Underpinning successful UK-based innovation in security alarm systems
Submitting Institution
University of LeicesterUnit of Assessment
Computer Science and InformaticsSummary Impact Type
TechnologicalResearch Subject Area(s)
Information and Computing Sciences: Artificial Intelligence and Image Processing, Computer Software, Information Systems
Summary of the impact
Expertise in mobile and location-aware web applications has underpinned
the development of a revolutionary new security alarm system.
Collaboration with an SME created, for the first time, a system to alert
customers in real-time, via sensor-triggered cameras and phones. The
impact of this collaboration has been to transform a UK company from a
distributor of hardware to a leading innovator in security. More than £1
million of the company's £1.9 million turnover for 2012 was directly
attributed to sales of the new system, now operating at more than 800
sites, providing improved security and cost savings — for example through
preventing metal theft — for commercial, transport, ecclesiastical and
construction sites across the UK.
Underpinning research
The expertise in context-aware (and specifically mobile, location-aware)
web applications and services was acquired through research in
context-aware collaborative systems and web service selection at Leicester
conducted within two larger research projects, Sensoria and InContext.
Briefly, InContext developed a platform and methodologies for
context-aware computing while Sensoria was concerned with
methodologies and tools for software engineering of service-oriented
systems. The projects were led by Heckel, Fiadeiro and Reiff-Marganiec,
and employed 5 RAs (Bocchi, Ehrig, Paoli, Hong, Yu).
Information about the context of an application, user or device, such as
their location, current or future activity, or capability, can be used to
select users or services for particular tasks, adapt the communication
channels used between participants, or even the functionality provided at
a point in time. For example, workers can be assigned tasks based on their
location or expertise, or when a mobile device experiences low bandwidth,
more demanding (e.g., video streaming) services may be deliberately
degraded or disabled.
To support such scenarios, context information needs to be collected and
stored, updated, shared and acted upon systematically. For this purpose,
the inContext project developed a service- oriented architecture
[4] based on a context store which, using a representation of the data in
semantic web formats, allowed interaction with (software or hardware)
sensors as well as client components as services. It furthermore employs
automatic selection mechanisms to decide on appropriate services to be
used. Specific contributions from Leicester included the modelling of Data
[1] and the development of the service selection mechanisms [2,3], while
the project partners were concerned with implementation (HP, Microsoft,
Ecosoft), consideration of team structures (TU Vienna) and Querying of
Semantic Structures (Deri).
Sensoria considered specific software engineering aspects for
service systems, most pertinent and related to the effort by Leicester are
the reengineering and related validation. The majority of service-oriented
applications arise from reengineering existing software, where services
are identified and extracted, replacing an existing user interface by a
web service interface. A corresponding methodology and process has been
developed [5]. Validating the quality of service- oriented applications
requires new approaches of testing, one of which has been explored and
reported accordingly [6].
References to the research
Grants:
"InContext: Interaction and Context Based Technologies for Collaborative
Teams", IST-2006-034718, EUR 2,497,264 (Leicester: EUR 309,564); May 2006
- January 2009. Grant holders for UoL: J L Fiadeiro, R Heckel, S
Reiff-Marganiec
"Sensoria: Software Engineering for Service-Oriented Overlay Computers",
FP6-IST-2005-16004; €8,158,000 (Leicester: €742,380); September 05 -
February 10. Grant holders for UoL: J Fiadeiro, R Heckel, S
Reiff-Marganiec.
Publications (Leicester authors underlined)
[1] Kamran Taj Pathan, Stephan Reiff-Marganiec, Yi Hong: Mapping
for Activity Recognition in the Context-Aware Systems Using Software
Sensors. DASC 2011: 215-221.
doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/DASC.2011.56
[2] Hong Qing Yu, Stephan Reiff-Marganiec: Automated
Context-Aware Service Selection for Collaborative Systems. CAiSE 2009:
261-274. dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02144-2_23
[3] Hong Qing Yu, Stephan Reiff-Marganiec, Marcel Tilly:
Composition Context for Web Services Selection. ICWS 2008: 785-786.
dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICWS.2008.98
[4] Hong Linh Truong, Schahram Dustdar, Dino Baggio, Stephane Corlosquet,
Christoph Dorn, Giovanni Giuliani, Robert Gombotz, Yi Hong, Pete
Kendal, Christian Melchiorre, Sarit Moretzky, Sebastien Peray, Axel
Polleres, Stephan Reiff-Marganiec, Daniel Schall, Simona Stringa,
Marcel Tilly, Hong Qing Yu: inContext: A Pervasive and
Collaborative Working Environment for Emerging Team Forms. SAINT 2008:
118-125. doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/SAINT.2008.70
[5] R Correia, C Matos, R Heckel, M El-Ramly:
Architecture Migration Driven by Code Categorization. ECSA 2007, LNCS ,
Springer, 115-122 (2007)
[6] R Heckel, Leonardo Mariani: Automatic Conformance Testing of
Web Services. FASE 2005, LNCS, Springer, 34-48 (2005)
Details of the impact
Video Domain Technologies (VDT) Direct Limited, based in Mansfield,
approached the UoA in 2009 after being advised by a growth consultant to
investigate university collaboration as a source of expertise. Engagement
has since taken various forms, including a University-funded Innovation
Partnership involving several members of the UoA in technical consulting
activities (S. Reiff-Marganiec, R. Heckel, Emilio Tuosto in 2009-10) and
three Masters (MSc) projects co-supervised by R. Heckel in 2010-12.
