Managing hypoglycaemia to improve quality of life in people with diabetes
Submitting Institution
King's College LondonUnit of Assessment
Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and PharmacySummary Impact Type
HealthResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Clinical Sciences
Summary of the impact
Research conducted at King's College London into the mechanisms
underlying hypoglycaemia unawareness in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM)
and novel technology for reducing the risk of hypoglycaemia has led
directly to innovative changes in the management of diabetes. These
include UK and worldwide development and dissemination of the
government-recommended `Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating' (DAFNE)
programme and on-going development of continuous subcutaneous insulin
infusion (pump) therapy, now used by over 18,500 people with T1DM in the
UK.
Underpinning research
For people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), therapeutic goals
include achieving improved glycaemic control to minimise risk of chronic
complications while avoiding hypoglycaemia. Research in this field at
King's College London (KCL) has been led by Prof Stephanie Amiel
(1995-present, Professor of Diabetic Medicine, Joint Head of the Diabetes
& Nutritional Sciences Division), Prof John Pickup (1976-present,
Professor of Diabetes and Metabolism), Angus Forbes (2008-present, FEND
Chair of Diabetes Nursing) and Dr Pratik Choudhary (2010-present, Senior
Lecturer).
From 1998, KCL researchers collaborated with researchers in Sheffield,
North Tyneside Hospital, and Dusseldorf's Heinrich Heine University, to
develop and test an English language version of a structured education
programme for people with T1DM: `Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating'
(DAFNE). DAFNE is a 5-day course in which participants learn to adjust
near-physiological insulin dose regimens to desired food and exercise by
using blood glucose monitoring reflectively to improve glycaemic control.
The initial trial, with 141 adults, found a significant improvement in
glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c, a risk marker for long term complications)
and sustained positive effects on quality of life, treatment satisfaction
and psychological wellbeing (1).
KCL researchers further developed the programme into a `hub-and-spoke
model' where, while initial patient training still took place at large
centres, diabetes teams from three smaller units were trained as DAFNE
advisors to assess, recommend and follow-up DAFNE users. This was found to
be a very feasible model of service provision for clinics where resources
did not allow for a full DAFNE service. They again demonstrated improved
control and reduced rates of severe hypoglycaemia and emergency service
use (2). In a 2012 national audit of DAFNE centres, KCL researchers showed
sustained improvements at one year in HbA1c and reduced episodes of severe
hypoglycaemia, with a 43% improvement of hypoglycaemia recognition in
those previously reporting unawareness. They also reported clinically
relevant decreases in anxiety and depression (3).
KCL researchers additionally developed, and are playing a major role in
applying, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy via a
pump for diabetic people with recurrent severe hypoglycaemia despite
optimised conventional therapy (including DAFNE). One 2005 study,
involving 27 patients, showed that CSII produced a significant fall in
HbA1c compared to multiple daily insulin injections (MDI), with a
reduction in insulin dosage, glucose oscillations and severity and
frequency of hypoglycaemia (4). Another study, with 40 patients, found
that people who may be excluded from CSII due to compliance issues when
controlling their diabetes on conventional therapy can responsibly use
CSII when guidance is provided by a specialist diabetes service. This led
to reductions in severe hypoglycaemia and extremes of high blood glucose
(5). KCL researchers have also produced several widely-used meta-analyses
including one in 2002 on 12 randomised controlled trials that compared
CSII (n = 301) to MDI (n = 299) and showed a lower mean blood glucose
concentration and HbA1c levels with an average reduction of 14% in insulin
dose (6). Continuing studies have showed that severe hypoglycaemia rates
could be reduced by pump therapy compared to MDI, with a greater reduction
in those with higher initial severe hypoglycaemia rates on MDI (7) and
especially with the addition of novel glucose monitoring devices (8).
