Driving the Prevention of Occupational Asthma
Submitting Institution
Imperial College LondonUnit of Assessment
Clinical MedicineSummary Impact Type
HealthResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology, Public Health and Health Services
Summary of the impact
Imperial College researchers demonstrated that the risk of occupational
asthma is related directly to the level of exposure in the workplace and
not, as previously thought, to host susceptibility. These findings
directly informed UK government and industry policy with a consequent
reduction in disease incidence.
Underpinning research
Key Imperial College London researchers:
Professor Paul Cullinan, Professor of Occupational and Environmental
Respiratory Disease (1987-present)
Professor Sir Anthony Newman Taylor, Professor of Occupational and
Environmental Medicine, (1977-present)
Occupational asthma, asthma whose primary cause was an agent or agents
inhaled in the workplace, is the most frequently reported occupational
respiratory disease in the United Kingdom (UK) and similar countries. It
is the only form of asthma where the cause is now fully understood and so
readily amenable to primary preventive action. Currently in the UK the
disease is especially common in bakery workers, in research scientists, in
some detergent manufacturers and in spray painters.
Occupational asthma when first recognised in the late 1960's was
considered an IgE mediated allergic reaction and early research into the
determinants of occupational asthma in the 1970's and 1980's focussed on
host (patient) susceptibility and the factors that increased individual
susceptibility to the disease (e.g. atopy).
The consequence of this approach was a raft of pre-employment policies
designed to screen out potentially susceptible employees. Professor Newman
Taylor, Professor Cullinan and colleagues undertook a series of
longitudinal cohort studies of workforces, exposed to different agents
which cause occupational asthma, to test the hypothesis that the primary
determinant of risk was the level of exposure to the causative agent. We
developed and validated methods to measure the levels of the airborne
allergens, including rat urine proteins and flour (1, 2) in order to
estimate the levels of exposure experienced in different circumstances of
work. Using different study designs we investigated working populations at
high risk of developing occupational asthma: laboratory animal workers,
bakery workers, enzyme detergent workers and plastics workers exposed to
acid anhydrides. We undertook prospective 5 year cohort studies in 355
laboratory animal workers and in 300 bakery workers, newly employed during
this period, a 3 year cohort study in 401 newly employed plastics workers
and a retrospective study of 342 enzyme detergent workers. We found that
in each of these different working populations the risk of developing new
asthma caused by the specific occupational agent was highest some 2 years
after the onset of exposure and was directly related to the level of
exposure to the specific cause: rat urine protein (3), flour (4),
detergent enzyme protease and amylase (5) and the acid anhydrides,
phthalic and trimellite (6): of particular importance, the lower the
levels of exposure, the lower the risk of developing asthma.
Our findings led to a profound change in the approach to the prevention
of occupational asthma with the focus of control primarily directed to the
reduction of levels of exposure to the specific agents in the workplace.
Our results were replicated by similar findings by research undertaken
elsewhere, particularly in the Netherlands, in Canada and in Sweden.
References to the research
(1) Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J., Sandiford, C.P., Lowson, D., Tee, R.D.,
Venables, K.M., McDonald, J.C., Newman Taylor, A.J. (1994). Dust and flour
aeroallergen exposure in flour mills and bakeries. Occ Env Med,
51, 584-588. DOI.
Times cited: 42 (as at 7th November 2013 on ISI Web of
Science). Journal Impact Factor: 3.21
(2) Gordon, S., Tee, R.D., Nieuwenhuijsen, M., Lowson, D., Harris, J.,
Newman Taylor, A.J. (1994). Measurement of airborne rat urinary allergen
in an epidemiological study. Clin Exp Allergy, 24, 1070-1077.
DOI.
Times cited: 30 (as at 7th November 2013 on ISI Web of
Science). Journal Impact Factor: 4.78
(3) Cullinan, P., Cook, A., Gordon, S., Nieuwenhuijsen, M., Tee, R.D.,
Venables, K.M., McDonald, J.C., Newman Taylor, A.J. (1999). Allergen
exposure, atopy and smoking as determinants of allergy to rats in a cohort
of laboratory employees. Eur Respir J, 13, 1139-1143. DOI.
Times cited: 96 (as at 7th November 2013 on ISI Web of
Science). Journal Impact Factor: 6.35
(4) Cullinan, P., Cook, A., Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J., Sandiford, C., Tee,
R.D., Venables, K.M., McDonald, J.C., Newman Taylor, A.J. (2001). Allergen
and dust exposure as determinants of work-related symptoms and
sensitisation in a cohort of flour-exposed workers: a case-control
analysis. Ann Occup Hyg, 45 (2), 97-103. DOI.
Times cited: 72 (as at 7th November 2013 on ISI Web of
Science). Journal Impact Factor: 2.15
(5) Cullinan, P., Harris, J.M., Newman Taylor, A.J., Hole, A.M., Jones,
M., Barnes, F., Jolliffe, G. (2000). An outbreak of asthma in a modern
detergent factory. Lancet, 356 (9245), 1899-1900. DOI.
Times cited: 69 (as at 7th November 2013 on ISI Web of
Science). Journal Impact Factor: 39.06
(6) van Tongeren, M., Barker, R.D., Gardiner, K., Harris, J.M., Venables,
K.M., Harrington, J.M., Newman Taylor, A.J. (1998). Retrospective exposure
assessment for a cohort study into respiratory effects of acid anhydrides.
