Preventing HIV in African adolescents
Submitting Institution
London School of Hygiene & Tropical MedicineUnit of Assessment
Public Health, Health Services and Primary CareSummary Impact Type
HealthResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Public Health and Health Services
Summary of the impact
During the 1990s, LSHTM researchers documented a steep rise in HIV
prevalence among young people between the ages of 15 and 24 in eastern and
southern Africa. Subsequent trials in Tanzania and Zimbabwe examined the
effectiveness of interventions to reduce HIV incidence among this age
group. The results, and subsequent reviews, have substantially influenced
the HIV policies of international organisations such as UNICEF, UNESCO and
WHO, and HIV programmes in individual African countries. In particular,
findings on knowledge and attitude change through sexual health education
have been widely implemented.
Underpinning research
Young people remain at the centre of the global HIV/AIDS epidemic, with
15-24-year-olds accounting for 50% of new cases in developing countries.
There is increasing recognition that for anti-HIV interventions to work,
they must be tailored to meet the local circumstances of young people.
LSHTM has been at the forefront of global research on approaches to
improve sexual and reproductive health, and prevent HIV, among youth
(15-24 years) in Africa. In the 1990s, population-based HIV prevalence
surveys in sub-Saharan African countries, led by Richard Hayes (Professor
of Epidemiology & International Health, LSHTM since 1978, then
Research Fellow) and others, highlighted a relatively low prevalence of
HIV and other STIs in 15-19-year-olds but a dramatic increase in
prevalence in 20-24-year-olds. There was a clear need for sexual and
reproductive health (SRH) interventions targeted specifically at youth.
Two major collaborative intervention programmes were subsequently
conducted by Hayes, David Ross (Professor of Epidemiology and Public
Health, LSHTM since 1983, then Research Fellow) and others, with
collaborators from University College London, Tanzania and Zimbabwe. These
included randomised controlled trials conducted between 1997 and 2008,
named MEMA kwa Vijana in Tanzania and Regai Dzive Shiri in Zimbabwe. They
showed that it was feasible to implement high-quality interventions in
schools, health facilities and the community using government employees
and/or youth volunteers, and to scale these up. The trials also showed
that these interventions had a substantial and sustained impact on young
people's SRH knowledge and self-reported attitudes to sexual risks, and on
key self-reported sexual risk behaviours. However, there was no consistent
impact on pregnancy or HIV rates, which highlighted the importance of
including biomedical evidence in trials.3.1, 3.2, 3.3
HALIRA, a comprehensive qualitative study carried out in 1999-2002
alongside the Tanzanian trial (in collaboration with the Medical Research
Council's Social and Public Health Sciences Unit and the National
Institute for Medical Research, Tanzania) highlighted key societal and
social barriers to sexual behaviour change among young people. The
findings showed that societal norms predispose against young people
avoiding risky sex, for example by condoning and even encouraging
transactional sex; for young women, exchanging sex for gifts or support is
seen as normal and acceptable.3.4
Hayes, Ross and colleagues subsequently used data from the Tanzanian and
Zimbabwean trials, along with other data from South Africa, Zimbabwe and
Uganda, to show a lack of association between reported adolescent risk
behaviours and adolescent HIV prevalence. These findings suggest that it
is primarily sex with adults rather than each other that puts adolescents
at risk, and so future interventions should include adults.3.5
Meanwhile, Ross and colleagues (in collaboration with WHO) led the
`Steady..., Ready..., Go!' reviews published in 2006 for the UN
Inter-Agency Task Team for Young People. These examined what kinds of
interventions work to prevent HIV infection among youth in low- and
middle-income countries. Among the interventions graded as Go! (i.e. to be
implemented widely) were curriculum-based programmes in schools and
interventions run through existing community structures. LSHTM updated
three of the key reviews for sub-Saharan Africa in 2011.3.6
References to the research
3.1 Ross, DA, Changalucha, J, Obasi, AIN, Todd, J, Plummer, ML,
Cleophas-Mazige, B, Anemona, A, Everett, D, Weiss, HA, Mabey, DC,
Grosskurth, H and Hayes RJ (2007) Biological and behavioural impact of an
adolescent sexual health intervention in Tanzania: a community-randomized
trial, AIDS, 21(14): 1943-1955, doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282ed3cf5.