References to the research
1. Amiel S, Beveridge S, Bradley C, The DAFNE Study Group, et al.
Training in flexible, intensive insulin management to enable dietary
freedom in people with type 1 diabetes: dose adjustment for normal eating
(DAFNE) randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2002;325(7367):746-49. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7367.746
(372 Scopus citations)
2. Rogers H, Turner E, Thompson G, Hopkins D, Amiel SA. Hub-and-spoke
model for a 5-day structured patient education programme for people with
Type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med 2009;26(9):915-20. Doi:
10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02796.x (4 Scopus citations)
3. Hopkins D, Lawrence I, Mansell P, Thompson G, Amiel S, Campbell M,
Heller S. Improved biomedical and psychological outcomes 1 year after
structured education in flexible insulin therapy for people with type 1
diabetes: the U.K. DAFNE experience. Diabetes Care 2012;35(8):1638-42.
Doi: 10.2337/dc11-1579 (11 Scopus citations)
4. Pickup J, Kidd J, Burmiston S, Yemane N. Effectiveness of continuous
subcutaneous insulin infusion in hypoglycaemia-prone type I diabetes.
Pract Diab Int 2005;22(1):10-14. Doi: 10.1002/pdi.732 (17 Scopus
citations)
5. Rodrigues IAS, Reid HA, Ismail K, Amiel SA. Indications and efficacy
of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy in Type 1
diabetes mellitus: a clinical audit in a specialist service. Diabet Med
2005;22(7):842-49. Doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01539.x (28 Scopus
citations)
6. Pickup J, Mattock M, Kerry S. Glycaemic control with continuous
subcutaneous insulin infusion compared with intensive insulin injections
in patients with type 1 diabetes: meta-analysis of randomised controlled
trials. BMJ 2002 23;324(7339):705. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7339.705
(271 Scopus citations)
7. Pickup JC, Sutton AJ. Severe hypoglycaemia and glycaemic control in
type 1 diabetes: meta-analysis of multiple daily insulin injections
compared with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Diabet Med
2008;25(7):765-74. Doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02486.x (127 Scopus
citations)
8. Choudhary P, Shin J, Wang Y, Evans ML, Hammond PJ, Kerr D, Shaw JA,
Pickup JC, Amiel SA. Insulin pump therapy with automated insulin
suspension in response to hypoglycemia: reduction in nocturnal
hypoglycemia in those at greatest risk. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:2023-25.
Doi: 10.2337/dc10-2411 (43 Scopus citations)
Key grants
• 1999-2000. Roberts S, Heller S, Amiel SA. The effects of brief
intensive training in self-management of Type 1 diabetes mellitus — the
dose adjustment for normal eating trial (DAFNE). British Diabetic
Association, £166,869
• 2003-5. Amiel SA (CI). Protecting against severe hypoglycaemia by
manipulation of glucose sensing and cortical function. Diabetes UK,
£98,241
• 2004-6. Amiel SA (CI), Reid H, Turner E. DAFNE A hub and spoke
initiative. Diabetes UK, £54,517
• 2004-7. Amiel SA (CI), Williams SCR, Brammer M, Zelaya F. Central
Glucose Sensing in Health and Disease. Wellcome Trust Project Grant,
£440,952
• 2006-12. Pickup JC (CI), Birch DJS. Nanometrology for Molecular
Science, Medicine and Manufacture. EPSRC/HEFCE, £4.3 million
• 2007-12. Amiel SA (CI), Ismail K, Docherty J, Thomas S, Edmonds M,
Costa D, Patel A, Turner E, Gulliford M, Treasure J, King M, Stahl D.
Non-pharmacological approaches to improving diabetes outcomes. The
National Institute of Health Research, £1,925,329
Details of the impact
Dose Adjustment For Normal Eating (DAFNE): One of the major goals
for people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is glycaemic control. To
address how this can be attained, the `Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating'
(DAFNE) programme — a skills-based structured education patient program in
intensive insulin therapy and self management — was set up as a
collaboration between King's College London (KCL), King's College Hospital
Diabetes service, Sheffield University and North Tyneside Hospital. From
its successful trial showing improved outcomes in T1DM, DAFNE was
initially rolled out to 10 centres, funded by the Department of Health. It
is now delivered in 77 UK centres.
