Improved productivity and growth through the use of new performance measurement systems
Submitting Institution
University of StrathclydeUnit of Assessment
Business and Management StudiesSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Information and Computing Sciences: Information Systems
Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services: Business and Management
Psychology and Cognitive Sciences: Psychology
Summary of the impact
Research into Performance Measurement Systems conducted by the
Strathclyde Institute for Operations Management (SIOM) between 1997 and
2013 has led to new knowledge which in turn has been applied in companies.
These new insights have resulted in significant economic impacts for
companies both large and small. The reach has been significant, with
economic and social improvements in approximately 170 companies, and
indirectly to over 1000 companies through intermediaries such as Scottish
Enterprise and the Manufacturing Advisory Service. This case study focuses
on impact generated since 2008 using companies of different sizes and from
different sectors to illustrate the financial and other benefits realised
from improved performance measurement and management systems. Some
companies have achieved benefits through KTP projects, while other
organisations focused on consultancy engagements. In addition, a large
scale executive education programme developed around operations and
performance improvement has allowed companies such as Babcock
International Group to deploy the new knowledge about performance
measurement systems throughout its international organisation, reaping
financial and organisational benefits.
Underpinning research
Background and Key Findings
The new knowledge that underpins this impact was developed through a
series of EPSRC and EU funded research projects between 1997 and 2013. At
a basic level, the research team were interested in developing an
understanding of:
- What makes high performing organisations different?
- What performance measurement and management practices and behaviours
can help organisations to translate strategy into action?
Initial EPSRC research conducted with ICI, GE Caledonian and Clyde
Blowers Ltd. identified performance measurement and management as a key
barrier to business wide integration, constraining overall performance.
This led to further work that explored performance management of business
and process-based teams [5,6]. This work was funded by the EPSRC and
carried out collaboratively with companies including IBM, McVities and
Rolls-Royce. The research established clear guidelines on the design of
performance measurement systems for teams [4]. The work was then
implemented in Highland Spring through the EPSRC Researchers into Industry
scheme. Further research concluded that performance measurement and
management practices of organisations are shaped by the mental models and
social forces within the organisation. Those organisations with a holistic
integrated understanding of the managerial system perform better as they
demonstrate better tendencies towards learning and adaption to their
environment [2,3].
In conducting this research, the research team engaged with both small
and large organisations, testing out their new theories and implementing
integrated performance measurement systems in the companies. Some
companies took part in collaborative, funded research (e.g. IBM, McVities,
Rolls-Royce, ICI, GE, Clyde Blowers), while other organisations used the
KTP scheme as a mechanism to engage with the research (e.g. Highland
Spring, Houston Warehousing, Alcan, Blairs). Other companies engaged
through short consultancy projects (e.g. Bullet Express, Babcock
International Group) whilst a significant number used student projects and
placements (e.g. Rolls Royce, Scottish Police, Landis+Gyr, Aberdeen
Council, Abbey, National Australia Group, Hilton) to transfer knowledge.
This in-depth, on the ground, experience of implementing performance
measurement systems led to a better understanding of the interplay between
performance measurement, management styles and organisational culture.
Indeed the findings of the case studies conducted with 30 manufacturing
companies established that the measurement of business process performance
is a key requirement and emphasised the need to deploy the business
process measures to the teams who operate these processes.
The research on process and people-focused performance measurement and
management systems continued [e.g. reference 1] and explored how
performance may be measured and managed in extended collaborative
enterprises such as supply chains and value chains. This led to new
insights concerning performance measurement and management challenges in
collaborative enterprises.
Key researchers
Prof. Umit Bititci (Senior Lecturer in 1996, Reader in 2000 and Professor
in 2002); Dr Jillian MacBryde (Lecturer, 1998; Senior Lecturer, 2004;
Reader, 2011); Dr Kepa Mendibil (Researcher in 1998 and Lecturer since
2005); Dr Nuran Acur (Researcher 1998-2001, Senior lecturer since 2008).
As the work developed more Strathclyde researchers were brought into the
interdisciplinary group, with Dr Steve Paton, Dr David Mackay, Professor
Fran Ackermann, Dr Robert van der Meer, Dr Farhad Shafti, Dr Marissa
Smith, Dr Aylin Ates, and Dr Catherine McGuire all joining the
collaborative research and knowledge exchange activity.
