4. Mitigation of geotechnical risk through the development of advanced numerical tools – ICFEP
Submitting Institution
Imperial College LondonUnit of Assessment
Civil and Construction EngineeringSummary Impact Type
EnvironmentalResearch Subject Area(s)
Mathematical Sciences: Statistics
Engineering: Civil Engineering, Resources Engineering and Extractive Metallurgy
Summary of the impact
The development of the bespoke finite element software ICFEP (Imperial
College Finite Element Program) is the main research outcome of the
numerical group in the Geotechnics Section at Imperial College (IC). The
research conducted in the Section since 1993 has led to a substantial
growth of ICFEP's modelling capabilities in both complexity and
robustness, following closely the advancements in understanding of real
soil behaviour achieved through laboratory and field investigations of
soils. Between 2008 and 2013 the application of these modelling
capabilities to practical engineering problems, which are generally
unavailable with a similar degree of sophistication in commercial
software, amounts to over 80 projects of which a third are worth
multi-billion pounds in global value. The impact of ICFEP's application
has been to reduce the geotechnical risk and the cost of design and
construction, and to give confidence in the environmental stability of
design solutions, by providing accurate predictions of soil response
associated with individual projects.
Underpinning research
ICFEP's capabilities in terms of numerical analysis cover a broad range
of geotechnical applications. The research described in this section
focuses only on developments that have been utilised directly in the
projects that describe the impact in Section 4.
Progressive failure is characteristic of soils with brittle
behaviour, where soil strength reduces gradually with deformation level,
leading to ultimate collapse. Since traditional methods of analysis are
unable to predict the impact of progressive failure, the development of
advanced numerical tools for the simulation of this complex phenomenon has
been a central topic in the research carried out between 1993 and 1997 by
Potts (academic staff member since 1979). The implementation of coupled
consolidation facilities in ICFEP, as well as that of strain-softening
constitutive models and porosity/stress level-dependent soil permeability
models, enabled the quantification, for the first time, of the
geotechnical risk associated with mechanisms of progressive failure in cut
slopes and embankment dams. This pioneering research led to the
prize-winning publications [1] and [2], the latter becoming the key
reference for the development of design strategies for such structures.
More recently, in order to extend this procedure to the simulation of
progressive failure of large underwater slopes, Potts developed advanced
boundary conditions and specific numerical strategies, [3], to combine
this type of analysis with ICFEP's large deformation capabilities.
Assessment of serviceability limit states ( SLS) of geotechnical
structures has been one of the constant drivers for numerical developments
in ICFEP, as the demand for increased accuracy of predicted ground
movements due to construction has grown rapidly over the years. This was
particularly important for urban environments such as London, where design
requires assessments of damage induced to existing structures and services
by e.g. tunnelling or deep excavations. To address this type of problem,
both new constitutive relationships aimed at reproducing soil behaviour
under a wide range of strains, and novel numerical strategies for
simulating structural elements, were implemented into ICFEP. With respect
to the former, the initial isotropic nonlinear elastic soil models were
systematically applied and developed further through the PhD research of
Addenbrooke (1992-1996), Franzius (2001-2004) and Grammatikopoulou
(2000-2004), the latter developing the most advanced framework [4].
Concurrently, the 3D modelling capabilities of ICFEP were enhanced with
the development of novel structural shell elements and their constitutive
models through the PhD research of Schroeder (1998-2002). The academic
staff involved with these PhDs include Potts and Zdravkovic (academic
staff member since 1999). The findings of this research enabled the
quantification of the effects that nonlinearity, anisotropy and plasticity
below gross yield have on the predictions of ground movements, in
particular around tunnels and deep excavations. Moreover, the advanced
modelling of structural components (such as tunnel linings and retaining
walls), accounting for anisotropy of their axial and bending stiffness,
clearly showed that an isotropic idealisation, which is standard in design
practice, leads to unsafe predictions of ground movements. Most of this
research originated from the group's involvement with the Jubilee Line
Extension project in London between 1993 and 1996, and was instrumental in
subsequent studies, [5], performed for the Crossrail project in London
from 2003 to 2010.