Prof Amiel of KCL oversaw this, chairing the first DAFNE National
Executive from 2002-2011. The executive coordinates training for DAFNE
educators, provides teaching tools and quality assurance (including peer
review) and monitors the curriculum through a national audit of outcomes.
Up until July 2013, the UK centres have trained 900 UK healthcare
professionals and 27,983 UK adults with T1DM in 4,045 courses. There is an
active DAFNE User Group with its own website (DAFNE On-line) providing the
patient voice. The original 2002 UK DAFNE study (Amiel 2002), along with
follow-up studies by KCL including Rogers H 2009 and Hopkins 2012 are
cited on the professionals' DAFNE website in providing their evidence base
(1a). A number of follow-up investigations have shown that the DAFNE
programme can lead to sustained benefit, including a mean improvement from
baseline in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and improvements in quality of
life that remained significant at 44 months (1b) and demonstrated cost
effectiveness (1c).
Use of DAFNE in the UK: DAFNE is the only nationwide structured
education programme for adults with T1DM recommended as an exemplar by the
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in their 2003
Health Technology Appraisal (HTA) (2a). This HTA is included in a number
of current NICE documents, such as the 2011 Quality Standard on Diabetes
in Adults (2b) and their T1DM Patient Pathway (2c). DAFNE is also named by
the NHS as one of only two "national patient education programmes designed
to give people the skills and confidence to manage their condition" in
their National Service Framework (NSF) document regarding standards for
diabetes care. The NSF aims to "set clear quality requirements for care
... based on the best available evidence of what treatments and services
work most effectively for patients" (2d). DAFNE has also become a NHS
Evidence Quality, Innovation, Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) case
study. Such case studies are provided by the Department of Health as
examples of recommended NHS care (2e).
Use of DAFNE overseas: Further afield, the UK programme has
trained healthcare professionals in new centres in Ireland and Australia
(OzDAFNE, which now trains teams in New Zealand and Singapore) (3a),
Kuwait, South Africa, Nigeria and Spain. The International Diabetes
Federation described the success of DAFNE in these centres in their
journal Diabetes Voice. This publication is distributed worldwide to over
200 national diabetes organisations, healthcare professionals and funders
including governments in over 160 countries (3b).
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy: While DAFNE has
been very successful for a large number of people with T1DM, for some
however, diabetes control and hypoglycaemia can remain problematic even
after DAFNE. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) via pump
therapy is a KCL-led innovation that can help such people. NICE's 2008
technology appraisal of pump therapy recommends it for adults and children
with T1DM where multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) results in
disabling hypoglycaemia (4a). This appraisal is based on an assessment by
Cummins E, et al. 2007 that acknowledges Prof Pickup as one of the
originators of CSII and cites Pickup 2002, 2005 and Rodrigues 2005, when
discussing the evidence of effectiveness (4b). A 2010 HTA update to this
assessment also concluded that pumps can be advantageous over MDI. This
cites these KCL studies and Pickup 2008 and uses these as the basis for
reporting in several sections including assessment of treatment costs
(4c). NICE's 2009 commissioning guide draws heavily on the 2008 technology
appraisal. This guide "provides support for the local implementation of
NICE guidance through commissioning and is a resource to help health
professionals in England to commission an effective insulin pump therapy
service" (4d). Both these NICE documents utilised expert opinion from KCL
Professors Amiel and Pickup. The reports have also been quoted in the
Diabetes UK recommendation that CSII "should be offered as a treatment to
people with T1DM as part of a cohesive and comprehensive diabetes service"
(4e).
