexia nervosa: The results of a controlled comparison of two family
interventions. J Child
Psychol Psychiatry 2000;41:727-36. Doi: 10.1017/S0021963099005922 (225
Scopus citations)
3. Eisler I, Simic M, Russell GFM, Dare C. A randomised controlled
treatment trial of two forms of
family therapy in adolescent anorexia nervosa: a five-year follow-up. J
Child Psychol Psychiatry
2007;48:552-60. Doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01726.x (66 Scopus
citations)
4. Dare C, Eisler I. A multi-family group day treatment programme for
adolescent eating disorder.
Eur Eat Dis Rev 2000;8:4-18. Doi
10.1002/(SICI)1099-0968(200002)8:1<4::AID-ERV330>3.0.CO;2-P (50 Scopus citations)
Grants
• 1994-97. PIs: I Eisler, C Dare. Medical Research Council. £70,000.
Evaluation of family
treatments for anorexia nervosa: five year FU study of two RCTs
• 2002-09. PIs: I Eisler, U Schmidt, J Treasure, B Lask, J Beecham, S
Landau, P Hugo. Health
Foundation. £625,000. A multi-centre RCT of the outcome, acceptability and
cost-effectiveness
of family therapy and multifamily day treatment compared with inpatient
care and outpatient
family therapy for adolescent anorexia nervosa
• 2003-05. PI: I Eisler. South London and Maudsley NHS Trustee Fund.
£48,000. Training
development grant for family interventions in eating disorders
• 2007-12. PIs: U Schmidt, J Treasure, K Tchanturia, H Startup, S
Ringwood, S Landau, M
Grover, I. Eisler, I. Campbell, J. Beecham, and G. Wolff. National
Institute of Health Research.
£2,000,000. Programme Grant: Treatment of Anorexia Nervosa
Details of the impact
Direct impact of KCL research at the Maudsley Eating Disorders
service: The KCL research
detailed above has been, and continues to be, developed in collaboration
with the South London
and Maudsley (SLaM) NHS Foundation Trust. SLaM's specialist Child and
Adolescent Eating
Disorders Service (CAEDS) provides comprehensive care at all levels of
severity of the illness
centred on the Maudsley family-based treatment. CAEDS currently provides
treatment for seven
London boroughs (population 1.8 m) and sees approximately 110-120 young
people a year (1a). A
recent audit of 316 consecutive SLaM CAEDS cases showed that the KCL
research findings
(Eisler et al 2000; 2007) of high recovery and low hospitalisation rates
translate well when the
service model is implemented in clinical practice. After 9-12 months of
typically 18-25 family
sessions at CAEDS, 64% had recovered and were referred back to primary
care with no further
treatment and a further 16% recovering from the eating disorder but
referred to their local Child
and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) for problems such as
depression or anxiety.
Only 13% were transferred to adult services at 18 years of age. The
majority of those seen in the
service were treated as outpatients, with only 12% requiring more
intensive treatment (7.5%
day care and 4.5% inpatient treatment) (1a) compared to 40% rates of
hospital admission for
adolescent anorexia typically found in non-specialist CAMHS services
(1b).
In September 2010, SLaM was awarded the Tier 4 CAMHS contract for Kent
and Medway and the
SLaM CAEDS team is now screening all eating disorders referrals for
hospital admissions and
providing family therapy as an alternative where appropriate. Over the
following year hospital
admissions for eating disorders were reduced by approximately 50%
(1c).
Research findings influence therapy provided in the UK: A growing
number of regions are
adopting this family based outpatient specialist service model. Prof
Eisler and colleagues run
regular training sessions and service development consultations in family
treatments for eating
disorders. Over the past 10 years they have trained over 800 eating
disorders specialists in the
Maudsley approach. Participants include individuals or small groups of
clinicians, managers and
commissioners, with team-based outreach training for larger groups (2a).
As a result of KCL
research on the efficacy of family therapy, and training delivered by Prof
Eisler and colleagues,
many UK services have altered their service provision and treatment
approach for eating disorders,
including services in North Essex, North East London, Dorset, Oxfordshire
and Buckinghamshire
(2b).
