Miltefosine for the treatment of leishmaniasis
Submitting Institution
London School of Hygiene & Tropical MedicineUnit of Assessment
Clinical MedicineSummary Impact Type
TechnologicalResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Clinical Sciences, Medical Microbiology
Summary of the impact
Miltefosine is the first oral drug to be developed for the treatment of
leishmaniasis, a worldwide
parasitic infection with up to 12m cases. Also developed as a cancer drug,
miltefosine was
identified and tested for leishmaniasis therapy at LSHTM and has been
added to WHO's essential
medicines list as a result of subsequent clinical trials. It has been
widely used for the treatment of
visceral leishmaniasis (VL) in India, Nepal and Bangladesh, and for the
cutaneous form of the
disease in Latin America. Phase III and IV clinical trials of combination
therapies including
miltefosine have been carried out in India.
Underpinning research
Leishmaniasis is a disease complex caused by 17 different species of
protozoan parasites
belonging to the genus Leishmania, which are transmitted between
mammalian hosts by sandflies.
An estimated 12m humans are infected, with an incidence of 0.5m cases of
the visceral form of the
disease (which is fatal if untreated) and 1.5 to 2.0m of the cutaneous
form. Leishmaniasis occurs
mostly in tropical and subtropical countries.
Research into oral treatment for the disease with miltefosine (a
phospholipid drug) was carried out
at LSHTM by Simon Croft, Professor of Parasitology (at LSHTM from
1982-1984 and since 1987).
The research took part in four phases, the earliest of which began prior
to the research
assessment period, but is outlined here briefly to provide context.
Discovery
Following the discovery of the anti-leishmanial activity of miltefosine
(hexadecyl phosphocholine)
by a team led by Croft at the Wellcome Research Laboratories between
1984-1986 (which
identified the compound as having selective in vitro and in vivo activity
against the causal parasite
of VL, Leishmania donovani) Croft continued the work at LSHTM. In
vitro and in vivo studies
funded by WHO Tropical Disease Research Programme (TDR), a programme for
research and
training in tropical diseases, extended the observations on miltefosine to
other similar phospholipid
drugs, including ilmofosine, and included recent clinical isolates of L.
donovani and other
trypanosomatid parasites.3.1, 3.2 Later, Croft and the team
also showed that miltefosine was active
against the Leishmania species that cause cutaneous leishmaniasis,
showing differences in
susceptibility between species (2002).3.3
Development
Independently, pharmaceutical companies were developing miltefosine and
other phospholipid
derivatives as anti-cancer agents between 1987 and 1996. In 1993-1994
Croft worked with the
WHO TDR programme to explore the possibility of clinical development of
these anti-cancer drugs
with four pharmaceutical companies for VL treatment. As a result, Asta
Medica (manufacturers of
miltefosine) was invited to participate in a clinical development
programme.
Mechanisms of action and resistance
Croft initiated and coordinated two programmes, funded by the EU with
partners from South
America and Europe, to study the mechanism of action and resistance of Leishmania
to
miltefosine. One partner in the programme, the Institute of Parasitology
and Biomedicine in
Granada/Spain, importantly identified a membrane transporter (LdMT)
responsible for conferring
drug resistance to the Leishmania parasite, which was shown to be
present in the intracellular
stage of the parasite in rodent models of infection by the LSHTM team.3.4,
3.5
Miltefosine combination therapy
The selection of resistant forms made studies on the potential of drug
combinations of anti-leishmanial
drugs an important next step. Experimental studies in vitro and in mice
with miltefosine
combined with other standard antileishmanials (pentavalent antimonial,
paromomycin and
amphotericin B), identified combinations that showed significant additive
activities against L.
donovani (e.g. miltefosine and amphotericin B).3.6 In
2004, Croft was seconded to the Drugs for
Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi) in Geneva for three years (retaining
his LSHTM staff position)
as the first R&D director of this product development partnership,
where he led the project for
clinical development of combination therapy.
References to the research
3.1 Croft, SL, Snowdon, D and Yardley, V (1996) The activities of four
anticancer
alkyllysophospholipids against Leishmania donovani, Trypanosoma cruzi
and Trypanosoma brucei,
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 38(6): 1041-1047, doi:
10.1093/jac/38.6.1041. Citation count:
119
3.2 Escobar, P, Yardley, V and Croft, SL (2001) Activities of
hexadecylphosphocholine (miltefosine),
AmBisome, and sodium stibogluconate (Pentostam) against Leishmania
donovani in immunodeficient
scid mice, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 45(6):
1872-1875, doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.6.1872-1875.2001.