Further use of CSII: KCL work on CSII has also informed several UK
guidelines including the NHS Technology Adoption Centre's `How To Why To'
guide (that cites Pickup 2002 and Rodrigues 2005). The guide is based on
the experiences of three `pump-naive' services mentored by diabetes teams
from KCL working at the King's Health Partner hospitals King's College,
Guy's and St Thomas's (5a,b). The guide had a major impact on roll-out of
insulin pump therapy across UK, with an increase in adult pump use from 2%
in 2008 to up to 6% in 2012. This has resulted in improved glycaemic
control and better quality of life for 13428 adults and 5094 children (19%
of all those with T1DM) now using these pumps (5c).
Sources to corroborate the impact
1) Dose Adjustment For Normal Eating (DAFNE): http://www.dafne.uk.com/
a. Evidence base for DAFNE:
http://www.dafne.uk.com/uploads/443/documents/PU07.002,%20Version%209%20-%20The%20Evidence%20Base%20-%20June%202012.pdf
b. Speight J, et al. Long-term biomedical and psychosocial outcomes
following DAFNE (Dose Adjustment For Normal Eating) structured education
to promote intensive insulin therapy in adults with sub-optimally
controlled Type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2010;89:22-9. Doi:
10.1016/j.diabres.2010.03.017.
c. Shearer A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of flexible intensive insulin
management to enable dietary freedom in people with Type 1 diabetes in the
UK. Diabet Med. 2004;21:460-7. Doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01183.x
2) Use of DAFNE in the UK
a. Heath Technology Appraisal HTA 60. April 2003. Guidance on the use of
patient-education models for diabetes: http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/11496/32610/32610.pdf
b. Quality Standard QS6: Diabetes in Adults. March 2011: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/QS6
c. T1DM Patient Pathway:
http://pathways.nice.org.uk/pathways/diabetes#path=view%3A/pathways/diabetes/managing-type-1-diabetes.xml&content=view-node%3Anodes-patient-education-models
d. NHS National Service Framework: Standards for Diabetes Care:
http://www.nhs.uk/NHSEngland/NSF/Pages/Diabetes.aspx
e. Department of Health Quality and Productivity Proven Case Study.
Improving the quality of care for patients with type 1 diabetes: Dose
adjustment for normal eating (DAFNE):
http://arms.evidence.nhs.uk/resources/qipp/899091/attachment
3) Use of DAFNE overseas
a. About OzDAFNE (from Diabetes Australia's Victoria branch): https://www.diabetesvic.org.au/type-1-diabetes/oz-dafne
b. IDF. Diabetes Voice 2011;56;19-28: https://www.idf.org/sites/default/files/attachments/DV_56-SI2.pdf
4) Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy: NICE
a. NICE Health Technology Appraisal 151. July 2008. Continuous
subcutaneous insulin infusion for the treatment of diabetes mellitus:
http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/12014/41300/41300.pdf
b. Cummins E, et al. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of continuous
subcutaneous infusion for diabetes: updating review. A technology
assessment report commissioned by the HTA Programme on behalf of NICE:
http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/11729/38223/38223.pdf
c. Cummins E, et al. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of
continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion for diabetes: systematic review
and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2010;14(11): http://www.hta.ac.uk/fullmono/mon1411.pdf
d. Insulin pump therapy service for people with diabetes. Commissioning
Guide. February 2009:
http://www.nice.org.uk/media/37C/67/290312_Insulin_Pumps_cmg_update_for_PDF.pdf
e. Diabetes UK position statement on Insulin Pump Therapy. Sept 2011:
http://www.diabetes.org.uk/About_us/Position-statements--recommendations/Position-statements/Insulin_pump_therapy/
5) Further use of CSII
a. NTAC `How to, Why to guide':
http://www.ntac.nhs.uk/HowToWhyToGuides/ContinuousSubcutaneousInsulinInfusion/Insulin-Infusion-Evidence-Base.aspx
b. NTAC report:
http://www.ntac.nhs.uk/web/FILES/InsulinInfusion/nhs__1276991568_FINAL_DATA_REPORT.pdf
c. Audit of pump use:
http://www.diabetes.org.uk/Documents/News/The_United_Kingdom_Insulin_Pump_Audit_May_2013.pdf