Citation count: 95
3.2 Doyle, AM, Ross, DA, Maganja, K, Baisley, K, Masesa, C, Andreasen, A,
Plummer, ML, Obasi AIN, Weiss, HA, Kapiga, S, Watson-Jones, D,
Changalucha, J and Hayes RJ for the MEMA kwa Vijana Trial Study Group
(2010) Long-term biological and behavioural impact of an adolescent sexual
health intervention in Tanzania: follow-up survey of the community-based
MEMA kwa Vijana Trial, PLoS Medicine, 7(6): e1000287, doi:
10.1371/journal.pmed.1000287. Citation count: 23
3.3 Cowan, FM, Pascoe, SJ, Langhaug, LF, Mavhu, W, Chidiya, S, Jaffar, S,
Mbizvo, MT, Stephenson, JM, Johnson, AM, Power, RM, Woelk, G and Hayes, RJ
on behalf of the Regai Dzive Shiri trial team (2010) The Regai Dzive Shiri
project: results of a randomized trial of an HIV prevention intervention
for youth, AIDS, 24(16): 2541-2552, doi:
10.1097/QAD.0b013e32833e77c9. Citation count: 13
3.4 Wamoyi, JM, Wight, D, Plummer, M, Mshana, GH and Ross, D (2010)
Transactional sex amongst young people in rural northern Tanzania: an
ethnography of young women's motivations and negotiation, Reproductive
Health, 7(2), doi:10.1186/1742-4755-7-2. Citation count: 19
3.5 Chapman, R, White, RG, Shafer, LA, Pettifor, A, Mugurungi, O, Ross,
D, Pascoe, S, Cowan, FM, Grosskurth, H, Buve, A and Hayes, RJ (2010) Do
behavioural differences help to explain variations in HIV prevalence in
adolescents in sub-Saharan Africa?, Tropical Medicine and
International Health, 15(5): 554-566, doi:
10.1111/j.1365-3156.2010.02483.x. Citation count: 10
3.6 Napierala Mavedzenge, SM, Doyle, AM and Ross, DA (2011) HIV
prevention in young people in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review, Journal
of Adolescent Health, 49(6): 568-586, doi:
10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.02.007. Citation count: 8
Key grants
Hayes, MEMA kwa Vijana Trial, European Commission, 1997-2002, €3m and
Irish Aid, 2001-2002, €948,000.
Ross, Wight and Changalucha, HALIRA Programme, MRC, 1999-2004, £844,000.
Ross, MEMA kwa Vijana Trial Further Survey, DFID and Irish Aid,
2006-2009, £1.85m.
Ross, Review of Effectiveness of Interventions for HIV Prevention,
Treatment and Support. UNICEF, 2013, US$137,000.
Details of the impact
The research described has had a direct impact on the HIV-related
policies of both international organisations and national governments in
Africa. Findings on knowledge and attitude change through education in
particular have been widely implemented.
UNESCO's 2009 International Technical Guidance on Sexuality Education
drew heavily on the evidence from the Tanzanian and Zimbabwean trials and
the Steady.., Ready..., Go! reviews, highlighting the MEMA kwa Vijana
results as `particularly interesting' while picking up on its caveat that
education and community-based programmes alone are not sufficient to bring
HIV incidence down.5.1 In 2010, comprehensive HIV knowledge
among 80% of young people was agreed as the first `bold result' of the
UNAIDS Business Case on Empowerment of Young People for HIV Prevention.
To help countries achieve this result, the UNAIDS Inter-Agency Task Team
on HIV and Young People agreed in 2011 to focus their efforts on sexuality
education in schools. The two trials were influential in these global
policy moves.5.2 The new UNAIDS Strategy for 2011-2015 points
to the need for expanded provision of effective school-based sexuality
education.5.3
The MEMA kwa Vijana intervention materials were introduced into schools
in Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe in the early 2000s, and roll-out
continued between 2008-2013.5.3 The materials are approved for
use in primary schools in Tanzania, where they are published in Swahili,
and are freely available in both English and Swahili on the MEMA kwa
Vijana website.5.4 They were also the first HIV prevention
educational materials to be featured in the Global HIV Archive in 2012.5.5
Two reviews for UNESCO stressed the importance of these two trials and
specifically highlighted the MEMA kwa Vijana trial. SIECUS (Sexuality
Information and Education Council of the United States), in its Global
Vision: Promising Resources From Around the World (2008) describes
MEMA kwa Vijana as `innovative' and highlights the features of its
training package.5.6 MEMA kwa Vijana's results were also
important evidence used for the WHO guidelines on preventing early
pregnancy and poor reproductive outcomes among adolescents in developing
countries (2011),5.7 and the key UNICEF Opportunity in
Crisis document (2011) endorsed MEMA kwa Vijana and Regai Dzive
Shiri as `successful in changing attitudes'.5.8
Ministries of Health in Tanzania, Uganda and Kenya have accepted the two
programmes' joint policy recommendations that educational interventions
will need to be combined with both biomedical and structural measures to
change social and sexual norms. Global health-related agencies such as
UNESCO, WHO, UNICEF and UNAIDS have also used the recommendations, with
UNICEF's Fourth Stocktaking Report on Children and HIV citing the
policy brief based on these projects.5.9
The results of the Steady.., Ready..., Go! reviews have been used
extensively by policy-makers and programme implementers in international
agencies and governments to focus their priorities on `Go!' and `Ready'
interventions — those that should be implemented forthwith without needing
further evidence, and those that should be implemented with careful
evaluation.5.2, 5.10 Senior UNICEF staff have quoted the
reviews to justify their priorities, including Geeta Rao Gupta, Deputy
Executive Director at the International AIDS Conference in July 2012.5.10
A 2012 LSHTM-UNICEF review of the national response to prevent HIV among
young people in 20 high-prevalence countries found that the programme with
the strongest evidence and thus designated as `Go!' in the review —
in-school interventions that are adult-led and curriculum-based — was the
most widely-implemented youth prevention strategy across countries.5.10
Presentations of the research to policy-makers and health practitioners
have helped raise awareness and understanding of the research findings.