Since 1999 a significant effort has been applied to the development and
implementation of advanced dynamic analysis capabilities in ICFEP,
which enabled the investigation of earthquake engineering and general
dynamic soil problems. This research was led by Zdravkovic and Potts,
through the PhDs of Hardy (1999-2003), Kontoe (2002-2006, academic staff
member since 2006) and Taborda (2006-2010, academic staff member since
2012). Apart from the formulation and implementation of a coupled
consolidation dynamics framework into ICFEP, three novel developments
during this research have been particularly successful: efficient and
accurate time integration schemes, a sub-structuring approach in terms of
the domain reduction method, [6], and advanced constitutive models that
can account for soil response under cyclic loading, including the
prediction of the occurrence of liquefaction.
References to the research
*References that best indicate quality of underpinning research
[1] Dounias G.T., Potts D.M. and Vaughan P.R. (1996) `Analysis of
progressive failure and cracking in old British dams'; Geotechnique
46(4) pp 621-640, doi:10.1680/geot.1996.46.4.621
*[2] Potts D.M., Kovacevic N. and Vaughan P.R. (1997) `Delayed collapse
of cut slopes in stiff clay' Geotechnique 47(5) pp
953-982, doi:10.1680/geot.1997.47.5.953
[3] Kovacevic N., Jardine R.J., Potts D.M., Clukey C.E., Brand J.R. and
Spikula D.R. (2012), A numerical simulation of underwater slope failures
generated by salt diapirism combined with active sedimentation; Geotechnique
62(9) pp 777-786, doi:10.1680/geot.12.OG.004
[4] Grammatikopoulou A., Zdravkovic L. and Potts D.M. (2006) ;General
formulation of two kinematic hardening constitutive models with a smooth
elasto-plastic transition' ASCE Int. Jnl. of Geomechanics 6(5)
pp 291-302; doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2006)6:5(291)
*[5] Zdravkovic L., Potts D.M. and St. John H.D. (2005) `Modelling of a
3D excavation in finite element analysis' Geotechnique 55(7)
pp 497-513; doi:10.1680/geot.2005.55.7.497
*[6] Kontoe S., Zdravkovic L. and Potts D.M. (2008) `The domain reduction
method for dynamic coupled consolidation problems in geotechnical
engineering' Int. Jnl. for Numerical and Analytical Methods in
Geomechanics 32(6) pp 659-680; doi:10.1002/nag.641
Paper 1 was awarded the ICE Telford Premium prize and paper 2 was awarded
the ICE Telford Medal.
Details of the impact
4.1 General
ICFEP's impact on Geotechnical Engineering practice is delivered through
direct consulting activities of the staff in the Geotechnics Section and
through its strategic partnership with the Geotechnical Consulting Group
(GCG) from London, who have adopted ICFEP as their key numerical tool and
employ specialists dedicated solely to performing numerical analysis using
ICFEP. Indeed, the latter has maximised the reach and practical relevance
of the geotechnical numerical research carried out at IC, amounting to
approximately 80 projects in the UK and abroad undertaken during the
assessment period 2008-2013. This has impacted on a broad range of
beneficiaries such as London Underground, Thames Water, BP America,
Crossrail, Health and Safety Executive, British Airport Authority, Shell,
Rome Metro and Darwin Port, by providing solutions that led to design cost
savings, reduced environmental impact of construction, and/or enhanced
safety of construction [A]. In most of these projects ICFEP was employed
due to the inadequacy of commercial software and/or the IC's ability to
develop specific numerical algorithms that were necessary for some of the
projects. Four of the most significant projects from the past 5 years are
described below as examples of impact.
