Wave Intensity Analysis removes the need for drugs in the diagnosis of coronary heart disease
Submitting Institution
Imperial College LondonUnit of Assessment
General EngineeringSummary Impact Type
TechnologicalResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology, Medical Physiology
Summary of the impact
Professor Kim Parker in the Department of Bioengineering has developed
Wave Intensity Analysis (WIA) for characterising pressure and flow waves
in arteries. It is being used to assess whether patients need
interventions to reduce narrowing of their coronary arteries. Conventional
diagnoses require the use of a drug that is costly, time consuming to
administer and has unpleasant side effects; it cannot be used in some
patient groups. WIA obviates the need for the drug and can be used as the
sole diagnostic method in more than half of patients. After being assessed
in trials involving >2500 patients, the method became commercially
available, and is in routine clinical use in 3 continents. It removes the
cost of the drug (which can be US$500 per case in some countries),
increases throughput by halving the time taken for the procedure, reduces
side effects and makes rigorous diagnosis available to patient groups that
cannot tolerate the drug and therefore depended on unreliable,
imaging-based methods until now.
Underpinning research
When the left ventricle contracts, it generates waves of blood pressure
and flow that propagate along the systemic arteries and smaller blood
vessels. When the waves reach discontinuities in vessel shape or
mechanical properties, such as occur at branches, some of the wave energy
is reflected. Maximum (systolic) and minimum (diastolic) blood pressures
in large arteries are widely used to indicate cardiovascular health and
risk of cardiovascular disease, but the pressure and flow waves and their
reflections also depend on cardiac performance and blood vessel
properties, so it should be possible to use them as additional — and
potentially more informative — diagnostic indicators.
Traditional methods for analysing the waves are based on Fourier
analysis. This approach has a conceptual flaw: despite the quasi-regular
appearance of the heartbeat, the circulatory system is not in steady-state
oscillation. The approach also has a practical flaw: the results are in
the frequency domain, which makes it hard to relate them to any
physiological property of the vessels. It was therefore a major paradigm
shift when Professor Kim Parker, working in the Department of
Bioengineering and its forebears at Imperial, introduced Wave Intensity
Analysis (WIA) to replace the traditional approach. WIA conceptualises the
pressure and flow waves as arising from the superposition of infinitesimal
wavefronts. The wavefronts can travel forward or backwards, and can
increase or decrease pressure and flow. The mathematical derivation of WIA
is complex, being based on Riemann's method of characteristics, but the
equations derived for its practical application are surprisingly simple.
Parker published early versions of the WIA concept in 1988 and 1990, but
it was developed and systematically applied to physiological data from
1997 onwards, initially to explain successive events in the filling of the
left ventricle [1] and to characterise the timing of waves in the aorta
[2]. These successes were facilitated by the fact that WIA operates in the
time domain, but they were hindered by the inability to determine the
local wave speed; separation of forward- and backward-travelling waves can
be achieved if the wave speed is known. Subsequent papers presented novel
methods for determining local aortic [3] and coronary artery [4] wave
speeds using only the pressure and flow measurements that are required for
the WIA itself. A further theoretical advance of great practical
significance was the separation of pressure due to waves from pressure
caused by the stretching of elastic blood vessels [5]; pressures during
the later part of each cardiac cycle are dominated by the latter
"reservoir" properties and had been incorrectly attributed to waves in
previous work based on Fourier methods.
The development of WIA into a method with practical utility has resulted
in it being used to characterise waves in the heart, arteries, and veins
by bioengineers, physiologists and clinicians in over 10 countries. It was
the subject of an international conference in 2004 and the focus of a
dedicated issue of Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing in
2009 [6]. Its application to clinically-important problems has resulted in
7 papers in the two top-ranked cardiovascular journals.
References to the research
* References that best indicate quality of underpinning research.
1. MacRae JM, Sun YH, Isaac DL, Dobson GM, Cheng CP, Little WC, Parker
KH, Tyberg JV. Wave intensity analysis: a new approach to left ventricular
filling dynamics. Heart Vessels. 1997;12:53-59. DOI: 10.1007/BF02820867
*2. Koh TW, Pepper JR, DeSouza AC, Parker KH. Analysis of wave
reflections in the arterial system using wave intensity: a novel method
for predicting the timing and amplitude of reflected waves. Heart Vessels.
1998;13:103-113. DOI: 10.1007/BF01747827 Cited 34 times by 12.10.2013
*3. Khir AW, O'Brien A, Gibbs JS, Parker KH. Determination of wave speed
and wave separation in the arteries. J Biomech. 2001;34:1145-1155. DOI:
10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00076-8
4. Aguado-Sierra J, Parker KH, Davies JE, Francis D, Hughes AD, Mayet J.
Arterial pulse wave velocity in coronary arteries. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med
Biol Soc. 2006;1:867-870. 10.1109/IEMBS.2006.259375
*5. Wang JJ, O'Brien AB, Shrive NG, Parker KH, Tyberg JV. Time-domain
representation of ventricular-arterial coupling as a windkessel and wave
system. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003;284: H1358-H1368. http://ajpheart.physiology.org/content/284/4/H1358
Details of the impact
WIA is now being used clinically to diagnose narrowing ("stenosis") of
coronary arteries. This narrowing is the underlying pathology of Coronary
Heart Disease (CHD), and is the cause of most heart attacks. In the UK, a
heart attack occurs every 2 minutes and around half of them are fatal,
accounting for approximately one third of all deaths. CHD is also a common
cause of severe morbidity.