The initial focus of the products developed focused on the commercial
rather than residential use where they provide for curtailing of losses
(e.g. the theft of copper cables on rail lines or lead on churches).
Traditional alarm systems involve the use of land-based servers which are
situated in physical buildings and monitored at computer screens. The
monitoring is often carried out by security company staff who lack
"on-the-spot" knowledge of what they are looking at and therefore find it
difficult to accurately interpret video footage.
The collaboration has led to the development of novel alarm system
software called WebEye. The software enables the company to offer
an alarm system (Videofied) which has several advantages over traditional
systems. Uniquely, the alarm system consists of a network of
battery-operated video cameras which are triggered by motion sensors to
capture a 10-second video clip when movement is detected. The video
footage is then remotely transmitted to a web-based system received by
WebEye software. Internet servers receive the video and forward it to the
customer, using a web-based application chosen by the customer — Browser,
purpose built app, text message, email, Facebook or LinkedIn, for example.
The recipients of the message are able to view the video footage, assess
whether a crime is taking place and take action if appropriate, within
seconds of the motion being detected.
The academics enabled the product to be developed by informing the design
of the system, consulting on the technologies used in its implementation,
providing training to enable the company to take up the advice and
supporting the development of more innovative aspects in MSc projects
underpinned by Heckel's expertise in designing, reengineering and testing
web-based and service-oriented systems and Reiff-Marganiec's expertise in
context-aware systems and services.
The work has informed the WebEye project in particular in view of the
location-based delivery of alarms to mobile clients, which requires
monitoring their locations based on the GPS sensors of these devices and
deciding which client (serving a mobile security guard) is best placed to
receive the alert, as well as in the service-oriented architecture of the
application itself.
Managing Director of VDT had identified the potential for a web-based
alarm system but the company lacked technical expertise to deliver the
business idea. He said: "There is no doubt in my mind that WebEye would
not have been developed without the University of Leicester expertise. We
would not have taken the first steps and we wouldn't have had the
confidence to invest in this idea."
The company is the first to market with this new system and there are two
novel and patented aspects:
1. Progressive alarm delivery — a cloud-based platform allows for
the use of mobile technologies for delivery of the alarm. This enables the
alert to be delivered to customers on the move, via their mobile phone, in
a progressive manner using different technologies, ie persistent
connection, push notification, sms, email, twitter, dependant on recipient
response or the lack of it.
2. Alarm response monitoring — provision to monitor whether the
recipient has actioned the alert. The second point is of particular
importance and interest to insurance companies who are keen to establish
what remedial action has been taken following the triggering of an alarm.
Most alarm systems operate on a "send and forget" basis, whereas the novel
systems continues to use different methods of communication — e.g. email,
social media, text alert — until an alarm is acknowledged by the
recipient.
The new product has found a market need driven by an epidemic of copper
thefts across the UK over the past 10 years. Cabling at telephone
exchanges and electricity substations, church roofs and even manhole
covers are targeted by thieves. In 2011, experts estimated the total
annual cost to the UK of copper theft had grown to £770 million with
emergency services, transport services and online business security being
undermined, as a result of railway lines and telephone networks being
routinely disabled by thefts. In 2011, Chief Superintendent Eamonn Carroll
of British Transport Police described the theft of copper cable as "the
next biggest priority after the terrorist threat. The disruption and the
problems it can cause are immense".
More than £1 million of the company's £1.9 million turnover for 2012 was
directly attributed to sales of the new system. The VDT chief executive
said that the key market sectors currently using the WebEye alarm system
were the rail, ecclesiastical and construction markets. There are now 800
WebEye alarm systems operating in these sectors — 600 of them paid for,
with the other 200 operating on a demonstration-basis. These systems are
delivering cost, effectiveness and efficiency benefits for customers
including Network Rail, the Ecclesiastical Insurance Group, Bloor Homes
and Taylor Wimpey.
The residential market (total 25 million homes in the UK) for WebEye is
now being targeted by a network of 30 installers in the UK. Agents for
WebEye have also been employed in the US, Australia, New Zealand and
Ireland to exploit commercial markets. As of July 2013, global security
providers Securitas were using the WebEye system in 15 test sites in the
US.
Sources to corroborate the impact
Chief Executive of Video Domain Technologies (VDT) Direct Limited