Underpinned by KCL research, the service model has recently been adopted
by the Department of
Health for inclusion in the Children and Young People's Project of the
NHS's Improving Access to
Psychological Treatments (CYP IAPT) programme as a specialist module in
Systemic Family
Practice IAPT training. KCL research, including Eisler, et al. 1997, 2000,
2007, is cited as evidence
of the efficacy of family therapy in the Eating Disorders module (2c).
Worldwide take up of the Maudsley family therapy approach: The
Maudsley family approach
has also been widely adopted by Eating Disorders services in many other
countries. In part this is
due to the SLaM CAEDS team also providing training to overseas
participants. A recent survey of
the two largest international Eating Disorders professional organisations
(Eating Disorders
Research Society and the Academy for Eating Disorders) indicated that
approximately 60% of the
350 respondents use the treatment with children and adolescents suffering
from anorexia nervosa
(3a). Prof Eisler has also disseminated KCL research including preliminary
evidence of the efficacy
of MFT to various professional audiences, including to both of these
organisations in 2010 and
2013 (3b,c). In Europe, Prof Eisler and the CAEDS team provide ongoing
consultation to the
Eating Disorders Service in Prague, Czech Republic, who have recently
published on the success
of the approach there (3d). They also have a contract with the Ministry of
Health in Cyprus for a 2
year training and service consultation to develop a Cyprus-wide specialist
Eating Disorders service
based on the Maudsley service model (3e).
In North America, the CAEDS team have also provided consultation and
training to the Hospital for
Sick Children in Toronto, Calgary and Vancouver in Canada (3f) and they
have an ongoing training
collaboration with the University of California San Diego, USA (3g). A
number of other services in
the USA highlight on their websites how they use the Maudsley family
therapy model including
Comer Children's Hospital in Chicago (3h), the Stanford School of Medicine
Child and Adolescent
Psychiatry service (3i) and the Children's Hospital in Colorado (3j).
Guidelines show Maudsley family therapy is a key treatment for child
and adolescent AN:
Findings from KCL research are reflected in and quoted by the current NICE
guidelines for eating
disorders (confirmed as current in 2011), which widely cite Eisler et al.
2000 as part of the
evidence for a key recommendation that children and adolescents with AN
should be offered
focussed family therapy (4a). Similarly, 2011 guidelines from the American
Psychiatric Association
on eating disorders use Eisler et al. 2007 when discussing how "the
practice guideline strongly
recommends family treatment for children and adolescents with eating
disorders" (4b). In 2010, the
Canadian Paediatric Society published family-therapy guidelines aimed at
community physicians.
Here Eisler et al. 2007, along with a review by Prof Eisler containing
Dare et al. 2000 and Eisler et
al. 1997 and 2000, are used when discussing how "the evidence to date
suggests that family-based treatment is the most effective treatment for children and teenagers
with AN" (4c).
Additionally, 2009 Spanish Clinical Practice Guidelines for Eating
Disorders use Eisler et al. 1997
and 2000 to highlight how scientific evidence supports the use of family
therapy (4d).
Impact on individual patients and their families: The evidence of
the effectiveness of the
Maudsley family based treatment approach has led to a growing demand from
family carer groups
for making the treatment more widely available. FEAST (Families Empowered
and Supporting
Treatments for Eating Disorders), an international group founded in 2008,
quote a leader in the
field who said that this approach "should be the gold standard or
first-line outpatient treatment for
medically stable teens" (5a). Maudsley Parents, an independent eating
disorders organisation
founded in the US in 2006 cite Eisler et al. 2000 when discussing this
model and say that "the
Maudsley Approach holds great promise for most adolescents who have been
ill for a relatively
short period of time" (5b). This growing `bottom up' demand has had a
particularly notable effect in
North America and Australia. A number of accounts have been published
describing the
experience from the perspective of families who have undergone Maudsley
family therapy (5c,d).
