Improving the environmental and economic sustainability of upland grazing systems
Submitting Institutions
Aberystwyth University,
Bangor UniversityUnit of Assessment
Agriculture, Veterinary and Food ScienceSummary Impact Type
EnvironmentalResearch Subject Area(s)
Environmental Sciences: Environmental Science and Management
Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences: Agriculture, Land and Farm Management, Animal Production
Summary of the impact
BEAA's large-scale research designing and testing alternative grazing
management systems for
the uplands has achieved impact on the environment and economy.
Environmental policy and its
implementation via agri-environment schemes has been directly and
indirectly influenced, with the
evidence provided by the research vital to the development of grazing
prescriptions and related
payment structures by government agencies and conservation bodies. The
results have also
benefitted the upland farming community by identifying opportunities for
improved productivity and
hence economic viability; through e.g. more efficient use of pasture
resources leading to higher
growth rates for forage-based systems and reduced reliance on purchased
feed and fertiliser.
Underpinning research
Forty-five percent of agricultural land in the UK is designated as EU
Less Favoured Area (LFA),
with most of this resource located in the hills and uplands. The
traditional basis of farming in these
areas is the keeping of breeding sheep and suckler cows, and livestock
farming has shaped, and
sometimes damaged, the upland landscape. At the time the research began
the uplands carried
around 12 million ewes and more than a million beef cows; in each case
over 60% of the UK total.
Previous hill farming research had focussed on adjusting fertiliser and
stocking rate guidelines for
re-seeded pastures. The new research by BEAA staff, Fraser (PI,
1994-present) and Davies
(Officer-in-charge, Bronydd Mawr Research Station, 1965- 2009) addressed
growing concern that
loss of cattle from upland systems following reform of the Common
Agricultural Policy (CAP) could
exacerbate biodiversity declines related to mismanagement of native
pastures, and sought to
quantify the benefits of retaining cattle within the uplands. Field-scale
studies were conducted at
the Bronydd Mawr [3.1,3.2,3.3,3.6] and Pwllpeiran [3.4,3.5] research
centres from 1998 to 2008,
with collaborative input from the University of Bristol (meat
characteristics [3.2,3.3], MLURI (upland
beef systems [3.1,3.2,3.3]) and ADAS (botanical surveying [3.4,3.5]). An
initial proof-of-principal
experiment demonstrated that mixed grazing with cattle improves production
efficiency relative to
sheep-only upland grazing systems through complimentary pasture use and
reduced parasite
burdens [3.1], strengthening the case to the farming community for
retention of cattle within the
uplands. Other studies established ways in which the production penalty of
grazing Molinia
caerulea (purple moor-grass) dominated semi-natural grasslands to
meet nature conservation
objectives could be minimised [3.2], and identified potential benefits to
the consumer of eating
meat produced from animals grazing such pastures [3.2,3.3].
Following reform of the CAP in 2003 subsidy payments became decoupled
from production. Since
then upland farmers have been offered financial incentives to manage the
land to meet nature
conservation and/or heritage objectives. The evidence base to support the
development of grazing
prescriptions within these new agri-environment initiatives was limited
however. Similarly, although
such schemes adopted an `income forgone' approach to fixing payments there
was a dearth of
relevant data available upon which to base such calculations. Further work
by Fraser and Davies
explored options to enable livestock to be effectively used to deliver
environmental gain without
compromising overall productivity, and tested assumptions made by both
farmers and
conservationists regarding the relative economic and environmental value
of different elements
within upland livestock systems. The research confirmed the vital role
that cattle can play in
restoring and maintaining biodiversity within priority habitats regardless
of breed type [3.3,3.4,3.6],
but highlighted the need for welfare considerations to be taken into
account when using stock as a
management tool [3.4,3.5]. Likewise, site-to-site variation in level of
animal performance and
floristic responses to grazing of Molinia-dominant vegetation
communities has demonstrated
shortcomings in implementing blanket prescriptions and strengthened the
case for site-specific
conservation agreements [3.3,3.5,3.6]. Systems studies incorporating both
sown and native
grasslands has shown that increased lamb growth rates are still detected
when cattle:sheep ratios
within mixed grazing systems are representative of those found on farm
[3.6], whilst earlier
finishing lambs command a greater market value and have a lower carbon
footprint.