Occ Environ Med, 55, 692-696. DOI.
Times cited: 7 (as at 7th November 2013 on ISI Web of Science).
Journal Impact Factor: 3.21
Key funding:
• National Asthma Campaign (1989-1994; £350,000), Principal Investigator
(PI), A. Newman Taylor, Environmental and occupational causes of asthma.
• Health and Safety Executive (1989-1994; £350,000), PI A. Newman Taylor,
Environmental and occupational causes of asthma.
• Health and Safety Executive (1990-1993; £250,000), PI A. Newman Taylor,
Respiratory reactions to inhaled acid anhydrides.
Details of the impact
Impacts include: health and welfare, public policy and services,
production, commerce, environment
Main beneficiaries include: industry, workforce, NHS, UK Health and
Safety Executive
The burden of occupational allergy and asthma is considerable. An
estimated 3000 new cases are reported in the UK each year; the lifetime
cost of each is about £125,000, half of which is met by the employee and
most of the remainder by the state, including the NHS. In healthcare
terms, workers who develop occupational asthma generally require long-term
treatment with asthma and nasal medications and have rates of emergency
and routine hospital care higher than those among the general population
of patients with asthma. For the employee occupational allergy, asthma and
occasionally anaphylaxis are at best disruptive since those affected are
advised to reduce or eliminate any future exposure to causal allergen; in
the worst cases the diagnosis is career-ending. On average one third to
one half of patients are out of work 3 to 5 years from diagnosis.
The findings of our research programme have led to a true
`paradigm-shift' in understanding the determinants of occupational asthma
and methods to prevent it; it is now universally accepted that
exposure-control in the workplace is key to prevention. The beneficiaries
are all workers exposed in the UK and other economically developed
countries who are exposed to respiratory sensitising agents at work and
for whom exposure control promises a real reduction in disease risk; and
their employers whose total costs fall.
Among its impacts have been a new focus on exposure control by the UK
Health and Safety Executive, evidenced by, among others, their guidance
notices for disease control in the baking and laboratory research sectors
[1]; each of these highlights exposure control as the primary means of
reducing the risk of occupational asthma.
Similarly, evidence-based (and award-winning) guidance, updated in 2010,
on the prevention and management of occupational asthma for employers and
occupational health professionals commissioned by the British Occupational
Health Foundation places primary importance on workplace exposure
reductions [2].
That rates of incident occupational asthma have fallen in the period
following our research findings is indicated by declining reports, by an
average of about 2% per annum, to the UK national surveillance scheme
(SWORD) [3]; by evidence that the decline coincided with the introduction
of national standards of exposure control [4] by the now very small
numbers of newly sensitised researchers in universities who have adopted
strict exposure controls; by low rates of asthma among bakers in plant
bakeries; and by one particular detergent factory in which we conducted a
series of detailed research studies as a result of which there was a
near-abolition of disease incidence through exposure control alone.
Similar reductions in incidence, nationally, have been reported in Europe
(e.g. France [5], Belgium [6]).
Using data from SWORD over a 15 year period and a modelled estimate of
the lifetime costs of a single case of occupational asthma it is estimated
that primary exposure control has led to savings of approximately £2bn
during this 15 year period [7].
Sources to corroborate the impact
[1] HSE guidance notices
http://www.hse.gov.uk/asthma/bakers.htm
(archived on
7th November 2013) http://www.hse.gov.uk/asthma/laboratory.htm
(archived on
7th November 2013)
[2] British Occupational Health Foundation guidance
http://www.bohrf.org.uk/downloads/OccupationalAsthmaEvidenceReview-Mar2010.pdf
Archived
on 7th November 2013.
[3] SWORD. Reduction in occupational asthma cases (see page 39)
http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/pdf/thortrends13.pdf
(archived
on 7th November 2013)
[4] Stocks,
S.J., McNamee,
R., Turner,
S., Carder,
M., Agius,
R.M. (2013). Assessing the impact of national level interventions on
workplace respiratory disease in the UK: part 1--changes in workplace
exposure legislation and market forces. Occup
Environ Med, 70 (7), 476-482. DOI.
[5] Paris, C., Ngatchou-Wandji, J., Luc, A., McNamee, R., Bensefa-Colas,
L., Larabi, L., Telle-Lamberton, M., Herin, F., Bergeret, A., Bonneterre,
V., Brochard, P., Choudat, D., Dupas, D., Garnier, R., Pairon, J.C.,
Agius, R.M., Ameille, J.; Members of the RNV3P (2012). Work-related asthma
in France: recent trends for the period 2001-2009. Occup Environ Med,
69(6), 391-397. DOI.
[6] Vandenplas, O., Lantin, A.C., D'Alpaos, V., Larbanois, A., Hoet, P.,
Vandeweerdt, M., Thimpont, J., Speybroeck, N. (2011). Time trends in
occupational asthma in Belgium. Respir Med, 105 (9), 1364-1372.
DOI.
[7] Ayres, J.G., Boyd, R., Cowie, H., Hurley, J.F. (2011). Costs of
occupational asthma in the UK Thorax, 66,128-133. DOI.