Using Product Design Techniques to Improve the Lives of Reconstructive Surgery Patients while Reducing the Cost to the NHS and Tax Payer
Submitting Institutions
Cardiff Metropolitan University,
University of Wales, Trinity Saint DavidUnit of Assessment
Art and Design: History, Practice and TheorySummary Impact Type
HealthResearch Subject Area(s)
Physical Sciences: Other Physical Sciences
Information and Computing Sciences: Artificial Intelligence and Image Processing
Medical and Health Sciences: Neurosciences
Summary of the impact
Over the last 15 years the Medical Applications Group (MAG) has engaged
in applied research into the use of product design techniques and
technologies in medical procedures. Their work has directly led to better,
safer, faster, more accurate and less intrusive surgical procedures. The
group has worked with surgeons at NHS hospitals all over the UK to deliver
well over 2,000 medical models for surgical use during the period. A
number of hospitals have adopted MAG's techniques, meaning that the
Group's research has improved the dignity, comfort and quality of life of
around two and a half thousand people since 2008 whilst saving the UK tax
payer many thousands of pounds.
[Throughout this template, references to underpinning research are
numbered 1-6; sources to corroborate are numbered 7-15]
Underpinning research
The research base from which MAG grew formed in 1994 with the launch of
the Design Engineering Research Centre (DERC), a research institute at
Cardiff Metropolitan, now called PDR. At the time, DERC's research
focussed on the effective utilisation of rapid prototyping (RP) within the
design process. Brown (Director 1994-2012) saw an opportunity to exploit
RP in the medical field [1]. He formed MAG in 1998 and appointed
Bibb to lead it. When Bibb left for Loughborough University in 2008, he
handed leadership to Eggbeer.
MAG does not conduct curiosity-driven research. It collaborates closely
with medical practitioners and applies the resulting techniques. For this
reason much of its research results in impacts on NHS practices. MAG also
disseminates its research outside of academic circles; presenting case
studies and running training events specifically aimed at medical
practitioners and manufacturers [13, 14, 15]. Much of their
funding comes from device sales to the medical profession, museums and
charities, although they also receive funding from, e.g., the TSB/EPSRC
and Welsh Government (A4B Knowledge Transfer Centre, see REF5).
MAG's research focuses primarily on maxillofacial reconstruction
procedures and new RP-based methods for surgical planning. In a formative
phase of the research they developed new facilitative processes to promote
more effective communication between clinical and design technologists [2].
This culminated in methods to translate medically generated 3D imagery
such as Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or Computerised Tomography scans
into a format readable by Computer Aided Design (CAD) Systems.
A second critical breakthrough was in the manipulation of these data. It
is virtually impossible to manipulate complex organic forms using
traditional CAD input methods. MAG's research into the working practices
of prosthetists led them to experiment with new manipulation techniques.
Their breakthrough was to `borrow' technology from the computer gaming
industry which uses haptic tools in character creation. Haptic technology
allows users to `feel' and mechanically manipulate items in a virtual
environment using a special force-feedback stylus. It has been likened to
`virtual sculpting' and transforms how organic CAD data can be used. For
example in the case of a person requiring a plate to rebuild a section of
their skull, CAD data from the undamaged side can be `mirrored' to the
damaged side to create a naturally shaped plate. Humans are never
symmetrical so further alterations occur via `sculpting' of the plate for
an exact fit, after which fixing points and other design detail can be
added. The CAD data are used to digitally manufacture a precise and
anatomically correct implant [4].
Together, MAG's methods for translating medical imaging files into CAD
data and the means to effectively manipulate them have facilitated the
design of products based on organic geometry [3] both by MAG and
by NHS groups using their techniques. These are the methods that have led
to many of the impacts described in 4.
Under Eggbeer's leadership, the original research remit and close
clinical collaborations of the group remained while new areas of
exploration opened up. For example the group researched exploiting MRI
bone density data to create unique anatomical jigs. Using these, surgeons
are guaranteed stable, high density anchorage points for prostheses such
as artificial ears. MAG has also investigated the use of product design
technologies in orthopaedics [6] and, most recently, they have
begun an investigation into the processes of developing artificial limbs,
expanding the reach of both the research and its impact. They are
researching the use of non-contact 3D scanning systems to capture
anatomical information and ways to merge it with medical imaging data.
They expect to use the insights to improve prosthetic limb production
leading to similar impacts as have been achieved through their work in the
maxillofacial field [5].
References to the research
The underpinning research for this impact case study has been published
in double-blind peer reviewed international journals (1, 2, 3, 4, 6) and
in an edited book (5). Between 2008 and 2013 the research has attracted
competitive research funding in excess of £1.3m and led to the production
of medical models and devices for hospitals that has brought in over
£750K. The research is also valued by practicing clinicians, and as a
result members of the group are often invited to speak about their
research at clinically-led conferences and training events.
