Clinical Development of Temozolomide: An Anticancer Drug that Improves Survival of Patients with Brain Cancer (Glioma)
Submitting Institution
Imperial College LondonUnit of Assessment
Clinical MedicineSummary Impact Type
TechnologicalResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Neurosciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Summary of the impact
Temozolomide is a major UK anti-cancer drug development success story.
Following chemical synthesis at Aston University, early clinical
evaluation of temozolomide carried out at Imperial College optimised how
temozolomide was scheduled and delivered to patients to ensure maximum
efficacy balanced acceptable side effects. Imperial's early trials
demonstrated how the drug could be used effectively to treat patients with
a type of brain cancer, glioma, and was pivotal to its subsequent market
licensing. ESMO and NICE guidelines recommend temozolomide for use in
patients with recurrent glioma and for patients with newly diagnosed Grade
IV glioma. Glioma is a relatively rare cancer yet annual sales of
temozolomide have been in excess of £900 million per year since 2009.
Temozolomide given during and following radiotherapy is now standard of
care for glioma and has improved survival compared to previous treatments
or radiotherapy alone.
Underpinning research
Key Imperial College London researchers:
Professor Ed Newlands, Professor of Cancer Medicine (1974-2004)
Professor Mark Bower, Professor of Oncology (1997-present)
Professor Pat Price, Clinical Professor (1989-2000), Honorary Professor
(2001-present)
Dr Cathryn Brock, Research Fellow (1994-1998), Consultant Medical
Oncologist Charing Cross Hospital (2003-2013), Honorary Clinical Senior
Lecturer (2008-present)
Following chemical synthesis of temozolomide by colleagues at Aston
University, in the early 1990s Professor Newlands and colleagues at
Imperial continued the preclinical evaluation of temozolomide and
conducted the first in-man trials that established the use of Temozolomide
in primary brain tumours (glioma, also referred to as glioblastoma), based
on an effective and safe treatment schedule.
In an Imperial study in 1993, of 28 patients with glioma given
750-1000mg/m2 divided over five days, radiological changes were
observed in 5/10 patients with recurrent glioma following surgery and 4/7
patients with newly diagnosed astrocytomas, a subtype of glioma
(confirming the temozolomide dosage established in the Phase I trial
conducted by Professor Newlands in 1992) (1). Temozolomide was well
tolerated with predictable myelosuppression and its activity in primary
brain tumours led to the establishment of a multicentre phase II study in
high-grade (rapidly growing) glioma, conducted under the auspices of the
Cancer Research Campaign.
In 1997, an Imperial-led phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and
toxicity of temozolomide recruited 103 patients with progressive or
recurrent supratentorial high-grade glioma. Patients received temozolomide
150-200mg/m2/day for 5 days repeated every 28 days. Of the 103
patients enrolled, 11% showed an objective response (radiological tumour
improvement and improvement in neurological symptoms and status by at
least one grade on the MRC neurological status scale) and 47% showed
stable disease (neither radiological change nor improvement or
deterioration in neurological status) over an 8 week period. The median
response duration was 4.6 months and response rates were similar for
anaplastic astrocytomas (grade III) and glioblastoma multiforme (grade IV)
tumours (2).
The observations of the multi-centre Phase II study supported further
investigation of temozolomide in high-grade glioma, and a phase I study to
evaluate continuous use of temozolomide for a 6-7 week period showed it
was well tolerated with the main tumour responses seen in the recurrent
glioma group (3). In parallel, Imperial researchers performed a
preclinical examination of temozolomide with concurrent radiotherapy, in
vitro, in the human glioma cell line (U373MG), demonstrating an
additive effect of the drug on the radiation dose-response curve (4). Dr
Brock and Imperial colleagues concluded the recommended dose as 75-85mg/m2/day
for 7 weeks on a continuous schedule which could be combined with
radiotherapy, on the basis of the Imperial preclinical data, for the
treatment of primary glioma.