KCL research is also used in patient-centred resources. For instance, the
Royal College of
Psychiatrists in their information page about eating disorders say that
"the best researched form of
family therapy for anorexia is known as the 'Maudsley Model'" citing
Eisler et al. 1997, 2000 (5e).
Sources to corroborate the impact
1) Direct impact of KCL research at the Maudsley Eating Disorders
service
a. SLaM Eating Disorder service: http://www.national.slam.nhs.uk/services/camhs/camhs-eatingdisorders/
b. House J, et al Comparison of Specialist versus Non-specialist Service
Provisions for
Adolescents with Anorexia Nervosa and Related Eating Disorders. Int J
Eat Dis 2012:45:8 949-
956. DOI: 10.1002/eat.22065
c. SLaM Annual Report for NHS Kent and Medway available on request
2) Take up of the Maudsley family therapy approach in the UK
a. Training: http://www.national.slam.nhs.uk/services/camhs/camhs-eatingdisorderstraining/
b. Letters of corroboration available on request
c. CYP IAPT (pg 27-29): http://www.iapt.nhs.uk/silo/files/curricula-for-systemic-work-with-families-.pdf
3) Worldwide take up of the Maudsley family therapy approach
a. Wallace LM and von Ranson KM. Perceptions and use of
empirically-supported
psychotherapies among eating disorder professionals. Behav Res Ther
2012;50(3):215-22. Doi:
10.1016/j.brat.2011.12.006
b. Eating Disorders Research Society 2010; Cambridge, Massachusetts.
http://www.edresearchsociety.org/2010Meeting/2010_EDRS_Program_Schedule.pdf
c. Academy for Eating Disorders 2013: Montreal, Quebec
http://www.aedweb.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Clinical_Teaching_and_Research_Training_Day1&Template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=3277
d. Mehl A, et al. Adapting multi-family therapy to families who care for
a loved one with an eating
disorder in the Czech Republic. J Fam Ther 2013;35:82-101. Doi:
10.1111/j.1467-
6427.2011.00579.x
e. Service contract with Cyprus available on request
f. Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto:
http://www.oise.utoronto.ca/aphd/UserFiles/File/Counselling_Psychology/Sickkids_08.pdf
g. University of California San Diego, School of Medicine:
http://eatingdisorders.ucsd.edu/patient/ift-pages/bft.shtml
h. University of Chicago Medicine, Comer Children's Hospital:
http://www.uchicagokidshospital.org/specialties/psychiatry/eating-disorders.html
i. Stanford School of Medicine, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry:
http://childpsychiatry.stanford.edu/clinical/eating_disorders.html
j. Children's Hospital Colorado:
http://www.childrenscolorado.org/conditions/psych/eatingdisorders/philosophy.aspx
4) Guidelines show Maudsley family therapy is a key treatment
a. NICE (2004) Guideline CG9: Eating disorders
http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/10932/29220/29220.pdf
b. American Psychiatric Association (2011). Practice guideline for the
treatment of patients with
eating disorders. 3rd ed. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric
Association:
http://psychiatryonline.org/content.aspx?bookid=28§ionid=39113853#0
c. Findlay S, et al. Family-based treatment of children and adolescents
with anorexia nervosa:
Guidelines for the community physician. Paediatr Child Health
2010;15(1):31-40:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2827322/pdf/pch15031.pdf
d. Catalan Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Research: Clinical
Practice Guideline
for Eating Disorders (2009):
http://www.gencat.cat/salut/depsan/units/aatrm/pdf/cpg_eating_disorders_cahta2009.pdf
5) Impact on individual patients and their families
a. FEAST: http://www.feast-ed.org/TheFacts/MaudsleyApproach.aspx
b. Maudsley Parents: http://www.maudsleyparents.org/whatismaudsley.html
c. Alexander J, Le Grange D (2010). My Kid is Back. Empowering Parents to
Beat Anorexia
Nervosa. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, Australia. ISBN-10:
041558115X
e. Brown, H. Brave Girl Eating. Hachette UK. 2011; ISBN-10: 0061725471
f. Royal College of Psychiatrists:
http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/expertadvice/problemsdisorders/anorexiaandbulimia.aspx