1. Bibb R, Brown R, "The Application of Computer Aided Product
Development Techniques in Medical Modelling" Biomedical Sciences
Instrumentation 2000; 36: 319-24, ISSN: 0067- 8856, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10834252
2. Sugar A, Bibb R, Morris C, Parkhouse J, "The development of a
collaborative medical modelling service: organisational and technical
considerations" British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 2004;
42: 323-30, ISSN: 0266-4356, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2004.02.025
3. Hughes CW, Page K, Bibb R, Taylor J, Revington P, "The custom-made
titanium orbital floor prosthesis in reconstruction for orbital floor
fractures" British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2003; 41(1):
50-3, ISSN: 0266-4356, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0266435602002498
4. Winder RJ, Bibb R, "Medical Rapid Prototyping Technologies: State of
the Art and Current Limitations for Application in Oral and Maxillofacial
Surgery" Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2005; 63(7): 1006-15,
ISSN: 0278-2391, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.03.016
5. Bibb R, "Medical modelling: the application of advanced design and
development technologies in medicine", Woodhead Publishing Ltd., Abington
Hall, Abington, Cambridge, CB1 6AH, October 2006, ISBN: 1-84569-138-5
Selected funding examples
a) £1m TSB/EPSRC grant to work with a large industrial partner to advance
the Group's research and application, 2013
b) Funding from the Welsh Government to use the research knowledge to
develop new services for industry (Knowledge Transfer Centre "Patient
Specific Medical Devices", £340K, 2009-2012)
c) The sale of these devices to hospitals also generated income of £754K
which helped to further the research interests of the group
Invited speaking
a) Advanced Digital Technologies in Head and Neck Reconstruction
Conference (This conference is the main international forum for
collaboration between professionals and industry partners to identify
advanced technologies in head and neck reconstruction: http://www.adt-conference.com)
2011
b) The AO Foundation (a medically guided non-profit organisation led by
an international group of surgeons specialising in the treatment of trauma
and disorders of the musculoskeletal system: http://www.aofoundation.org/Pages/home.aspx)
c) Institute of Maxillofacial Prosthetists and Technologists (IMPT)
congress (a professional body that oversees the training, qualifications
and practice of Maxillofacial Prosthetists: www.impt.co.uk)
2005; 2010; 2011
Details of the impact
MAG's research has led to better, safer, faster, more accurate and less
intrusive reconstructive surgical procedures. The direct impacts of the
research have been:
- improved dignity, comfort and quality of life for thousands of people
and;
- significant savings for the UK taxpayer.
MAG has worked with 84 hospitals since 2008. At least 2,214 individuals
have directly benefitted from their work in the period [7] and a
further 282 have benefitted from NHS services exploiting processes and
techniques pioneered by the group [8]. In 2012 alone, MAG provided
550 custom medical models and devices for the NHS, research organisations,
charities and museums. They have disseminated their techniques and
processes to over 330 individual company and public sector representatives
and scoped the potential for bespoke medical device design and production
with 198 companies in the period [9].
MAG's impacts are achieved in four ways:
- by reducing invasive patient interactions;
- by increasing the speed of delivery of prostheses;
- by improving quality and consistency of prostheses, and;
- by reducing cost.
Such impacts are confirmed by surgeons and other clinicians with whom MAG
has collaborated in the period [10, 11] and are discussed
in more detail below.
MAG's techniques allow digital data to be used both to plan surgery and
develop prostheses without the need for patients to repeatedly attend the
hospital. This has typically reduced the number of invasive patient
interactions from four to one [10]. Before MAG's processes became
available it was necessary to produce a series of prostheses at ever
increasing levels of fidelity until a `correct' fit was achieved; a
process which typically took up to a year to complete. The use of MAG's
techniques has reduced this process typically down to six weeks [11]
because the prosthetic device consistently fits the patient first time. In
addition, the production of more accurate prostheses has resulted in a
reduction in theatre time for patients. This significantly reduces the
risk of infection, another key benefit to patients of methods enabled by
MAG.
The accurate positioning of a prosthesis requires a full understanding of
the anatomical `environment' into which it is fitted. Computer Aided
Design (CAD) allows this in a way that cannot be achieved by traditional
means. MAG's techniques have allowed the production of accurate digital
models of a patient's anatomical structure thereby improving the quality
and, importantly, the consistency of prostheses. The use of CAD tools has
also reduced the `craft' aspect of prosthetic development thereby
facilitating a previously impossible level of consistency of output [13].
In addition to the impact the use of these procedures has had on
patients, their introduction has also reduced the amount of time required
of surgeons and other medical professionals. This has the effect of
reducing the cost of such procedures to the NHS and consequently the UK
tax payer. For example, use of MAG's methods has led to a 19% reduction in
the cost of delivering an average sized semi-digital cranioplasty when
compared with conventional methods [12].
In summary, the impact of the implementation of methods researched and
developed by MAG have benefited a combined total of at least 2,496
patients since 2008. The introduction of MAG processes have ensured that
prostheses fit accurately and properly first time and reduced each
patient's experience of invasive procedures associated with device fitting
by, on average, 75%. Each patient has been saved an average of 46 weeks
without an implant which equates to more than 2,200 patient years of
improved dignity, comfort and quality of life.
Adoption of the methods developed by MAG have enabled the NHS to provide
a better service to these patients, more efficiently and at a reduced
cost.
Sources to corroborate the impact
- PDR/Cardiff Metropolitan University Invoice Data demonstrating numbers
of devices sold
- Statement from Consultant Maxillofacial Prosthetist / Laboratory
Manager, University Hospitals, Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
- Dorrington P. 2013, Patient-Specific Medical Design Knowledge Transfer
Centre, Welsh Government
- Statement from Consultant Oral & Maxillofacial sugeon, Department
of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Craniomaxillofacial Surgery,
University Dental Hospital, Cardiff
- Statement from Chief Maxillofacial Prosthetist, Maxillofacial Unit,
Morriston Hospital, Swansea
- Peel S., 2013, Clay Vs. CAD: Design Processes For Bespoke Implants,
26th Scientific Congress of The Institute Of Maxillofacial Prosthetists
and Technologists, 4th-6th September 2013, Inverness, UK
- Eggbeer D, Evans P, Bibb R, "A Pilot Study in the Application of
Texture Relief for Digitally Designed Facial Prostheses", Journal of
Engineering in Medicine 2006; 220(6): 705-714, ISSN: 0954-4119, http://dx.doi.org/10.1243/09544119JEIM38