References to the research
3.1 Fraser, M.D., Davies, D.A., Vale, J.E., Hirst, W.M. and Wright, I.A.
(2007). Effects on animal
performance and sward composition of mixed and sequential grazing of
permanent pasture by
cattle and sheep. Livestock Science 110, 251-266. DOI:
10.1016/j.livsci.2006.11.006
3.2 Fraser, M.D., Davies, D.A., Wright, I.A., Vale, J.E., Nute, G.R.,
Hallett, K.G. et al. (2007). Effect
on upland beef finishing systems of incorporating winter feeding of red
clover or summer grazing of
Molinia-dominated semi-natural rough grazing Grass & Forage
Science, 62, 284-300. DOI:
10.1111/j.1365-2494.2007.00581.x
3.3 Fraser, M.D., Davies, D.A., Vale, J.E., Nute, G.R., Hallett, K.G.,
Richardson, R.I. & Wright, I.A.
(2009). Performance and meat quality of native and continental cross
steers grazing
ryegrass/white clover improved pasture or semi-natural rough grazing. Livestock
Science, 123, 70-82.
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2008.10.008
3.4 Fraser, M.D., Theobald, V.J., Griffiths, J.B., Morris, S.M. &
Moorby, J.M. (2009). Comparative
diet selection by cattle and sheep grazing contrasting heathland
communities. Agriculture,
Ecosystems & Environment, 129, 182-192 DOI:
10.1016/j.agee.2008.08.013
3.5 Fraser, M.D., Theobald, V.J., Dhanoa, M.S., Davies, O.D. (2011).
Impact on sward composition
and stock performance of grazing Molinia-dominant grassland Agriculture,
Ecosystems &
Environment 144, 102-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.08.004
3.6 Fraser, M.D., Vale, J.E., Dhanoa, M.S. (2013). Alternative upland
grazing systems: Impacts on
livestock performance and sward characteristics. Agriculture,
Ecosystems and Environment, 175,
8-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2013.05.002
Details of the impact
The experimental work described above has been "critical in providing
evidence to support
management and policy decisions in the uplands" [5.1]. The research was
funded primarily by
DEFRA, with additional funding contributions from English Nature (now
Natural England) and the
Countryside Council for Wales (now Natural Resources Wales). Findings were
presented to and
discussed with policy officers from these government departments/agencies
and other key
stakeholder organisations, such as the RSPB, National Trust and Welsh
Government. Through
these interactions the research has been "important in underpinning policy
and agri-environment
scheme development in recent years" [5.2]. In particular it has informed
the development of mixed
grazing options within the Glastir Entry (Option 15c and 15d) and Glastir
Advanced (Option 41b)
agri-environment schemes in Wales [5.1,5.2]. Glastir was launched in 2012
to replace the four
existing schemes at that time (Tir Cynnal, Tir Gofal, Tir Mynydd and the
Organic Farming
Scheme). In 2012 around 1,700 Glastir Entry (also known as All-Wales
Element) contracts were
signed, covering a total area of 154,000 ha; and around 500 of these
applicants were selected for
entry into Glastir Advanced (also known as Targeted Element). In addition,
the research findings
have informed the development of specific polices and initiatives
targeting the restoration and
maintenance of priority habitats within Wales, including support payments
to encourage cattle
grazing on Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) [5.1]. There are
currently 179 SSSIs in the
Welsh uplands, covering over 138,000 ha.
The research has also provided an evidence base for policy implementation
in England [5.3], and
within the impact assessment period influenced the development of the
priority UL18 cattle grazing
option within the Upland Entry Level Scheme (UELS; launched in 2010), and
a related
reprioritisation of the EK5 mixed grazing option within the Entry Level
Stewardship (ELS) scheme.
The cattle grazing option has been one of the most popular UELS options
across England [5.4],
and to date has been included within 3200 agreements covering an area of
nearly 200,000 ha
[5.3]. In addition to influencing the development of these environmental
schemes, output from the
research has informed the individual agreements put in place by land
management advisors to
meet the specified conservation targets for holdings entered into higher
level schemes [5.3].