Ross presented findings from the MEMA kwa Vijana trial and the systematic
reviews at numerous UN and other meetings, including the Annual Meeting of
HIV Program Focal Points from Ministries of Education in Sub-Saharan
Africa, Dakar, Senegal, December 2008 (over 50 participants from 30
countries); and an expert consultation at the International Centre for
Research on Women, Washington DC, May 2011 (over 50 participants from
international organisations, funding agencies and governments).
Ross has also been influential as the Chair of the Technical Steering
Committee of the WHO's Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and
Adolescent Health,5.2 on the UNAIDS Monitoring and Evaluation
Reference Group, and as an academic lead on the new Lancet
Commission on Adolescent Health and Wellbeing.5.2
In July 2013, Ross and colleagues presented their latest review of global
evidence on the effectiveness of interventions for HIV prevention,
treatment and care to UNICEF (48 participants, including UNICEF staff,
government adolescent health focal persons, etc.) and these have been used
as a central piece in UNICEF's new operational guidance on adolescents and
HIV.5.10
Sources to corroborate the impact
5.1 UNESCO (2009) International Technical Guidance on Sexuality
Education: An Evidence-informed Approach for Schools, Teachers and
Health Educators. Paris: UNESCO, http://hivaidsclearinghouse.unesco.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdf/2009/20091210_international_guidance_sexuality_education_vol_1_en.pdf
(accessed 16 October 2013) (this review highlighted the MEMA kwa Vijana
Trial in Box 4 on p. 16).
5.2 Scientist, Maternal, Newborn, Child & Adolescent Health Dept
(MCA), WHO.
5.3 UNAIDS (2010) Getting to Zero: 2011-2015 Strategy,
http://www.unaids.org/en/media/unaids/contentassets/documents/unaidspublication/2010/JC2034_UNAIDS_Strategy_en.pdf
(accessed 16 October 2013) (see particularly p. 32).
5.4 MEMA kwa Vijana (2008) Teacher's Guides, http://memakwavijana.org/materials-and-resources/teachers-guides.html
(accessed 16 October 2013) (this web page had been accessed 457 times as
of June 2013).
5.5 MEMA kwa Vijana Program: Good Things for Young People, Global
HIV Archive, http://www.socio.com/globalhivarchive/GHA07.php.
(accessed 17 October 2013) (featured in Archive from 2012, this website
selects and then archives the most important and best evaluated
interventions for HIV prevention globally).
5.6 Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States
(SIECUS) (2008) Global Vision: Promising Resources from Around the
World, http://www.siecus.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=Feature.showFeature&featureID=1154&noheader=1
(accessed 16 October 2013) (this initiative provides `an online resource
that connects educators and program planners with the latest, most
compelling, international sexuality education, HIV and AIDS prevention,
and sexual and reproductive health interventions and practices').
5.7 WHO (2011) WHO Guidelines on Preventing Early Pregnancy and Poor
Reproductive Outcomes Among Adolescents in Developing Countries.
Geneva: WHO, http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789241502214_eng.pdf
(accessed 16 October 2013) (specifically see refs #13 and 15 for Outcome
3, `Increase use of contraception by adolescents at risk of unintended
pregnancy', p. 68).
5.8 UNICEF, UNAIDS, UNESCO, UNFPA, ILO, WHO and World Bank (2011) Opportunity
in Crisis: Preventing HIV from Early Adolescence to Young Adulthood,
UNICEF, http://www.unicef.org/publications/index_58708.html
(accessed 16 October 2013) (see particularly pp. 17/18 and their ref.
#81).
5.9 UNICEF, UNAIDS, WHO and UNFPA (2009) Children and AIDS: Fourth
Stocktaking Report. New York: UNICEF,
http://www.unicef.org/publications/files/Children_and_AIDS_Fourth_Stocktaking_Report_EN_110609.pdf
(accessed 16 October 2013) (see particularly ref. #54, p. 17).
5.10 Senior Specialist/Team Leader, HIV (Adolescents), UNICEF HQ.