Global Change in Guidelines Relating to Treatment of the Very Elderly Resulting from HYVET (Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial)
Submitting Institution
Imperial College LondonUnit of Assessment
Public Health, Health Services and Primary CareSummary Impact Type
HealthResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Clinical Sciences, Neurosciences, Public Health and Health Services
Summary of the impact
Before the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET) it was not
clear whether people aged 80 and over with hypertension should receive
antihypertensive treatment. The over 80s are one of the fastest growing
groups in society and are at high risk of hypertension and its sequelae
due to age. HYVET demonstrated benefit of treatment including reduced
mortality and cardiovascular comorbidity. Guidelines around the world for
the treatment of hypertension have changed as a result. In the UK it is
proposed that the Quality Outcomes Framework (QOF) for GPs now includes
those over 80 and uses the target blood pressure used in HYVET.
Underpinning research
Key Imperial College London researchers:
Professor Christopher Bulpitt, Professor of Geriatric Medicine
(1989-2005), now Emeritus Professor and Chief Investigator of HYVET
Dr Nigel Beckett, Clinical Research Fellow, Honorary Consultant Physician
and trial coordinator (1998-2010)
Dr Ruth Peters, Senior Researcher and deputy trial coordinator
(1997-present)
HYVET is the only multinational double blind randomised placebo
controlled trial of antihypertensives in those aged 80 and over. HYVET was
sponsored, directed, coordinated and managed by an Imperial team led by
Professor Bulpitt. Prior to HYVET the balance of risks and benefits from
antihypertensive treatment in this very elderly group were not clear and
guidelines were equivocal. A multinational open label pilot trial from the
same Imperial-led group (1) preceded the main HYVET trial allowing
piloting of methodology.
Professor Bulpitt and Imperial colleagues were responsible for securing
and managing the funding, design, data collection, processing, statistics,
pharmacovigilance, endpoint identification and, validation, quality
assurance, monitoring and day to day running of the trial in all
countries/centres.
3845 Hypertensive participants (systolic blood pressure ≥160mmHg at trial
entry) aged 80 or over at time of randomisation were recruited from 195
centres in Eastern and Western Europe, China, Australasia and Tunisia and
randomised to antihypertensives, a thiazide like diuretic (Indapamide
sustained release 1.5mg) +/-an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor
(perindopril 2-4mg) or matching placebos. Participants were seen every 3
months in the first year then 6 monthly thereafter. Mean follow up was 2.1
years when the trial was terminated early at the time of the second
interim analysis due to a significant reduction in total mortality in the
actively treated group.
Key results from the main trial indicated that antihypertensive use was
associated with a 21% reduction in total mortality, a 37% reduction in
stroke, a 34% reduction in cardiovascular events, a 64% reduction in
incident/worsening heart failure, a 42% deceased risk of fracture and no
negative impact on cognitive decline/dementia (2-4).
A one year open label extension followed, carried out by the same team.
It found that very elderly patients with hypertension may gain early
benefit from treatment in terms of stroke and cardiovascular events but
that treatment for more than 12 months may be needed to achieve reductions
of cardiovascular and total mortality. The results reinforce the benefits
from treatment and support the need for both early and long term treatment
(5).
Substudies included Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM; showing a
high prevalence of white coat hypertension and a potential gain from
treatment in this group) and Quality of Life (showing no detriment
associated with antihypertensive treatment) (6).
References to the research
(1) Bulpitt, C., Beckett, N., Cooke, J., Dumitrascu, D., Gil-Extremera,
B., Nachev, C., Nunes, M., Peters, R., Staessen, J., Thijs, L., on behalf
of the HYVET-pilot investigators. (2003). Results of the pilot study for
the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial. Journal of Hypertension,
21 (12), 2409-2417. DOI.
Times cited: 140 (as of 4th November 2013 from ISI Web of
Science). Journal Impact Factor: 3.80
(2) Beckett, N., Peters, R., Fletcher, A.E., Staessen, J., Liu, L.S.,
Dumitrascu, D., Stoyanovsky, V., Antikainen, R., Nikitin, Y., Anderson,
C., Belhani, A., Forette, F., Rajkumar, C., Thijs, L., Banya, W., Bulpitt,
C., for the HYVET study group. (2008). Treatment of hypertension in
patients 80 years of age or older. New England Journal of Medicine,
358 (18), 1887-1898. DOI.
Times cited: 652 (as of 4th November 2013 from ISI Web of
Science). Journal Impact Factor: 51.65
(3) Peters, R., Beckett, N., Forette, F., Tuomilehto, J., Clarke, R.,
Ritchie, C., Waldman, A., Walton, I., Poulter, R., Ma, S., Comsa, M.,
Burch, L., Fletcher, A., Bulpitt, C., for the HYVET investigators. (2008).
Incident dementia and blood pressure lowering in the Hypertension in the
Very Elderly Trial cognitive function assessment (HYVET-COG): a
double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Lancet Neurology, 7 (8),
683-689. DOI.