As well as influencing government policy, the research has had an impact
on the work by leading
conservation bodies. For example it has "shaped the science, practice and
policy" of the RSPB;
informing the advisory materials they produce, the advice they give to
farmers, and the
management implemented on their own sites [5.5]. The National Trust has
similarly drawn on the
work by BEAA in respect of upland grazing systems. Management
prescriptions for upland habitats
and future research proprieties have also been influenced through Fraser's
membership of the
Upland Ecosystem Group of the Wales Biodiversity Partnership and her
appointment as a
"recognised independent expert" on the Moorland Grazing Group for Natural
England's Upland
Evidence Review in 2012 [5.6]. Through membership of the advisory group
for PONT (a not-for-profit
organisation affiliated to CCW/NRW which exists to encourage and
facilitate grazing for the
benefit of the wildlife, landscape and cultural heritage of Wales) the
research has influenced
management regimes put in place as part of conservation projects across
Wales [5.1,5.7];
including the Anglesey Grazing Animals Project, the Gwendraeth Grasslands
project in
Carmarthenshire, and the Forgotten Landscape Project centred around the
Blaenavon Industrial
Landscape World Heritage Site in South Wales.
The wider environmental benefits that arise from increased efficiency of
resource use within mixed
grazing systems are associated with enhanced productivity for upland
farmers. Higher growth
rates can potentially lead to improved market returns, lower costs and
reductions in associated
greenhouse gas emissions. The advantages for producers of including
grazing by cattle were
summarised in a specific booklet prepared for farmers in Wales by Hybu Cig
Cymru (the strategic
body responsible for the promotion and development of the Welsh red meat
industry) as part of its
EU-funded Sheep and Beef Development Programme [5.8], which quotes results
from grazing
trials at Bronydd Mawr. The booklet states that in the years prior to its
publication the total number
of breeding beef females in Wales dropped by 5.5%, and that "a
continuation with this trend could
not only impact on efficiencies of production on the farm but also have a
detrimental effect on the
Welsh landscape". The benefits of retaining a mixture of cattle and sheep
advocated include: "a
much higher utilisation of the pasture than sheep or cattle alone;
improvements in animal
performance; improvements in the utilisation of marginal land; more
productive swards; and
reductions in worm burdens reducing drench costs". There is also growing
recognition of the
production benefits of utilising native grassland. One of the
opportunities for improving
sustainability within the supply chain that was highlighted by the HCC
Welsh Red Meat Roadmap
(2011) is maximising the use of grazeable habitats of principle importance
(or Section 42 habitats);
the policies and prescriptions for which have been influenced by the
research as outlined
previously. The link between environmental and economic benefits is also
recognised in a recent
report commissioned by the Farmers Union of Wales, which references work
by Fraser and Davies
on the impact of different breed types of cattle [5.9]. The research
findings relating to breed
differences and grazing options for Molinia-dominant vegetation
have also informed a recent
analysis of the likely biodiversity implications of changing livestock
numbers in the uplands [5.10];
again contributing to the on-going debate regarding the future of LFAs
within the UK.
Sources to corroborate the impact
5.1 Letter from Senior Technical Policy Advisor, Land Nature and Forestry
Division, Welsh
Government regarding influence on agri-environment scheme development in
Wales.
5.2 Letter from Team Leader, Terrestrial Ecosystems, Natural Resources
Wales regarding
influence on conservation grazing in Wales.
5.3 Letter from Senior Environmental Specialist, Land Management
Technical Support Team,
Natural England regarding influence on agri-environment scheme development
in England.
5.4 Defra Agricultural Change and Environment Observatory Research Report
No. 29, p2.
5.5 Statement from Agricultural Advisor, Royal Society for Protection of
Birds regarding influence
on RSPB policy and advice.
5.6 Galbraith, C.A., Gill, M., Pepper, S. & Hill, T.O. (2013). Natural
England review of upland
evidence — Assurance Group report. Natural England Evidence Review,
Number 007; pgs 4-5.
Details of the membership and remit of the topic review groups.
5.7 Statement from PONT co-ordinator regarding influence on PONT
activities.
5.8 HCC (2008). Mixed grazing — the benefits. Booklet prepared for
distribution to farmers by Hybu
Cig Cymru — Meat Promotion Wales. pg 4.
5.9 Joyce, I.M. (2013). The role of grazing animals and agriculture in
the Cambrian Mountains:
recognising key environmental and economic benefits delivered by
agriculture in Wales' uplands.
Report commissioned by the Farmers' Union of Wales. pg 30.
5.10 Cumulus Consultants Ltd (2012). Changing livestock numbers in the UK
Less Favoured
Areas — an analysis of likely biodiversity implications. Report
commissioned by the Royal Society
for the Protection of Birds. pgs 9, 95, 98.