Non-pharmaceutical, non-surgical treatment consists of making a small
incision in an artery in the groin, guiding a catheter up the arterial
system into the stenosed area of the coronary artery, and then temporarily
inflating a balloon and/or permanently inserting a stent (a cylindrical
tube made of wire mesh) to open up the lumen of the vessel. About 90,000
procedures of this type are carried out in the UK each year. However, they
are expensive and carry risk for the patient, including precipitation of a
heart attack, re-narrowing of the vessel, or occlusion of the stent; the
risk of a serious adverse event at the time of the procedure is 1%, and
around 3% of cases suffer in-stent restenosis in the longer term. It is
therefore important not to use them unnecessarily. On the other hand, the
procedures substantially reduce symptoms when the disease is severe so it
is also important to use them in patients who do need them.
Patient stratification was traditionally carried out by X-ray imaging of
the stenosis. However, many stenoses that appear significant by such
anatomical criteria are not functionally significant, and stenting them
worsens patient outcomes. Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) is a functional
method for assessing stenosis, introduced in 1995 [A]. In this method, the
ratio of the mean pressure downstream and upstream of the stenosis is
measured as an indicator of the severity of the stenosis. FFR is replacing
image-based methods; for example, the "appropriate use" criteria in the
USA now require a measure of ischaemia (impaired blood supply) in all
patients before stenting. However, during FFR measurements, it is
necessary to stabilise and minimise the resistance of the smaller blood
vessels supplied through the coronary artery by administering a potent
dilating drug. That carries serious practical difficulties and adverse
consequences. The drugs are unavailable or precipitously expensive (up to
US$500 per case) in some countries. Even if the cost is acceptable for a
single vessel, multi-vessel assessment in the same patient is usually not
feasible. Administration of the drug takes time (about 12 minutes of a
20-30 minute procedure) and requires catheterisation of the femoral vein.
Furthermore, the drug is very unpleasant, causing a sensation of
"impending doom." For these reasons, the procedure is inadvisable for some
patient groups (children, asthmatics, hypotensives and people with heart
block) who therefore have to rely on the less invasive but unreliable
imaging-based methods, and patient throughput is reduced with consequent
increase in cost.
WIA has permitted the development of an alternative method —
instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) — that does not require dilating
drugs. WIA is used to identify a wave-free period during the cardiac cycle
where resistance of the small vessels is naturally low and stable. At that
point, the pressure ratio across the stenosis can be used to assess the
resistance caused by the stenosis, as in FFR after drug administration.
iFR requires hardware that is already in place in many catheterization
clinics — a fine-wire catheter system simultaneously measuring pressure at
two locations and flow. Only new software is required; this is based on
algorithms developed by Professor Parker and Dr Justin Davies of the
National Heart and Lung Institute at Imperial. First-in-man cases using
the on-line system were conducted at Hammersmith Hospital London in
January 2013. Since then the system, manufactured by Volcano, has been
placed in 20 centres, in 3 continents around the world [B]. The updated
software was initially distributed for research purposes, and used in the
multi-centre international clinical trial ADVISE (ADenosine Vasodilator
Independent Stenosis Evaluation), which concluded that iFR gave a
drug-free index of stenosis severity comparable to FFR [C]. (The most
recent study [D] found in 1500 patients that iFR can achieve a 95% overall
match with FFR.) The system is now available commercially and is in
regular clinical use; by July 2013, real-time measurements had been made
in around 650 cases [D].
Ongoing clinical trials include ADVISE II, an FDA-sanctioned trial to
further compare iFR with FFR in 900 patients. Provisional results of
ADVISE II were presented at EuroPCR [E]; they showed that the use of iFR
alone was sufficient for diagnosis in more than half of patients. Although
such clinical trials continue, the technique is already changing routine
clinical practice. For example, Dr Sharp, Interventional Cardiologist at
Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, has stated [F]: "After using iFR in
real world clinical practice, its simplicity is clearly its strength. In a
busy cath lab, saving time is important and the results in my early
experience have been consistent and clinically useful."
Sources to corroborate the impact
A. Pijls NH, Van Gelder B, Van der Voort P, Peels K, Bracke FA, Bonnier
HJ, el Gamal MI Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the
influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow.
Circulation. 1995;92: 3183-3193. A paper that describes the method
employing drugs which is superseded by using wave intensity analysis
B. Executive Vice President and General Manager, Functional Management
Business Unit, Volcano Corporation. Mr Burnett can verify sales of the
Volcano system that incorporates the new software.
C. Sen S, Escaned J, Malik IS, Mikhail GW, Foale RA, Mila R, Tarkin J,
Petraco R, Broyd C, Jabbour R, Sethi A, Baker CS, Bellamy M, Al-Bustami M,
Hackett D, Khan M, Lefroy D, Parker KH, Hughes AD, Francis DP, Di Mario C,
Mayet J, Davies JE. Development and validation of a new
adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary
wave-intensity analysis: results of the ADVISE (ADenosine Vasodilator
Independent Stenosis Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:
1392-1402. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.003 A paper that describes a
clinical trial comparing the previous and new methods of coronary
diagnosis
D. Senior Research Fellow and Honorary Consultant Cardiologist at the
National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London. Dr Davies
can confirm the number of patients examined using real-time iFR and
unpublished data from ongoing clinical trials
E. Adenosine vasodilator independent stenosis evaluation II (ADVISE II) J.
Escaned. EuroPCR, Paris, May 23rd 2013. http://solaci.org/en/javier_escaned_europcr.php
Web-published abstract of a EuroPCR talk describing interim data from
the ADVISE II trial. Archived on 24/10/2013 at
https://www.imperial.ac.uk/ref/webarchive/r1f
F. http://ir.volcanocorp.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=766802
Source of a quotation from Dr Sharp describing the benefits of adopting
iFR in clinical practice at the Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital.
Archived on 24/10/2013 at https://www.imperial.ac.uk/ref/webarchive/q1f