4.2 Mardi Gras
In the Gulf of Mexico, BP America is carrying out hydrocarbon exploration
in geologically young and active regions, where kilometres of escarpments,
approximately 700m high, have been created by locally uplifting and
translating salt diapirs and simultaneous large scale sediment deposition
in water depths over 1km. Large underwater slope failures of these
escarpments present a significant geotechnical hazard to exploration
equipment, with a potentially catastrophic environmental impact. Between
2008 and 2011 an IC/GCG team carried out studies using ICFEP for BP
America's Mardi Gras project — a billion dollar highest capacity deepwater
pipeline system ever built — confirming that periods of slope instability
were likely to have occurred in the past and should be expected in the
future, but that these processes developed over hundreds, rather than
thousands of years as previously thought. The analysis of such a complex
geological setting, which followed the progressive failure modelling
approach developed in [2], required the use of ICFEP's large displacement
and coupled consolidation facilities, as well as the specific development
of novel methods for simulating the underwater deposition of geomaterials
[3]. The outcome of the performed analyses had a direct impact on risk
assessments, by identifying reasonable estimates for the current annual
probability of slope failure, which enabled BP America "to more
effectively determine how to properly locate pipelines and facilities and
mitigate risk along this escarpment" [B].
4.3 Abberton Reservoir
Following the forecast of a substantial growth in future demand for
public water supply in the east of England, Northumbrian Water opted to
raise the water level in Abberton Reservoir, the largest freshwater body
in Essex, by 3.2m (resulting in an increase in reservoir capacity of 58%).
Given the complex history of the reservoir, which involved the failure of
the original dam in 1937 and its reconstruction in 1938, as well as its
status of an environmental haven, designated as a Special Protection Area
(SPA), IC/GCG were commissioned in 2009 by the main designer MWH
(Montgomery-Watson-Harza) to carry out a numerical study of the planned
raising of Abberton's main dam. ICFEP's unique combination of advanced
constitutive relationships [4], coupled consolidation capabilities and
progressive failure facilities [2], enabled the successful simulation of
the complete dam history, including the prediction of the failure of the
original dam and the post-reconstruction behaviour of the existing dam.
This gave credibility to the results obtained from the subsequent
modelling of the dam rising, which demonstrated satisfactory embankment
stability during all phases of work. The analyses were pivotal in
developing the design solution for the steeper downstream slope, impacting
directly on the design cost by reducing the use of land and the amount of
fill material for dam raising, thus also having a significantly positive
environmental impact, with different aspects of savings amounting to an
estimated several tens of millions of pounds. The convincing analyses
results contributed to the efficient approval of the planning permission
by presenting the solution which persuaded the stakeholders that the SPA
will not be degraded. The raising of the dam has now been successfully
completed and MWH note the fact that "this is the first time that an SPA
has been altered in Europe and to do so without recourse to Public Inquiry
is a notable success" [C].
4.4 Crossrail
Crossrail is the biggest tunnelling project in London in recent history,
both in monetary value and the length of tunnel construction. The main
challenge of the project is to ensure the stability, applying accurate
assessment of ground movements, of existing undergrounding lines,
utilities, services and building foundations in Central London, due to the
construction of new 21 km long twin bore tunnels. An additional challenge
is that new tunnels run at about 40 m depth, requiring access via deep
station boxes, a type of structure for which there is little prior
experience in London. Following the outcome of key research carried out at
IC, [5], the Crossail project team commissioned IC/GCG between 2008 and
2011 to perform a 3D FE study to establish assessment procedures for
ground movements induced by box excavations. In addition to ICFEP's
capabilities in reproducing the nonlinearity of soil behaviour at small
strains, advanced constitutive models for shell elements were used to
model the retaining walls of the box excavations. By providing more
accurate estimates of ground movements, this study reduced the
geotechnical risk associated with estimation of building damage caused by
the deployment of the Crossrail project, compared to standard assessment
methods. It is estimated that the developed assessment procedure led to
about 350 critical buildings along the Crossrail route (a quarter of the
total number) being eliminated from further detailed assessment and costly
structural survey [D].