Citation count: 61
3.3 Escobar, P, Matu, S, Marques, C and Croft, SL (2002) Sensitivities of
Leishmania species to
hexadecylphosphocholine (miltefosine), ET-18-OCH3 (edelfosine)
and amphotericin B, Acta Tropica,
81(2): 151-157, doi: 10.1016/S0001-706X(01)00197-8. Citation count: 102
3.4 Seifert, K, Matu, S, Pérez-Victoria, FJ, Castanys, S, Gamarro, F and
Croft, SL (2003)
Characterisation of Leishmania donovani promastigotes resistant to
hexadecylphosphocholine
(miltefosine), International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents,
22(4): 380-387, doi: 10.1016/S0924-8579(03)00125-0.
Citation count: 82
3.5 Seifert, K, Pérez-Victoria, FJ, Stettler, M, Sánchez-Cañete, MP,
Castanys, S, Gamarro, F and
Croft, SL (2007) Inactivation of the miltefosine transporter, LdMT, causes
miltefosine resistance
that is conferred to the amastigote stage of Leishmania donovani
and persists in vivo, International
Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 30(3): 229-235, doi:
10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.05.007. Citation
count: 34
3.6 Seifert, K and Croft, SL (2006) In vitro and in vivo interactions
between miltefosine and other
antileishmanial drugs, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy,
50(1): 73-79, doi:
10.1128/AAC.50.1.73-79. Citation count: 63
Key grants
Croft, An Integrated Screen for the Identification and Evaluation of
Novel Antileishmanial and
Antitrypanosomal Compounds, WHO/TDR (I-CHEM), 1992-1996, $420,000.
Croft, Antileishmanial and Antitrypanosomal Activities of
Alkyllysophospholipids, EU FP4, 1996-1998,
€200,000.
Croft, Miltefosine for Leishmaniasis: Molecular Basis of Mechanisms of
Action, Resistance and
Combination Therapy, EU FP6, 2001-2004, €304,000.
Croft and Yardley, Funding for Pre-clinical Studies and the Leish Drug
Combo Working Groups, Drugs
for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi), five grants, 2004-2013,
£602,422.
Details of the impact
The research described in Section 2 has directly impacted on WHO drug
policies and enabled
miltefosine treatment for tens of thousands of people with leishmaniasis
in high-incidence countries
such as India, Bangladesh and Colombia. It has also had commercial impacts
for miltefosine
manufacturers, and led to phase III and IV clinical trials in India.
Following clinical trials in the 1990s and 2000s and the registration of
miltefosine in India in 2002
(the first new drug for visceral leishmaniasis in 40 years), the
governments of India, Nepal and
Bangladesh agreed a 10-year programme to eliminate leishmaniasis by 2015.
Miltefosine was
adopted as the only drug to be included in this VL elimination programme —
a decision in which the
research by Croft and colleagues played a significant part.5.1,
5.2 The drug has since been used to
treat about 25,000 patients per year through government-run centres — a
total of more than
137,000 between 2008 and mid-2013. Miltefosine is also available on the
private market, although
it is not known how many patients benefit through this route.
In 2010, an application was made by the manufacturers of miltefosine,
Paladin Laboratories in
Montreal, Canada, to include the drug on the WHO's Model List of Essential
Medicines, a directory
of drugs which — according to WHO — should be available within the context
of functioning health
systems at all times in adequate amounts. The WHO Expert Committee charged
with the selection
of essential medicines reviewed the evidence (including the Croft research
outputs) and approved
miltefosine, which has since been included in two editions of the list in
March 2011 and April
2013.5.3 The list is essential for the funding and distribution
of the drug by international
organisations such as Médecins Sans Frontièrs (MSF) who follow the WHO
list. The list is also
used by Ministries of Health in individual countries to assemble their own
essential drugs lists.
Also in 2010, Croft was invited to serve on another WHO Expert Committee,
which produced a
technical report on Control of the Leishmaniases.5.4
This is a key public health advisory document
used by governments in countries affected by leishmaniasis, with
miltefosine treatment playing an
important part in it — again on the basis of Croft's research.
These endorsements led to considerable commercial benefits for the
manufacturers of miltefosine,
Paladin Laboratories. (Asta Medica, originally selected by WHO for the
development process, had
sold their rights to Zentaris in 2001, and Zentaris was subsequently
acquired by Paladin.)