Imperial researchers also investigated innovative imaging to
quantitatively measure metabolic changes in the brain as a surrogate
measure of clinical and subclinical response to temozolomide in 2000.
Using [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography
(FDG-PET), the metabolic uptake of glucose was measured (before and after
temozolomide treatment) and a 25% reduction in glucose uptake was observed
in patients responding to treatment. This indicated that changes in tumour
metabolism could reflect the degree of cell kill following chemotherapy
(5). Labelling of temozolomide with carbon-13 enabled researchers at
Imperial, in 2006, to visualise its distribution in humans and find that
the drug was concentrated in and around the brain tumour (6). Imperial
confirmed the drug's mechanism of action using radiolabelled temozolomide
and showed that early changes to the tumour metabolic rate of glucose
could predict the response to temozolomide treatment (6).
These Imperial clinical trials, including use of innovative imaging
approaches, defined the safety profile, patient response, dose schedule
and mechanism of action for Temozolomide. These trials subsequently
provided the basis for registration trials of the drug and its subsequent
use world-wide.
References to the research
(1) O'Reilly, S.M., Newlands, E.S., Glaser, M.G., Brampton, M.,
Rice-Edwards, J.M., Illingworth, R.D., Richards, P.G., Kennard, C.,
Colquhoun, I.R., Lewis, P., et al. (1993). Temozolomide: a new oral
cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agent with promising activity against primary
brain tumours. Eur J Cancer, 29A (7), 940-942. DOI.
Times cited: 201 (as at 1st October 2013 on ISI Web of
Science). Journal Impact Factor: 5.06
(2) Bower, M., Newlands, E.S., Bleehen, N.M., Brada, M., Begent, R.J.,
Calvert, H., Colquhoun, I., Lewis, P., Brampton, M.H. (1997). Multicentre
CRC phase II trial of temozolomide in recurrent or progressive high-grade
glioma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 40 (6), 484-488. DOI.
Times cited: 105 (as at 1st October 2013 on ISI Web of
Science). Journal Impact Factor: 2.79
(3) Brock, C.S., Newlands, E.S., Wedge, S.R., Bower, M., Evans, H.,
Colquhoun, I., Roddie, M., Glaser, M., Brampton, M.H., Rustin, G.J.
(1998). Phase I trial
of temozolomide using an extended continuous oral schedule. Cancer
Res, 58 (19), 4363-4367. Times cited: 180 (as at 1st
October 2013 on ISI Web of Science). Journal Impact Factor: 8.65
(4) Wedge, S.R., Porteous, J.K., Glaser, M.G., Marcus, K., Newlands, E.S.
(1997). In vitro evaluation of temozolomide combined with X-irradiation. Anticancer
Drugs, 8 (1), 92-97. DOI.
Times cited: 99 (as at 1st October 2013 on ISI Web of Science).
Journal Impact Factor: 2.23
(5) Brock, C.S., Young, H., O'Reilly, S.M., Matthews, J., Osman, S.,
Evans, H., Newlands, E.S., & Price, P.M. (2000). Early evaluation of
tumour metabolic response using [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose and positron
emission tomography: a pilot study following the phase II chemotherapy
schedule for temozolomide in recurrent high-grade gliomas. British
Journal of Cancer, 82 (3), 608-615. DOI.
Times cited: 76 (as at 1st October 2013 on ISI Web of Science).
Journal Impact Factor: 5.08
(6) Saleem, A., Brown, G.D., Brady, F., Aboagye, E.O., Osman, S., Luthra,
S.K., Ranicar, A.S., Brock, C.S., Stevens, M.F., Newlands, E., Jones, T.,
Price, P. (2003). Metabolic
activation of temozolomide measured in vivo using positron emission
tomography. Cancer Res, 63 (10), 2409-2415. Times cited: 43
(as at 1st October 2013 on ISI Web of Science). Journal Impact
Factor: 8.65
Details of the impact
Impacts include: health and welfare, practitioners and services,
commercial, public policy and services
Main beneficiaries include: patients, practitioners, industry
Brain tumours account for 2% of all cancers diagnosed in the UK. Around
4,500 people are diagnosed with a brain tumour each year in the UK, and
around 3,500 die from the disease. Just over half, 52%, of brain tumours
diagnosed in the UK are glioma. Prior to the clinical use of temozolomide,
median survival of glioma patients was generally less than one year
following diagnosis, where treatment included surgery and radiation
therapy.