Times cited: 185 (as of 4th November 2013 from ISI Web of
Science). Journal Impact Factor: 23.91
(4) Peters, R., Beckett, N., Burch, L., Vernejoul, M., Liu, L., Duggan,
J., Swift, C., Gil-Extremera, B., Fletcher, A., Bulpitt, C. (2010). The
effect of treatment based on a diuretic (indapamide) {+/-} ACE inhibitor
(perindopril) on fractures in the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial
(HYVET). Age and Ageing, 39 (5), 609-616. DOI.
Times cited: 9 (as of 4th November 2013 from ISI Web of
Science). Journal Impact Factor: 3.81
(5) Beckett, N., Peters, R., Tuomilehto, J., Swift, C., Sever, P.,
Potter, J., McCormack, T., Forette, F., Gil-Extremera, B., Dumitrascu, D.,
Staessen, J., Thijs, L., Fletcher, A., Bulpitt, C. (2012). Immediate and
late benefits of treating very elderly people with hypertension: results
from active treatment extension to Hypertension in the Very Elderly
randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 344, d7541.
DOI. Times cited: 12 (as
of 4th November 2013 from ISI Web of Science). Journal Impact
Factor: 17.21.
(6) Bulpitt, C., Beckett, N., Peters, R., Staessen, J., Wang, J., Comsa,
M., Fagard, R., Dumitrascu, D., Gergova, V., Antikainen, R., Cheek, E.,
Rajkumar, C. (2013). Does white coat hypertension require treatment over
age 80? Results of the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial ambulatory
Blood Pressure side project. Hypertension, 61, 89 - 94. DOI.
Times cited: 2 (as of 4th November 2013 from ISI Web of
Science). Journal Impact Factor: 6.87
Awards:
• HYVET was unanimously voted as the 2008 Trial of the Year by the
prestigious Project ImpACT (Important Achievements of Clinical Trials) and
the Society for Clinical Trials and judged to have improved the lot of
mankind providing the basis for a substantial, beneficial change in health
care and to be a landmark clinical trial in terms of design, execution,
and results. http://www.sctweb.org/public/about/toty.cfm
Key funding:
• British Heart Foundation (1998-2004; £728,830), Principal Investigator
(PI) C. Bulpitt, Hypertension in the very elderly trial.
• Servier International Research (1999-2010; £8,301,643), PI C. Bulpitt,
Hypertension in the very elderly trial.
• British Heart Foundation (2000-2005; £143,141), PI C. Rajkumar, Effects
of arterial compliance, ambulatory blood pressure, blood pressure
variability on morbidity and mortality in hypertension subjects over 80
Details of the impact
Impacts include: health and welfare; public policy and services;
practitioners and services Main beneficiaries include: patients; NICE;
health professionals; industry; international guideline bodies
The relatively healthy elderly aged 80 and over are one of the fastest
growing sectors of the population, both in the UK and globally (in both
developed and developing countries). Systolic blood pressure tends to rise
with age as does the risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events and
dementia. The rise in blood pressure with ageing means that a substantial
proportion of those aged 80 and over suffer from hypertension, estimated
at ~70% in the UK (Health Survey for England 2009). The results of the
HYVET research not only show the reduction in risk of cardiovascular
events but the identification of a safe goal blood pressure in this group
and are applicable to a large and growing group. This Imperial-led study
was the first in this age group and has directly influenced hypertension
guidelines internationally.
The results from HYVET have shaped hypertension guidelines in the UK,
Europe, Canada, Japan, the USA, China, Russia, Latin America, and South
Africa. In the UK the NICE guidelines (2011) indicate that people aged ≥80
should be treated [1] and the consultation on new indicators for the UK
2013/14 Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) proposes inclusion of new
indicators specifically for the over 80s, using the HYVET goal systolic
blood pressure [2].
The European guidelines (2009) now recommend that antihypertensive
treatment can be extended to help patients aged 80 years and above,
stating that `gap in the evidence has been filled with...the results of
HYVET' [3].
The Canadian Hypertension Education Program (2009) `specifically
recommends that age not be used as a factor in prescribing' based on HYVET
results [4]. The Japanese guidelines (2009) now specify that hypertension
should be treated in patients of all ages [5; chapter 3] and the adequate
antihypertensive treatment is recommended in elderly patients (chapter 8).
Guidelines on hypertension in China, Latin America, Russia [6-8] also
recommend treatment of high blood pressure in the elderly and cite HYVET.
Beyond the ten sources of evidence provided, we can also evidence changes
to guidelines in Taiwan and South Africa.
A consensus document in the US on hypertension in the elderly (American
College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Foundation, 2011)
concludes that HYVET provides clear evidence that blood pressure lowering
drugs are associated with definite cardiovascular benefits in patients 80
years and over and US guidelines from the National Heart Lung and Blood
Institute (JNC8) are expected to include HYVET at their next update [9].