According to its own records, the company sold about 100,000 treatments
directly to governments
between 2008 and the middle of 2013, with the most recent sales level at
17,000 per annum.5.5
This excludes private sector sales, which are difficult to measure.
Phase III and IV clinical trials on anti-leishmanial drug combinations
which include miltefosine,
aimed at reducing the length of course of treatment and prevention of drug
resistance, were carried
out in India beginning in 2009-2010. The phase III trials showed AmBisome
+ miltefosine and
paromomycin + miltefosine combinations giving a >98% cure rate.5.6
These combinations are part
of a phase IV clinical trial beginning in July 2013 and could reduce the
courses of treatment from
28 days to 8 days.
Miltefosine is also used for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis
(CL), especially in South
America.5.7 In Colombia, it has become the drug of choice for
this disease as a result of Croft and
colleagues' research, and has been shown to achieve a cure rate of 84-91%
for L. panamensis.
Argentina's Ministry of Health recommended miltefosine as the drug of
choice for CL in a 2010
guide for health professionals.5.8 The drug has also undergone
extensive clinical trials in other
countries, in particular Brazil and Bolivia5.9 against CL and
mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (MCL)
caused by L. braziliensis and L. guyanensis.
In East Africa, miltefosine has been used in clinical trials to improve
treatment of HIV VL co-infected
patients, proving to be as effective as, and less toxic than, the standard
antimonial drugs.
Croft has worked to raise awareness and understanding of leishmaniasis
treatment among medical
practitioners and the general public in a variety of ways, including
through presentations at 12
international practitioner meetings and symposia during the impact
assessment period, and media
interviews (BBC online August 2009), as well as a YouTube video recorded
for an exhibition on
neglected tropical diseases at the Royal Festival Hall in London in July
2010.5.10
Sources to corroborate the impact
5.1 Former Director, National Institute for Medical Research, India; was
Director at time of clinical
trials and can corroborate importance of miltefosine and role of Croft.
5.2 Staff member, WHO TDR can also corroborate role of LSHTM findings in
Indian decision to
use miltefosine in elimination programme.
5.3 WHO (2013) WHO Model List of Essential Medicines: 18th list
(April 2013). Geneva: WHO,
http://www.who.int/medicines/publications/essentialmedicines/18th_EML_Final_web_8Jul13.pdf
(accessed 29 October 2013).
5.4 WHO (2010) Control of the Leishmaniases: Report of a Meeting of
the WHO Expert Committee
on the Control of Leishmaniases, Geneva, 22-26 March 2010, WHO
Technical Report no. 949.
Geneva: WHO, http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO_TRS_949_eng.pdf
(accessed 29 October 2013)
(p. 56ff. Croft acknowledged as member Expert Committee p. vii).
5.5 Statement from Paladin Laboratories can be made available to the
panel on request.
5.6 Sundar, S, Sinha, PK, Rai, M, Verma, DK, Nawin, K, Alam, S,
Chakravarty, J, Vaillant, M,
Verma, N, Pandey, K, Kumari, P, Lal, CS, Arora, R, Sharma, B, Ellis, S,
Strub-Wourgaft, N,
Balasegaram, M, Olliaro, P, Das, P and Modabber, F (2011) Comparison of
short-course multidrug
treatment with standard therapy for visceral leishmaniasis in India: an
open-label, non-inferiority,
randomised controlled trial, Lancet, 77(9764): 477-486, doi:
10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62050-8.
5.7 Head of Leishmaniasis Clinical Program, DNDi (Drugs for Neglected
Diseases initiative).
5.8 Dirección de Epidemiología (2010) Enfermedades infecciosas
leishmaniasis visceral:
Diagnóstico de Leishmaniasis Visceral, Guia para el equipo de salud,
no. 5 (Spanish), Ministerio
de Salud de la Nación, Argentina, http://www.msal.gov.ar/images/stories/epidemiologia/pdf/guia-leish.pdf
(accessed 29 October 2013) (p. 16).
5.9 Machado, PR, Ampuero, J, Guimarães, LH, Villasboas, L, Rocha, AT,
Schriefer, A, Sousa, RS,
Talhari, A, Penna, G and Carvalho, EM (2010) Miltefosine in the treatment
of cutaneous
leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania braziliensis in Brazil: a
randomized and controlled trial', PLoS
Neglected Tropical Diseases, 4(12): e912,
doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0000912.
5.10 Imperial College London (2010) Leishmania: lessons from a parasite —
videos and Interviews,
http://wwwf.imperial.ac.uk/theoreticalimmunology/exhibit2010/?page=video
(accessed 29 October
2013).