The significant improvement in survival of glioma patients in clinical
trials, including those led by Imperial, supported the introduction of
temozolomide as the standard of care for glioma. According to European
Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines in 2010, the use of
temozolomide both during and post radiotherapy, as suggested by data from
Imperial researchers, is now standard of care for newly diagnosed glioma
(these concur with the current NICE recommendations) [1].
Following the licensing of temozolomide from Cancer Research Technologies
to Schering-Plough annual sales of temozolomide (Temodal) reached $1
billion in 2009 (the use of the drug increasing by 50%) [2, 3], $935
million in 2011 and $917 million in 2012 [4].
A multi-centre Phase III trial, conducted by the pharmaceutical company
independently from Imperial, confirmed that the addition of temozolomide
to radiotherapy significantly improves survival among patients with newly
diagnosed glioma. Analysis at 5 years, showed an overall survival of 9.8%
with temozolomide and radiotherapy versus 1.9% with radiotherapy alone.
The combined treatment benefit was seen in all clinical prognostic
subgroups, including patients aged 60-70 years [5]. Prior to the
introduction of temozolomide, it was very rare for a patient to survive 5
years from a diagnosis of glioma.
A retrospective study in the United States compared survival of adult
glioma patients diagnosed during 2000-2003 prior to the use of
temozolomide (n=6,673) to patients diagnosed from 2005-2008 after
introduction of temozolomide (n=7,259), in order to evaluate
pre-temozolomide and post-temozolomide periods. Statistical analysis of
patient survival data showed that the survival of patients with newly
diagnosed glioblastoma improved from 2000-2003 to 2005-2008 and the
authors concluded that the improved patient survival is highly likely to
be due to the introduction of temozolomide use [6].
Temozolomide has revolutionised the treatment of patients with recurrent
high-grade glioma and newly diagnosed glioma. The team at Imperial, in
conjunction with Cancer Research Campaign, played a pivotal role in the
clinical development of this drug, its anti-tumour effect, scheduling and
use which is now providing clinical and survival benefit to patients with
high grade glioma.
Sources to corroborate the impact
[1] Stupp, R., Tonn, J.C., Brada, M., Pentheroudakis, G. on behalf of the
ESMO Guidelines Working Group (2010). High-grade malignant glioma: ESMO
Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann
Oncol, 21 (suppl 5), 190-193. DOI.
[2] Cancer Research Technology Press Release: Temozolomide sales reach $1
billion (Feb 2009) http://www.cancertechnology.com/temozolomide-sales-reach-1-billion.
Archived on 7th
November 2013.
[3] Uptake of temozolomide following NICE approval.
http://www.nice.org.uk/newsroom/news/newsarchive/2009/reportshowsimprovementuptakeniceapprovedcancerdrugs.jsp.
Archived on 7th
November 2013.
[4] Tickerpot web-site: Temodar/Temodol mentioned by Merck & Co Inc
(MRK):
http://tickerpot.com/symbol/mrk/310158/topic/temodar
[5] Stupp, R., Hegi, M.E., Mason, W.P., van den Bent, M.J., Taphoorn,
M.J., et al (2009). Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant
temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a
randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet
Oncol, 10 (5), 459-466. DOI.
[6] Johnson, D.R., O'Neill, B.P. (2012). Glioblastoma survival in the
United States before and during the temozolomide era. J Neurooncol,
107 (2), 359-64. DOI