References to the research
1. MacBryde, J., Paton, S., Grant, N., & Bayliss, M. (2012)
"Performance measurement driving change: a case from the defence sector",
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 61,
Issue 5, pp.462 - 482
2. Bititci, U., Ackermann, F., Ates, A., Bourne, M., Davies, J., Gibb,
S., MacBryde, J.C., Mackay, D., Maguire, C., Shafti, F., & Van Der
Meer, R.B. (2011), "Managerial Processes: Business Process that Sustain
Performance", International Journal of Operations and Production
Management, Vol 31, Issue 8, pp.851-891
3. Bititci, U., Ackermann, F., Ates, A., Bourne, M., Davies, J., Gibb,
S., MacBryde, J.C., Mackay, D., Maguire, C., Shafti, F., & Van der
Meer, R.B. (2011) "Managerial processes: an operations management
perspective towards dynamic capabilities", Production Planning and
Control, Vol 22, Issue 2, pp.157-173
4. MacBryde J.C., & Mendibil K. (2006) "Factors that affect the
design and implementation of team-based performance measurement systems",
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol 55,
No 2. pp.118-142
5. MacBryde, J.C., & Mendibil K. (2005) "Designing Performance
Measurement Systems for Teams", Production Planning and Control, Vol 16,
No. 2, pp.208-225
6. MacBryde J.C. & Mendibil K. (2003) "Designing Performance
Measurement Systems for Teams: Theory and Practice", Management Decision,
Vol 41, No. 8, pp.722-733
Research grants totalling around £6M underpinned this research between
1997 and 2013 including: EPSRC GR/L73715 ROPA: Use Of Active Monitoring
Techniques To Maintain Reliability Of Business Processes (Biticti,
1997-1998); EPSRC GR/M98203/01 Measuring and Managing Team Performance
(MacBryde, Carrie, Bititci 2000-2001); EPSRC GR/T25897/01 Understanding
and Managing the Manage Processes (Bititci, MacBryde, Davies, Ackerman,
Gibb, van der Meer, Shafti 2005-2008); EU FP7 FutureSME (Bititci, MacBryde
& Antony 2009-2013).
Details of the impact
Process/events from research to impact
As evidenced above, an extensive body of research conducted by
researchers within the Strathclyde Institute of Operations Management
(SIOM) resulted in the development of performance measurement and
management models and frameworks. Insights from this work were published
in leading international journals but also operationalised through
practical workbooks, audit tools and self-assessment forms to make it
easier for practitioners to benefit from the research. In particular,
engaging with industry via industry facing seminars organised by CompetitiveScotland.com
(a networking organisation dedicated to facilitating companies operating
in Scotland) along with SIOM's own industrial seminar series, became a
powerful mechanism for the dissemination of key research findings widely
to industry. Such events led to interest from workshop and event
participants leading in turn to further consultancy agreements (e.g.
Allied Distillers) and KTP projects (e.g. Houston Co-Pack, Korway Foods,
Simpson Labels, Campbell & Kennedy) to embed the frameworks and the
associated tools. This case study features impact generated for an
illustrative selection of companies during the REF period.
Description of impact
The Strathclyde research was instrumental in reshaping and reengineering
the performance measurement and management practices in a large number of
organisations. Records of interventions show that approximately 170
companies have directly benefited from working with the Strathclyde team
(Source 6). The adoption of the performance measurement research by
intermediary organisations including Scottish Enterprise, the Scottish
Manufacturing Advisory Service and research partners across Europe (e.g.
The Lean Institute (Poland), Ernst & Young (Italy) and Tsunami
(Ireland)) has also created conditions for the further diffusion of impact
to a much larger number of organisations — in the region of 1000 (Source 6
and 3). In addition, the European wide FP7 FutureSME project (2009-2013)
led by the Strathclyde team developed and delivered a €6M programme to
improve the competitive capabilities of European Manufacturing SMEs. The
research described above, and particularly the maturity models, team
performance tools and visual performance measurement approaches, formed
the foundations of the project. Over the duration of the project, it
delivered detailed longitudinal interventions with 13 European SMEs and
also involving performance measurement and management maturity diagnostic
with 63 manufacturing SMEs across Turkey, Italy, Czech Republic, Poland,
Spain, Slovakia, UK and Ireland (Source 7). The training programme
developed was awarded the European Training Programme of the Year Medal by
the Polish Chamber of Commerce.