4.5 Panama Canal
The Panama Canal is a key water route for global trade and security
between the Pacific and Atlantic oceans and a primary source of income to
Panama, contributing to 30% of its GDP. Its width governs the maximum size
of container ships and warships passing through and studies at the
beginning of this century showed that the Canal was operating close to its
maximum capacity, thus generating the need for its expansion. In 2009
IC/GCG was commissioned to assess Royal Haskoning's solution for widening
and deepening of the Panama Canal including the construction of a third
set of locks. Due to the high seismicity in the area, the main concern of
the design was the potential for a rocking mode of deformation of the high
lock walls and the risk of up-lift and pounding of the central lock
foundations in the event of a strong earthquake. ICFEP's advanced
capabilities in terms of coupled consolidation analyses under dynamic
solicitations, [6], and cyclic nonlinear constitutive modelling, as
opposed to industry practice of simple pseudo-static or equivalent linear
modelling, demonstrated that such a mode of deformation would not occur
under the design earthquakes. These results impacted directly the design,
with significant savings made on construction material and construction
time. [E]
4.6 Examples of other lasting impact
Stabilisation of the Leaning Tower of Pisa: ICFEP was key software
in the development of stabilisation solutions for the tower and prevention
of its collapse (1992 - 2000); the remarkable agreement between measured
and predicted (by ICFEP) tower's response to implementation of temporary
stabilisation (counterweight) in 1993/94 and subsequent permanent
stabilisation (soil extraction) in 1999/2000, enabled the understanding of
the basic mechanism of the ground-tower interaction, which was otherwise
impossible to assess [F]; it provided confidence to the long-term
stability of the adopted permanent solution, leading to the eventual
re-opening of the tower to public access in Dec. 2001; continuous
monitoring of the tower to date shows no signs of further lean, hence
enabling its open access and providing lasting confidence in ICFEP's
predictions. A number of outreach lectures, TV and radio broadcasts have
presented the Pisa research (e.g., article in The Daily Telegraph
Newspaper on the 28 Jul 2010 http://bit.ly/dy9Y8Z
[J] and a BBC One `One Show' feature on 6 May 2011 [K]).
Two text books on finite element analysis in geotechnical
engineering, [G, H]; presenting both the finite element theory and its
practical application on real geotechnical problems, as developed and
applied in ICFEP, these books have been not only an essential academic
text, but also a source of guidance for appropriate use of numerical
methods by industry; they continue to be re-printed to date and have just
been issued as eBooks by the publisher Thomas Telford; due to a specific
demand, the books were translated into Chinese and published by the China
Science Press in 2010.
ICE Manual of Geotechnical Engineering [I]; Chapter 6 of this
manual is dedicated to computational geotechnical analysis, providing
guidance on the correct use of numerical analysis, based on experiences
gained through application of ICFEP in solving real geotechnical problems.
Sources to corroborate the impact
[A] Technical Director, GCG to corroborate ICFEP's impact on Geotechnical
Engineering practice
[B] Geotechnical Advisor, BP to corroborate ICFEP impact on BP America's
Mardi Gras project
[C] Technical Director for Dams, MWH UK Ltd to corroborate ICFEP impact
on Abberton Reservoir
[D] Head of Geotechnics, Crossrail to corroborate ICFEP impact on
Crossrail project
[E] Senior Partner, Geotechnical Consulting Group-Royal Haskoning Team to
corroborate impact of ICFEP on assessment of Royal Haskoning's solution
for Panama Canal
[F] Potts D.M. and Burland J.B. Development and application of a
numerical model for simulating the stabilisation of the Leaning Tower of
Pisa; in Developments in Theoretical Geomechanics, Smith & Carter
(eds) © 2000 Balkema, Rotterdam, ISBN 90 5809 158 9
[G] Potts D.M. and Zdravkovic L. (1999), Finite Element Analysis in
Geotechnical Engineering: Theory; Thomas Telford, London, doi:10.1680/feaiget.27534
[H] Potts D.M. and Zdravkovic L. (2001), Finite Element Analysis in
Geotechnical Engineering: Application, Thomas Telford, London, doi:10.1680/feaigea.27831
[I] Potts D.M. and Zdravkovic L. (2012), Computer analysis principles in
geotechnical engineering; ICE Manual of Geotechnical Engineering; Chapter
6: 35-57, doi:10.1680/moge.57074
[J] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/art/architecture/7907298/Solving-the-800-year-mystery-of-Pisas-Leaning-Tower.html.
Archived https://www.imperial.ac.uk/ref/webarchive/48f
[K] http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/newsandeventspggrp/imperialcollege/newssummary/news_11-5-2011-11-25-32
Archived https://www.imperial.ac.uk/ref/webarchive/28f