More generally, medical professionals globally have benefitted in terms
of receiving clearer guidance, elderly individuals benefit in health terms
and health service providers in economic terms. A Swiss group have
calculated that applying the results of HYVET means a lower total cost per
patient receiving antihypertensive treatment as compared to an untreated
group and that the additional medication cost is covered by the reduction
of costs related to the treatment of strokes, myocardial infarction and
heart failure. The potential decrease in incident dementia and fracture
suggests that this may be an underestimate [10].
The pharmaceutical company (Servier) that provided part of the funding
and the medication for HYVET report that in the company financial year
during which the HYVET results were published their own sales of
indapamide (the first line medication used in HYVET) rose by 4% across 11
countries. Data provided by Servier also show generic indapamide sales
increasing year on year from 2009 to 2012 with the largest increase in the
Sustained Release formulation as used in the trial.
Sources to corroborate the impact
[1] NICE clinical guideline 127 Hypertension: clinical management of
primary hypertension http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG127
(pages 136-140). Archived
on 4th November 2013. NCGE (Commissioned by NICE) Update of
Clinical Guidelines 18 & 24. Hypertension: The Clinical Management of
Hypertension in adults. Clinical Guide 127: Methods, Guides and Clinical
Evidence August 2011 (refer to p.171).
http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/13561/56007/56007.pdf.
Archived
on 4th November 2013.
[2] National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Consultation
on potential new indicators for the 2013/14 Quality and Outcomes Framework
(QOF). Archived
on 4th November 2013.
[3] Mancia, G., Laurent, S., Agabiti-Rosei, E., Ambrosioni, E., Burnier,
M., Caulfield, M., et al. (2009). Reappraisal of European guidelines on
hypertension management: a European Society of Hypertension Task Force
document. Journal of Hypertension, 27, 2121 - 2153 (refer to pp.
2140-2142). DOI.
[4] 2009 Canadian Education Programme Recommendations. The Short Clinical
Summary: An Annual Update. 1-17 (refer to p.3). http://www.hypertension.ca/images/stories/dls/09-clinical-summary.pdf.
Archived
on 4th November 2013.
[5] Ogihara, T., Kikuchi, K., Matsuoka, H., Fujita, T., Higaki, J.,
Horiuchi, M., Imai, Y., et al, on behalf of The Japanese Society of
Hypertension Committee. The Japanese Society of Hypertension: Guidelines
for the Management of Hypertension. Chapter 3: Principles of Treatment. Hypertension
Research, 32 (1): 24 - 28 (refer to p. 26).
http://www.nature.com/hr/journal/v32/n1/pdf/hr20083a.pdf.
(archived
on 4th November 2013) Chapter 8, Hypertension in the elderly.
(2009). Hypertension Research 32, 57-62. (refer to p58). http://www.nature.com/hr/journal/v32/n1/pdf/hr20086a.pdf
(archived
on 4th November 2013)
[6] Liu L. 2010 Chinese guidelines for the management of
hypertension. (2011). Chinese Journal of Cardiology, 39(7): 579 - 616. Full copy of the guidelines available on request; refer to p.49 of
translated version.
http://so.med.wanfangdata.com.cn/ViewHTML/PeriodicalPaper_zhxxgb201107002.aspx.
Archived on 26th
November 2013.
[7] Ramiro, A., Sanchez, M. A., Baglivo, H., Velazquez, C., Burlando, G.,
Kohlmann, O., et al on behalf of the Latin America Expert Group. (2009).
Latin American guidelines on hypertension. Journal of Hypertension,
27, 905-922; refer to p.913.DOI.
[8] Diagnosis & Treatment: Arterial Hypertension. Recommendations of
the Russian Medical Society on Arterial Hypertension and the Russian
Scientific Society of Cardiology Moscow. (2008); 7 (6), 3 - 32.
ДИАГНОСТИКА И ЛЕЧЕНИЕАРТЕРИАЛЬНОЙ ГИПЕРТЕНЗИИ Приложение 2 к журналу
“Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика” (see page 21). Full copy of the
guidelines available on request.
[9] Aronow, W., Fleg, J., Pepine, C., Artinian, N., Bakris, G., Brown,
A., et al (2011). ACCF/AHA 2011 Expert Consensus Document on
Hypertension in the Elderly. American College of Cardiology Foundation
Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents, American Academy of
Neurology, American Geriatrics Society, American Society for Preventive
Cardiology, American Society of Hypertension, American Society of
Nephrology, Association of Black Cardiologists, European Society of
Hypertension. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 57
(20), 2037-2114. (refer to pp. 2074 - 2075). DOI.
[10] Szucs, T., Waeber, B., Tomonaga, Y. (2010). Cost-effectiveness of
antihypertensive treatment in patients 80 years of age or older in
Switzerland: an analysis of the HYVET study from a Swiss perspective. Journal
of Human Hypertension, 24, 117-123. DOI.