The impact of these changes began to be evident between 2008 and 2013 in
the form of improved productivity and growth within the collaborating
organisations. Benefits for the companies has been significant as the
Managing Director of Linn Products explains:
"We worked with the Strathclyde team to adopt the performance
measurement and management methods and tools developed through their
research. The visual management approach has transformed the way we
manage the strategy and performance of our business, which resulted in
the company exceeding its growth objectives" (Linn Products; Source
2).
For some organisations the interventions have been timely helping them
survive tough economic conditions:
"Our consultant has introduced us to the visual performance management
tools developed at Strathclyde. It helped us survive through a deep
recession and made us stronger for growth in the future" (Roche
Manufacturing; Source 4.)
Highland Spring provides a detailed example of an organisation
where the impact has been extensive. A long-term relationship was
developed with Highland Spring via various mechanisms which have included
6 KTP projects, jointly funded research (funded through the EPSRC and EU)
and numerous student projects and placements, as well as a number of
consultancy assignments. Together these interventions have ensured the
adoption of the key research findings within the Highland Spring business,
which resulted in the delivery of relevant, timely, consistent and visible
performance information. This in turn facilitated more meaningful
strategic and operational dialogue to take place within the organisation
resulting in more informed and confident decision making, as well as more
focused action at all levels. This resulted in improved efficiencies
across sales, manufacturing, materials and distribution operations, as
well as improved customer service levels. During just one KTP project
(between 2008-2010), Highland Spring Ltd. saw improvements in productivity
(2%), 150% increase in turnover (from £54M to £81M) and a 80% increase in
the workforce (107 new employees) (Source 8). Further acquisitions
resulted in the business growing to become the UK's number 1 bottled water
producer with a turnover of c. £100M and 450 people (Source 1). Daniel
Muir of Highland Spring has commented on the importance of the Strathclyde
research in helping achieve the improvements:
"We've had better planning, better control, better use of resources as
well, so probably less wastage. So a number of benefits. It also went on
to be the basis for further development that could take place that's
helped with reporting and performance improvement throughout the
operations side of the business. I think it has benefited the company.
We also turn to Strathclyde because we have that relationship, and
definitely that is valued within the company." (Source 1)
So successful was the use of performance measurement at Highland Spring,
the Scottish Manufacturing Advisory Service (SMAS) has been using Highland
Spring as a best practice example and encouraging Scottish manufacturers
to adopt similar solutions. To date over 50 other Scottish companies have
been introduced to the concepts and systems that underpin Highland
Spring's performance measurement and management systems (through the SMAS
network).
More recently Strathclyde has been expanding the reach of the performance
measurement research whilst working with Babcock International Group.
Strathclyde developed an executive development programme with a module on
Operations and Performance Improvement at its core. Since 2009 over 800
managers from the Babcock organisation have been through this training.
This has had a profound effect on the multinational business, which has
now embraced the Strathclyde performance measurement frameworks and tools
throughout its business.
"The partnership with Strathclyde works so well because they tailor it
to our company. Together, we have provided the senior teams in each of
our divisions with a toolset and knowledge that have helped shape our
corporate strategy and improved collaboration across the business." (Source
5).
In parallel to the operations and performance training provided,
Strathclyde researchers also worked with managers from different parts of
the Babcock International Group to improve performance and productivity.
As an example, the successful transformation of Her Majesty's Naval
Base-Clyde (HMNB-C) resulted in changes to working practices and
significant cost savings. Between 2002 and 2012 the total running costs of
the Naval Base were reduce by over £190M (whilst Babcock still maintained
profit). From 2002-2005 much of the cost saving came from renegotiation of
subcontracts and rationalisation of expensive maintenance regimes, but
from 2005-2012 the change was carried out using performance measurement as
a key lever in the change process (Source 9).
Sources to corroborate the impact
- A statement from the Customer Supply and Logistics Manager, Highland
Spring
- A statement from the Managing Director, Linn Products.
- Former Director of Scottish Manufacturing Advisory Service can be
contacted to corroborate the number companies exposed to the key
research findings
- A statement from the Managing Director/Owner, Roche Manufacturing
- A statement from the Executive Sponsor, Babcock Academy
- Records of interactions with companies recorded by
CompetitiveScotland.com
- FurtureSME end of project report
- KTP project end of project report
- The following publication can corroborate the impact on Her Majesty's
Naval Base-Clyde (HMNB-C) — MacBryde, J., Paton, S., Grant, N., &
Bayliss, M. (2012) "Performance measurement driving change: a case from
the defence sector", International Journal of Productivity and
Performance Management, Vol. 61, Issue 5, pp.462 - 482